Title: 2. Solving Schr
12. Solving Schrödingers Equation
Superposition
- Given a few solutions of Schrödingers equation,
we can make more of them - Let ?1 and ?2 be two solutions of Schrödingers
equation - Let c1 and c2 be any pair of complex numbers
- Then the following is also a solution of
Schrödingers equation
- We can generalize this to an arbitrary number of
solutions
- We can even generalize to a continuum of
solutions
22A. The Free Schrödingers Equation
We know a lot of solutions
- Consider the free Schrödinger equation
- We know a lot of solutions of this equation
- By combining these, we can make a lot more
solutions
- The function c(k) can be (almost) any function of
k - This actually includes all possible solutions
The factor of (2?)3/2 is arbitrary and inserted
here for convenience. In 1D, it would be (2?)1/2
3We can (in principle) always solve this problem
Goal Given ?(r,t 0) ?(r), find ?(r,t) when
no potential is present
- This just says that c(k) is the Fourier transform
of ?(r)
- Substitute it in the formula above for ?(r,t) and
we are done - Actually doing the integrals may be difficult
4Sample Problem
A particle in one dimension with no potential has
wave function at t 0 given by What is the wave
function at arbitrary time?
- Need 1D versions of these formulas
From Appendix Find c(k)
5Sample Problem (2)
A particle in one dimension with no potential has
wave function at t 0 given by What is the wave
function at arbitrary time?
62B. The Time Independent Schrödinger Eqn.
Separation of Variables
- Suppose that the potential is independent of time
- Conjecture solutions of the form
- Substitute it in
- Left side is independent of r
- Right side is independent of t
- Both sides are independent of both! Must be a
constant. Call it E
7Solving the time equation
- The first equation is easy to solve
- Integrate both sides
- By comparison with e-i?t, we see that E ?? is
the energy - Substitute it back in
8The Time Independent Schrödinger Equation
- Multiply the other equation by ?(r) again
The Strategy for solving
- Given a potential V(r) independent of time, what
is most general solution of Schrödingers
time-dependent equation? - First, solve Schrödingers time-independent
equation - You should find many solutions ?n(r) with
different energies En - Now just multiply by the phase factor
- Then take linear combinations
- Later well learn how to find cn
9Why is time-independent better?
- Time-independent is one less variable
significantly easier - It is a real equation (in this case), which is
less hassle to solve - If in one dimension, it reduces to an ordinary
differential equation - These are much easier to solve, especially
numerically
102C. Probability current
Probability Conservation
- Recall the probability density is
- This can change as the wave function changes
- Where does the probability go as it changes?
- Does it flow just like electric charge does?
- Want to show that the probability moves around
- Ideally, show that it flows from place to place
- A formula from E and M can we make it like this?
- To make things easier, lets make all functions
of space and time implicit, not write them
11The derivation (1)
- Start with Schrödingers equation
- Multiply on the left by ?
- Take complex conjugate of this equation
- Subtract
- Rewrite first term as a total derivative
- Cancel a factor of i?
- Left side is probability density
12The derivation (2)
- Consider the following expression
- Use product rule on the divergence
- Substitute this in above
- Define the probability current j
- Then we have
13Why is it called probability current?
- Integrate it over any volume V with surface S
- Left side is P(r ? V)
- Use Gausss law on right side
- Change in probability is due to current flowing
out
V
- If the wave function falls off at infinity (as it
must) and the volume V becomes all of space, we
have
14Calculating probability current
- This expression is best when doing proofs
- Note that you have a real number minus its
complex conjugate - A quicker formula for calculation is
- Lets find ? and j for a plane wave
15Sample Problem
A particle in the 1D infinite square well has
wave function For the region 0 lt x lt a. Find ?
and j.
16Sample Problem (2)
A particle in the 1D infinite square well has
wave function For the region 0 lt x lt a. Find ?
and j.
17Sample Problem (3)
A particle in the 1D infinite square well has
wave function For the region 0 lt x lt a. Find ?
and j.
182D. Reflection from a Step Boundary
The Case E gt V0 Solutions in Each Region
I
- A particle with energy E impacts a step-function
barrier from the left
incident
transmitted
reflected
II
- Solve the equation in each of the regions
- Assume E gt V0
- Region I
- Region II
- Most general solution
- A is incident wave
- B is reflected wave
- C is transmitted wave
- D is incoming wave from the right set D 0
19Step with E gt V0 The solution
I
incident
transmitted
reflected
- Schrödingers equation second derivative finite
- ?(x) and ?(x) must be continuous at x 0
II
- We cant normalize wave functions
- Use probability currents!
20Summary Step with E gt V0
I
incident
transmitted
reflected
II
21Step with E lt V0
- What if V0 gt E?
- Region I same as before
- Region II we have
I
II
incident
reflected
evanescent
- Most general solution
- A is incident wave
- B is reflected wave
- C is damped evanescent wave
- D is growing wave, cant be normalized
- ?(x) and ?(x) must be continuous at x 0
- No transmission since evanescent wave is damped
22Step Potential All cases summarized
- For V0 gt E, all is reflected
- Note that it penetrates, a little bit into the
classically forbidden region, x gt 0 - This suggests if barrier had finite thickness,
some of it would bet through
232E. Quantum Tunneling
Setting Up the Problem
V(x)
- Barrier of finite height and width
V0
- Solve the equation in each of the regions
- Particle impacts from left with E lt V0
- General solution in all three regions
III
II
I
- d/2
d/2
x
- Match ? and ? at x -d/2 and x d/2
Why didnt I include e-ikx in ?III? Why did I
skip letter E?
- Solve for F in terms of A
24Skip this Slide Solving for F in terms of A
- Multiply 1 by ik and add to 2
- Multiply 3 by ? and add to 4
- Multiply 3 by ? and subtract 4
- Multiply 5 by 2? and substitute from 6 and 7
25Barrier Penetration Results
- We want to know transmission probability
- Exponential suppression of barrier penetration
26Unbound and Bound State
- For each of the following, we found solutions for
any E - No potential
- Step potential
- Barrier
- This is because we are dealing with unbound
states, E gt V(??) - Our wave functions were, in each case, not
normalizable - Fixable by making superpositions
- We will now consider bounds states
- These are when E lt V(??)
- There will always only be discrete energy values
- And they can be normalized
- Usually easier to deal with real wave functions
272F. The Infinite Square Well
Finding the Modes
V(x)
- Infinite potential implies wave function must
vanish there - In the allowed region, Schrödingers equation is
just
x
a
0
- The solution to this is simple
- Because potential is infinite, the derivative is
not necessarily continuous - But wave functions must still be continuous
28Normalizing Modes and Quantized Energies
- We can normalize this wave function
- Note that we only get discrete energies in this
case - Note that we can normalize these
- Most general solution is then
29The 3D Infinite Square Well
- In allowed region
- Guess solution
- Normalize it
- This is product of 1D functions
- Energy is
- This is sum of 1D energies
c
b
a
302G. The Double Delta-Function Potential
Finding Bound States
V(x)
a/2
-a/2
I
III
II
- First, write out Schrödingers Equation
x
- Bound states have E lt V(?) 0
- Within each region we have
- General solution (deleting the parts that blow up
at infinity)
31Dealing with Delta Functions
V(x)
a/2
-a/2
I
III
II
- To deal with the delta functions, integrate
Schrödingers equation over a small region near
the delta function - For example, near x a/2
- Do first term on right by fundamental theorem of
calculus - Do second term on right by using the delta
functions
- Take the limit ? ? 0
- Left side small in this limit
32Simplifying at x ½a
V(x)
a/2
-a/2
I
III
II
- Since there is a finite discontinuity in ?, ?
must be continuous at this boundary
On the right side of the equation above, is that
?I, ?II, or ?III?
- Write these equation out explicitly
- Substitute first into second
33Repeating at x ½a
- Repeat the steps we did, this time at x ½a
- Note these equations are nearly identical
- The only numbers equal to their reciprocal are ?1
34Graphical Solution
- Right side is two curves, left side is a straight
line
- Black line always crosses red curve, sometimes
crosses green curve, depending on parameters - Sometimes two solutions, sometimes one
- Normalize to finish the problem
- Note one solution symmetric, one anti-symmetric