Response to Intervention - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Response to Intervention

Description:

Response to Intervention The Implementation Process Plans and Strategies Part III – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Owen86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Response to Intervention


1
Response to Intervention
  • The Implementation Process
  • Plans and Strategies
  • Part III

2
The Implementation ProcessChange Theory
  • Gene Hall Shirley Hord identified components of
    change. Implementing Change Patterns,
    Principles, and Potholes
  • They include
  • Change is a process not an event.
  • It happens gradually as understanding, skills and
    competencies increase. (It doesnt happen with an
    administrative announcement or a two day
    workshop.)

3
Change Theory
  • Theres a big difference in what is involved in
    developing an innovation and then implementing
    it.
  • Development includes all activities related to
    researching and creating an innovation.
  • Implementation includes all the steps and actions
    involved in learning about and then using the
    innovation.
  • We in schools need to be sure we take care of
    both aspects.

4
Change Theory
  • A school doesnt change until the individuals
    within it change.
  • Successful change starts and ends at the
    individual level.
  • Be patient supportive, yet firm in maintaining
    momentum. The rate of change coupled with skills
    and competencies will vary individually.
  • Change will be grasped quickly by some, in time
    by others, and avoided by a few.

5
Change Theory
  • Interventions are the actions and events that are
    key to successful change.
  • Interventions come in many sizes.
  • A two day workshop might be considered large.
  • The most important interventions are the smallest
    ones.
  • (Ex. A one legged interview a brief
    discussion held between the principal teacher
    regarding the intervention.) Its brief in
    nature not lasting longer than a person might be
    able to stand on one leg.
  • Research indicates that teachers are markedly
    more successful with change when they are
    involved in many one legged interviews.

6
Change Theory
  • There will be no change in outcomes until new
    practices are implemented.
  • We are expected to have ever increasing results
    in schools. We measure student growth
    constantly. In essence Just weighing a pig
    wont make him gain weight.
  • Remember, change is a processnot an event.
  • If the process takes 2 to 3 years be patient in
    getting results.

7
Change Theory
  • Results will rapidly increase with a high level
    of use of new practices.
  • Remembering that successful change happens at the
    individual level each staff member must cross
    the bridge from unsuccessful / unproven practices
    to those that have proven to be successful
    through research.

8
Change Theory
  • Administrative Leadership is essential to
    successful long term change.
  • Administrative support on a daily basis is
    crucial. (One legged interviews.)
  • Administrators are key to securing the needed
    infrastructure and long term resources needed to
    sustain the intervention.
  • This might find them bringing the intervention
    forward to policy makers.

9
Change Theory
  • The school is the primary unit for change.
  • The staff and leadership will make or break any
    innovation.
  • That being said, be willing to seek support from
    others within and outside the system.

10
Change Theory
  • Appropriate interventions can reduce resistance
    to change.
  • Research shows three apparent rationales for
    resistance.
  • 1) Dealing with the sense of loss as you move
    away from a practice that was comfortable.
  • 2) Having serious questions regarding whether
    the change will really be an improvement.
  • 3) Change is painful and must be endured as a
    natural part of the change process.
  • Be thoughtful in analyzing resistance and work
    with each staff member as an individual.

11
Change Theory
  • The context of the school influences the process
    of change.
  • Physical features including size and arrangement
    of the facility as well as resources, policies,
    and schedules impact successful change.
  • People factors including attitudes, beliefs and
    values of the individuals involved as well as
    relationships also will have a huge impact on
    change.

12
The Personal Side of Change
  • The feelings and perceptions regarding the
    proposed change can be sorted classified into
    Stages of Concern
  • Having an understanding of the staffs stages of
    concern can assist in one-on-one coaching
    sessions as well as provide insight into
    continued planning and possible training.

13
Types of Concerns
  • These four types of concern provide a framework
    for the seven stages of concern.
  • Unrelated concerns - people at this level
    obviously have concerns but none relating to the
    innovation. (1 level of concern listed)
  • Self Concerns concerns center on whether or not
    the individual can be successful with the
    innovation. (2 levels of concern listed)

14
Types of Concerns
  • Task Concerns staff members who are focused on
    the mechanics of the process (i.e.) gathering
    materials, dealing with schedules, in essence
    just making it work. (1 level of concern listed)
  • Impact Concerns staff concerns focus on what is
    truly happening with students and what they can
    do to be more effective in improving their
    outcomes. (3 levels of concern listed)

15
The Stages of Concern
  • Stage 0 Awareness (Unrelated Type) Little
    concern about the innovation.
  • Personal Expression Im not concerned about
    RTI.
  • Stage 1 Informational (Self Type) The staff
    member has a general awareness and interest in
    learning more about the innovation.
  • Pers.. Express Id like to know more about RTI

16
Stages of Concern
  • Stage 2 Personal (Self Type) the staff member
    is uncertain about the demands of the innovation
    and his or her abilities to meet those demands.
  • Pers.. Express How will using RTI really affect
    me?

17
Stages of Concern
  • Stage 3 Management (Task Type) the staff
    member focuses attention on the processes and
    tasks of using the innovation.
  • Pers.. Express I really seem to be spending all
    my time getting materials ready Im really
    swimming in it.

18
Stages of Concern
  • Stage 4 Consequence (Impact type) the staff
    member focuses on impact of the innovation on
    his/her students. They are aware of
    effectiveness and search out ways to make changes
    that will impact student results.
  • Pers.. Express How is my use of RTI helping my
    kids meet AYP?

19
Stages of Concern
  • Stage 5 Collaboration (Impact type) staff
    members have progressed to the point of focusing
    on coordination and cooperation with their
    instructional peers.
  • Pers.. Express Id really like to have a chance
    to spend time planning with Mrs. Jones so that we
    can use each others talents to help both
    classrooms in small group instruction.

20
Stages of Concern
  • Stage 6 Refocusing (Impact type) the teachers
    focus is on more universal benefits that might
    come from the innovation. They might suggest
    major changes or alternatives based on their
    developing views.
  • Pers. Express I have some ideas regarding our
    benchmarking approach that might improve the
    process.

21
Closing Thoughts Regarding Change Theory
  • My hope is that this brief discussion will
    provide foundation for the upcoming discussion
    regarding practices and procedures that have been
    used successfully in implementing RTI.

22
Small Group InstructionA closer look
  • Collaborative Differentiated Small Group
    Instruction Defined
  • Collaborative instruction that is shared in
    nature in both planning and application.
  • Staff share in deciding what should be taught to
    whom and then agree on the roles they will assume
    in the process.
  • Differentiated meeting the changing
    identified needs of students through a study of
    their individual or group data.
  • Flexible grouping must be maintained based on the
    changing learning pace of students and by the
    specific skill needs of individuals.
  • Small Group Experience tells us that a group of
    3 to 5 students is optimal for both learning and
    instruction.
  • Less cuts into the level of efficiency when
    considering the amount of staff available
    compared to student needs.
  • More cuts into the level of effectiveness of
    instruction that small groups by nature, offer

23
Impact of Small Group Instruction
  • Positive Impact
  • Students enjoy the small group attention.
  • They are more willing to share.
  • They appear more intense in the learning process.
  • Students benefit from varied instructors their
    knowledge, etc.
  • Allows all students to learn at a comfortable,
    yet challenging level.
  • Specialists appear to enjoy the opportunity to
    work with a wider range of students.
  • Created an increased openness to sharing
    expertise.
  • Has shown a decrease in number of students
    referred for LD testing decrease in identified
    case load.

24
Impact of Small Group Instruction
  • Positive Impact
  • Results, Results, Results!
  • Marked improvement in students Fluency Measures.
  • NWEA results at previous school showed
    extraordinary increases in number of Grade 2
    students meeting the criteria moving from below
    average to proficient from fall to spring
    testing and above average increases in students
    who were considered proficient in grades 3 - 5.

25
(No Transcript)
26
Impact of Small Group Instruction
  • Negative Impact
  • There needs to be a huge buy-in by specialists
  • During the initial transition specialists tend to
    work in both worlds.
  • Working with caseload that had been identified
    using previous methodology while taking part of
    their time to provide small group collaborative
    instruction.
  • This can be alleviated initially by rewriting
    goals of identified students so that they are
    still meeting the IEP requirements while adding
    flexibility to their instruction.
  • There is evidence to support that many students
    placed in LD might not had been placed if their
    Reading Concerns were addressed with early
    intervention.
  • This is supported by a decrease in students
    referred for services through the RTI process.
  • Current School 420 students / LD specialist
    currently serving 9 students case manager for
    5.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com