Water Quality

1
Water Quality
2
Water quality problems in developing countries

• Evidence from the WHO
• In 2003, an estimated 1.6 million deaths
  worldwide were caused by unsafe drinking water
  and sanitation
• 90 of these deaths were among children under age
  five
• 1.1 billion people dont have access to improved
  water sources
• 2.4 billion people dont have access to improved
  sanitation
• Source www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wsh040
  4/en/

3
Water quality problems in developing countries

• Biggest water quality problem in developing
  countries is the threat of infectious diarrhea
  caused by water-borne diseases.
• If there was a 50 reduction in the number of
  people lacking access to in-house piped water and
  sewer connections with partial treatment of waste
  waters, the number of illnesses would be reduced
  by an average of 69 in affected regions.
• http//www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene
  /envsan/lookingback/en/

4
Water quality problems in the U.S.

• The Cuyahoga River Fire in 1969
• Floating debris and oil caught fire on the
  surface of the Cuyahoga River near downtown
  Cleveland in 1969.
• The Cuyahoga River had also ignited a couple of
  times in earlier years.
• The Cuyahoga River fire brought water-quality
  problems to the attention of the public and
  Congress.
• Photos http//www.cwru.edu/artsci/engl/marling/6
  0s/pages/richoux/Photographs.html

5
Water quality problems in the U.S.

• Cryptosporidium contamination in Milwaukee in
  1993
• Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite thats
  usually present at low levels in water supplies.
• An outbreak of cryptosporidium contamination in
  1993 in Milwaukee caused diarrhea, fever, and
  other symptoms for over 400,000 residents and
  killed more than 100.
• The contamination was traced to a water treatment
  plant that had inadequately filtered water from
  Lake Michigan.
• It is believed that the original source of the
  contamination was storm runoff from nearby farms.

6
Water quality problems in the U.S.

• Narrowing the focus
• Surface water pollution
• Groundwater pollution
• Types of surface water pollution
• Pollution from point sources
• Nonpoint-source pollution
• Regulation depends on designated uses of surface
  water
• Drinking water supply
• Recreational uses (such as swimming)
• Aquatic life support
• Fish consumption
• etc.

7
Examples of Water Contaminants

• Contaminants affecting human health
• Organic compounds (such as pesticides and
  gasoline)
• Heavy metals (such as mercury and lead)
• Pathogens (such as cryptosporidium)
• Contaminants affecting aquatic life
• Plant nutrients, including nitrate and phosphorus
  compounds
• Organic wastes, which lead to depletion of
  dissolved oxygen in the water

8
Federal Water Quality Legislation

• Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972
• Clean Water Act of 1977
• Water Quality Act of 1987
• The Year of Clean Water 2002-3

9
Water Quality Control An Overview

• Control of point-source pollution
• Federal government sets water-quality standards
• States create pollution-control programs to meet
  the standards
• Programs usually require polluters to install
  certain pollution-control technologies
• Subsidies for construction of Publicly Owned
  Treatment Works (POTWs)
• Control of non-point source pollution

10
Water Quality Control An Overview

• The effect that a particular effluent has on
  water quality depends on a number of factors such
  as
• biochemical oxygen demand in the effluent
• time of year and water temperature
• location of waste sources
• turbulence of water flow
• volume of water flow
• A perfect water pollution control policy would
  have to take all these factors into account.
  Since this is impractical, actual policies
  involve compromises.

11
The Oxygen Sag Curve
12
Water Treatment Facilities

• Since 1970 the federal government has spent over
  60 billion to subsidize construction of POTWs,
  and total spending by all levels of government
  has been over 200 billion.
• Evidence suggests that federal funding for POTW
  construction has largely just replaced local
  funding about 67 of construction would have
  taken place anyway.
• Federal subsidies provided perverse incentives at
  first
• Municipalities had an incentive to build POTWs
  that were too large.
• Federal funding didnt help to cover operating
  expenses and maintenance.
• But more responsibility has been shifted to local
  authorities.
• Progress has been significant
• http//www.epa.gov/owm/wquality/

13
Control of Other Point Sources

• Basic federal program National Pollutant
  Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
• Administered through a system of permits that set
  effluent limits but these permits are typically
  not tradable.
• Goal is zero discharge but limits are usually
  based largely on what level of control is
  technically feasible.
• Efficiency? Cost-effectiveness?
• EPA Envirofacts
• WDNR - WPDES Permit Program

14
Point-Source Control Other Options

• Effluent taxes or fees?
• In theory, this is could be an effective
  approach.
• Effluent taxes have been used in Europe, but the
  taxes are usually set too low to provide strong
  incentives to reduce pollution levels.
• Best example the Netherlands has used effluent
  fees as an effective pollution-control approach.
• Why not use effluent taxes?
• Political objections
• Concerns that taxed firms will face a competitive
  disadvantage
• Effluent taxes require careful monitoring of
  discharges

15
Point-Source Control Other Options

• Tradable effluent permits
• EPA gt Watersheds gt Trading gt Frequently Asked
  Questions About Water Quality Trading
• Advantages of effluent permit trading
• Cost-effectiveness
• Problems with effluent permit trading
• Hot spots?

16
Control of Pollution from Non-Point Sources

• Major remaining water pollution problem,
  especially in agricultural states like Wisconsin.
• Two important sources
• Agricultural runoff
• Storm runoff

17
Control of Pollution from Non-Point Sources

• Control of agricultural runoff the DNR provides
• Technical assistance to farmers
• Subsidies for improvements to prevent runoff
• Performance standards
• Control of storm runoff
• Storm runoff performance standards for industry,
  municipalities, and construction sites
• In Eau Claire, new businesses must pay fees based
  on their likely runoff.