The Value of Wetlands Versus Open Water in Louisiana - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Value of Wetlands Versus Open Water in Louisiana

Description:

Title: Hedonic Modeling of Open Space in James City County Author: axwaxm Last modified by: Mary Created Date: 7/31/2003 12:25:51 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: axw4
Learn more at: http://www.cnrep.lsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Value of Wetlands Versus Open Water in Louisiana


1
The Value of Wetlands VersusOpen Water in
Louisiana
  • Walter R. Keithly, Jr.
  • Baifu Xu
  • John Barras
  • Richard F. Kazmierczak, Jr.

2
Land Loss of Coastal Louisiana
  • Americas Wetlands, about 30 of the Lower 48
    states coastal wetland
  • 20 of wetlands lost in the past 100 years
  • Catastrophic loss rate 25-35 square miles a
    year
  • 90 of the continental US coastal marsh loss
  • Hurricane Katrina caused southeastern Louisiana
    over 90 billion in physical losses and Hurricane
    Rita caused the southwest coastal area of
    Louisiana over 5 billion, and unexpected wetland
    loss.

3
(No Transcript)
4
Wetlands Restoration Measures
  • 129 federal and state restoration projects
  • Less than 10 of the minimum funding needed for
    restoration
  • 80 percent of all coastal Louisiana wetlands are
    privately owned.

5
Objectives
  • To identify the factors influencing the value of
    coastal wetland properties in southwestern
    Louisiana
  • To examine the influence of open water and
    wetland types on private market property values
  • To estimate implicit prices associated with
    underlying wetland characteristics.

6
Steps for Hedonic Model
  • Gather property transfers and price
  • Collect explanatory variables
  • Property characteristics (e.g., wetland type)
  • Structural characteristics (e.g., acreage,
    distance from coast)
  • Establish the relationship between price and
    explanatory variables.

7
Study Area
8
How Did We Digitalize a Privately Owned Property?
  • Bill of Sales (Transfers)
  • Township Map locate township, range, and
    section
  • Scanned Topographic Maps
  • Draw property polygons using ArcGIS.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Example of One Individual Property
11
Property Polygons - Digitalizing
12
Symbols and Descriptive Statistics
Symbol Mean Minimum Maximum Std. Dev
PRICE2K 284004 12858 3369130 524137
P2KPACRE 570.89 51.05 2938.65 495.13
ACRES 933.93 36.21 11395.48 1765.14
OPEN WATER 20.24 0 87.41 21.30
FRESH 10.81 0 99.89 25.39
INTER 26.49 0 98.97 34.94
BS 15.88 0 98.00 30.99
OTHER 25.97 0 99.89 36.84
INTEREST 0.957 0.03 1 0.176
13
General Hedonic Model





14
Specific Model
  • Ln(Price/acre)

15
Hedonic Price FunctionR2 0.7110, Adjusted R2
0.6763
16
Discussion/Key Findings
  • An increase of fresh marshes relative to open
    water enhances the price per acre, ceteris
    paribus
  • An increase in intermediate marsh and/or brackish
    saline marsh relative to open water decreases
    the price per acre, ceteris paribus
  • Other significant positive influences include
    interest in property and year
  • Other significant negative influences include
    total acres and higher expected erosion rate

17
Thanks!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com