In-medium Hadrons Properties, Interaction and Formation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

In-medium Hadrons Properties, Interaction and Formation

Description:

Title: Folie 1 Author: Ulrich Mosel Last modified by: Umo Created Date: 5/17/2006 3:24:24 PM Document presentation format: Bildschirmpr sentation Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Ulrich93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In-medium Hadrons Properties, Interaction and Formation


1
In-medium Hadrons Properties, Interaction and
Formation
  • L. Alvarez-Ruso, Thomas Falter, Kai Gallmeister,
    T. Leitner,
  • Ulrich Mosel, Pascal Mühlich

2
Why study in-medium hadrons?
  • In-medium properties may signal exotic states of
    nuclear matter (e.g. QGP, chirally restored
    phase)
  • ?need baseline effects in normal nuclear matter
  • Mesons in medium can give infos on meson-nucleon
    interactions through selfenergies
  • Nucleus as a microdetector
  • access to production- and formation-times in
    quark-fragmentation, color transparency

3
Experiments
  • Observe outgoing nucleons, mesons, photons,
    dileptons, ...
  • A A GSI, AGS, SPS, RHIC, LHC
  • p A COSY
  • ? A GSI (HADES)
  • ?() A MAMI, ELSA, JLAB, HERMES incoherent
    photo- and electroproduction of hadrons on nuclei
    from 100 MeV (MAMI, ELSA) over few GeV (JLAB) to
    20 GeV (HERMES)
  • ? A in LBL neutrino experiments
  • Need to understand connection between in-medium
    property and final observable!

4
In-medium changes experiment 2000
explained by spectral change of ? meson in dense,
(hot) matter
  • Evidence for QGP at CERN Invariant
    (ee-) mass spectrum
  • Total photoabsorption cross section

5
In-medium changes experiment 2003Jet Quenching
  • evidence for QGP at RHIC
  • Related Photonuclear Effect at HERMES

6
Hadron Properties in Medium Theory
  • QCD Sum Rules for Vector Mesons
  • Hadronic Models
  • Connection with Experiment

7
QCD Sum Rule
  • Compare spectral function in time-like region
    with OPE of current-correlator for space-like
    distances
  • Lhs dominated by soft scale m?
  • Rhs separates hard scale Q2 from soft scale
    (condensates)

8
? spectral function in medium
QCDSR-allowed (?,m) at saturation density
QCD Sum Rules provide constraints, but do not fix
in-medium hadron props
Leupold et al, Phys.Rev.C582939-2957,1998
Need hadronic model
9
Medium Effects
  • on baryon resonances
  • Fermi-motion ?
    ?
  • meson decay ? ?
  • N ? N meson
    (Pauli blocking)
  • collisional broadening ? ?
  • NN ? NN
  • quenching
    reduction of
  • NN ? NN
    meson yield
  • N-propagation, self energy mass /
    width
  • on mesons
  • absorption/rescattering
  • modified meson-meson interaction
  • partial chiral symmetry restoration ?

10
Rho meson in matterResonance-hole model
  • Transverse
  • Longitudinal

Post et al., 2004
D13(1520) and ? (2?) strongly mixed
11
Observables Theoretical Method
  1. Calculate hadronic properties in equilibrium
    nuclear matter
  2. Calculate elementary production cross section, in
    vacuo and in matter, formation times determined
    by resonance lifetimes or string-fragmentation
    times
  3. Propagate produced particles out from production
    to detector, including all FSI and CC effects.

12
Theoretical Method for FSI (and ISI) BUU CC
Transport Model
  • Off-shell CCBUU Equation for spectral phase
    space density

with
  1. In-medium changes can be modelled in H
    (selfenergies) and in Icoll (reaction rates,
    form. times, prehadron cross sections)
  2. Experimental acceptance can be simulated event by
    event

13
Consequences of in-medium change
  • Broad ? spectral function explains
  • Absence of nucleon resonances in total
    photoabsorption cross sections on nuclei
  • D13(1520) couples to ?,
  • ? broad with strength at low
  • masses ? opens phase-space
  • for decay of D13
  • Dilepton spectra in URHICs

free D13
14
In-medium effects

QE
?
15
Nucleon Knockout at
wo FSI
w FSI
16
? in Medium
Theory P. Muehlich et al
? m -0.15 ?/?0 put in by hand
17
? in Medium
transverse
Very little mass change from hadronic resonance-ho
le models Collisional broadening ¼ 60-70 MeV
from t? approx with K-matrix parameters
longitudinal
Inelastic width ? transparency
18
Nuclear Transparency for ?
Depends crucially on inelastic ? Method to
measure ?_inel
P. Muehlich, U. Mosel Nucl. Phys. A (2006) In
press. E? 1.5 GeV
Crucial Input inelastic omega-N cross section
19
Formation times
  • At low energies, resonance regime
  • tf lifetime of resonance ? N hadron
  • At high energies, QCD regime,
  • tf from string-fragmentation

20
Transparency at high energies determined by quark
fragmentation
Hermes condition ? 14 GeV, Q2 2.5 GeV2
21
Prehadron cross sections
22
EMC and Hermes Transparency
23
Attenuation of Identified Hadrons
Red absorption only Blue with CC and
rescattering
  • Essential to know what happens to hadrons
  • after attenuation
  • distinguish between energy-loss
  • and absorption

T. Falter et al., PRC
24
JLAB 5 GeV 12 GeV
CLAS acceptance corrected
Strong nuclear effects Fermi motion, stronger
overpopulation of low z
25
Summary - Conclusions
  • Essential problem link of in-medium props to
    observables ? FSI must be part of theory
  • Models of attenuation have to describe not only
    that leading hadrons disappear, but also where
    they go ? separate energy loss from absorption
  • In-medium changes seem to be established
  • CERES, NA60, TAPS/CB, Photoabs., hadron
    attenuation
  • Transport is now reliable for a wide class of
    reactions

26
Why study in-medium hadrons?
  • Interior of stars depends on properties of
    hadrons at high density

27
Why study in-medium hadrons?
  • Density may restore symmetries of QCD
  • Drop of condensates
  • Degeneracy of chiral partnersm? /to m?

T
?
28
Gold-plated Observables
explained by spectral change of ? meson in
dense/hot matter ?
29
Theoretical Method for FSI BUU CC transport model
  • Same Method for Same Physics
  • Photonuclear reactions ? A
  • Hadronic reactions ?,p A
  • Heavy-ion reactions A A
  • Resonance and Continuum Region treated
  • Resonance Decays from data
  • Continuum Decays from String Fragmentation

30
Observables
  • Experiment
  • weak ISI ? ? best to reach nuclear interior,
  • but entrance formfactors often not well known,
  • ? like ?, because of shadowing
  • FSI
  • Hadronic, e.g. ? ! KK- difficult
  • Semihadronic, e.g. ? ! ?0 ? possible
  • Electromagnetic, e.g. ? ! ee- best

31
Observables Theoretical Method
  • Entrance Channel
  • For Photons Quantum Coherence Shadowing
  • Primary Production
  • Resonance Decay or String-Fragmentation (PYTHIA)
  • Exit Channel
  • Incoherent Final State Interactions (Absorption
    Scattering Side-Feeding), Propagation with
    self-energies and interactions through resonances
    or fragmentation, coupled channels!? products of
    gA reaction need not be created in
    primary gN reaction

32
Production and Formation Times? 14 GeV, Q2
2.5 GeV2
33
With prehadronic FSI
Formation times in restframe ¼ 0.5 fm
34
Transparency

Attenuation involves powers of L and L2
35
Color Transparency (?)
  • Glauber
  • CBUU

T. Falter et al, Phys.Rev.C67054606,2003
36
Off-shell Transport
? in-medium mass
Can be derived from Kadanoff-Baym eqs. (Leupold
Cassing), drives particles back to mass-shell
when they leave the nucleus
37
? Photo-Production on nuclei
  • S11(1535)
  • small in-medium
  • change for p0,
  • sizeable momen-
  • tum dependence
  • of self-energy.

J. Lehr et al, Phys.Rev.C68044601,2003
38
? in Medium
  • ? ! ? ?0 (TAPS_at_ELSA)

Background from 2?0 ! 4 ?,one escapes with p(?)
39
Photo-pion production on nuclei
  • TAPS Data on p0 production

Theory Lehr et al
Data Krusche et al, Eur.Phys.J.A22347-351,2004

40
Chiral Symmetry Restoration
  • Expected s-p degenerate in chiral limit
  • ? shift of s -gt 2? strength to lower masses

Connection to Observables??
41
Chiral Symmetry Restoration2?0 Production on
Nuclei
  • Expected s-p degenerate
  • in chiral limit ? shift of s -gt 2? strength
  • to lower masses

TAPS data, E? 400 500 MeV
42
FSI on 2? in Nuclei
43
Expecteds-p degenerate in chiral limit ? shift
of s strength to lower masses
2? production sites
44
Nucleus as MicrodetectorHigh Energy ? Production
Processes
  • Diffractive VMD-Event
  • Main contribution to
  • exclusive ?0-production
  • Deep inleastic scattering,
  • Jets
  • How long does it take to form a hadron?

45
2?0 Production on Nuclei
P. Muehlich et al, Nucl.Phys.A703393-408,2002
46
2?0 Production on Nuclei
  • Chiral symmetry restoration??

47
Neutrino-nucleus scattering
  • Fermi motion
  • Pauli blocking
  • Nuclear binding
  • In-medium D width
  1. Elementary reactions
  2. In-medium modifications of the elementary cross
    sections
  3. Propagation of the final state X FSI

48
Nucleon knockout
  • Enhancement due to secondary interactions
  • ( , , )

49
pT Spectra
Cronin ???
50
Without prehadronic FSI
  • charged hadrons

prehadronic interactions needed
51
Jlab at 12 GeV
CLAS acceptance modelled
T. Falter, PhD thesis, Giessen, 2004
C Fe Pb
52
Introduction
  • Neutrino nucleus interactions are relevant for
  • Oscillation experiments systematic uncertainties
  • Hadron structure
  • In-medium modifications
  • Experiments MINERnA, FINeSSE with a high
    intensity n beam
  • neutrino fluxes
  • backgrounds
  • detector responses
  • nucleon axial form factor
  • N-R axial transitions
  • strangeness in the nucleon spin
  • form factors
  • spectral functions
  • nuclear correlations

Understanding nuclear effects is essential for
the interpretation of the data and represents
both a challenge and an opportunity
53
Inclusive cross section
D
QE
54
Pion production
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com