Title: Starting/Discussion questions
1 2Starting/Discussion questions
- What does adaptation mean for you? How is it
related to translation? - What approach does McFarlane take in analyzing
filmic adaptation?
3Outline
- Novel and Film
- Three Different Approaches to Filmic Adaptations
- (Structuralist) Critical Approaches
4Novel and Film
5Novel Film (1) major differences
- Conrad My task which 1 am trying to achieve is,
by the powers of the written word, to make you
hear, to make you feel--it is, before all, to
make to see. (qtd in McFarlane 3) - // D. W. Griffith
- Novel mental image ? physical details
- Film visual image (George Bluestone) ? stories
6Novel Film (2) Continuity
- Late 19th century fiction its ostensibly
unmediated visual language (5) - Conrad and James -- anticipate the cinema in
their capacity - for decomposing a scene,
- for altering point of view so as to focus more
sharp1y on various aspects of an object - for exploring a visual field by fragmenting it
rather than by presenting it scenographically - modern novels (such as those of Proust and Woolf)
influenced by cinema montage (ref. Cohen)
7Novel Film (3) Analogy difference
- Dickens-Griffith connection
- Eisenstein discusses narrative techniques
analogous to frame composition and close-up - McFarlane critics tend to focus too much on
their similarities in themes or narrative
patterns, - But not analyzing in details
- Possible parallels and disparities between the
two different signifying systems, - the range of functional equivalents available
to each within the parameters of the classical
style as evinced in each medium.
8Novel Film (4) influence difference
- Modern novels (as well as Death of a Salesman,
Equus, or M. Butterfly) and films - Influences from film montage, split screen,
flashbacks - less easily adaptable to films Do you agree?
- they have lost a good deal of their fluid
representations of time and space when
transferred to the screen. - the suture device of the classic narrative film
shot/reverse shot (image source) - The spectator becomes aware of the off-screen
space of frame and absent space of A and
stitched into the film
B
A
A
B
9Story told vs. Story Presented
- two language systems codes and their processes
of encoding and decoding - Different functions of the codes (one
symbolically, and the other through interaction) - tense films cannot present actions in the past
the way novels do. - films spatiality gives it a physical presence
denied to novels (29)
10Three Different approaches
11Adaptation The Phenomenon
- different considerations and approaches
- commercialism, respect for lit. work
- 3 approaches visual transliteration, selective
interpretation, re-creating an established mood.
- a readers phantasy of what the novel looks like.
? common response violation of the original - still there is an urge to embody verbal concepts
? more than 3/4 of Oscars best pictures were
adaptations (Morris Beja qtd in McFarlane 8)
12Three major approaches to Adaptation
fidelity Partial revision Creative
(1) Transposition commentary analogy
(2) Fidelity of transformation intersection Borrowing
(3) Fidelity to the main thrust Significantly reinterpreting Source as raw materials only
Sources (1) (2) (3)
13Three major approaches to Adaptation
fidelity Partial revision Creative
BBC Shakespeare or Jane Austen --Mansfield Park by Patricia Rozema --Mulan (Disney) The Hours (Mrs. Dalloway)
Conditions of production ideologies Appropriation for the present?
-- The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008 F.
Scott Fitzgerald) -- Girls, Interrupted ( Susanna
Kaysen's memoir) -- Blade Runner (Philip K. Dick
... (novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric
Sheep?") -- The Shawshank Redemption (1994
Stephen King (short story "Rita Hayworth and
Shawshank Redemption")
14(1) Fidelity
15(2) Revision Mary Shelleys Frankenstein (1994)
- To complicate the issue of creation
16(3) Creative adaptation
- Issues
- Respectful adaptation or a pastiche?
- Conditions of production (p. 10)
- Supporting which ideologies?
Chimes at Midnight Shakespeares Lover etc.
17Critical Approaches
- 1) The Centrality of Narrative (the chief
transferrable element) - e.g. the plot of embourgeoisement (p. 12)
- Roland Barthes distributional and integrational
functions
Transferrable Distributional --doing Function proper -- cardinal (turning points) and catylyzer
Adapting Integrational --being Indices proper (characters and atmosphere) -- adaptable informants (concrete data -- transferreable
18First-Person narration
- (a) subjective cinema
- a consistently subjective perspective is less
likely while cinema may be more agile and
flexible in changing the physical point of view
from which an event or object is seen, it is much
less amenable to the presentation of a consistent
psychological viewpoint derived from one
character (16). - (b) oral narration and voice-over
- Ones sense of the characters still come more
from his/her action than from his/her comments.
different from the first-person narrative
fiction
19Restricted Consciousness
- Or center of consciousness
- there is always a narrator looking over their
shoulder, in the way that the camera may view
action over the shou1der of a character in the
foreground of a shot, giving the viewer both the
character' s point of view and a slightly wider
point of view which includes the character (19).
20Omniscient novel? film
- Attributed to various characters in direct speech
- the narrative, or the apparently authoritative
metalanguage, that surrounds the characters - -- an issue the cameras mise-en-scene serving
narrational function? - --Yes and no. The camera is not part of the film
as an omniscient narrator is of a novel. (pp.
17-18)
21Terms of Structuralist narratology a review
- Story and discourse
- enunciation and enunciated
- character function and fields of action
- Mythic and psychological pattern
- Linearity and spatiality
- frame and its spatial impact (richer than a
word) - the frame is not a discrete entity as a word is
- Codes
22References
- McFarlane, Brian. Part I Backgrounds, Issues,
and a New Agenda. Novel Into Film An
Introduction to the Theory of Adaptation. Oxford
UP, 1996. - Suture. Cinema Studies The Key Concepts.
Works mentioned by McFarlane - George B1uestones Novels into Film
- Alan Spiegel' s Fiction and the Camera Eye
- Keith Cohen' s Film and Fiction.
- Eisensteins discussion of Dickens cinematic
technique - (1) Geoffrey Wagner, The Novel and the Cinema
(Fairleigh Dickinson University Press
Rutherford, NJ, 1975), 222. - (2) Dudley Andrew, 'The Well-Worn Muse
Adaptation in Film History and Theory' , in Syndy
Conger and Janice R. Welsch (eds.), Narrative
Strategies ( West Illinois University Press
Macomb, Ill., 1980), 10. - (3) Michael Klein and Gillian Parker (eds.), The
English Novel and the Movies ( Frederick Ungar
Publishing New York, 1981), 9-10.