Development Assistance: the African Context - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Development Assistance: the African Context

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: Carleton University Last modified by: Windows User Created Date: 3/1/2006 7:50:02 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: Carle61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Development Assistance: the African Context


1
Development Assistance the African Context
  • ECON 3510, Carleton University
  • June 10, 2014
  • Arch Ritter
  • Source Class notes Collier Chapter 9

2
  • Agenda
  • Definition What is "Aid
  • Historical Evolution
  • Donor Motives for Providing "ODA"
  • Ethical Justification
  • What Can "Aid" Accomplish? The Positives
  • Possible Negative Impacts
  • Magnitudes, and Patterns
  • Development Assistance to Africa
  • Problems of Aid Quality
  • How Can Development Assistance Be Improved?

3
  • Definitions What is Aid and ODA
  • Development Assistance or Aid would include
    a) Multilateral or Governmental (i.e. ODA),
  • b) NGO, and Private Grants plus
  • c) the grant component of Highly Concessional
    Loans
  • Official Development Assistance Net
    disbursements of loans (on concessional terms) or
    grants by governmental agencies for development
    purposes
  • All Aimed at Transferring Resources
  • In Currency or In Kind
  • All Pro-Developmental or Emergency Relief, not
    Welfare Oriented
  • Non-Commercial from Donor Perspective

4
  • Where do the following fit in?
  • Donations to and through NGOs or Foundations
    (e.g. Gates Foundation, Oxfam, CARE, Red Cross)
  • Faith-based organizations (Caritas, Mennonites,
    Vision, Aga Khan Foundation)
  • Private assistance provided unofficially and
    usually without much publicity and perhaps
    without official awareness by individuals or
    groups.

5
  • 2. Historical Evolution
  • Marshall Plan
  • Cold War impetus
  • Gradual expansion to 1990s, decline then renewal
  • Citizen, Faith-based and NGO Initiatives
  • Millennium Development Goals
  • Current questioning of aid effectiveness
  • Bill Easterly
  • Dambisa Moyo of Zambia

6
  • Donor Motives for Providing ODA
  • Political and Historic
  • e.g. Commonwealth Francophone connections
  • Win friends influence people
  • Strategic/military
  • note the impact of the Cold War
  • Commercial
  • Humanitarian
  • Ethical

7
  • 4. Ethical Justification
  • Should High Income Countries Provide Aid to
    Low-Income Countries?
  • First step towards world fiscal federalism

8
  • 5. What can Aid Accomplish?
  • Aims at Development not Welfare
  • The potential positives of aid
  • Gap-Filling Role
  • foreign exchange,
  • tax revenues,
  • technological,
  • managerial
  • entrepreneurial gaps
  • 2. A Catalytic Role?

9
  • 3. Capacity-Building Role
  • 4. Direct Basic Human Needs or MDG Filling Role
  • 5. Emergency Relief Reconstruction Role
  • Promote Re-Construction of War-torn Lands
  • Regional flood, famine, military, and political
    crisis relief
  • 6. An Investment in Internationally Shared
    Security as well as Shared Prosperity?

10
The Range of Types of Assistance Organization
  • Multilateral World Bank
  • National CIDA (Africa Program)
  • Major Foundations
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • NGOs CanAssist
  • Academics Without Borders Canada
  • Faith-Based Programs
  • Mennonite Central Committee
  • Aga Khan Foundation
  • Note the above labels are hyper-linked to the
    organizations web sites

11
  • 6. Possible Negative Impacts of ODA
  • May permit recipients to pursue
    counter-productive or foolish policies
  • May support an ineffective, counter-developmental
    and corrupt government
  • May Promote a Dependency Welfare Syndrome?
  • Leadership responsibility may be abdicated by
    national governments and/or taken by foreign aid
    agencies, NGOs ..
  • May deform domestic policies to accommodate
    priorities of donors

12
  • Possible Negative Impacts of ODA, contd
  • 4. May permit donor to exercise inappropriate
    influence on recipient
  • 5. May permit recipient country to shift
    resources to other undesirable areas
  • 6. Volatility of aid flows may be hurtful to
    recipient

13
  • Possible Negative Impacts of ODA, continued
  • 7. May lead to appreciation of exchange rate with
    damage to export activities (See Chart)
  • 8. May provide discretionary funds for
    governments where officials are involved in
    corruption
  • 9. May support dictatorial regimes that violate
    human rights in major ways

14
Development Assistance to Selected Countries
of Africa
Selected Countries Net Aid from All Donors as of GDP, 2003 Net Aid per Capita, from All Donors 2003 Net Aid as of Gross Domestic Investment, 2003
Burundi Cabo Verde Eritrea Ghana Guinea-Bissau Malawi Sao Tome South Africa Tanzania 37.6 18.0 40.9 12.1 60.8 29.3 63.2 0.4 16.2 31 306 70 44 98 45 239 14 47 246.1 89.2 182.5 52.4 490.7 260.6 210.0 2.2 87.9
Sub-Saharan Africa Excluding South Africa Excl. S. Africa Nigeria 5.6 8.2 11.2 34 33 44 29.9 41.9 60.4
15
Aid is not always given to the poorest countries
16
7. Magnitudes and Patterns Donor Efforts
17
(No Transcript)
18
Magnitudes and Patterns Donors Efforts
19
(No Transcript)
20
  • But note
  • Previous ODA numbers do not include
  • Donations to and through NGOs or Foundations
    (e.g. Gates Foundation, Oxfam, CARE, Red Cross)
  • Nor faith-based organizations (Caritas,
    Mennonites, Vision, Aga Khan Foundation)
  • Nor private assistance provided unofficially
    and usually anonymously by individuals.

21
  • 8. Development Assistance to Africa

22
Africa receives about 50 per cent of total aid
0.40
0.36
140
0.35
0.33
120
0.30
0.30
0.26
100
ODA as a
0.25
of GNI
80
(left scale)
of GNI
ODA (2004 billion)
0.22
0.20
Total ODA
60
(right scale)
0.15
40
0.10
Total ODA to
20
0.05
Africa
(right scale)
0.00
0
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Source OECD/DAC Statistics (2006). DAC Members
ODA 1990-2004 and simulations to 2006 and 2010,
based on Monterrey and subsequent commitments
23
ODA increases have been driven by debt relief and
emergency assistance
Total net official development assistance (ODA),
non-aid official flows and private flows in
Africa, 1993-2004. (Source OECD/DAC)
24
Development Assistance to Selected African
Countries
Selected Countries Net Aid from All Donors as of GDP, 2003 Net Aid per Capita, from All Donors 2003 Net Aid as of Gross Domestic Investment, 2003
Burundi Cabo Verde Eritrea Ghana Guinea-Bissau Kenya Malawi Nigeria Sao Tome South Africa Tanzania 37.6 18.0 40.9 12.1 60.8 3.4 29.3 0.6 63.2 0.4 16.2 31 306 70 44 98 15 45 2 239 14 47 246.1 89.2 182.5 52.4 490.7 26.0 260.6 2.4 210.0 2.2 87.9
Sub-Saharan Africa 5.6 34 29.9
25
Macroeconomic Indicators, Some African Countries
Liberia Kenya Ethiopia Tanzania Sierra Leone
Gross Investment of GDP 16.4 19.4 10,2 16.4 14.7
Foreign Direct Invest t of GDP 17.1 0.3 0.4 3.6 -o.2
Development Assistance Per capita 329 35 41 54 66
Remittances of GDP Per capita, 6.9 15 5.1 44 1.5 5. 0.1 0.0 7.7 27
Tax Revenues, of GDP n.a. 18.9 10.2 n.a. 10.8
UNDP. HDR, 2010
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
DFAIT-Development (formerly CIDA) Countries of
Focus in Sub-Saharan Africa
30
2007-2008
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
  • DFAIT-Development (ex-CIDA)s Mission and Mandate
  • Mission
  • Lead Canada's international effort to help
    people living in poverty.
  • Mandate
  • Manage Canada's support and resources
    effectively and accountably to achieve
    meaningful, sustainable results and engage in
    policy development in Canada and internationally,
    enabling Canada's effort to realize its
    development objectives.  
  • Comment re accountability and effectiveness

35
  • Example of Canadian Assistance Ethiopia
  • Achievements 2011-2012
  • Children and youth
  • Contributed to 7.1 million children receiving
    essential vitamins and minerals.
  • Increased, by 55 percent, the detection of
    tuberculosis and successfully treated 85 percent
    of all cases reported in 314 remote villages.
  • Trained more than 20,000 health workers to treat
    childhood diseases from 2007 to 2012.
  • Contributed to an increase in the proportion of
    children vaccinated against diphtheria, whooping
    cough and tetanus to 88 percent and against
    measles to 86 percent.
  • Helped increase the proportion of births attended
    by health workers by 5 percent (to 34 percent).
  • Distributed anti-malarial bed nets to households
    in malaria-prone areas, maintaining a rate of 100
    percent coverage.
  • Food security
  • Supported the Productive Safety Net Program, a
    cash-for-work program that helped feed 7.6
    million people while at the same time addressing
    underlying causes of food insecurity with
    construction of soil conservation structures and
    tree planting.
  • Trained 3,274 health workers who contributed to
    improving the health and nutritional status of
    pregnant and breastfeeding women and of 1.5
    million under-five children.

36
  • CIDA-Funded Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa by
    Country and in Aggregate
  • See Project Browser CIDA Projects in Africa

37
Recent shift by Canada away from Africa in Aid
Allocation and towards Latin America? - With
lots of rhetoric but not much action Rationale?
Unclear
38
9. Problems of Aid Quality
  • Predictability and volatility
  • During 2001-03 the gap between commitments and
    disbursements exceeded 2 of GNI for 35 countries
  • Conditionality
  • Coordination a problem
  • On average, a country in SSA dealt with more than
    30 donors in 2002
  • In 2002 Senegal hosted over 50 World Bank
    missions
  • In 2003 Zambia hosted 120 donor missions

39
  • 7. Some Specific Issues
  • Allocation of Burden among Donors
  • Allocation of Aid among Recipients
  • Executing Agencies IFIs, Bilateral, Civil
    Society Organizations?

40
  • Food Aid Impact on Domestic Agriculture
  • Co-ordination of Aid Programs
  • Aid, Human Rights and "Bad" Political Regimes

41
  • The tying of aid
  • Why Tie Aid?
  • Effects of Tying
  • Positive Effects of Tying ?
  • Solutions?

42
What can we realistically expect development
assistance to accomplish?
  • Recall what can go wrong
  • Aid may ratify counter-productive policies
  • Dependency Welfare Syndrome Recipient country
    effort may be reduced
  • Donors priorities may dominate
  • Inappropriate donor influence
  • May permit recipient country to shift resources
    to other undesirable areas
  • 6. Aid volatility may damage recipient
  • 7. Appreciation of exchange rate may block
    exports, increase imports, economic
    diversification
  • 8. Discretionary unearned funds for government
    may encourage facilitate corrupt practices
  • May support dictatorships and human rights
    violations

43
  • Conclude
  • Aid alone can not achieve sustainable development
  • A useful support for domestic or national
    efforts.
  • Responsibility rests with developing countries
    themselves, not aid donors
  • Perhaps neither sufficient nor necessary but
    useful.

44
  • Other factors are vital
  • Governmental commitment to development
    objectives
  • Reasonably incorrupt government
  • Equity orientation of public policy
  • Sound economic policies to strengthen and sustain
    an indigenous economic foundation
  • An enabling environment so that people can
    improve their own situations for themselves (e.g.
    re the informal sector, micro-credit .
  • Question Is representative democracy a necessary
    precondition or element?

45
  • How Can Development Assistance Be Improved?
  • Increase the Quantity of Development Assistance?
  • More grants fewer loans
  • Link Aid More Directly to Need?
  • Further Debt Service Reductions?
  • Donor co-ordination via consortium technique
  • But recall that aid is no panacea and also
    creates additional problems and stresses

46
  • Can More Aid be Absorbed or Used Effectively?
  • Would it lead to a collapse of domestic effort
    (e.g. taxation F. Xch. earnings etc.)?
  • Would it promote Dutch Disease
  • Would it sap indigenous efforts and initiatives
  • Could it be used effectively?
  • Would it permit increased corruption?
  • Would donor priorities take over?
  • Would high levels of aid institutionalize
    dependence?

47
  • 10. How Can Development Assistance Be Improved?
    Continued
  • For the Donors Improve the Quality of Aid
  • A Partnership philosophy and approach
  • Orchestrate programs to avoid chaos,
  • Use a consortium approach
  • 3. Reduce administrative burdens placed on
    recipient governments
  • 4. Minimize aid volatility unpredictability
  • 5. Reduce the tying of aid to donor suppliers
  • 6. Increase untied budget support? Increased
    Program Aid not Project Aid
  • 7. Emphasize capacity building

48
  • How Can Development Assistance Be Improved?
    Continued
  • (b) for the Recipients
  • Pursue wise, equitable and effective development
    strategies
  • Make a major domestic effort
  • Take Charge Own the Program
  • Improve budget management and accountability
    combat corruption
  • Ensure effective management
  • Avoid currency appreciation due to aid inflows
    (Dutch Disease)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com