Improving Food Safety by Poultry Carcass Mapping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Improving Food Safety by Poultry Carcass Mapping

Description:

Title: CRIS 052 Validation of the Effect of Interventions and Processes on Persistence of Pathogens on Foods Author: toscar Last modified by: toscar – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: toscar
Learn more at: https://www.ars.usda.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving Food Safety by Poultry Carcass Mapping


1
Improving Food Safety by Poultry Carcass Mapping
  • Thomas P. Oscar, Ph.D.
  • USDA, ARS
  • Princess Anne, MD

2
(No Transcript)
3
Definition Poultry Carcass Map
  • Map of the distribution of pathogens on the
    carcass of poultry.

Salmonella
Campylobacter
Listeria
4
Military Map War on Pathogens
  • Location
  • Number
  • Types

5
Why Poultry Carcass Maps?
To better assess and manage food safety risks!
6
Microbial EcologyPathogen is a minority member
of the microbial community
  • Unattached
  • surface water layer
  • Attached
  • biofilms
  • Entrapped
  • skin crevices
  • feather follicles
  • deep tissues

7
Carcass Sampling Methods
  • Rinse
  • Swab
  • Sponge
  • Excision

These methods will not produce an accurate
carcass map
8
Whole Carcass Enrichment
  • Detects all pathogens present.
  • Can be used to determine pathogen numbers.

9
Whole Carcass Enrichment Concepts and principles
for enumeration
lt 1 CFU/ml
gt 3 CFU/ml
pathogen
pre-enrichment broth
competitor
carcass part
10
Whole Sample EnrichmentStandard Curve for
Enumeration
Oscar, T. P. (2004) J. Food Prot. 67(6)1201-1208.
11
Poultry Carcass MappingConcepts and Principles
Cornish Game Hen
12
Step 1Divide Carcass into 12 Parts
A Wing, left 41 g
B Wing, right 41 g
G Back, rib 67 g
D Breast, right front 60 g
C Breast, left front 62 g
E Breast, left back 35 g
F Breast, right back 37 g
I Thigh, left 48 g
J Thigh, right 50 g
H Back, sacral 77 g
K Drumstick, left 45 g
L Drumstick, right 48 g
13
Step 2Spot Inoculate with 1 to 106 CFU of a MDR
Salmonella
2 µl
5 µl
A Wing, left 0.5-1 log
B Wing, right 0.5-1 log
G Back, rib 3.5-4 log
D Breast, right front 1.5-2 log
C Breast, left front 1.5-2 log
A
B
G
D
C
E Breast, left back 2.5-3 log
F Breast, right back 2.5-3 log
F
E
H
J
I
I Thigh, left 4.5-5 log
J Thigh, right 4.5-5 log
L
K
H Back, sacral 3.5-4 log
K Drumstick, left 5.5-6 log
L Drumstick, right 5.5-6 log
14
Distribution of Salmonellain a 5 µl drop of a 3
log/ml diluted culture
Oscar, T. P. (2009) J. Food Prot. 72304-314
15
Step 3Incubate whole parts in 300 ml BPW at 40?C
and 100 rpm for 24 h
16
Step 4Sample and drop plate (2 µl) onto XLH-CATS
_at_ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 24 h
17
Step 5Incubate XLH-CATS plates _at_ 38?C for 24 h
18
Step 6Capture the Image
19
Step 7Convert to Monochrome Image
20
(No Transcript)
21
Step 8Count pixels
22
Step 9Determine Detection Time
23
Step 10Develop a Standard Curve
No 7.78 0.61 (0.995DT)
24
Limitation Only MDR strainsSolution Real-time
PCR or Impedance
25
Qualitative MapCornish Game Hen _at_ Retail
26
Qualitative Map
Obtain chickens from retail
Divide carcass into 12 parts
Incubate part in BPW (300 ml)
Transfer 0.1 ml of BPW enrichment to RV broth
B
A
Streak RV broth enrichment onto XLT4
G
D
C
F
E
Grow suspect colony in BHI broth
H
J
I
Store isolate at 70C
L
K
Serotype, R-type and pulsotype
27
Salmonella serotype Salmonella serotype Salmonella serotype Salmonella serotype Salmonella serotype Salmonella serotype
Antibiotic Resistance Profile Thompson Thompson Kentucky Typhimurium Glostrup Enteritidis n
Pansusceptable Pansusceptable 1 1 3 5 2.8
Ax-Am-Ce-Su-Te Ax-Am-Ce-Su-Te 1 136 137 75.7
Ax-Am-Ce-K-Su-Te Ax-Am-Ce-K-Su-Te 24 24 13.3
Am-Cm-Su-Te Am-Cm-Su-Te 7 7 3.9
Ax-Am-Ce-Te Ax-Am-Ce-Te 1 1 0.6
Ax-Am-Ce-Cef-Su-Te Ax-Am-Ce-Cef-Su-Te 1 1 0.6
G-Su-Te G-Su-Te 4 4 2.2
Ax-Am-Su-Te Ax-Am-Su-Te 1 1 0.6
Ax-Am-Ce-Cef-K-Su-Te Ax-Am-Ce-Cef-K-Su-Te 1 1 0.6
n 1 1 2 171 4 3 181
0.6 0.6 1.1 94.5 2.2 1.7    
28
(No Transcript)
29
Parts 181/840 (21.5) Carcasses 40/70
(57.1) 37 different patterns
30
April 17, 2006
April 25, 2006
May 22, 2006
A
B
A
B
A
B
Pos.
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
Neg.
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
May 30, 2006
June 5, 2006
June 12, 2006
A
B
A
B
A
B
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
31
April 17, 2006
April 25, 2006
May 22, 2006
Pos.
G Back, rib Thompson Pansusceptable
L Drumstick, right Kentucky AxAmCeSuTe
C Breast, left front Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
Neg.
B
B
B
A
A
A
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
32
(No Transcript)
33
October 16, 2006
A Wing, left Typhimurium Pansusceptable
G Back, rib Typhimurium AxAmCeKSuTe
Pos.
C Breast, left front Kentucky AxAmCeTe
B
A
Neg.
G
D
C
F
E
H
J
I
L
K
n 33 with gt 1 contaminated part n 33 with gt 1 contaminated part
Serotype 12.1 (4/33)
Ab resistance pattern 33.3 (11/33)
PFGE pattern 100 (33/33)
34
Nov. 6, 2006
Nov. 13, 2006
Nov. 27, 2006
A
B
A
B
A
B
Pos.
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
Neg.
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
Dec. 4, 2006
Dec. 4, 2006
Jan. 8, 2006
A
B
A
B
A
B
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
35
Dec. 4, 2006
Pos.
A Wing, left Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
B Wing, right Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
G Back, rib Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
Neg.
B
A
G
D
C
F
E
H
J
I
L
K
H Back, sacral Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
L Drumstick, right Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
PFGE patterns 100 similarity
36
Jan. 22, 2007
Feb. 5, 2007
Feb. 20, 2007
A
B
A
B
A
B
Pos.
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
Neg.
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
Feb. 26, 2007
March 12, 2007
March 5, 2007
A
B
A
B
A
B
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
37
March 5, 2007
Pos.
A Wing, left Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
B Wing, right Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
G Back, rib Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
Neg.
D Breast, right front Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
C Breast, left front Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
B
A
G
D
C
E Breast, left back Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
F Breast, right back Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
F
E
H
J
I
L
K
H Back, sacral Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
K Drumstick, left Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
L Drumstick, right Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
PFGE patterns 100 similarity
38
March 26, 2007
April 2, 2007
April 9, 2007
A
B
A
B
A
B
Pos.
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
Neg.
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
April 16, 2007
April 30, 2007
April 23, 2007
A
B
A
B
A
B
G
G
G
D
C
D
C
D
C
F
E
F
E
F
E
H
H
H
J
I
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
L
K
39
April 9, 2007
Pos.
B Wing, right Glostrup GSuTe
G Back, rib Glostrup GSuTe
Neg.
D Breast, right front Glostrup GSuTe
C Breast, left front Glostrup GSuTe
B
A
G
D
C
F
E
H
J
I
L
K
L Drumstick, right Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
40
(No Transcript)
41
April 2, 2008
April 9, 2008
Pos.
A Wing, left Typhimurium AxAmCeCefKSuTe
A Wing, left Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
Neg.
B
B
A
A
G
G
D
C
D
C
F
E
F
E
H
H
J
I
J
I
L
K
L
K
H Back, sacral Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
H Back, sacral Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
42
Pos.
Neg.
43
April 20, 2008
Pos.
Neg.
D Breast, right front Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
B
A
G
D
C
F
E
H
J
I
I Thigh, left Enteritidis Pansusceptable
L
K
H Back, sacral Typhimurium AxAmCeSuTe
44
Population Map (n 70)
Poultry Inspection WPE of all edible parts
A Wing, left 41 g 27.1
B Wing, right 41 g 24.3
G Back, rib 67 g 38.6
D Breast, right front 60 g 25.7
C Breast, left front 62 g 28.6
B
A
G
D
C
E Breast, left back 35 g 7.1
F Breast, right back 37 g 8.6
F
E
H
J
I
I Thigh, left 48 g 17.1
J Thigh, right 50 g 12.9
L
K
H Back, sacral 77 g 34.3
K Drumstick, left 45 g 10.0
L Drumstick, right 48 g 24.3
45
Wings versus Thighs
Fisher's exact test      
P value 0.0371    
P value summary    
One- or two-sided Two-sided    
Significant? (Plt0.05) Yes    
Data analyzed Positive Neg. Total
A B 36 104 140
I J 21 119 140
Total 57 223 280
Explanation Carcass hung upside down and washed
from back to front
46
Left versus Right Drumstick
Fisher's exact test      
P value 0.0420    
P value summary    
One- or two-sided Two-sided    
Significant? (Plt0.05) Yes    
Data analyzed Positive Neg. Total
K 7 63 70
L 17 53 70
Total 24 116 140
Explanation Viscera hung on right drumstick
47
Fine Map Sub-parts
Part code Part Weight, g Positive Total Incidence
Gskin Back, rib 5.2 0 6 0.0
Ginside 62.9 5 6 83.3
Explanation Contamination from crop
48
Future Mapping Research
  • Broilers and Turkeys
  • Other Plants
  • Process Steps
  • Sub-part maps
  • Other Pathogens
  • Other Foods
  • Quantitative

49
Take Home MessageCorrect Approach Accurate
Map Good Food Safety Decisions Improved Food
Safety
  • Location
  • Number
  • Types
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com