Assessment of Risk and Need - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessment of Risk and Need

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Robert F Forman Last modified by: Peter Stathakis Created Date: 5/14/2002 8:07:17 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: RobertF100
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessment of Risk and Need


1
Assessment of Risk and Need
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals
2
Exigent Risk
  • History of violence or dangerousness
  • Records check
  • Interview collaterals
  • GAIN-Q Behavioral Health Scale TCU Hostility
    Scale
  • Substance abuse and psychosis, combat-related
    PTSD, mania or frontal brain injury
  • Mental status assessment or psychiatric history
  • Any substance abuse screen (CAGE, DAST, AUDIT,
    etc.)
  • Psychopathy
  • PCL-R

3
Risk of Dangerousness Tools
  • COMPAS Violence Scale
  • Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG)
  • Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG)
  • Historical-Clinical-Risk 20 (HCR-20)
  • Classification of Violence Risk (COVR)
  • Static-99

4
Prognostic Risk
Any validated recidivism risk tool
5
Prognostic Risk
  • Any validated recidivism risk tool
  • Prior criminal history
  • Current age lt 25 years
  • Delinquent onset lt 16 years
  • Substance abuse onset lt 14 years
  • Prior rehabilitation failures
  • Antisocial Personality
  • Criminal values
  • Familial history of crime or addiction
  • Criminal associations
  • Instability (chronic homelessness, unemployment)

6
Recidivism Risk Tools
Level of Service Inventory-Revised
(LSI-R)   Wisconsin Risk and Need Assessment
Scale (WRN)   Risk and Needs Triage
(RANT)   Correctional Offender Management
Profiling for Alternative Sanctions
(COMPAS)   Ohio Risk Assessment System
Community Supervision Tool (ORAS-CST)    Post
Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA)    
7
Criminogenic Needs
  • Substance Dependence or Addiction
  • Triggered binge response
  • Cravings or compulsions
  • Withdrawal symptoms

8
DSM-5 Criteria
  • Substance Use Disorder- 2 in 12 months
  • Often taken in larger amounts than anticipated
  • Persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to quit
  • Great deal of time obtaining or using the
    substance
  • Cravings
  • Failure to fulfill major role obligations
  • Persistent social or interpersonal problems
  • Important activities given up
  • Recurrent use in physically hazardous situations
  • Persistent physical or psychological problems
  • Tolerance
  • Withdrawal


Must be causal
Mild 2 to 3 Moderate 4 to 5 Severe 6
9
DSM-5 Criteria
  • Substance Use Disorder- 2 in 12 months
  • Often taken in larger amounts than anticipated
    (i.e. binges)
  • Persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to quit
  • Great deal of time obtaining or using the
    substance
  • Cravings
  • Failure to fulfill major role obligations
  • Persistent social or interpersonal problems
  • Important activities given up
  • Recurrent use in physically hazardous situations
  • Persistent physical or psychological problems
  • Tolerance
  • Withdrawal


Must be causal
Mild 2 to 3 Moderate 4 to 5 Severe 6
10
DSM-5 Criteria
  • Substance Use Disorder- 2 in 12 months
  • Often taken in larger amounts than anticipated
    (i.e. binges)
  • Persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to quit
  • Great deal of time obtaining or using the
    substance
  • Cravings
  • Failure to fulfill major role obligations
  • Persistent social or interpersonal problems
  • Important activities given up
  • Recurrent use in physically hazardous situations
  • Persistent physical or psychological problems
  • Tolerance
  • Withdrawal


Must be causal
Mild 2 to 3 Moderate 4 to 5 Severe 6
11
DSM-5 Criteria
  • Substance Use Disorder- 2 in 12 months
  • Often taken in larger amounts than anticipated
    (i.e. binges)
  • Persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to quit
  • Great deal of time obtaining or using the
    substance
  • Cravings
  • Failure to fulfill major role obligations
  • Persistent social or interpersonal problems
  • Important activities given up
  • Recurrent use in physically hazardous situations
  • Persistent physical or psychological problems
  • Tolerance
  • Withdrawal


Must be causal
Mild 2 to 3 Moderate 4 to 5 Severe 6
12
DSM-5 Criteria
  • Substance Use Disorder- 2 in 12 months
  • Often taken in larger amounts than anticipated
    (i.e. binges)
  • Persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to quit
  • Great deal of time obtaining or using the
    substance
  • Cravings
  • Failure to fulfill major role obligations
  • Persistent social or interpersonal problems
  • Important activities given up
  • Recurrent use in physically hazardous situations
  • Persistent physical or psychological problems
  • Tolerance
  • Withdrawal


Must be causal
Mild 2 to 3 Moderate 4 to 5 Severe 6
13
Criminogenic Need Tools
  • Substance Dependence Abuse Diagnostic Tools
  • Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN)
  • Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV
    (SCID)
  • Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and
    Mental Disorders (PRISM)
  • Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS)
  • Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Dependence
    Screen-II
  • Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-20)

14
Criminogenic Need Tools (cont.)
  • Mental Illness
  • Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS)
  • GAIN-Q, GAIN-SS, ASI Psychiatric, etc.
  • Severe Functional Impairment
  • Low IQ, disinhibition
  • Lack of employable skills
  • Poor daily living skills (ADLs)

15
LSI-R
  • Third Generation (3G) tool
  • Meta-analyses mean r .36
  • compared to .27 for 2G tools, and .10 for 1G
    judgments
  • Kelly Welsh (2008)
  • N 276 male drug offenders released from special
    prison
  • Return to custody within approximately 15 months
  • Total Score predicted return to custody r .25
    r2 .08.
  • Drug Alcohol Score also predicted return to
    custody r .16 r2 .04

16
LSI-R (cont.)
  • Lowenkamp Latessa (2002)
  • Predictive validity highly variable across
    different programs and populations
  • Holsinger et al (2006)
  • Not predictive for Native Americans
  • Whiteacre (2006)
  • Higher false positives and false negatives for
    African-Americans

17
LSI-R (cont.)
  • Fass et al. (2008)
  • Total Score significantly predicted rearrest
    within 1 year
  • AUC .60 r2 .03
  • Higher false positives for African-Americans

18
COMPAS
  • Fourth Generation (4G) tool
  • Fass et al. (2008)
  • 276 males released from halfway houses in NJ
  • Not significantly predictive of re-arrest within
    1 year
  • AUC .53
  • Significantly higher false positives and false
    negatives for African-Americans

19
COMPAS (cont.)
  • Brennan et al. (2009)
  • Northpointe (test developers)
  • 2,328 probationers, both male and female
  • Rearrests within 1 to 5 years
  • All but three scales predicted felony recidivism
    (AUC .70 in combination)
  • Recidivism Risk Index predicted felony recidivism
    (AUC .70)
  • Equivalent prediction by gender, race and
    ethnicity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com