Fedora and versioning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Fedora and versioning

Description:

Title: E-theses: management and access via a digital repository Last modified by: Richard Document presentation format: Custom Other titles: Lucida Grande Myriad Pro ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: lseAcUkli
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fedora and versioning


1
Fedora and versioning
  • VIF Workshops
  • 22nd April 2008
  • Richard Green (University of Hull)

2
Fedora object model
persistent identifier
DC metadata
other metadata 1
other metadata n
relationships
datastream1
datastream 2
datastream n
System identifier

Metadata datastream(s)



Content datastream(s)

3
Example Fedora text object model
persistent identifier
DC metadata
MODS metadata
preservation metadata
relationships
thumbnail
Pdf file
Word file
System identifier

Metadata datastream(s)



Content datastream(s)

4
Example Fedora text object model 2
persistent identifier
DC metadata
MODS metadata
preservation metadata
relationships
thumbnail
Pdf file (v1.0)
Word file
System identifier

Metadata datastream(s)



Content datastream(s)

Version 0.1
Version 0.n
Version 1.0
5
RepoMMan tool
  • The RepoMMan project developed a tool to allow
    users to interact with a private repository
    space

6
RepoMMan tool - versions
  • Double clicking a file (actually a digital
    object in the repository) allowed the user access
    to versions (uploading a file creates a version,
    not a replacement)

7
Datastream versions
  • Any metadata or content datastream can be
    versioned
  • Identified by date-time stamp
  • Default is to retrieve most recent time-stamped
    version
  • All versions can be retrieved at will
  • ...but no easy way to match a data version with a
    metadata version.

8
So what are we versioning?
  • Versions versus revisions
  • A single Fedora object is best suited to
    developments of the same thing (v0.1, 0.2,
    0.3...)
  • Significantly different forms of content
    (authors completed first draft, authors final,
    publishers version, second edition) are probably
    best kept as different Fedora objects with
    relationships declared between them

9
Identifiers
  • Essential (well, good practice anyway) that the
    metadata of related objects contains the basis
    for declaring relationships (shared elements
    common title, original catalogue reference, ...)
  • Include as many identifiers as possible and
    provide clarity about what the digital payload
    represents

10
Contact etc
  • Richard Green (r.green_at_hull.ac.uk)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com