Shrink: Paper Efficiency Project PEP Talk Paper v Digital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Shrink: Paper Efficiency Project PEP Talk Paper v Digital

Description:

... the UK Publishers Association a group of UK publishers created Bookcarbon.com Invenntia built this tool It calculates Monoprint carbon footprints Titles ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Lis1199
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Shrink: Paper Efficiency Project PEP Talk Paper v Digital


1
Shrink Paper Efficiency ProjectPEP TalkPaper v
Digital
shrinkpaper.org
  • Mandy Haggith - hag_at_environmentalpaper.eu
  • Michael Sturges - michael.sturges_at_innventia.com
  • Meredith Walsh - Meredith.Walsh_at_uk.penguingroup.co
    m

2
European Environmental Paper Network
3
Common Vision
  • The Environmental Paper Networks in Europe and
    North America (gt 100 NGOs) have a shared Vision
    for Transforming the Pulp and Paper Industry
  • Reduce consumption
  • Reduce reliance on virgin forest fibre
  • Ensure social responsibility
  • Source fibre responsibly
  • Ensure clean production

4
We want to protect this
5
from becoming this
6
and minimise this.
7
Main impacts of paper-making
  • Climate Change
  • Forest Destruction
  • Energy Use
  • Waste
  • Water Use
  • Pollution
  • Plantations
  • Illegal Logging
  • Human Rights Abuses

8
The shrink project 2 (2012-13)
  • 60 UK organisations being assessed and urged to
    take action on paper efficiency, 10 each of
  • Supermarkets
  • Catalogue retailers
  • Financial firms
  • Utilities (gas, phone etc)
  • Governmental bodies
  • Universities
  • The scorecard will be published in July 2013
  • New website, more paper saving case studies
  • Motivational seminars and PEP talks
  • Packaging (5 June)
  • Paper Vapour (climate change), 9 July, London

9
Paper v digital some starting points
  • Global annual sector CO2e emissions (from Climate
    for Ideas)
  • paper - 2500 MTonnes (8 of global emissions)
  • IT - 860MTonnes (2.7 of global emissions)
  • The Climate Group estimates digital applications
    could replace up to 25 of paper consumption.
  • That could produce really substantial carbon
    emission reductions.

10
Paper v Digital some questions
  • Do we compare global impacts of the paper and IT
    industries, or marginal impacts, product by
    product?
  • Do we compare impacts of use, or include impacts
    of manufacture and disposal as well (full life
    cycle assessment?)
  • What is included in the life cycle assessment of
    products? Carbon footprint only? Or all
    environmental and social impacts?
  • Is enough known about the impacts of new
    technologies (e.g. rare metals and handling of
    e-waste)?
  • How to handle threshold effects? (e.g. the claim
    that lt5000 pages, paper is better, gt 5000 pages,
    digital is better)
  • How to handle multi-functionality of electronic
    tools?

11
Understanding the footprint of digital content
experiences from the UK magazine sector
  • Michael Sturges, Innventia Edge

10
12
PPAs carbon journey
  • 2001 Balanced Reading mass balance of the UK
    magazine publishing supply chain (Phase 0)
  • 2008 Magazine sector carbon footprint (Phase 1)
  • 2009 Magazine Carbon calculator (Phase 2)
  • 2011 Updating the carbon calculator data (Phase
    3)
  • 2012-13 Moving the calculator online, extending
    the scope, reporting to government (Phase 4)
  • 2012-13 Carbon footprint of digital media
    (Phase 5)
  • 2013 Embedding carbon footprinting in the
    industry and reporting to government (Phase 6)

11
13
Potential sources of GHG from digital publishing
12
Source Innventia Edge 2011
14
What did we learn from the existing research and
our own case studies?
  • Some words of caution
  • There are few studies and only one of these
    evaluates the carbon footprint of these
    technologies from the perspective of a magazine
    publisher
  • Data and assumptions in different studies are
    often contradictory or lack transparency
  • Boundaries and methodologies are highly
    influential
  • Some studies lack rigour but achieve influence
  • The displacement relationship between
    e-publishing and traditional publishing is
    unclear
  • There is only limited data on the carbon impact
    of reading devices

13
15
What did we learn from the existing research and
our own case studies?
  • Nonetheless, we still begin to get some insights
  • Data and knowledge is improving all the time and
    this can change results and conclusions
  • Data centre impacts may be small when allocated
    across many activities
  • The carbon impact of the supporting distribution
    network (Internet and access networks) should not
    be forgotten
  • User devices are a significant part of the
    digital footprint
  • Powering the devices
  • Manufacturing the devices
  • User behaviour has a significant influence on the
    overall footprint of digital content
  • Publishers can take decisions which help the
    user minimise their footprint

14
16
Crude estimate of the footprint for alternative
channels for delivering content
15
Source Innventia Edge 2011
17
Paper and DigitalWhat do we know?
  • Meredith Walsh
  • Penguin Group UK
  • May 2013

18
Why did Penguin want to calculate their CO2
footprint?
  • Penguin publish trade mono and colour books
  • We manage the impact on biodiversity and
    landrights via certification and other tools
  • We want to manage carbon impacts
  • We need knowledge to do this
  • Goal is to know paper and digital product
    footprints
  • We will make both products and want to manage the
    impacts of both
  • There is also the increasing possibility of
    legislation that will require us to know the
    carbon footprint of our supply chain

19
Bookcarbon.com
  • Through the UK Publishers Association a group of
    UK publishers created Bookcarbon.com
  • Invenntia built this tool
  • It calculates
  • Monoprint carbon footprints
  • Titles printed in the UK
  • Cradle to Grave

20
Paper and Digital Comparison
  • Manufacturing and creation footprint
  • Manufacturing and creation PLUS Apples estimate
    of the CO2 produced over the life of an iPad
  • http//images.apple.com/euro/environment/reports/d
    ocs/iPad_Retina_PER_oct2012.pdf
  • http//www.ethicalconsumer.org/ethicalreports/buyi
    ngbookswithoutamazon/environment.aspx

21
What have we learnt?Book Production
  • Where the main CO2 impacts lie when we print a
    book
  • For Penguin its mostly in the paper, as most of
    our titles are over a certain number of pages
    and we can manage this impact
  • Whether or not a mill is integrated and what it
    uses for energy make a big difference to the
    carbon impact
  • Using the WRI scopes we have lowered our impact

22
What would we like to know more about?Digital
supply chain and product use
  • More knowledge would provide more insights with
    which to manage our impacts
  • Questions wed like to answer
  • How do customers use devices? How long do they
    read for, do they read to finish an article or do
    they have a screen tolerance time?
  • What kind of product is used on what devices?
  • Can products be designed to be low storage and
    low use?
  • What methodology should be used for comparing
    single function devices or products to
    multifunction devices?
  • What are the other environmental impacts of the
    digital supply chain, particularly for the
    extraction of minerals? Mineral extraction as a
    driver of deforestation?
  • As products change how should our communication
    with customers change?

23
(No Transcript)
24
What have we learnt?Digital production
  • We can measure the CO2 generation of content
    creation for a digital product
  • There is limited publicly available data on the
    CO2 footprint of reading devices, but what there
    is we can use to begin the paper and digital
    comparison
  • Using the WRI scopes moving to digital products
    lowers our carbon and forest impacts
  • We see that there are additional impacts across
    the full length of the digital supply chain
  • We can engage our customers and offer advice on
    end of life for both paper and digital
  • Opportunities to recycle books and devices
  • Repairing devices
  • Reusing books

25
Thank you
26
Thanks for listening and for caring about your
impact on the environment! More information
on paper versus digital herehttp//shrinkpaper.o
rg/toolkit/paper-versus-digital/The
environmental paper calculator is here
http//c.environmentalpaper.org/home Were
happy to answer any questions you may have.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com