INSURANCE PRINCIPLES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

INSURANCE PRINCIPLES

Description:

insurance principles chapter-3 part-i – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: acer
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INSURANCE PRINCIPLES


1
INSURANCE PRINCIPLES
  • CHAPTER-3 PART-I

2
Essentials of a valid contract of insurance
3
How different is Life Insurance Contract?
  • ? A Life Insurance Policy is a contract, in terms
    of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
  • ? Insurance is a specialised type of contract.
  • ? Principle of Utmost Good Faith Principle of
    Insurable Interest are applicable to both life
    and non-life contracts apart from the usual
    aforesaid essentials of a valid contract.

4
Offer Acceptance
  • The Proposer offers his proposal to be accepted
    by the Insurer. If the Insurer, after considering
    the proposal and other related information, is
    willing to insure a policy, he sends a letter
    termed Letter of Acceptance. The letter of
    acceptance is counter offer.

5
Consideration
  • In Insurance contract, the payment of the premium
    is consideration for the contract on the part of
    the life assured and the undertaking of the
    insurer to pay a sum of money when the claim
    arises is consideration on the part of the
    insurer.

6
Capacity to Contract
  • The parties to an assurance contract must be
    capable of entering into contracts. Every person
    is competent to contract who is of the age of
    majority, who is of sound mind and is not
    disqualified from contracting by any law to which
    he is subject. Thus, minors and persons of
    unsound mind cannot enter into insurance
    contracts.

7
Consensus
  • Two or more persons are said to consent when they
    agree upon the same thing in the same sense. A
    contract must be founded on a true agreement and
    the parties must be of one mind. There will be no
    consensus if either of the parties or both of
    them are under a wrong impression as to some
    circumstance affecting the contract.

8
Legality of object or purpose
  • Every agreement wherein the consideration or
    object is unlawful, is void. Therefore, for a
    valid contract there should be proper
    consideration and legally valid object. The
    object or the purpose of an agreement must be
    lawful i.e. it should not be forbidden by law or
    it should not be fraudulent. For example, stolen
    goods cannot be insured.

9
Insurable interest
  • Insurable Interest is necessary for a valid
    contract of insurance, the insured who is to
    benefit from the proceeds must be in a
    relationship with the subject of insurance,
    whereby he benefits from its safety and
    well-being and would be prejudiced by its loss or
    damage.

10
continued
  • Insurable interest is required to support the
    contract of insurance in order to make it
    enforceable at law. In absence of insurable
    interest, no contract of insurance can come into
    existence. Lack of insurable interest will render
    the contract void.

11
continued
  • The subject matter of insurance can be any type
    of property or any event that may result in a
    loss of a legal right or the creation of a legal
    liability. Eg. Under a fire policy it can be a
    building, stock or machinery with a life
    insurance policy it is the life being assured in
    marine insurance it could be the ship, its cargo
    etc.

12
Examples of Insurable Interest
  • A person has unlimited insurable interest in his
    own life.
  • A husband has insurable interest in the life of
    his wife and vice-versa.
  • An employer has insurable interest in his
    employee to the extent of the value of his
    services.
  • An employee has insurable interest in the life of
    his employer to the extent of his remuneration
    for the period of notice.

13
continued
  • A creditor has an insurable interest in the life
    of the debtor, to the extent of the debt which he
    may lose if the debtor dies before repaying the
    loan.
  • Partners have insurable interest in the lives of
    each other because they stand to lose in the
    event of death of any of them.

14
continued
  • A surety has an insurable interest in the life of
    his co-surety to the extent of the debt and also
    on the life of the principal debtor.
  • A company has an insurable interest in the life
    of key valuable employee.
  • Parents have insurable interest in the life of a
    child till the policy vests in him on attainment
    of majority.

15
Features of Insurable Interest
  • In case of life insurance policies, insurable
    interest must exist at the inception of the
    policy and is not required at the time of claim
    under the policy.
  • In case of Marine policies, insurable interest
    must exist at the time of claim under the policy
    and there need not be insurable interest at the
    inception of the policy.
  • In other insurances, insurable interest must
    exist at the time of inception as well as at the
    time of claim.

16
PRINCIPLE OF UTMOST GOOD FAITH UBERRIMAE FIDES
  • Commercial contracts are normally subject to the
    principle of Caveat emptor i.e. let the buyer
    beware. Each party can verify the correctness of
    the statements of the other party and proof can
    be asked for.

17
continued
  • The seller under a commercial contract has no
    duty to disclose any information about the
    subject-matter of the contract to the buyer. The
    seller cannot deliberately mislead the buyer but
    it is the duty of the buyer to inspect the goods
    to see if there are any defects. ExampleFor a
    purchase of a car, the buyer has to take all
    precautions by inspecting the car for any
    defects. The seller has no duty to disclose the
    defects.

18
continued
  • However, Life Insurance contract is a contract of
    Uberrimae Fides i.e. contracts in which the
    Utmost Good Faith is required. The proposer has a
    legal duty to disclose everything that is
    relevant to the subject-matter of insurance,
    because the insurer knows nothing about it.

19
continued
  • The duty of full disclosure rests on both
    parties.
  • The duty exists on the part of the proposer to
    disclose and furnish all material information for
    proper assessment of the risk by the insurer. The
    insurer cannot possibly be aware of all the
    details of the health, family history, habits and
    other matters relevant to the assessment of the
    risk and has frequently no means of verifying
    them.

20
continued
  • It is true that the underwriter can have a survey
    for fire insurance or medical examination of life
    for health insurance, carried out, but even then
    there are certain aspects of the risk which are
    not apparent at the time of survey or medical
    examination, for example, the previous loss or
    medical history and so on.

21
continued
  • Duty on the part of the Insurer
  • The proposer also because of his lack of
    technical knowledge has to depend on the good
    faith of the Company to ensure that the terms of
    the contract are fair and equitable. The insurer
    or his agent has to make true statements at the
    time of sale of insurance, advise the proposer
    properly about the terms and conditions of the
    policy without withholding any information.

22
continued
  • An insurer must disclose the precise terms of the
    contract and make no untrue statements in
    negotiations with the proposer. It is customary
    for insurer to issue prospectus or leaflets
    setting out briefly the terms and conditions of
    the contract. Lack of good faith on the part of
    the insurer would arise if the terms and
    conditions of the policy issued differ from those
    advertised.

23
Disclosure of Material Facts
  • In the event of failure to disclose material
    facts, the contract can be held to be void ab
    initio i.e. from the beginning itself.
  • Material Fact Every circumstance that would have
    a bearing on the judgment of a prudent insurer in
    fixing the premium or determining the
    acceptability of the proposal for insurance is a
    material fact.

24
continued
  • The proposer cannot defend non-disclosure by
    contending that he did not think that the fact
    was material to be disclosed (correction on page
    27, point 7, last line- the fact was material)
  • Facts of common knowledge, facts of law, facts
    revealed by a survey or facts which could be
    reasonably discovered by reference to previous
    policies and records available with the insurer
    need not be disclosed.

25
Duty of Disclosure
  • The duty of disclosure in life insurance,
    operates till the risk commences.
  • However, if the policy is issued with a condition
    that any change in occupation must be notified to
    the insurer or if the terms of the policy are to
    be altered or if a lapsed policy is to be revived
    or a surrendered policy is to be reinstated,
    there would be a duty to disclose all material
    facts at that time since what follows is a
    contract novell or a new contract.

26
Breach of Principle of Utmost Good Faith
  • The breach of the principle of utmost good faith
    arises due to misrepresentation or non-disclosure
    of material facts.
  • Any statement made in the Proposal for insurance
    or any report of a Medical Examiner or refree or
    friend of the insured or any other document
    leading to the policy, was on a material matter
    fraudulently suppressed by the policy holder who
    knew at the time of making it that the statement
    was false, amounts to misrepresentation or
    non-disclosure.

27
Declaration
  • In a proposal for life insurance, the proposer
    makes a declaration to the effect that all the
    statements in the proposal form are true and that
    he agrees that these statements as also any
    further statement made or to be made by him
    before the medical examiner shall be the basis of
    the contract between him and the insurer and if
    any untrue statement be contained therein, the
    insurer would be entitled to treat the contract
    as null and void and forfeit all the moneys paid
    therefor.

28
Section 45 of the Indian Insurance Act,1938
  • The effect of the declaration at the foot of the
    proposal form by the proposer is to turn the
    representations in the proposal into warranties
    which must be complied in toto.
  • Any incorrect or inaccurate answers to a question
    on the proposal form will render the contract
    voidable at the option of the insurer,
    irrespective of the fact whether it is material
    to the risk or not. The answers are required to
    be literally true and absolutely correct.

29
continued
  • However, section 45 of the Indian Insurance Act,
    1938 stipulates that a policy cannot be called in
    question after 2 years, on the grounds of
    inaccurate or false statement, unless it is
    proved to be material and fraudulent. After
    expiry of a period of 2 years from the date of
    acceptance of risk the burden of proof rests with
    the insurer.

30
Principle of Indemnity
  • Insurance is meant to compensate losses and
    cannot be used to make profit.
  • The amount paid out as a claim cannot exceed the
    amount of loss incurred.
  • Insurer should place the insured in the same
    financial position after a loss as he enjoyed
    before it, but not better.

31
continued
  • Indemnity is defined as compensation for loss or
    injury sustained. Insurance contracts promise
    to make good the loss or damage. However,
    payments for loss or damage are limited to the
    actual amount of the loss or damage subject to
    the sum insured.

32
continued
  • For example, if an insured takes a policy of Rs.1
    lac on a house worth Rs.75,000/- and later sells
    it during the policy period, no payment is made
    under the policy if the house is destroyed by
    fire because the insured has suffered no loss. If
    the house is destroyed before it is sold, the
    insured will be paid only Rs.75,000/- because
    that is his actual loss.

33
continued
  • From the above example it is clear that an
    insured can recover a loss under a policy only if
    he has insurable interest and he can recover a
    loss only to the extent of his insurable
    interest.
  • The object of the principle of indemnity is to
    place the insured after a loss in the same
    financial position as far as possible, as he
    occupied immediately before the loss to prevent
    the insured from making a profit out of his loss
    or gaining any benefit or advantage.

34
continued
  • If it were possible to make profit out of the
    happenings of loss or damage, the insured would
    be tempted to deliberately cause the loss or
    damage. It would also tend to make the insured
    careless in maintaining the property in good
    condition and in preventing the loss.

35
Whether the Principle of Indemnity applicable to
Life Insurance?
  • There is a link between indemnity and insurable
    interest in the sense that the amount of claim
    cannot exceed the extent of interest.
  • In case of life insurance however, because the
    insurable interest is assumed to be unlimited,
    the principle of indemnity does not apply.

36
continued
  • The Principle of Indemnity is applied in
    insurance where the loss suffered by the insured
    is measurable in terms of money. Thus the
    principle is applied to insurances of physical
    property (i.e. fire, burglary etc.) and in
    insurances of liabilities (employers liability)

37
continued
  • The Principle of Indemnity does not apply to life
    insurance where human life is the subject matter
    of these insurances, because of difficulty in
    putting monitory value on human life. It is not
    possible to measure the financial loss caused by
    the death of the insured or bodily injury
    sustained by him due to accident.

38
continued
  • However, in practice the spirit of the Principle
    of Indemnity is preserved in life insurance
    policies by restricting the sum insured to an
    amount which is commensurate to the financial
    status of the insured and by insuring that the
    monthly benefit for disablement is in line with
    the insureds normal earning capacity.

39
continued
  • For example, a person whose monthly salary is
    Rs.1000/- will not be granted a personal accident
    policy of Rs.1,00,000/- which would provide a
    monthly benefit of Rs.4000/-. This amount is far
    in excess of his monthly income and, in the event
    of disablement due to accident, the insured would
    be tempted to prolong his recovery to derive
    undue financial advantage under his policy.

40
continued
  • Insurers also try to control over-insurance. A
    question is asked in the proposal form whether
    the proposer has already covered himself by
    previous policies on his life and the sun insured
    thereunder. The sum insured is fixed under the
    proposed insurance taking into account the amount
    already insured under the existing policy.

41
  • THANKS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com