Restructuring Roundtable: Merchant vs Rate-Base - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Restructuring Roundtable: Merchant vs Rate-Base

Description:

Restructuring Roundtable: Merchant vs Rate-Base presented by Dan Allegretti The Basic Idea Merchant = Gooood!!!! Rate Base = Baaaad!!!! Benefits of Moving to Merchant ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: e44
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Restructuring Roundtable: Merchant vs Rate-Base


1
Restructuring Roundtable Merchant vs Rate-Base
  • presented by
  • Dan Allegretti

2
The Basic Idea
  • Merchant Gooood!!!!
  • Rate Base Baaaad!!!!

3
Benefits of Moving to Merchant Model
Utility-owned power plant
Merchant power plant
  • Three Main Benefits
  • Competitive forces lead to more efficient
    operation
  • Risk of generation plant cost over-runs shifted
    from captive ratepayers to merchant owner
    shareholders
  • Provide more efficient reliable power system

4
More Efficient Operation
  • Improved Generator Performance. Since Wholesale
    Restructuring, plant availability in New England
    has increased by 8, avoiding the construction of
    up to five 400 MW generating facilities.
  • Reduced Emission Rates. While electricity
    generation within New England increased 25
    between 1998 and 2004, associated SO2 rates
    decreased by 56, NOX by 57 and CO2 by 22.
  • Consumer Savings. Consumers have saved between
    6.5 and 7.6 billion between 1998 and 2005,
    based on projections of where prices would have
    trended in the absence of restructuring.

Source A Review of Electricity Industry
Restructuring in New England, Polestar
Communications and Strategic Analysis (for the
New England Energy Alliance), September 2006.
5
Less Ratepayer Risk
  • Example Duke Energy

U.S. power company Duke Energy on Thursday
significantly boosted its estimated cost for
building two proposed power plants, citing higher
material expenses and a shortage of skilled
labor. Chief Executive Jim Rogers said at a
press luncheon that the proposed clean-coal power
plant in Indiana may cost 2 billion, up from a
prior estimate of about 1 billion. The cost for
the proposed conventional coal plant in the
Carolinas has been increased to 3 billion from
2 billion, Rogers said.
Source Reuters, November 16, 2006.
6
Less Ratepayer Risk
  • Example Exelon

In 2003 Exelon Corp. turned over ownership of the
newly re-powered Mystic and Fore River generating
plants to its lenders. According to the Boston
business Journal Exelon had acquired the plants
from Sithe for a 543 million note. None of this
money was recovered from captive ratepayers
through stranded cost recovery charges.
7
Efficient Reliable System
  • Nearly 40 of installed generation capacity is
    now merchant
  • Competitive sector built almost all new
    generation since early 1990s
  • Competitive Powers Fuel Diversity
  • Coal 36
  • Natural Gas 27
  • Nuclear 27
  • Renewables 5
  • Other 5

8
How Much More Do You Need To See????
  • New England. 6.5 to 7.6 billion since
    restructuring. Polestar Study 2006.
  • New York. 14.7 to 17.7 savings for all
    customers. NYPSC Staff 2006.
  • PJM NY Combined. 430 million to 1.3
    billion/year. LECG 2006.
  • Eastern Interconnect. 15 billion for 1999-2003.
    Global Energy Decisions 2005.
  • Whole Nation. 34 billion over 7 years.
    Cambridge Energy Research Associates.
  • Economists agree benefits are real. 2006 Open
    Letter.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com