Criminal Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Criminal Psychology

Description:

... i.e. Rodney King Sequestered Voir Dire Presenting the Case Developing the story of the case - narrative Narrative coherence Is it consistent? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ShawnD88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Criminal Psychology


1
Criminal Psychology
  • Chapter 12
  • Trial Consultation
  • Talbot
  • Kellogg Community College

2
Trial Consultation
  • Assists attorneys in preparing for the trial,
    evaluating the effectiveness of the presentation,
    and formulating procedures for the selection of
    the jury.
  • Forensic Psychologists?
  • American Society of Trial Consultants (ASTC)
  • No certification or licensure requirement
  • Backgrounds such as psychology, communications,
    sociology, and political science.
  • Criminal v. Civil cases?
  • Ethical Issues.

3
Pretrial Activities
  • Focus Groups Group studies of the general
    population or specific groups of interest in
    order to determine any beliefs, feelings or
    biases held by that group.
  • Witness preparation.
  • Testimony Inconsistencies
  • Role Plays
  • Powerless Speech
  • Ethical issues?
  • Jury Composition issues.
  • Peremptory Challenges
  • Pretrial Publicity issues
  • Change of Venue i.e. Rodney King
  • Sequestered Voir Dire

4
Presenting the Case
  • Developing the story of the case - narrative
  • Narrative coherence Is it consistent? Does it
    have internal logic?
  • Narrative fidelity the logic of good reasons.
    Are these facts or values?
  • Timing of the Defense opening statement.
  • 2 options now or later?
  • Making concessions
  • Sponsorship Theory Make them say it.
  • Inoculation Theory Stealing Thunder

5
Evidence Presentation
  • Serial Position Effect
  • Recency Effect
  • Primacy Effect

6
(No Transcript)
7
Closing Arguments
  • First or Last?
  • Expository Approach Why is our evidence better
    than your evidence?

8
Jury Selection
  • Systematic Jury Selection v. Seat of the pants.
  • Kernel-of-truth hypothesis
  • Two primary approaches.
  • Broad Attitudes and Traits
  • Juror biases
  • Pro-plaintiff v. Pro-defendant (or at least
    anti-plaintiff)
  • Litigation Explosion, Deep pockets syndrome
  • Case-Specific Approaches
  • O.J. Simpson Juror questionnaire. P.302

9
(No Transcript)
10
Other Juror Biases
  • The defendants characteristics
  • Physical attractiveness beautiful people are
    given the benefit of the doubt.
  • Similarity to the jurors people more similar to
    us are often given the benefit of the doubt.
  • The judges instructions
  • Disregard the last comment often results in
    people paying closer attention to it.
  • Beyond reasonable doubt. Is often misunderstood
    as meaning beyond all doubt. It instead means
    beyond the doubt of a reasonable person.

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com