Title: Exchange
1Exchange
- Molly W. Dahl
- Georgetown University
- Econ 101 Spring 2009
2Exchange
- Two consumers, A and B.
- Their endowments of goods 1 and 2 are
- E.g.
- The total quantities available
and
and
units of good 1
are
units of good 2.
and
3Starting an Edgeworth Box
Height
The dimensions ofthe box are thequantities
availableof the goods.
Width
4Feasible Allocations
- What allocations of the 8 units of good 1 and the
6 units of good 2 are feasible? - One feasible allocation is the before-trade
allocation - i.e. the endowment allocation.
5The Endowment Allocation
OB
6
OA
8
6The Endowment Allocation
OB
6
4
OA
6
8
7The Endowment Allocation
2
OB
2
6
4
OA
6
8
8The Endowment Allocation
2
OB
2
6
Theendowmentallocation
4
OA
6
8
9The Endowment Allocation
OB
Theendowmentallocation
OA
10Other Feasible Allocations
- denotes an allocation to consumer
A. - denotes an allocation to consumer
B. - An allocation is feasible if and only if
and
11Feasible Reallocation
OB
OA
12Feasible Reallocation
OB
OA
13Feasible Reallocations
- All points in the box, including the boundary,
represent feasible allocations of the combined
endowments.
14Feasible Reallocations
- All points in the box, including the boundary,
represent feasible allocations of the combined
endowments. - Which allocations will be blocked by one or both
consumers? - Which allocations make both consumers better off?
15Adding Preferences to the Box
For consumer A.
More preferred
OA
16Adding Preferences to the Box
For consumer B.
More preferred
OB
17Adding Preferences to the Box
For consumer B.
OB
More preferred
18Edgeworth Box
OB
OA
19Pareto-Improvement
- An allocation of the endowment that improves the
welfare of a consumer without reducing the
welfare of another is a Pareto-improving
allocation. - Where are the Pareto-improving allocations?
20Edgeworth Box
OB
OA
21Pareto-Improvements
OB
OA
The set of Pareto-improving allocations
22Pareto-Improvements
- Since each consumer can refuse to trade, the only
possible outcomes from exchange are
Pareto-improving allocations. - But which particular Pareto-improving allocation
will be the outcome of trade?
23Pareto-Improvements
OB
OA
The set of Pareto-improving reallocations
24Pareto-Improvements
25Pareto-Improvements
26Pareto-Improvements
Tradeimproves bothAs and Bs welfares.This is
a Pareto-improvementover the endowment
allocation.
27Pareto-Improvements
New mutual gains-to-trade region is the
set of all further Pareto-
improving
reallocations.
Tradeimproves bothAs and Bs welfares.This is
a Pareto-improvementover the endowment
allocation.
28Pareto-Improvements
Further trade cannot improve
both A and Bs
welfares.
29Pareto-Optimality
Better forconsumer A
Better forconsumer B
30Pareto-Optimality
Both A andB are worseoff
A is strictly better off but B is strictly
worse off
B is strictly betteroff but A is strictlyworse
off
Both Aand B are worse off
31Pareto-Optimality
The allocation isPareto-optimal since theonly
way one consumers welfare can be increased is
todecrease the welfare of the otherconsumer.
32Pareto-Optimality
An allocation where convexindifference curves
are only just back-to-back is
Pareto-optimal.
The allocation isPareto-optimal since theonly
way one consumers welfare can be increased is
todecrease the welfare of the otherconsumer.
33Pareto-Optimality
- Where are all of the Pareto-optimal allocations
of the endowment?
34Pareto-Optimality
All the allocations marked bya are
Pareto-optimal.
OB
OA
35Pareto-Optimality
- The contract curve is the set of all
Pareto-optimal allocations.
36Pareto-Optimality
All the allocations marked bya are
Pareto-optimal.
OB
OA
The contract curve
37Pareto-Optimality
- But to which of the many allocations on the
contract curve will consumers trade? - That depends upon how trade is conducted.
- In perfectly competitive markets? By one-on-one
bargaining?
38The Core
OB
OA
The set of Pareto-improving reallocations
39The Core
OB
OA
40The Core
Pareto-optimal trades blocked by B
OB
OA
Pareto-optimal trades blocked by A
41The Core
Pareto-optimal trades not blocked by A or B
are the core.
OB
OA
42The Core
- The core is the set of all Pareto-optimal
allocations that are welfare-improving for both
consumers relative to their own endowments. - Rational trade should achieve a core allocation.
43The Core
- But which core allocation?
- Again, that depends upon the manner in which
trade is conducted.
44Trade in Competitive Markets
- Consider trade in perfectly competitive markets.
- Each consumer is a price-taker trying to maximize
her own utility given p1, p2 and her own
endowment. That is, ...
45Trade in Competitive Markets
For consumer A.
OA
46Trade in Competitive Markets
- So given p1 and p2, consumer As net demands for
commodities 1 and 2 are
and
47Trade in Competitive Markets
For consumer B.
OB
48Trade in Competitive Markets
- So given p1 and p2, consumer Bs net demands for
commodities 1 and 2 are
and
49Trade in Competitive Markets
- A general equilibrium occurs when prices p1 and
p2 cause both the markets for commodities 1 and 2
to clear i.e.
and
50Trade in Competitive Markets
Can this PO allocation be achieved?
OB
OA
51Trade in Competitive Markets
Budget constraint for consumer A
OB
OA
52Trade in Competitive Markets
Budget constraint for consumer A
OB
OA
53Trade in Competitive Markets
OB
OA
Budget constraint for consumer B
54Trade in Competitive Markets
OB
OA
Budget constraint for consumer B
55Trade in Competitive Markets
OB
OA
But
56Trade in Competitive Markets
OB
OA
and
57Trade in Competitive Markets
- So at the given prices p1 and p2 there is an
- excess supply of commodity 1
- excess demand for commodity 2.
- Neither market clears so the prices p1 and p2 do
not cause a general equilibrium.
58Trade in Competitive Markets
So this PO allocation cannot be achieved by
competitive trading.
OB
OA
59Trade in Competitive Markets
Which PO allocations can beachieved by
competitive trading?
OB
OA
60Trade in Competitive Markets
- Since there is an excess demand for commodity 2,
p2 will rise. - Since there is an excess supply of commodity 1,
p1 will fall. - The slope of the budget constraints is
-p1/p2 so the budget constraints will pivot about
the endowment point and become less steep.
61Trade in Competitive Markets
Which PO allocations can beachieved by
competitive trading?
OB
OA
62Trade in Competitive Markets
Which PO allocations can beachieved by
competitive trading?
OB
OA
63Trade in Competitive Markets
Budget constraint for consumer A
OB
OA
64Trade in Competitive Markets
OB
OA
Budget constraint for consumer B
65Trade in Competitive Markets
OB
OA
So
66Trade in Competitive Markets
OB
OA
and
67Trade in Competitive Markets
- At the new prices p1 and p2 both markets clear
there is a general equilibrium. - Trading in competitive markets achieves a
particular Pareto-optimal allocation of the
endowments. - This is an example of the First Fundamental
Theorem of Welfare Economics.
68First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
- Given that consumers preferences are
well-behaved, trading in perfectly competitive
markets implements a Pareto-optimal allocation of
the economys endowment.
69Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
- The First Theorem is followed by a second that
states that any Pareto-optimal allocation (i.e.
any point on the contract curve) can be achieved
by trading in competitive markets provided that
endowments are first appropriately rearranged
amongst the consumers.
70Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
- Given that consumers preferences are
well-behaved, for any Pareto-optimal allocation
there are prices and an allocation of the total
endowment that makes the Pareto-optimal
allocation implementable by trading in
competitive markets.
71Second Fundamental Theorem
OB
OA
The contract curve
72Second Fundamental Theorem
OB
OA
73Second Fundamental Theorem
Implemented by competitive trading from the
endowment w.
OB
OA
74Second Fundamental Theorem
Can this allocation be implementedby competitive
trading from w?
OB
OA
75Second Fundamental Theorem
Can this allocation be implementedby competitive
trading from w? No.
OB
OA
76Second Fundamental Theorem
But this allocation is implementedby competitive
trading from q.
OB
OA