Evaluation: Full Circle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation: Full Circle

Description:

Evaluation: Full Circle CHSC 433 Module 7/Chapter 14 UIC School of Public Health L. Michele Issel, PhD, RN – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Michel305
Learn more at: http://www.uic.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation: Full Circle


1
Evaluation Full Circle
  • CHSC 433
  • Module 7/Chapter 14
  • UIC School of Public Health
  • L. Michele Issel, PhD, RN

2
Objectives
  1. Discuss the relevance of the Evaluation Standards
    to the quality of evaluations
  2. State under what conditions informed consent is
    needed
  3. Write an Executive Summary and appropriate
    Recommendations

3
Approaches to Assessing Quality of Evaluations
  • Product-based view looks at what is produced, not
    preferences of evaluation stakeholders
  • Manufacturing-based view looks at whether met
    contract and specifications
  • User-based view is from the point of view of
    evaluation users

4
Standards and Principles
  • The professional evaluation association has
    established both standards for high quality
    evaluations, and principles for conducting
    evaluations.
  • These are values that guide the practice of
    evaluation.

5
4 Standards for Evaluation
  • Utility standards
  • Feasibility standards
  • Propriety standards
  • Accuracy standards

6
Principles for Evaluation
  • Systematic inquiry
  • Competence
  • Integrity and Honesty
  • Respect for People
  • Responsibilities for General and Public Welfare

7
Ethics and IRBs
  • Ethics is the discipline concerned with just,
    equitable, and moral decision making
  • IRB is the administrative body that oversees the
    ethical conduct of research

8
IRBs and Informed Consent
  • Informed consent is a process whereby an
    individual agrees to be in a study after
    receiving all the information about what being in
    the study entails.
  • Program evaluations that include a research
    element must get IRB approval and use informed
    consents

9
Informed Consent
  • Has 8 elements required by Federal Regulations
  • Need to obtain if the evaluation
  • Findings will be disseminated beyond the program
  • and
  • The evaluation is being done to generate new
    knowledge

10
Evaluation CQI/TQM
  • Effect of Quality Improvement initiatives on
    evaluation
  • Staff have expectations of involvement
  • Easier to develop program theory because know and
    can use applicable TQM techniques
  • Still need outcome evaluations in tax supported
    organizations

11
Performance Measures
  • Terminology varies across sectors and disciplines
  • Federal lingo is not evaluation lingo
  • Level of specificity and measurement varies with
    terminology
  • Performance Measures generally refer to
    indicators of either process or effect.

12
Making Recommendations (Hendricks Papagiannis,
1990)
  • The following are recommendations about making
    recommendations based on the evaluation

13
Recommendations
  • Consider all issues in the evaluation as fair
    game for recommendations
  • Think about recommendations as soon as begin
    collecting data
  • Draw recommendations from a wide variety of
    sources
  • Work closely with agency personnel throughout
    the process

14
Recommendations
  • Offer realistic recommendations
  • Decide on how specific recommendations will be
  • Think twice about recommending fundamental
    changes
  • Show future implications of recommendations

15
Recommendations
  • Make recommendations easy for decision makers to
    understand
  • Stay involved after your recommendations have
    been accepted
  • Look for other opportunities to make a repeat
    recommendation if an important one was not
    accepted

16
Executive Summary
  • Provides brief, but comprehensive summary of the
    project and evaluation
  • Gives highlights and recommendations
  • Ranges from one to several pages
  • Is often distributed in place of the full report

17
Grant Writing Tips
  • Write for the reviewers minimize jargon,
    maximize explanations, keep the grammar easy to
    read
  • Follow the instructions! Down to the font size,
    margin specification and lines per inch

18
More Grants Tips
  • Match idea with funding priorities keep looking
    for a good match or change the idea
  • Make contact with the program officer it is
    their job to get grants submitted, hence their
    helpfulness

19
Recommendations Across the Pyramid
Consider whether recommendations for each level
is appropriate Consider policy recommendation Reco
mmendations at same level are the program,
support or enhance the program
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com