Sampling microorganisms in water - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Sampling microorganisms in water

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Last modified by: DEOHS Created Date: 5/19/2003 4:23:09 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company: UW Other titles: Arial Arial Narrow ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: coursesWa5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sampling microorganisms in water


1
Sampling microorganisms in water
  • Gwy-Am Shin
  • Department of Environmental and Occupational
    Health Sciences

2
The challenges
  • Different microbe types
  • Different water types
  • Low numbers of pathogens in natural waters

3
Different waterborne pathogens
  • Viruses
  • Bacteria
  • Protozoa
  • Helminths

4
Different type of waters
  • Wastewater
  • Surface water
  • Ground water
  • Source water
  • Drinking water
  • Recreational water
  • Sea water
  • Sediments and sludges

5
Low numbers of pathogens in water
6
Incidence and concentration of enteric pathogens
in feces (USA)
Pathogen Incidence () Concentration(/gram)
Enteric virus 10-40 103-108
Hepatitis A 0.1 108
Rotavirus 10-29 1010-1012
Salmonella 0.5 104-1010
Giardia 3.8 18-54 106 106
Cryptosporidium 0.6-20 27-50 106-107 106-107
7
Concentration of enteric pathogens in raw sewage
(USA)
Organism Concentration (/liter)
Enteric virus 104-105
Salmonella 103-105
Clostridium perfringens 104-107
Cryptosporidium oocysts 102-104
Giardia cysts 102-105
Helminth ova 104-105
8
Conventional Community (Centralized) Sewage
Treatment
Pathogen Reductions Vary from low (lt90) to Very
High (gt99.99)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Transmission of enteric pathogens
11
Low number of microbes in natural waters
  • Need large volumes
  • Need to separate microbes from other materials

12
Steps in pathogen sampling in water
  • Concentration
  • Purification/Reconcentration
  • Analysis

13
Sampling enteric viruses in water
14
Concentration methods (viruses)
  • Small volume
  • Adsorption to minerals (e.g. aluminum hydroxide,
    ferric hydroxide)
  • Hydroextration (dialysis with Polyethylene Glycol
    (PEG))
  • Ultrafiltration (hollow fiber filters)
  • Large volume
  • Filtration (adsorption filters)

15
Filters for sampling viruses (I)
  • Adsorbent filters
  • pore size of filters (0.2 -0.45 µm) larger than
    viruses
  • viruses retained by adsorption
  • electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions
  • Positively charged and negatively charged filters

16
Filters for sampling viruses (II)
  • Positively charged
  • 1MDS Virozorb
  • cellulose/fiberglass
  • not so efficient with seawater or water with pH
    gt8
  • Negatively charged
  • Millipore HA
  • cellulose ester/fiberglass
  • Need pH adjustment and addition of cations

- - - - - - Virus
- - - - - -

Electronegative viruses adsorb to electropositive
filter surface
17
Different types of filters
18
Field sampling device for viruses
19
Sampling procedure for viruses
20
Elution from Adsorbent Filters
  • Choice of eluants
  • Beef extract
  • Amino acids
  • w/mild detergents
  • Considerations
  • Efficiency of elution
  • Compatibility with downstream assays
  • Volume
  • Contact time

21
Reconcentration and Purification (Viruses)
  • Organic Flocculation
  • Adsorption to minerals (e.g. aluminum hydroxide,
    ferric hydroxide)
  • Hydroextraction (dialysis with Polyethylene
    Glycol (PEG))
  • Spin Column Chromatography (antibodies covalently
    linked to gel particles)
  • IMS (Immunomagnetic separation)
  • Ligand capture

22
Immunomagnetic Separation
Y
Antibody
Bead
Y
Y
Y
Microbe
23
Immonomagnetic separation assay
24
Application of sCAR with Para-Magnetic Beads for
Virus Particle Capture and then RT-PCR
sCAR purification
Covalent coupling to paramagnetic beads
Culture media sCAR produced
Blocking post-coupling
(RT-) PCR
sCAR
NA extraction
Sample containing viruses
Virus Particle
Blocking protein
Amine Terminated Support Magnetic Bead
BioSpheres(Biosource) Pre-coated to provide
available amine groups for covalent coupling of
proteins or other ligands by glutaraldehyde-mediat
ed coupling method
25
Sampling protozoan parasites in water
26
Concentration methods (protozoa)
  • Small volume
  • Flocculation with calcium carbonate
  • Membrane filtration
  • Ultrafiltration
  • Large volume
  • Filtration (size exclusion filters)

27
Filters for sampling protozoa in water
  • Size exclusion filters
  • 1-several µm pore size
  • Protozoa retained by their sizes
  • Various formats
  • Cartridge, capsule, and disk filters

28
Different types of filters
29
Sampling procedure for protozoa
30
Elution from size exclusion filters
  • Choice of eluants
  • PBS with Tween 80 and SDS (sodium dodecyl
    sulfate)
  • Tris buffer with laureth-12, EDTA, and antiform A

31
Reconcentration and Purification (Protozoa)
  • Floatation/Sedimentation
  • IMS (Immunomagnetic separation)

32
Flotation/sedimentation
  • Flotation centrifugation
  • Layer or suspend samples or microbes in medium of
    density greater than microbe density centrifuge
    microbes float to surface recover them from top
    layer
  • Isopycnic or buoyant density gradient
    centrifugation
  • Layer or suspend samples or microbes in a medium
    with varying density with depth but having a
    density to the microbe at one depth.
  • Microbes migrate to the depth having their
    density (isopycnic)
  • Recover them from this specific layer

Isopycnic density gradient microbe density
medium density at one depth
Flotation microbe density lt medium density
33
Sampling and analysis for bacteria in water
34
Membrane filtration technique
  • Waters with relatively high bacteria numbers
  • Filtration (0.45 µm nitrocellulose)
  • Growth on a selective solid medium

35
(No Transcript)
36
Bacteria on membrane filters
Total coliform
E. coli (blue), total coliforms (red-orange)
Salmonella (colorless) colonies
Fecal coliform
37
Conclusions
  • Sampling methods are lagging behind detection
    methods
  • Difficulties with a single platform for any one
    media because of wide range of organisms and
    environmental conditions
  • Speed isnt everything
  • Negative results dont necessarily mean target
    not there
  • There is a need to focus on the reliability and
    sensitivity of concentration methods
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com