Postoperative Visual Loss - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Postoperative Visual Loss

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation - Post Operative Author: Automation Management Last modified by: Jason Barton Created Date: 10/10/2006 4:49:30 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: Automa3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Postoperative Visual Loss


1
Postoperative Visual Loss
  • Marybeth A. Grazko MD

2
Postoperative Visual Loss
  • Impairment or total loss of sight following an
    otherwise uncomplicated surgical anesthetic
    requiring procedure (non-ocular)
  • Most commonly associated with spinal surgeries.
  • Most common pathophysiology is posterior ischemic
    optic neuropathy (PION).

3
Postoperative Visual Loss
  • Uncommon,devastating and poorly understood.
  • Uncommon
  • Most often associated with spinal, cardiac, head
    and neck surgeries. Incidence is spine surgery
    0.2 (50 fold higher incidence )
  • Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy is by far the
    most common mechanism of permanent visual loss
  • 83/93 cases reported in American Spine
    Association registry were due to ischemic optic
    neuropathy (ION),
  • 53 P(posterior)ION, 19 A(anterior)ION, 10
    unspecified ION, 10 central retinal artery
    occlusion

4
Case 1
  • 65 year old male underwent
  • Cystocopy, bilateral ureteral stent placement
  • Laparascopic bilateral pelvic lymph node
    dissection
  • Laparscopic radical prostatectomy
  • 16.5 hour procedure
  • Trendelenburg dorso-lithotomy position for most
    of this time

5
Pre-Op History
  • Past Ocular hx
  • Retinal detachment repair
  • Cataract
  • Primary open angle glaucoma OS with glaucomatous
    optic neuropathy (had afferent pupillaryt defect
    OS pre-operatively)
  • Humphrey 30-2 perimetry pre-operatively showed
  • Normal OD
  • Arcuate defect OS
  • pre-operative visual acuity of 20/20 OD, 20/50 OS

6
Intra-operative Course
  • After anesthetic induction blood pressure dropped
    to 80/50 for 30 minutes but otherwise maintained
    110-130 mmHg systolic and 70-80 mm Hg for the
    rest of the case
  • Blood loss 500cc
  • Post op HCT was 38.3
  • No known operative or anesthetic complications

7
Post Op exam
  • Patient complained of visual loss OD upon
    awakening
  • Visual acuity 20/40 OD, 20/60 OS no afferent
    pupil defect!
  • Mild punctate corneal erosions OD
  • Significant facial and periorbital edema
  • Dilated fundus exam was normal
  • Humphrey perimetry OD peripheral depression
    extending to fixation superiorly. OS unchanged

8
(No Transcript)
9
Case 2
  • 22 year old female
  • Right laparoscopic pyeloplasty for right
    ureteropelvic junction obstruction
  • 6 hour surgery
  • Blood pressure 100/45 after induction, 100-110
    over 50-60 mm Hg for duration of the case
  • Blood loss 50 cc
  • Post op HCT 34.2
  • Significant facial and periorbital edema

10
Post Operative status
  • Immediately noted bilateral loss of vision but
    attributed it to the anesthesia
  • Post-Op Day 7 Ophthalmology consult
  • Visual acuity 20/20 OU
  • Relative afferent pupil defect OS
  • Humphrey perimetry peripheral depression OD,
    diffuse depression OS
  • Brain and orbit MRI were normal

11
(No Transcript)
12
Post Operative Visual Loss
  • Primary pathophysiology
  • Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
  • Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy
  • Central retinal artery occlusion
  • Associated surgical procedures
  • Cardiac, thoracic, cerebrovascular, abdominal,
    orthopedic, sinus and neck
  • Majority of the cases are associated with spinal
    surgeries

13
Majority of perioperative visual loss has been
due to PION (50-71)
  • Posterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
  • Sudden painless loss of vision
  • Unilateral or bilateral (may or may not have
    associated afferent pupillary defect)
  • Normal fundus exam
  • Nonspecific visual field abnormality
  • In the absence of an afferent pupil defect may
    need negative neuroimaging to confirm the
    diagnosis

14
Delay in Diagnosis
  • Often most of the bedside objective exam will be
    normal.
  • Patients often may attribute changes in their
    vision to a recovery time following anesthesia.
  • May have other post-operative issues that
    overshadow these symptoms.

15
Clinical Characteristics of PatientsBuono MB,
Forrozan R, Surv Ophthalmol 50 15-26, 2005Lee
et al, Anesthesiology 2006 105 652-9
  • Age
  • 51.9 average
  • 43.9 spinal surgery, registry average was 50
  • Degree of visual loss
  • Count fingers or worse in 75.8
  • No light perception in 53.8 (56.6)
  • Bilateral involvement in 60.9 (66)
  • Visual recovery
  • Some visual recovery in 37.9 (42)
  • Patients with poorer vision initially tended to
    have less improvement and poorer outcomes
  • 54.9 had a final visual acuity of Hand motion or
    worse

16
Clinical Characteristics of PatientsBuono MB,
Forrozan R, Surv Ophthalmol 50 15-26, 2005
  • No optic disc cupping noted
  • Small congenital optic nerve head or absent
    phyiologic cupping noted only in 4 in one series
  • 65.5 had one or more vascular risk factors
  • 34.5 had no vascular risk factors

17
Clinical CharacteristicsLee et al,
Anesthesiology 2006 105 652-9
  • Average anesthetic duration
  • 9.8 h /- 3.1 hours
  • 6 hours or longer in 94
  • Estimated blood loss
  • 82 was 1000 cc or greater
  • Blood Pressure widely varied from less than 20
    of baseline to 50 of baseline or greater, HCT
    (hematocrit) also had wide variations between
    patients

18
Pathology
  • PION results from infarction of the intraorbital
    portion of the optic nerve
  • Infarction results due to decreased oxygen
    delivery presumably to any number of
    perioperative hemodynamic derrangements

19
PathophysiologyDecreased oxygenation leading to
infarction
  • Decrease in perfusion pressure
  • Hypotension (decreased Mean Arterial Pressure)
  • Disturbed autoregulation (atherosclerosis,
    hypertension)
  • Increase in intraocular pressure ( prone and head
    down positioning)
  • Increase in Venous pressure
  • Prolonged head down and prone position
  • Internal jugular compression or ligation
  • Decreased oxygen carrying ability
  • Anemia
  • Hemodilution

20
Hemodynamic derangements
  • Hypotension and blood loss are common in cardiac
    bypass surgery. Low incidence of PVL seen in
    cardiac bypass patients suggests that another
    mechanism is playing an additional role in the
    mechanism for permanent visual loss.
  • Anatomic variation in blood supply of
    intraorbital nerve (absent anastomoses)
  • Positioning creating either increased intraocular
    pressure and/or increased orbital venous pressure

21
From Ozcan Anesth Analg, Volume 99 (4), Oct
2004. 1152-1158
22
Blood Supply of the Nerve
23
Facial Edema
  • Facial edema
  • Often data was not provided but in 19 patients
    where this was commented upon, 17/19 had post
    operative facial edema and in 11 was considered
    to be severe. (both of our cases had severe
    facial edema)
  • Evidence that positioning can increase
    intraocular pressure (maximal in Trendelenberg)
  • Increased intraocular pressure can lead to
    decreased perfusion.

24
Pathogenesis
  • Hemodynamic derangement
  • Evidence to date points to prolonged surgery,
    blood loss or combination of both
  • In a patient with a specific susceptibility which
    at this point remains unclear
  • Incomplete anastomoses, altered anatomy
  • Risks factors of positioning and
    periorbital/facial edema may contribute but at
    this point are less clearly factors

25
Recent Practice AdvisoryAm Soc of
Anesthesiologists
  • Spine procedure
  • Positioned prone
  • Receiving general anesthesia
  • Uncommon occurrence
  • Less than 0.2 of spine surgeries
  • Makes it a difficult thing to study, mostly case
    control studies and case reports in terms of what
    is in the literature.

26
ASA Practice Advisory
  • Task force of 12 members
  • 4 Anesthesiologists
  • 3 Neuro-Ophthalmologists
  • 1 Orthopedic Spine Surgeon
  • 1 Neurosurgeon
  • 2 Methodologists from ASA Practice Parameters
    committee
  • 3 physicians served as liasons from national
    organizations
  • NANOS
  • Am Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons
  • Am Association of Neurologic Surgeons
  • Opinions were also solicited from Society for
    Neurosurgical Anesthesia and Critical Care,
    NANOS, and North American Spine Society
  • Summary of the available literature, expert
    opinion, open forum commentary and consensus
    surveys

27
Predictive Risk Factors
  • Vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes,
    smoking,obesity,glaucoma, carotid artery disease)
  • Pre-operative presence of anemia
  • Prolonged procedures (range was 2-12 with average
    of 6.5 hours)
  • Substantial blood loss (ranges was 10-200 with
    average of 44.7 of total blood volume)

28
Pre-Operative Assessment
  • Task Force was in consensus that
  • There is no evidence that an ophthalmic or
    neuro-ophthalmic exam pre-operatively is useful
    for identifying patients at risk
  • Recommendation was to consider informing patients
    in whom prolonged procedures, substantial blood
    loss or both are anticipated that there is a
    small unpredictable risk of perioperative visual
    loss.

29
BP,fluid,blood loss managment
  • Recommend continual monitoring in high risk
    patients (CVP monitoring)
  • Deliberate hypotensive techniques have not been
    shown to be associated with peri-operative visual
    loss.
  • There is no absolute hematocrit number to use a
    transfusion threshold, individually dependent

30
Patient Positioning
  • Several case reports of direct pressure to the
    eyes from use of a sheet roll or head rest
    resulting in central retinal artery occlusion
    (CRAO) or ION but also in patients with no
    headrest (head held by pins)
  • All task force members agreed that direct
    pressure on the eye should be avoided to reduce
    risk of CRAO and other ocular damage.

31
Head positioning?
  • No pathophysiologic mechanism by which facial
    edema can cause perioperative ION
  • Eyes of prone patients should be regularly
    checked
  • Peri-operative facial edema is common in high
    risk patients
  • Postion the head level or higher than the heart
    for high-risk patients
  • Keep the head in a neutral forward position when
    possible
  • Direct pressure on the eye should be avoided to
    avoid CRAO

32
Treatment
  • Correction of hemodynamic derangements, systemic
    steroids, antiplatelet therapy, measures to lower
    intraocular pressure or intracranial pressure.
  • None effective though a few case reports of
    improvement with transfusion and keeping blood
    pressure over 140/80

33
Peri-operative Visual loss registry
  • http//depts.washington.edu/asaccp/eye/index.shtml
  • www.asaclosedclaims.org
  • Established in 1999
  • Recently published on 93 spine cases (93/131
    cases 72)
  • Lee et al Anesthesiology 2006, 205652-659.
  • Anonymous reporting

34
(No Transcript)
35
Advisory
  • PION can be seen with a variety of surgical
    procedures but is more likely to be seen with
    spinal procedures
  • There is no evidence that compression is a factor
    in the pathophysiology of this entity although
    compression is clearly related to CRAO
  • PION does correlate with prolonged surgery (gt 6
    hours)

36
Advisory
  • While PION does correlate with blood loss, the
    amount of blood loss required is unclear and can
    still occur in the absence of significant blood
    loss as our cases demonstrate.
  • PION is somewhat more likely with prolonged
    hypotension but again the range where this is
    significant is likely to be very patient
    dependant.

37
Advisory
  • Patients in a prolonged supine position with
    significant peri-orbital swelling (our two cases)
    while theoretically this could predispose them to
    PION has yet to be recognized as an independent
    risk factor.

38
Prognosis
  • Visual recovery
  • Some visual recovery in 37.9 (42)
  • Patients with poorer vision initially tended to
    have less improvement and poorer outcomes
  • 54.9 had a final visual acuity of HM or worse
  • Both of our patients had some improvement both in
    their acuity and visual fields but again were
    more mildly affected than many of the other
    reported cases

39
Summary
  • Postoperative Visual Loss is a fortunately rare
    but devastating condition that is still poorly
    understood.
  • Recent reports by the ASA Registry and reviews of
    the literature would suggest counseling patients
    who are undergoing procedures that are prolonged
    and/or with expected substantial blood loss about
    the potential risk for this condition.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com