PDM: the Octograph - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

PDM: the Octograph

Description:

The team members provide the necessary information to the leader rather than generating ... PowerPoint Presentation ... Red=group Combinations and Permutations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: AlAr73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PDM: the Octograph


1
PDM the Octograph
2
Autocratic. Consultative. Democratic
  • CI This consultative (collective) leadership
    style is The leader shares the problem with the
    relevant team members individually getting their
    ideas and suggestions without bringing them
    together as a group. Then the leader makes the
    decision that may or may or reflect team member
    influence.
  • CII The leader shares the problem with the
    relevant team members as a group, obtaining their
    collective ideas and suggestions. Then the leader
    makes the decision that may or may not reflect
    team member influence.
  • AI The first autocratic style is described as
    follows The leader solves the problem or makes
    the decision using information available to the
    leader at the time.
  • AII The leader obtains the necessary information
    from team members, then decides the solution. The
    team members provide the necessary information to
    the leader rather than generating or evaluating
    alternative solutions.
  • GI The democratic (also called group) leadership
    style is The leader shares the problem with the
    relevant team members as a group. Together they
    generate and evaluate alternatives and attempt to
    reach agreement (consensus) on a solution. The
    leader's role is much like that of chairperson.
    The leader does not try to influence the group to
    adopt a solution and is willing to accept and
    implement any solution that has support of the
    entire group. The designation GII (instead of G1)
    is for consistency with the literature regarding
    leadership.

3
Decision situation use Vroom Yetton
You are a department head with ten subordinates.
The company has authorised you to adopt a
flexitime schedule with some employees reporting
to work earlier than others and leaving earlier.
At present, everyone reports to work at the same
time. The different arrangements of work
schedules possible for your department would not
affect the capacity of your subordinates to get
the work done. However, you are aware that your
subordinates have strong preferences in this
matter, and some competition is likely for the
best times. How would you decide what work
schedule to assign to each subordinate?
4
Questions
  • How would you decide what work schedule to assign
    to each subordinate?
  • Is this an individual problem (IP) or a group
    problem (GP)?
  • Which policy alternatives would you choose to
    analyse in your report?

Individual AI AII CI GI DI Group AI AII CI CII
GII
5
Decision Making Style
  • AI Autocratic I Leader solves the problem
    alone using information that is readily available
    to him/her
  • AII Autocratic ll Leader obtains additional
    information from group members, then makes
    decision alone. Group members may or may not be
    informed.
  • CI Consultative l Leader shares problem with
    group members individually, and asks for
    information and evaluation. Group members do not
    meet collectively, and leader makes decision
    alone.
  • CII Consultative ll Leader shares problem with
    group members collectively, but makes decision
    alone
  • GII Group ll Leader meets with group to
    discuss situation. Leader focuses and directs
    discussion, but does not impose will. Group makes
    final decision.

6
Flow Chart Redgroup
A. Is there a quality requirement such that one
solution is likely to be more rational than
another? B. Do I have sufficient info to make a
high quality decision? C. Is the problem
structured? D. Is acceptance of decision by
subordinates critical to effective
implementation? E. If I were to make the decision
by myself, is it reasonably certain that it would
be accepted by my subordinates? F. Do
subordinates share the organizational goals to be
attained in solving this problem? G. Is conflict
among subordinates likely in preferred solutions?
(the question is irrelevant to individual
problems) H. Do subordinate have sufficient info
to make a high quality decision?
1 AI, AII, CI, CII, GII 1 AI, DI, AII, CI, GI 2 GII 2 DI, GI 3 AI, AII, CI, CII, GII 3 AI, DI, AII, CI, GI 4 AI, AII, CI, CII, GII 4 AI, AII, CI, GI 5 AI, AII, CI, CII 5 AI, AII, CI 6 GII 6 DI, GI 7 GII 7 GI 8 CII 8 CI 9 CI, CIII 9 CI 10 AII, CI, CII 10 AII, CI 11 AII, CI, CII, GII 11 DI, AII, CI, GI 12 AII, CI, CII, GII 12 AII, CI, GI 13 CII 13 CI 14 CII, GII 14 DI, CI, GI 15 CII, GII 15 CI, GI 16 GII 16 DI GI 17 GII 17 GI 18 CII 18 CI
7
Combinations and Permutations
8
Requirements Quality - Time - Accptance
  1. Quality Requirement (QR) How important is the
    technical quality of the decision?
  2. Commitment Requirement (CR) How important is
    subordinate commitment to the decision?
  3. Leader's Information (LI) Do you (the leader)
    have sufficient information to make a high
    quality decision on your own?
  4. Problem Structure (ST) Is the problem well
    structured (e.g., defined, clear, organized, lend
    itself to solution, time limited, etc.)?
  5. Commitment Probability (CP) If you were to make
    the decision by yourself, is it reasonably
    certain that your subordinates would be committed
    to the decision?
  6. Goal Congruence (GC) Do subordinates share the
    organizational goals to be attained in solving
    the problem?
  7. Subordinate conflict (CO) Is conflict among
    subordinates over preferred solutions likely?
  8. Subordinate information (SI) Do subordinates
    have sufficient information to make a high
    quality decision?

9
Cases 1, 2, 3 4
  • Questions case 1
  • A (Quality?) yes
  • B (Leaders information?) yes
  • E (Acceptance?) no
  • Problem type 4
  • Feasible set AI, AII, CI, CII, GII
  • Minimum man-hours solution (from figure 3.2) AI
  • Rule violation none
  • Questions Case 2
  • A (Quality?) no
  • E (Acceptance?) yes
  • F (Prior probability of acceptance?) no
  • Problem type 3
  • Feasible set GII
  • Minimum man-hours solution (from figure 3.2) GII
  • Rule violation
  • AI and AII violate rules 4, 5 6.
  • CI violates rules 5 6
  • CII violates rule 6.
  • Questions Case 3
  • A (Quality?) yes
  • B (Leaders information?) no
  • D (Structured?) no
  • E (Acceptance?) no
  • Problem type 14
  • Feasible set CII, GII
  • Minimum man-hours solution (from figure 3.2) CII
  • Rule violation
  • AI violates rules 1 3.
  • AII violates rule 3.
  • CI violates rule 3.
  • Questions Case 4
  • A (Quality?) yes
  • B (Leaders information?) no
  • C (Subordinates information?) yes
  • D (Structured?) no
  • E (Acceptance?) yes
  • F (Prior probability of acceptance?) no

10
Further developments
  • Check the Internet to find the model of Vroom
    Jago. Vroom, V. H., Jago, A. G. (1988). The new
    leadership Managing participation in
    organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice
    Hall.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com