Diagnosis of Genitourinary Tuberculosis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Diagnosis of Genitourinary Tuberculosis

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Last modified by: acer Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:484
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: mediaWix65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diagnosis of Genitourinary Tuberculosis


1
Diagnosis of Genitourinary Tuberculosis
Dr. Jayesh Dhabalia Dr. Ulhas
Sathe Consultant Urologist
Consultant Urologist Professor Head
Sahyog Speciality Hospital Department of
Urology, Lithotripsy
Centre LTMG Hospital , Mumbai
Jhamnagar
2
INTRODUCTION
  • General Incidence India1
  • One fifth of world TB population
  • 1.8 million new cases / year
  • 8 lac infectious cases
  • One death every 90 sec , 45 / hour , 1080 / day ,
    3.88 lack /year

3
INTRODUCTION
  • General Incidence India GUTB1
  • Most common extra pulmonary TB
  • 30 of all extrapulmonary TB
  • 18 of infertile women
  • 11 of hematospermia
  • 5-25 year after primary pulmonary TB
  • Primary GUTB - anecdotal cases in females

4
MICROBIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND
5
MICROBIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND
  • Bacterial characteristics diagnostic
    difficulties
  • Slow growing - divides every 1520 hours
  • - Delayed growth on culture
  • Can survive in a dry state for weeks
  • - Infectivity contamination
  • Obligate aerobic
  • Acid-fast -waxy coating on the cell surface makes
    the cells impervious to Gram staining

6
GUTB - DIAGNOSTIC DIFFICULTIES
  • Characteristics of M. tuberculosis bacteria
  • Difficult and delayed lab diagnosis
  • Index of suspicion not high enough

7
GUTB - DELAYED DIAGNOSIS
  • After significant irreversible anatomical changes
    -
  • major surgical procedure
  • ( thimble bladder , multiple ureteric
    strictures, multiple infundibular stenosis)
  • Irreversible loss of kidney function
  • Infertility in both gender
  • Early diagnosis in India high index of suspicion

8
GUTB DIAGNOSTIC MODALITIES
CLINICAL RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY
Reliability increases with Progression of disease Multisystem involvement Early changes Needs confirmation Advanced disease Almost diagnostic Valuable for Early disease diagnosis Rapid diagnosis Drugs sensitivity
9
GUTB - CLINICAL EVALUATION
  • SPECIFIC - Genitourinary tract
  • Lower urinary tract 50 to 80
  • Burning , frequency , urgency , urge incontinence
  • Dysuria , hematuria
  • Suprapubic pain / perineal discomfort
  • Decreased stream , straining, ineffective voiding
  • Slough in urine

10
GUTB - CLINICAL EVALUATION
  • Upper urinary tract symptoms
  • Pain - kidney and ureter region
  • Gross hematuria- 10
  • Genital Male
  • Hematospermia - 10
  • Azoospermia
  • S/S of chronic
  • epididymorchitis
  • Genital Female
  • Menstrual irregularities
  • Pelvic pain syndrome
  • Infertility 18

11
GUTB - CLINICAL EVALUATION
  • Other systems
  • Respiratory - 12 patients
  • Gastrointestinal - 10
  • Lymphoreticular
  • Constitutional - 10 to 15 1
  • Evening rise of temperature
  • Weight loss
  • Anorexia

12
GUTB - LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
13
GUTB - PROBLEMS IN LAB DIAGNOSIS
  • Paucibacillary
  • Intermittent bacterial shedding
  • Fastidious / slow growth difficult to culture
  • Diagnostic difficulty due to atypical
    mycobacteria / MOTT / NTM
  • Sensitivity of all tests - extra pulmonary TB

14
GUTB - LAB DIAGNOSIS SUPPORTIVE TESTS
  • Urine routine and microscopy
  • Acidic urine , sterile pyuria , microscopic
    hematuria
  • Guide for further investigation, especially in
    pauci-symptomatic patients
  • Montaux Test (Robert Koch in 1890)
  • If Positive supports the diagnosis
  • If Negative can not exclude extrapulmonary TB
  • Response HIV, Immunocompromised ,
    Post-transplant pts
  • Problems in India
  • Invariably positive - Exposure in childhood ,
    BCG vaccination

15
GUTB SERODIAGNOSIS
  • Basis by detecting
  • I. Specific immunological host response
  • Humoral (serological) antibody immune response
    to M. tb 
  • Ig G High levels in active TB
  • Ig M Immediate appearance, disappears later on
  • Commercial ELISA test kit available
  • T cellbased cellular immune response
  • Different antigens detects different types of
    TB
  • Test kit not available
  • II. Direct detection of bacterial antigens
    metabolites
  • Test kit not available

16
GUTB SERODIAGNOSISPROBLEMS
  • Low sensitivity and specificity
  • At present supportive at best
  • Potential role in future
  • Early diagnosis
  • Response measurement to treatment
  • Early detection of relapse
  • LITTLE OR NO ROLE IN DIAGNOSIS

17
GUTB - POTENTIALLY DIAGNOSTICLAB TESTS
  • COLLECTION OF SAMPLES
  • Urine
  • Physiologically pooled ( overnight) early morning
    1stsample
  • Three consecutive days , ? 5 days
  • Volume 10 ml for AFB, culture , PCR
  • Immediate processing if not feasible
    refrigerate at 4-8o C
  • Alkalinisation of urine - ? Increased yield2
  • Tissue
  • In neutral transport media avoids dessication
  • Swab specimen not suitable

18
GUTB - POTENTIALLY DIAGNOSTIC LAB TESTS
TEST UTILITY EVALUATION CRITERIAS
19
GUTB - DIAGNOSTIC LAB TESTS ZN / AFB SMEAR
EXAMINATION
  • First described by Franz Ziehl (1859 to 1926), a
    bacteriologist and Friedrich Neelsen (1854 to
    1894)
  • Requiring 104 bacilli ml-1 of sample to achieve
    a positive result3
  • Can not differentiate between live versus dead
    bacteria

20
GUTB - DIAGNOSTIC LAB TESTS ZN / AFB SMEAR
EXAMINATION
  • 1. Take sediment and make a smear
  • 2. Carbol-fuchsin solution - allow slides to
    stand in hot solution for 5 minutes.
  • 3. Wash in running tap water.
  • 4. 1 Acid alcohol until light pink and color
    stops running.
  • 5. Wash in running tap water for 5 minutes...
  • 7. Working methylene blue for 30 seconds.
  • 8. Rinse in water.
  • 9. Dehydrate, clear, and cover slip.
  • RESULTS
  • Acid-fast bacilli bright red
  • Background blue

21
ZN - AFB STAIN TEST UTILITY EVALUATION
  • Availability - Universal
  • Sensitivity - 30 40 4
  • Specificity - 95 4
  • Processing time - 45 mins
  • Cost - Cheap
  • Antibiotic sensitivity - NA

22
GUTB - DIAGNOSTIC LAB TESTS FLUORESCENCE
MICROSCOPY
  • Microscopy with fluorochrome dyes such as
    auramine O or auramine-rhodamine
  • To increase sensitivity over
  • ZN AFB staining

23
TEST UTILITY EVALUATION
  • Availability - Poor
  • Sensitivity - 10 gt ZN
    staining5
  • Specificity - Similar
  • Processing time - Less than ZN
    staining
  • Cost - Significantly gt
    ZN staining
  • Antibiotic sensitivity - NA

24
MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGY POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION
(PCR)
  • Principle- by detection of species
    specific DNA
  • Technique to amplify a single or few copies of
    a piece of DNA to generate millions of copies of
    a particular DNA sequence
  • Targeting different gene sequences of M.
    tuberculosis , showed different positivity
  • IS6110 - 77 - Most commonly targeted6
  • 65kDa - 75, 38 kDa - 72 ,85B protein - 73

25
MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGY POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION
(PCR)
  • Diagnostic Problems
  • Few Indian strains lack copy of IS 6110
  • IS 6110- present in M.tb complex bacteria
  • ( tuberculous / africanum / microti / bovis)
  • False positive old cases of TB, contamination
  • False negative extremely paucibacillary cases
  • ( detection limit up to 10 copies / ml )
  • Cannot differentiate dead from live bacteria

26
MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGY - PCR
  • Universal Sample Processing (USP) Technology
  • AIM - To false negative rate by removing
    inhibitors of DNA amplification
  • Potent inhibitor-heparin, hemoglobin, phenol
    sodium dodecyl sulfate4
  • Detected in 0 to 20 of the clinical specimen4

27
MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGY - PCR TECHNICAL PROCESSING
28
MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGY - PCR
TEST UTILITY EVALUATION
  • Availability - Limited
  • Sensitivity - 75 - 956
  • Specificity - 95 - 97 6
  • Processing time - One day
  • Cost - Rs 1600
  • Antibiotic sensitivity - NA

29
MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGY RNA PCR
  • DNA PCR cannot differentiates dead from live
    organisms
  • Principle Reverse transcriptase copies the RNA
    target from DNA into a transcription complex,
    which is then amplified by RNA polymerase

30
MOLECULAR TECHNOLOGY TISSUE PCR
  • Sampling limitations
  • Availability - Limited
  • Sensitivity - 95
  • Specificity - 95 to 97
  • Processing time - One day
  • Cost - Rs 1600
  • Antibiotic sensitivity - NA

TEST UTILITY CRITERIA
31
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURE
  • Gold standard ????
  • Highly specific and sensitive
  • Detects presence of live bacteria
  • Can differentiate between typical and atypical
  • Antimicrobial sensitivity
  • Biggest drawback time required

32
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTUREMEDIA
  • Solid
  • Egg-based - Petragnini medium and Dorset medium
  • Middlebrook 7H10 Agar
  • Middlebrook 7H11 Agar
  • Blood based -Tarshis medium
  • Serum based - Loeffler medium
  • Potato based - Pawlowsky medium
  • LJ media
  • Liquid
  • Dubos' medium
  • Middlebrook 7H9 Broth
  • Proskauer and Beck's medium
  • Sula's medium
  • Sauton's medium
  • Radiometric Bactec
  • Nonradiomaetric MGIT / MB Redox

33
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURE
34
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURESOLID MEDIA
LOWENSTEIN-JENSEN MEDIUM
  •  Growth medium specially used for culture
    of Mycobacterium
  • Processing time 2-8 weeks
  • Time increases in pauci bacillary specimen
  • Further 2-8 weeks in typical v/s atypical -?
    Simultaneous culture with inhibition of M.tb
  • Further 2-8 weeks for drug susceptibility

35
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURE LOWENSTEIN-JENSEN MEDIUM
  • Composition
  • Malachite green ,Glycerol, Asparagine , Potato
    starch, Coagulated eggs, Mineral salt solution
    (Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, Magnesium
    sulfate, Sodium citrate )
  • Penicillin and nalidixic acid -Inhibit growth
    of gram positive and gram negative bacteria, .
    Presence of malachite green in the medium
    inhibits most other bacteria.

36
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURE
LIQUID CULTURE MEDIA
  • More sensitive and specific
  • Shorter processing time
  • Variable availability
  • Simultaneous differentiation of atypical v/s
    typical

37
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURE RADIOMETRIC
  • BACTEC 460 TB system
  • Principle
  • Detection of the metabolism of the bacteria
  • Detects 14CO2 liberation during the
    decarboxylation of 14C labelled substrates
    palmitic acid
  • Differentiates typical and atypical mycobacteria
    4
  • p-nitro benzoic acid (PNBA) test
  • The BACTEC NAP test

38
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURE NONRADIOMETRIC
  • Principle detection of metabolism of bacteria
  • Types
  • Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)
  • MB Redox

39
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURELIQUID MEDIA
Nonradiometric Liquid Culture Media
  • (1) Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)
  • Sensor Contains 4 ml of modified Middlebrook 7H9
    broth with an oxygen quenching- based fluorescent
    sensor.

40
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURELIQUID MEDIA
Nonradiometric Liquid Culture Media
  • (2) MB Redox Tube
  • Four ml of modified, serum-supplemented Kirchner
    medium with a colourless tetrazolium salt as a
    growth indicator.
  • During bacterial growth, the tetrazolium salt is
    reduced to a pink-, red-, or violet-colored
    formazan.
  • Contains a special vitamin complex which provides
    for a considerable acceleration of the growth of
    mycobacteria

41
M.TUBERCULOSIS CULTURE SOLID V/S LIQUID MEDIA
Solid media Liquid media
Availability Good Variable
Sensitivity 40-70 80-95
Specificity 95 - 97 95 - 97
Processing time 4-8 weeks 12-15 days
Cost 1500 1500
Antibiotic sensitivity
Hence liquid media is preferred
42
TEST UTILITY EVALUATION RADIOMETRIC V/S
NONRADIOMETRIC
Radiometric Non radiometric Non radiometric
Bactec MGIT MB redox
Availability Variable Most common Uncommon
Sensitivity 90-95 70 - 80 80
Specificity 95-97 95-97 95-97
Processing time 12-14 days 17 days 16 days
Cost 1600 1600 -
Antibiotic sensitivity
Technical difficulty Labor intensive Radiation hazards
43
GUTB DIAGNOSISENDOSCOPY BIOPSY
  • Indications
  • Suspected GU Koch's with equivocal radiology
    and lab test
  • Ureteric evaluation ( RGP) and stenting
  • Risks
  • Bladder perforation, septicemia
  • Problems
  • - Morphology - If normal no biopsy
  • - Changes - specific / nonspecific
    biopsy
  • ? Need Highly suggestive radiological findings



44
VIDEO
45
GUTB - ENDOSCOPY BIOPSY
  • Classical Histological features
  • Granuloma formation
  • Caseous necrosis
  • Cavitation
  • Chronic inrterstital inflammation

46
HISTOPATHOLOGY
47
GUTB DIAGNOSIS ENDOSCOPY BIOPSY
  • Differential diagnosis -
  • Fungal infection histoplasmosis cryptococcus
  • Infections
  • Cat-scratch fever (caused by bartonella henselae)
  • Chronic pyelonephritis , sarcoidosis
  • Wegener's granulomatosis
  • Drugs
  • Very rare compared to M.tb infection

48
GUTB DIAGNOSIS ENDOSCOPY BIOPSY
  • Availability - Universal
  • Sensitivity - 18 to 56 6,12,13
  • Specificity - 95 to 97
  • Processing time - four days
  • Cost - Rs 500
  • Antibiotic sensitivity - NA

49
GUTB DIAGNOSIS ENDOSCOPY BIOPSY
  • Bivalved resected specimen shows two foci of
    caseous necrosis in the upper pole (arrows).

50
DIAGNOSTIC LAB TESTSCOMPARISON
AFB Stain PCR LJ Culture Bactec MGIT MB redox
Availability Universal Limited Common Limited Limited Uncommon
Sensitivity 40 60 95 40-70 80-95 70 - 80 80
Specificity 95 - 97 95 - 97 95 - 97 95 - 97 95 - 97 95 - 97
Processing time 45 mins one day 4-8 weeks 12-14 days 17 days 16 days
Cost Rs 500 Rs 1600 Rs 1600 Rs 1500 Rs 1500 -
Antibiotic sensitivity NA NA
51
GUTB LAB DIAGNOSIS
  • PROBLEMS - No Gold Standards
  • Current Literature
  • - Not all test done in all patients
  • - Different samples from different systems
  • Sensitivity Specificity
  • - Maximum with combination of tests
  • Recommendation PCR with Bactac
  • Radiometric Culture

52
DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM
  • Persistent Irritative voiding /OR genital
    symptoms
  • History of recurrent UTI, past H/O TB, Failed
    symptomatic t/t
  • Urine sterile pyuria, acidic , microscopic
    hematuria

USG
NonSpecific
Urine-PCR/AFB stain Culture
?
Specific
Positive
Negative
IVP
Endoscopy
AKT
Morphology
Specific / Non-Specific
Biopsy HPE Tissue PCR
Normal
Clinical Decision
Negative
No Biopsy
Positive
AKT
53
  • Bibliography
  • Das P, Ahuja A, Gupta SD. Incidence,
    etiopathogenesis and pathological aspects of
    genitourinary tuberculosis in India A journey
    revisited. Indian J Urol 200824356-61
  • Debra L. Piddington et al Infection and
    Immunity, August 2000, p. 4518-4522, Vol. 68, No.
    8
  • 10th Edn, Topley and Wilson.  Bacteriology Vol.
    2, pg 1190
  • Negi SS, Khan SF, Gupta S, Pasha ST, Khare S, Lal
    S. Comparison of the conventional diagnostic
    modalities, bactec culture and polymerase chain
    reaction test for diagnosis of tuberculosis.
    Indian J Med Microbiol 20052329-33
  • Nguyen Van Hung et al Fluorescence microscopy
    for tuberculosis diagnosis The Lancet
    Infectious Diseases - Volume 7, Issue 4 (April
    2007)
  • A. K. Hemal, N. P. Gupta et al Polymerase Chain
    Reaction In Clinicall Suspected Genitourinary
    Tuberculosis Comparison With Intravenous
    Urography, Bladder Biopsy, And Urine Acid Fast
    Bacilli Culture UROLOGY 56 570574, 2000
  • Venkataswamy MM, Rafi W, Nagarathna S, Ravi V,
    Chandramuki A. Comparative evaluation of bactec
    460tb system and lowenstein-jensen medium for the
    isolation of M. tuberculosis from cerebrospinal
    fluid samples of tuberculous meningitis patients.
    Indian J Med Microbiol 200725236-40
  • P Anargyros, D S Astill and I S Lim Comparison
    of improved BACTEC and Lowenstein-Jensen media
    for culture of mycobacteria from clinical
    specimens J Clin Microbiol. 1990 June 28(6)
    1288-1291

54
  • H.P. Chien M.C. Yu M.H. Wu T.P. Lin K.T. Luh
    Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 with
    Löwenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of
    mycobacteria from clinical specimens The
    International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung
    Disease, Volume 4, Number 9, September 2000 , pp.
    866-870(5)
  • L. Heifets, T. Linder, T. Sanchez, D. Spencer,
    and J. Brennan Two Liquid Medium Systems,
    Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube and MB Redox
    Tube, for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolation
    from Sputum Journal of Clinical Microbiology,
    March 2000, p. 1227-1230, Vol. 38, No. 3
    Specimens
  • W. K. Chew1, R. M. Lasaitis, F. A. Schio and G.
    L. Gilbert Clinical evaluation of the
    Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)
    compared with radiometric (Bactec) and solid
    media for isolation of Mycobacterium species J
    Med Microbiol 47 (1998), 821-827
  • Wong SH, Lau WY, Poon GP, et al The treatment
    of urinary tuberculosis. J Urol 131 297301, 198
  • Gow JG Genito urinary tuberculosis, in Walsh PC,
    Retik AB, Stamey TA, et al (Eds) Campbells
    Urology, 6th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1992,
    vol 1, pp 951981

55
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com