Grading of the

1
PRESENTATION ON
Grading of the Institutes Under Haryana State
Counseling Society India
2
Submitted By
EWIS
East West InfoSolutions
Dr. S. N. Nandi and Dilip Gayen DELHI
3
VIEW ON COST, QUALITY TIME
4

• The process is very cumbersome and time
• consuming for an institute.
• The process creates fear and misunderstanding
• on the part of an individual institute
• Both the faculty members and administrative
• staff hardly participates intellectually
• The process is often perceived as an inspection
• by a few outsiders with all the hide and
  seek
• elements
• There is a shortage of trained manpower to
  conduct the process
• As the accreditation is being done by a
  regulatory agency itself, the effectiveness is
  diluted.

5
It is required to be reviewed and reengineered
especially in the light of new concepts
For comprehensive and participative system of
Grading/Rating and Accreditation for Technical
Education
6
(No Transcript)
7
THE EFQM EXCELLENCE MODEL
Results
Enablers
Leadership
People
Processes
People Result
Key Performance Results
Policy Strategy
Customer Result
Partnership Resources
Society Result
Innovation Learning
8
THE MBNQA MODEL
Customer and Market Focused Strategy and Action
Plans
Strategic Planning
HRD and Management
Leadership
Business Result
Process Management
Customer and Market focus
Information Analysis
9

• Scope of the study
• Identification of criteria and related
  parameters and formulation of strategy and
• Model methodology for assessment of the above
  and
• Finally application of the same for all the
  technical Institutes selected in the state of
  Haryana.

10
EVALUATION PLAN FOR GRADING OF INSTITUTES UNDER
DTE HARYANA
EVALUATION CRITERIA EVALUATION CRITERIA EVALUATION CRITERIA EVALUATION CRITERIA
Sl. No. Factor New Institute Old Institute
Sl. No. Factor Total Marks Total Marks
1. Governance and Leadership 200 150
2. Human Resources 150 150
3. Teaching, Learning and Evaluation 250 250
4. Infrastructure 250 250
5. Students Support and Progression 150 100
6. Research, Consultancy and Extension Nil 100
7. Total 1000 1000
11

• 1. Governance and Leadership
• This factor examines the Mission and Vision with
  which the Chief Executive has been building up
  the Institute. The focus of this examination
  will be assessment of depth of commitment the
  Chief Executive as reflected in his plan of
  action. His action should reflect his concern for
  development of internal leadership and
  environment. Some of the areas such actions could
  be reflected are as follows
• Quality of persons selected as academic head of
  the Institution/Director.
• Use of external networking for the development of
  Institute.
• Availability of funding.
• Development of internal environment (both
  academic and non-academic ones).
• Strategy in action (as reflected in choice of
  main area of study selected and nature of
  specialization offered).
• This factor also examines the support and
  encouragement being given to continuous quality
  improvements in all academic and non-academic
  activities and building up names and fames of the
  Institute to various stakeholders.
• Sub-Factor Considered
• Selection of Director and of Teachers and the
  methods of selection
• Selection of main area of study and of
  specialization
• External Network accessible (by CEO, Directors
  and other influencing members of the Institute)
• Availability of capital fund, future plan and
  provisions and scope for further expansion
• Quality Orientation and image and goodwill of the
  Institutes

12
2. Human Resources This factor essentially
examines quality and adequacy of teachers and of
supporting staff. Teaching staff should be mix
of both young and old with sufficient amount of
teaching and or corporate experiences. Besides
teaching, they should be inclined to carry out
various kinds of academic persuasions like
guiding research work, writing papers,
coordinating professional activities etc.
Sub-Factor Considered 2.1 Adequacy a) Full
time Faculty Students b) Visiting Faculty
Full time 2.2 Qualification of Full time Faculty
Members 2.3 Experiences a) Teaching b) Corpor
ate 2.4 Engagement on Research / Professional
Activities 2.5 Days spent on development
programs per Faculty
13

• 3. Teaching, Learning and Evaluation
• This factor examines curriculum, session
  planning, teaching methodology and evaluation
  system under quality of curriculum and
  appropriateness of specialization are prime
  concern under this factor. The Institute should
  ensure that time table plan in advance is adhered
  to. There should be effective examination
  systems for both internal and external
  assessments.
• Sub-Factor Considered
• Quality of Students
• a) Cut off points (Ranks) received in Entry
  Examination
• b) Percentage of Management Quota and Selection
  Method
• Employed
• Background / Discipline
• Feedback Results
• Changes made / suggested to the University for
  Curriculum
• Academic Results in terms of percentage of
  students clearing all the papers first time
• Sessions
• Total hours Planed Vs. Actual
• Percentage of hours taken up by outsiders

14
4. Infrastructure This factor examines adequacy
of modern facilities like Lecture Halls, Audio
Visual aids, Library and IT facilities. These
facilities are not only acquired but also
arrangements are being made for their proper
upkeep. Sub-Factor Considered 4.1 Classroom
a) Total Area (square meters) / student covering
both technical and tutorial rooms b) Percentage
of Area (square meters) with AC c) Number of LCD
and Projectors per 60 Students 4.2 Library
a) Areas per student b) Copies of books per
student c) Number of titles per 1000 copies of
books d) Number of journals per student
e) Percentage of journals published abroad
4.3 IT a) Number of Computers per student
b) De-centralized Vs Centralized
c) Percentage of Computers with Internet Access
4.4 Physical Facility a) Effective
availability of Generator b) Effective
availability of Lift if number of stories exceed
3 c) Effective availability of Canteen
d) Effective availability of Hostel
e) Effective availability of Transport
4.5 Security a) Availability of 24 hours
Security arrangements b) Availability of Health
Checkup and Emergency arrangements c) Number of
negative comments on Housekeeping
15
5. Research, Consultancy and Extension This
factor examines not only provisions but also
encouragement made to the Faculty members and
students to undertake Research, Consultancy,
Collaborative Projects and Extension Services so
that their knowledge and expertise are being
harnessed. It also may supplement the institutes
income to small extent. Sub-Factor
Considered 5.1 Number of Projects 5.2 Values
of Projects 6. Student Support and Progression
This factor examines arrangements and
encouragements being made to provide to the
students for their welfare, development and
placement with potential recruiters.
Sub-Factor Considered 6.1 No. of Hours spent
on student development work per semester 6.2 No
of committees and of man days spent for
participatory welfare and self management
activities 6.3 No. of sessions per subject per
semester conducted by faculties from industries
and Alumni 6.4 No of student days spent per
semester for Industry related activities 6.5
No. of organizations contacted and agreed for
Project work 6.6 Recognition received by
students in any external event
16
DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL MARKS FOR GRADING
Sl. No Grading Criteria Grade Code Scores / Grade Ranges ( )
1 Outstanding A More than 90
2 Excellent A From 85 to 90
3 Very Good B From 80 to Less than 85
4 Good B From 75 to Less than 80
5 Fair C From 70 to Less than 75
6 Above Average C From 65 to Less than 70
7 Average D From 60 to Less than 65
8 Below Average D From 45 to Less than 60
9 Up Gradable E Less than 45

• Note
• For Old Institute All the above Process of
  Evaluation will be applicable in a Separate List
• For Old Institutes (That Institutes where 1st
  batch not Passes out) will be listed in a
  separate list of the same assessment Criteria.

17
EVALUATION OF INSTITUTES FOR GRADING FOR OLD
INSTITUTES
Sl. No. Item Total Marks
1 Governance and Leadership 150.0
1.1 Selection of Director and of Teachers and the methods of selection 30
1.2 Selection of main area of study and of specialization 30
1.3 External Network accessible (by CEO, Directors and other influencing members of the Institute) 30
1.4 Availability of capital fund, future plan and provisions and scope for further expansion 30
1.5 Quality Orientation and image and goodwill of the Institutes 30
2 Human Resources 150.0
Adequacy 30.0
Qualification 20.0
Composition 20.0
Experience 30.0
Research Interest 30.0
Faculty Training 20.0
18
3 Teaching, Learning and Evaluation 250
3.1 Quality of Students 50.0
3.2 Curriculum Feedback and Results 50.0
3.3 Sessions 50.0
3.4 Evaluations 50.0
3.5 Feedback from Students 50.0
4 Infrastructure 250.0
4.1 Classroom 60.0
4.2 Library 60.0
4.3 IT Facility 50.0
4.4 Physical Facility 50.0
4.5 Security 30.0
5 Research, Consultancy and Extension 100.0
5.1 Number of Projects 50
5.2 Values of Projects 50
6 Student Support and Progression 100.0
6.1 No. of Hours spent on student development work per semester 20
6.2 No of committees and of man days spent for participatory welfare and self management activities 10
6.3 No. of sessions per subject per semester conducted by faculties from industries and Alumni 10
6.4  No of student days spent per semester for Industry related activities 30
6.5 No. of organizations contacted and agreed for Project work 20
5.6 Recognition received by students in any external event 10
TOTAL 1000.0
19
EVALUATION OF INSTITUTES FOR GRADING FOR NEW
INSTITUTES
Sl. No. Item Total Marks
1 Governance and Leadership 200.0
1.1 Selection of Director and of Teachers and the methods of selection 50
1.2 Selection of main area of study and of specialization 40
1.3 External Network accessible (by CEO, Directors and other influencing members of the Institute) 35
1.4 Availability of capital fund, future plan and provisions and scope for further expansion 40
1.5 Quality Orientation and image and goodwill of the Institutes 35
2 Human Resources 150.0
Adequacy 30.0
Qualification 20.0
Composition 20.0
Experience 30.0
Research Interest 30.0
Faculty Training 20.0
20
3 Teaching, Learning and Evaluation 250
3.1 Quality of Students 50.0
3.2 Curriculam Feedback and Results 50.0
3.3 Sessions 50.0
3.4 Evaluations 50.0
3.5 Feedback from Students 50.0
4 Infrastructure 250.0
4.1 Classroom 60.0
4.2 Library 60.0
4.3 IT Facility 50.0
4.4 Physical Facility 50.0
4.5 Security 30.0
5 Student Support and Progression 150.0
5.1 No. of Hours spent on student development work per semester 30
5.2 No of committees and of man days spent for participatory welfare and self management activities 20
5.3 No. of sessions per subject per semester conducted by faculties from industries and Alumni 30
5.4  No of student days spent per semester for Industry related activities 30
5.5 No. of organizations contacted and agreed for Project work 20
5.6 Recognition received by students in any external event 20
TOTAL 1000.0
21
Terms of Reference The study will be carried
out in 2 Phases I-Model Development. Piloting
and II- Rolling out Broad activities to be
performed in each of the two phases are given
below .
22
Approach Methodology 1. An apex Committee
consisting of Educationist, Industry
Practitioners and Professionals for Guidance on
model development 2. A team of 2-4 consultants
will make the necessary Literature Survey,
discussion with Stakeholders and visit to a
sample number of Technical Institute in order to
develop the necessary model and methodology. The
tam will carry out all the necessary steps as
outlined under Terms of Reference.
23

• Phase I Formulation and Validation
• To study the present status of Technical
  Education in India vis-à-vis in Haryana, the
  emergent requirements for students career and
  job potentialities and of other stakeholders and
  prevalent conditions in the Technical Institutes
  in the state and to develop a suitable model
  depicting criteria and their interrelationship
  reflecting total quality of the Technical
  Institutes under consideration.

24
Phase I Formulation and Validation
(contd.) II. To study existing vision
Mission, Policy, Process, Human Resource aspects
and information infrastructure prevalent in
Technical Institutes and to identify parameters
and measures reflecting the selected criteria as
well as to develop appropriate methodology of
collecting data related to parameters and
measures identified. A Development workshop with
the Representatives from Technical Institutes
will be organized for this purpose.
25
Phase I Formulation and Validation
(contd.) III. To apply the above mentioned
model and methodology to a sample number of 5
Institutes for pilot run and work out
Grading/Rating and Accreditation and then after
to validate the model by comparing the results
with overall perception of stakeholders fine
tune the model and methodology, if necessary.
26
Phase-II Rolling out To apply the model and
methodology thus validated as above for the
remaining Institutes.
27
Phase-II Rolling out (Contd) 1. One
Orientation workshop of 1 days duration will be
organized for a group of nominated staff member
from every batch of 15-20 Institutes. These
nominated members will participate actively in
assessment by filling up the application from and
coordinating the site visit to be conducted by
assessment team at their respective
institutes. 2. Grading/ Rating and subsequently
accreditation will be worked out based on
verified quantitative date obtained through
application forms and observations made by the
study team during their study visits. 3.
Questionnaire and Process of Grading would be
presented and discussed as per requirement and
demand by HSCS
28
East West InfoSolutions A Profile Established
by a group of Technical Management
professionals in the years of 2003. EWIS has
emerged as an Management Consultancy and
Business Solutions Company integrating latest in
technologies and people. The company headed by
eminent Professionals has emerged as an icon of
understanding the Customer needs and in molding
them into a progressive vehicle of tomorrow. Our
Dynamic engineers are flexible enough to meet the
challenges of the emerging market scenario. We
believe in building relationships through a total
commitment to Quality and Reliability. The
company offers highly specialized skills in our
areas, Evolution Oriented Systems, Procedures and
Packages. We are Strategic, Focused, Streamlined
and Integrated. The guiding philosophy of EWIS is
the way of life here. WE OFFER
(SERVICES) BUSINSS CONSULTANCY (HR, MARKETING
FINANCE) TRAINING ECONOMIC SURVEY SOFTWARE
DEVELOPMENT E-GOVERNANCE CORPORATE CONSULTING /
ONSITE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENTERPRISE RESOURCE
PLANNING CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT BUSINESS
PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING
29

• Business Application
• Organisation Strategy Management
• Efficiency Measurement
• Benchmarking
• Organizational Restructuring and Process
  Improvement
• Financial Analysis
• EWIS delivers the highest level of expertise and
  flexibility to meet your needs
• Just-in-time approach to service delivery, when
  and how to apply our expertise.
• Knowledge transfer helps you gain long-term value
  
• Experienced professionals help you relieve
  congestion, reconfigure present system and new
  applications, and better manage
• In addition to EWIS services offers comprehensive
  Consultancy from Design to Implementation of
  the required Services.

30

• Why you should choose EWIS over other companies??
• We react and get things done fast
• We are flexible and make decisions quickly to
  respond to client needs and solve client
  problems
• We have close professional relationship with all
  our clients
• Our low operating overheads are reflected in our
  charges to our clients
• We agree payment linked to project deliverables
  with our client
• Our expertise makes you save time and therefore
  cost within your company by not having to
  educate implementation consultants
•  
• We ensure complete customer satisfaction

31

• A Select list of Assignments completed
• Benchmarking study for the following sectors
• 1. Engineering Industry
• 2. Automobile Industry
• 3. Sugar Industry
• 4. Fertilizer Industry
• 5. Pharmaceutical Industry
• 6. Machine Tools Industry
• 7. Power Plants
• 8. Management Institutes
• 9. Environmental Laboratories
• 10. Shipping agencies
• 11. Software firms

32

• B. Formulation of Award scheme and evaluation of
  participating organisations for award
• Public sector known as SCOPE EXCELLENCE AWARD for
  Public Sector firms covering both Manufacturing
  and Service organization.
• 2. Steel, Sector PM Trophy for the best Steel
  plant in both Public and Private sectors
• 3. E-Governance award by the Government of India
• 4. Comparative Evaluation of innovativeness in IT
  
• Firms
• C. Consulting service to CSIR for evaluation of
  performances of research and development
  Institutes

33
Thank You