Title: Area Under the Curve
1Area Under the Curve
- We want to approximate the area between a curve
(yx21) and the x-axis from x0 to x7 - We will use rectangles to do this.
- One way will be to choose rectangles whose
heights are taken from the x-coordinate of the
right side of the rectangle (Right Sum) - We will let n be the number of rectangles we use
to approximate the area
2Right Sum n5
3Right Sum n10
4Right Sum n20
5Right Sum n50
6Right Sum n100
7What do you notice?
- What will happen as you add more rectangles for a
Right Sum? - Will this happen for any function? Why or why
not? - How many rectangles do we need to get the actual
area? - Can you think of another way to approximate the
area?
8Another way
- What if we were to use rectangles whose heights
were formed from the x-coordinate of the Left
side of the interval? - We will call these Left Sums
- As we go through the Left Sums, what do you
notice about the areas?
9Left Sum n5
10Left sum n10
11Left Sum n20
12Left Sum n50
13Left Sum n100
14Lets look at the areas again
Right Sums Left Sums
n5 157.92 89.32
n10 139.055 104.755
n20 130.0513 112.9013
n50 124.7862 117.9262
n100 123.054 119.624
n1000 121.5049 121.1619
n5000 121.3676 121.299
n30000 121.3391 121.3276
15Another Example
- While it is easiest for computational reasons to
look at Left Sums and Right Sums, theoretically
it is necessary to look at Upper Sums (where each
rectangle circumscribes the function) and Lower
Sums (where each rectangle is inscribed in the
function). Recall that in the example seen so
far, the Right Sums were also Upper Sums and the
Left Sums were Lower Sums. Under what
circumstances would this not be true? Is it
possible for some Upper Sums to be left sums and
others to be right sums?
16Here is an example of an Upper Sum. Notice that
the rectangles are all formed by choosing the
height from the highest point on the graph that
the rectangle hits.
17Here is a Lower Sum with 8 rectangles. What do
you think will happen if a rectangle starts at
-½ and ends at ½? What would the height be for
a Lower Sum?
18Finding Exact AreasRiemann Sums
- It turns out, as you could see from the table,
that if you use enough rectangles, the Left Sum
will be very close to the Right Sum. If you use
an infinite amount of rectangles, the Left Sum
and Right Sum will be equal, and they will equal
the exact area. - Theoretically, there are a great many ways to
design rectangles that will lead to the area.
Any of these will be a type of Riemann Sum. So
far we have seen Left, Right, Upper, and Lower
Sums these are all types of Riemann Sums. There
are lots of others. - Since any Riemann Sum will eventually lead to the
exact area, we will use the Right Sum. The Right
Sum is computationally easiest to use.
19Finding Exact AreasRiemann Sums
- Back to
- If we use 8 rectangles, how wide is each one?
- What about if we used 12 rectangles?
- How about n rectangles?
- In general, if we start at xa and stop at xb,
how wide would each rectangle be?
20Exact Area
- In general, the width of each rectangle will be
- We call the width of each rectangle
- What would the height of each rectangle be? Lets
look at the graph again, and then see if we can
generalize
21As you can see, the heights of each rectangle are
found by getting the y-value at the right side of
each rectangle. If xi represents the x-coordinate
of the right side of the ith rectangle, then
the height of the ith rectangle is f(xi ). For
our example, each xi is found by adding to
the previous right side. Since we start at x0,
the first right side is the next one is
. Without doing the addition, what would be
the coordinate of the right side of the 5th
rectangle? Do you see that you merely multiply 5
times ? How would this generalize?
22- If the area we are interested starts at xa, and
the width is then the x-coordinate
of the ith rectangle xi will be - Example If I was finding the area under a curve
on the interval 3, 7 and I was using 100
rectangles, the x-coordinate of the 70th
rectangle would be - Find x25 for an area on the interval 2, 8 if
we use 120 rectangles - Did you get 3.25?
-
23Area of the i th rectangle
- Since area of a rectangle is height times width,
and the height is just the value of the function
at xi , we get - Given on the
interval 5, 7 with 20 rectangles, find the area
of the 14th rectangle. - Did you get
24Putting it all together
- Now we want to put it all together. We want to
add up all n rectangles to give an approximation
for the area. This is the formula we use - Lets go back to our first example
on 0, 7 and lets use 100 rectangles. We
get -
- which is what we had before on our table.
25The exact area
- To find the exact area, all we need to do is look
at an infinite number of rectangles. Believe it
or not, this is actually easier than what we just
did. The formula becomes - The previous example becomes
- Remember that the sum of a constant is the
constant times n.
26Another example
- Find the area under on
the interval 2, 5 - We have ,
and - So the area is
27A few last comments
- Dont Panic an easier way is coming soon
- There are many, many applications of what we just
didalso coming soon - What do you think would change if we tried to
find the exact area using a Left Sum? Why is
using a Left Sum more complicated? - Another, very common method used to approximate
the area under a curve is called a Midpoint Sum.
Without any other information, what do you think
that might be? - To approximate the area under a curve, we usually
just use a few rectangles, and which method we
use depends on what the graph looks like. To get
the exact area we use Right Sums, but we are
limited to only finding the area under polynomial
of degree 3 or less (Why?)
28A final comment or three
- If you are approximating the area under a curve
and you are using only a few rectangles it is
MUCH easier to find the heights and areas by hand
(or using a table in your calculator) than to use
formulas. - The width of each rectangle will not always be
the samethink about how you approach that
situation. - On an AP test you will need to do Left, Right,
Upper, Lower, and/or Midpoint Sums for small
numbers of rectangles.