Ben Bittrolff - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Ben Bittrolff

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: D Last modified by: Jennifer Drowns Created Date: 9/8/2004 11:34:22 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:142
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: D8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ben Bittrolff


1
Ben Bittrolff Mark Mitchell Andrea Ranalli Ryan
Ricci Sonia Varkey
2
Background
  • Worlds largest supplier of Database Management
    Software
  • Develops additional products including
    applications in financial reporting,
    manufacturing management, systems engineering and
    office automation
  • KSF strong RD and committed sales force

3
Problem Identification
  • In August 1990, the CEO of Oracle faced
    increasing pressure from analysts regarding the
    methods used to recognize revenue in its
    financial reports
  • Currently, Oracle recognizes any revenue that
    they BELIEVE will be shipped within the next
    twelve months
  • Industry Standard book only the revenue that
    has been shipped

4
Primary Stakeholders
  • Employees
  • Stockholders/Investors
  • Analysts
  • Clients
  • Financial Institutions (i.e. lending)

5
Analysis
  • Threat of New Entrants (MODERATE)
  • Legal barriers
  • Scale economies
  • 1st mover advantage
  • Rivalry Among Existing Firms (HIGH)
  • Growing industry
  • Product differentiation
  • High switching costs
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers (HIGH)
  • High switching costs
  • Alternative products
  • Quality and costs important
  • High volume purchase
  • Aggressive sales
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers (LOW)
  • Internally manufactured
  • Threat of Substitutes (MODERATE)
  • Similar price and performance
  • Willingness to switch
  • Disruptive technology

6
Competitive Advantage
  • Differentiation
  • Unique products and services
  • Investment in brand image and RD
  • Focus on innovation in RD and control systems
  • Product quality and variety

7
Aggressive Revenue Recognition Policy
  • Oracle recognizes revenue when a contract is
    signed
  • Effect
  • Revenue is recognized early
  • 162 days between recognition and collection

8
Oracles Assumptions
  • All major services have been performed
  • The contract is legally binding
  • Oracle can collect on the contracts
  • 453 million owed

9
Strengths
  • Aggressive revenue recognition exaggerates
    quarterly and annual growth
  • Meet or exceed analyst estimates. Affects stock
    performance
  • Appear to take market share. Affects customer
    buying decisions
  • Strengthens internal morale through performance
    bonuses
  • Management and sales force bonuses are larger (In
    the short run)

10
Weaknesses
  • Aggressive revenue recognition increases
    quarterly and annual revenue and profit
    volatility
  • Looser credits terms result in lower quality
    customers
  • Receivables are twice the level of competitors.
    Serious exposure
  • Must eventually write off non-performing accounts
  • Financial transparency is sacrificed
  • Management may loose credibility with analysts
    and investors
  • Negative effect on company valuation
  • Increase stock volatility
  • May have to periodically restate earnings
  • Could leave the company exposed to legal action.
    Class action suits

11
Opportunities
  • Convince analysts and investors that receivables
    are collectible
  • Demonstrate that appropriate financial
    constraints are in place
  • Announce and commence a stock repurchase program
  • Would send positive signal and increase confidence

12
Threats
  • Survivability
  • Reduced earnings from an accounting change could
    deter enough future customers to seriously affect
    real earnings
  • Impact on lending agreements. A change to more
    conservative account methods would result in
    Oracle violating lending covenants
  • Conservative accounting may inhibit Oracles
    ability to raise capital, especially for RD

13
Accounting Analysis
  • Accounting Policies
  • Recognize license revenue at time of product
    shipment or at time of agreement if customer is
    creditworthy
  • Recognize maintenance service revenue after
    services are performed on a proportionate basis
    over the maintenance period
  • Recognize consulting service revenue under the
    percentage of completion method
  • There is No Accounting Standard for Recognizing
    License Fee Revenues

14
Accounting Analysis
  • High level of days receivable (160 days vs 62 day
    average for industry)
  • Credit policy balances are to be paid/received
    within one year

15
Stop and Think
  • Oracles assumptions when recording revenue at
    time contract is signed
  • All major services have been performed
  • Contract is largely binding
  • Can collect the fees
  • Are their assumptions reasonable? Are there
    possible underlying forces influencing Oracles
    management
  • Aggressive sales policy putting pressure to grow
    sales
  • May be relying on customers that may cancel or
    not able to pay
  • Selling products that have defects

16
Rule of Thumb for Earnings Recognition
High Collection Risk
Low Collection Risk
Moderate Risk
Early Recognition
Usual Recognition
Late Recognition
Order Placed
Goods/Services Delivered
Cash Collected
17
Aggressive Revenue Recognition Risks
  • Customer default
  • Returns
  • Defects
  • Inability of Oracle to deliver product/service
  • Are contracts legally binding
  • ? These also double as risks of carrying high
    days receivables

18
Analyst Concerns
  • Oracles accounting practices might have played
    a role in the low net income results. The top
    line went up over 50, though net bottom line did
    not do so well . . . The companys aggressive
    revenue-recognition policy and relatively high
    amount of accounts receivables make the stock
    risky.

19
Analyst Concerns
  • Prefer Oracle to recognize licensing revenue when
    software is delivered rather than when contract
    is signed
  • Should recognize these revenues only when they
    can reasonably estimate the degree of
    collectibility of those revenues (receivables)

20
Management Concerns
  • Analysts opinions (credibility with investors)
  • Downturn in Oracles stock
  • Credibility with customers

21
Accounting Alternatives
  1. Change to more conservative accounting method but
    make no retroactive adjustment
  2. Change to more conservative accounting method and
    make retroactive adjustment
  3. Make no changes and wait for FASB to announce its
    position on software revenue recognition or
    vigorously defend its current policies

22
Impact of Revenue Recognition Change on Earnings
23
Impact of Revenue Recognition Change on Earnings
24
Impact of Revenue Recognition Change on Earnings
25
Factors to Consider with Accounting Change
  • Impact on Stock Price
  • If doesnt affect cash flow, should be no impact
    on share price
  • If investors feel accounting change is
    managements way of tackling some of Oracles
    problems (ex. Aggressive selling) ? share
    price
  • Could signal that management is not confident in
    value of receivables and revenue recognition
    assumptions ? share price

26
Factors to Consider with Accounting Change
  • Impact on Customers
  • Current customers might see change to accounting
    method that decreases net income as threat to
    Oracles long-term survival, impact services
    needs
  • Could deter future customers as future sales
    dependent on referrals/word of mouth

27
Factors to Consider with Accounting Change
  • Impact on Lending Agreements
  • If changes to more conservative accounting, will
    violate debt covenants?
  • If changes are retroactive, will violate
    covenants?
  • Oracle will have to look at options if accounting
    change violates debt covenants
  • Also, reduced EPS is less attractive to lenders
  • How to fund RD expenses in future?

28
Factors to Consider with Accounting Change
  • Impact on Management Compensation
  • Management does not have incentive to keep
    accounting policy as is. Compensation based on
    stock price, not EPS
  • If compensation tied to earnings or revenue then
    more conservative accounting would be resisted
  • CEO (Ellison) owns 26 Oracle stock

29
Recommendations
  • Alternatives
  • Change to more conservative accounting method but
    make no retroactive adjustment
  • Change to more conservative accounting method and
    make retroactive adjustment
  • Make no changes and wait for FASB to announce its
    position on software revenue recognition or
    vigorously defend its current policies
  • Consider Impact on
  • Managers
  • Lending Agreements
  • Customers
  • Stock Price

30
Actual Events Post 1990
  • August 27th, 1990 announced it would change
    method of recognizing revenues
  • Net Income (1990) would have dropped from
    117,410 to 83,654
  • 26 drop in stock price
  • September 9th, 1990
  • Loss of 27.4M for the first quarter
  • Laid of 10 of its domestic workforce
  • Initiation of Cash Collection program

31
Actual Events Continued
  • 1991 - Oracle uncovered errors in recording its
    revenues
  • A number of top executives were fired (i.e. CFO)
  • Changes to payment terms (bills now paid in 30
    days compared to 9 months)
  • Capital expenditures and hiring frozen
  • Replaced short-term debt with long-term financing
  • 1992 completed restructurings and returned to
    profitability with net income of 61.5M

32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com