THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT: AVOIDING JAIL TIME - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT: AVOIDING JAIL TIME

Description:

Title: Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Impact on Auditors, Client Companies and Audit Committees Author: Licensed User Last modified by: Licensed User Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: Licens7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT: AVOIDING JAIL TIME


1
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT AVOIDING JAIL TIME
  • Presented to
  • Society of International Business Fellows
  • Atlanta, Georgia
  • January 28, 2004
  • Presented by
  • Robert F. Dow, Esq.
  • (404) 873-8706
  • Robert.Dow_at_agg.com
  • Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
  • 2800 One Atlantic Center
  • 1201 West Peachtree Street
  • Atlanta, Georgia 30309

2
Ways to Get in Deep Trouble under SOX
  • Enhanced criminal liability for document
    destruction
  • Liability for retaliation against informants
  • Liability for signing false certifications
    (public co.s)
  • Notice of defined contribution plan blackout
    periods
  • Enhanced penalties for securities fraud
  • Enhanced liability for white-collar crime
  • Improper influence on auditors (public co.s)

3
DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION
4
Document Destruction
SOX Section 802 expands criminal liability for
document destruction
  • Knowingly destroy
  • Any records/documents
  • With intent to impede
  • Any investigation or case
  • - or in contemplation of a case

5
Document Destruction(contd)
  • Destruction, alteration, or falsification of
    records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy
  • Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates,
    conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false
    entry in any record, document, or tangible object
    with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence
    the investigation or proper administration of any
    matter within the jurisdiction of any department
    or agency of the United States or any case filed
    under title 11 bankruptcy, or in relation to or
    contemplation of any such matter or case, shall
    be fined under this title, imprisoned not more
    than 20 years, or both.

6
Tampering with Evidence
Section 802 amends 18 U.S.C. 1102 titled
Tampering with a Record or Otherwise Impeding an
Official Proceeding
  • to provide that whoever corruptly alters,
    destroys, mutilates or conceals a record,
    document or other object, or attempts to do so,
    with the intent to impair the objects integrity
    or availability for use in an official federal
    agency or judicial proceeding, or who otherwise
    obstructs any official proceeding, or attempts to
    do so, shall be fined under Title 18 or
    imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

7
Tampering with Evidence (contd)
SOX 802 also creates another new statute, 18
U.S.C. 1520, entitled Destruction of corporate
audit records, which provides that
  1. Any accountant who conducts an audit of an issuer
    of securities to which section 10A(a) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applies, shall
    maintain all audit or review workpapers for a
    period of 5 years from the end of the fiscal
    period in which the audit or review was concluded.

8
Recent Enforcement Actions Ernst Young/Next
Card
  • NextCard under examination by banking regulators
  • Ernst Young partner orders altering of
    workpapers to show more support for accounting
  • Also destroyed emails and documents from hard
    drive
  • Two Ernst Young managers barred from practicing
    before SEC
  • Partner faces criminal charges with up to 20
    years and 250,000 in fines

9
  • SECURITIES FRAUD

10
SOX 807 creates a new general securities fraud
statute, 18 U.S.C. 1348, entitled Securities
fraud, which provides that Whoever knowingly
executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or
artifice -
  1. To defraud any person in connection with any
    security of an issuer with a class of securities
    registered under section 12 of the Exchange Act
    or that is required to file reports under section
    15(d) of the Exchange Act or

11
  • To obtain, by means of false or fraudulent
    pretenses, representations, or promises, any
    money or property in connection with the purchase
    or sale of any security of an issuer with a class
    of securities registered under section 12 of the
    Exchange Act or that is required to file reports
    under section 15 (d) of the Exchange Act
  • shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned
    not more than 25 years, or both.

12
  • CIVIL LIABILITY
  • WHISTLEBLOWER
  • PROVISIONS

13
SOX Whistleblower Provisions
  • Civil remedies for retaliation against employees
    reporting securities fraud to company
    supervisors, law enforcement or Congress (Section
    806)
  • Criminal remedies for retaliation against
    informants reporting violations of any federal
    law to law enforcement (Section 1107)

14
Section 806 Who is Potentially Liable?
  • Officers
  • Employees
  • Contractors
  • Subcontractors
  • Agents

15
Section 806 What Actions are Protected
  • Providing information or otherwise assisting in
    an investigation OR
  • Filing, testifying, participating in or otherwise
    assisting in a proceeding that is
  • Filed or
  • About to be filed (with any knowledge of the
    employer)

16
Section 806 What Investigations are Covered
  • Investigations involving violations of
  • Federal criminal law involving securities fraud,
    mail fraud, bank fraud, or wire, radio and
    television fraud
  • SEC rules or regulations, or
  • Federal law relating to fraud against
    shareholders

17
Section 806 Blowing the Whistle To Whom?
  • Federal regulatory or law enforcement agency
  • Any member or committee of Congress
  • Persons working for the employer
  • Supervisory authority over employee
  • Authority to investigate, discover or terminate
    misconduct

18
Murray v. TXU Corp. et al. (Texas April 2003)
  • Allegations in Murrays complaint
  • Murray was SVP of Capital Management
  • TXU had aggressive earnings targets
  • CFO engaged in earnings management
  • TXU didnt disclose exposures in trading markets
  • Murray made numerous objections to management
  • Murray was terminated 8/1/02

19
Collins v Beazer Homes(Georgia March 2003)
  • Allegations in Collins complaint
  • Beazer was taking deposits on homes but
    misapplying the funds for other purposes
  • Collins suspected that Beazer division management
    was receiving kickbacks from a contractor
  • Collins complained to corporate management
  • Division management immediately terminated her

20
  • Section 1107
  • CRIMINAL WHISTLEBLOWER PENALTIES

21
Section 1107 Criminal Penalties Overview
  • Very broad application
  • Applies to public and private companies
  • Whistleblowing of violations of any federal law
  • Employers and their agents may face
  • Fines up to 500,000 (250,000 for individuals)
  • Imprisonment up to 10 years

22
Section 1107 Who is Protected?
  • Any person!!

23
Section 1107 What Action is Protected?
  • Providing to a law enforcement officer
  • Any truthful information relating to
  • The commission or possible commission
  • Of any federal offense

24
Section 1107 What Retaliation is Prohibited?
  • Any harmful action (!)
  • Including but not limited to! interference
    with
  • Lawful employment
  • Livelihood

25
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reward Effective
Compliance Program
  • Compliance standards and procedures reasonably
    capable of reducing the prospect of criminal
    activity
  • Oversight by high-level personnel
  • Due care in delegating substantial discretionary
    authority
  • Effective communication to all levels of employees

26
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reward Effective
Compliance Program (contd)
  • Reasonable steps to achieve compliance, which
    include systems for monitoring, auditing, and
    reporting suspected wrongdoing without fear of
    reprisal
  • Consistent enforcement of compliance standards
    including disciplinary mechanisms
  • Reasonable steps to respond to and prevent
    further similar offenses upon detection of a
    violation

27
  • LIABILITY FOR SIGNING FALSE CERTIFICATIONS

28
CEO/CFO Certification
  • Two separate CEO/CFO certifications for periodic
    reports Section 302 and Section 906
  • Both sections require the CEO and CFO to include
    a certification for each annual or quarterly
    report of the issuer
  • Section 906 imposes criminal sanctions
  • Section 302 is a civil provision implemented by
    SEC regulations issued in August 2002

29
SOX 906 Criminal Liability
Must certify
  • The periodic report containing the financial
    statements fully complies with the requirements
    of the Securities Exchange Act and that
    information contained in the periodic report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of
    the issuer.

Penalties False 10 years/1M Willful 20
years/5M
30
SOX 302 Certification
The SEC regulations under Section 302 requires
the CEO and CFO to certify in each periodic
report regarding
  • Financial and other information included in the
    report
  • The establishment, maintenance and evaluation of
    disclosure controls and procedures
  • Internal control disclosures must be made to
    auditors and AC
  • Evaluation of internal controls and any changes
    thereto must be disclosed to auditors and AC

31
SOX 302Certification(contd)
Does the company require management below CEO/CFO
to sign sub-certifications? Percent of
respondents to survey who said yes
  • Controller/CAO 68
  • Financial reporting personnel 68
  • Treasury personnel 54
  • Risk management 32

Source Deloitte Touche Survey of Consumer
Business Companies, November 2002
32
Recent Enforcement Actions SEC v. David
  • Irving Paul David was CFO of one investment fund
    and controller of another related fund (Smith
    Barney World Fund)
  • David embezzled a total of 47k from two funds
  • David signed a certification stating he had
    disclosed to the auditors and audit committee any
    fraud, whether material or not, involving
    management
  • U.S. Attorney charged him with embezzlement
  • SEC charged him for false certification

33
Recent Enforcement Actions Legato Systems
  • Legato recorded income when customer (Logicon)
    not committed to pay
  • Side letter
  • Logicon has right to cancel
  • Cancellation provision omitted from purchase
    order because of impact on revenue recognition
  • SEC charges its CFO and two sales executives
  • SEC also charges Logicons VP of sales with
    aiding and abetting

34
  • ENHANCED LIABILITY AND CRIMINAL PROVISIONS

35
Statute of Limitations for Securities Fraud
  • Section 804 amends 28 U.S.C. 1658 by adding
    subsection (b), which extends the statute of
    limitations for private rights of action
    involving claims of fraud, deceit, manipulation
    or contrivance in contravention of a regulatory
    requirement concerning the securities laws, to
    the earlier of (i) 2 years formerly 1 year
    after discovery of the facts constituting the
    violation or (ii) 5 years after such violation
    formerly 3 years.

36
Penalty Enhancements
  • Section 902 creates new Section 1349, Attempt and
    Conspiracy, to Title 18 of the U.S. Code,
    providing that those persons who attempt or
    conspire to commit certain fraud offenses will be
    subject to the same penalties as those prescribed
    for the offense
  • Section 903 increases the maximum penalties for
    mail and wire fraud from five years to 20 years
    imprisonment

37
Penalty Enhancements(cont d)
  • Section 904 increases the criminal penalties for
    ERISA violations from one year to 10 years
    imprisonment and up to 500,000 in fines
  • Section 1106 amends Section 32(a) of the Exchange
    Act to raise the maximum individual penalties
    from 1 million and 10 years imprisonment to 5
    million and 20 years imprisonment, and to raise
    the maximum corporate fine from 2.5 million to
    25 million

38
  • Improper Influence On Auditors

39
Improper Influence on Auditors
New SEC rules say that officers may not
fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or
mislead an independent auditor
  • To issue a report that is not warranted in the
    circumstances
  • Not to perform procedures required by GAAS
  • Not to withdraw a report
  • Not to communicate with AC

40
What is Improper Influence?
SEC says the following may be improper influence
  • Offering or paying bribes or other financial
    incentives, including offering future employment
  • Providing an auditor with inaccurate or
    misleading legal analysis
  • Threatening to cancel existing non-audit or audit
    engagements if the auditor objects to the
    issuers accounting
  • Seeking to have a partner removed from the audit
    engagement because the partner objects to the
    issuers accounting
  • Blackmailing, and
  • Making physical threats

41
  • Section 306
  • ERISA BLACKOUT PROVISIONS

42
Blackout Notices
  • Administrative Information
  • Final regulations issued by DOL on January 24,
    2003
  • Regulations are effective for Blackout Periods
    beginning on or after January 26, 2003

43
Blackout Notices(contd)
  • Blackout Period Defined
  • Any period of more than three consecutive
    business days during which the ability of
    participants or beneficiaries in an individual
    account plan to direct or diversify assets
    credited to their accounts or to obtain loans or
    distributions from the plan is temporarily
    suspended, limited, or restricted.

44
Blackout Notices(contd)
  • Typical Blackout Period Scenarios
  • Change in service providers (e.g., third-party
    recordkeepers)
  • Change in payroll systems, vendors, or software
  • Changing investment options

45
Blackout Notices(contd)
  • Content of Notice
  • Reason(s) for the Blackout Period
  • Identification of the investments and/or rights
    affected by the Blackout Period
  • Expected beginning and ending dates for the
    Blackout Period (specific dates or calendar
    weeks)
  • If investments are affected, a statement advising
    evaluation of appropriateness of current
    investment decisions in light of inability to
    direct or diversify during Blackout Period

46
Blackout Notices(contd)
  • Content of Notice
  • If Notice is not provided 30 days in advance of a
    Blackout Period, a statement that 30-day advance
    notice is generally required and an explanation
    as to why notice was not given
  • Name, address, and phone number of contact
    person/department for questions
  • Notice must be written so that it can be
    understood by the average participant
  • DOL has provided a model notice
  • Not required, but its use satisfies certain safe
    harbors

47
Blackout Notices(contd)
  • Form and Distribution of Notice
  • In writing
  • Distributed to affected participants and
    beneficiaries in any manner permitted under ERISA
    (including electronic media)
  • Must be mailed (or sent electronically) by the
    distribution deadline (need not be received by
    the deadline)
  • Must be sent to the participants or
    beneficiaries last known addresses

48
Blackout Notices(contd)
  • Timing of Notice
  • At least 30 calendar days, but not more than 60
    calendar days, prior to the last day on which the
    participants or beneficiaries may exercise the
    affected rights
  • Example Trading permitted 1 x per month on last
    day of month Blackout Period 6/20 7/15
    (i.e., no trades on 6/30) last day to exercise
    rights is 5/31 thus, Notice must be provided
    30-60 days prior to 5/31 (i.e., no later than
    5/1)

49
Blackout Notices(contd)
  • Civil Penalties
  • Civil penalty for administrators failure to
    provide timely Blackout Notices
  • DOL may assess up to 100 per day, per
    participant or beneficiary
  • Penalty period begins on the last date the Notice
    could have been properly filed and ends on the
    date the Blackout Period ends
  • Personal, joint and several liability of plan
    administrator
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com