world development report 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

world development report 2004

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: DFilmer Last modified by: wb85931 Created Date: 6/11/2003 9:32:25 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: DFil8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: world development report 2004


1
world development report 2004
Making Services Work for Poor People
2
Messages
  • Services are failing poor people.
  • But they can work. How?
  • By empowering poor people to
  • Monitor and discipline service providers
  • Raise their voice in policymaking
  • By strengthening incentives for service providers
    to serve the poor

3
Outcomes are worse for poor peopleDeaths per
1000 births
Source Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey
data
4
Growth is not enough
Percent living on 1/day Percent living on 1/day Primary completion rate (percent) Primary completion rate (percent) Under-5 mortality rate Under-5 mortality rate
Target 2015 growth alone Target 2015 growth alone Target 2015 growth alone
East Asia 14 4 100 100 19 26
Europe and Central Asia 1 1 100 100 15 26
Latin America 8 8 100 95 17 30
Middle East and North Africa 1 1 100 96 25 41
South Asia 22 15 100 99 43 69
Africa 24 35 100 56 59 151
Sources World Bank 2003a, Devarajan 2002.
Notes Average annual growth rates of GDP per
capita assumed are EAP 5.4 ECA 3.6 LAC 1.8
MENA 1.4 SA 3.8 AFR 1.2. Elasticity assumed
between growth and poverty is 1.5 primary
completion is 0.62 under-5 mortality is 0.48.
5
Making Services Work for Poor People
But increasing public spending is also not enough
Percent deviation from rate predicted by GDP
per capita Source Spending and GDP from World
Development Indicators database. Under-5
mortality from Unicef 2002
6
Vastly different changes in spending can be
associated with similar changes in outcomes.
Sources Spending data for 1990s from World
Development Indicators database. Child mortality
data from Unicef 2002. Other data from World
Bank staff
7
How are services failing poor people?
  • Public spending usually benefits the rich, not
    the poor

8
Expenditure incidence
Health
Education
Source Filmer 2003b
9
How are services failing poor people?
  • Public spending benefits the rich more than the
    poor
  • Money/goods/people are not at the frontline of
    service provision
  • Public expenditure tracking results on what
    reaches or is at the facility level

10
Nonwage funds not reaching schools Evidence from
PETS ()
Country Mean
Ghana 2000 49
Madagascar 2002 55
Peru 2001 (utilities) 30
Tanzania 1998 57
Uganda 1995 78
Zambia 2001 (discretion/rule) 76/10
Source Ye and Canagarajah (2002) for Ghana Francken (2003) for Madagascar Instituto Apoyo and World Bank (2002) for Peru Price Waterhouse Coopers (1998) for Tanzania Reinikka and Svensson 2002 for Uganda Das et al. (2002) for Zambia.
11
Access to primary school and health clinics in
rural areas
Distance to nearest primary school (km) Distance to nearest primary school (km) Distance to nearest primary school (km) Distance to nearest medical facility (km) Distance to nearest medical facility (km) Distance to nearest medical facility (km)
GNI per capita Poorest fifth Richest fifth Ratio Poorest fifth Richest fifth Ratio
Chad 1998 250 9.9 1.3 7.6 22.9 4.8 4.8
Nigeria 1999 266 1.8 0.3 5.5 11.6 1.6 7.1
CAR 1994-95 819 6.7 0.8 8.9 14.7 7.7 1.9
Haiti 1994-95 336 2.2 0.3 6.4 8.0 1.1 7.2
India 1998-99 462 0.5 0.2 2.3 2.5 0.7 3.6
Bolivia 1993-94 1004 1.2 0.0 - 11.8 2.0 6.0
Morocco 1992 1388 3.7 0.3 13.1 13.5 4.7 2.9
Source Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey
data. Note GNI per capita is in 2001 US.
Medical facility encompasses health centers,
dispensaries, hospitals, and pharmacies.
12
How are services failing poor people?
  • Public spending benefits the rich more than the
    poor
  • Money/goods fail to reach frontline service
    providers
  • Service quality is low for poor people

13
Percent of staff absent in primary schools and
health facilities
14
But services can work
  • Motivating health workers reduced infant
    mortality in Ceará, Brazil
  • Contracted services in Johannesburg, South Africa
    improved transport and water delivery
  • Cash transfers to families in Mexico increased
    enrollment, lowered illness
  • Citizen report cards improved services in
    Bangalore, India
  • Publicizing what schools were supposed to get
    resulted in more money reaching primary schools
    in Uganda
  • Delegating project choice and management to
    villagers improved infrastructure in Indonesia

15
A framework of relationships of accountability
Poor people
Providers
16
Short and long routes of accountability
17
The relationship of accountabilityhas five
features
18
A framework of relationships of accountability
Policymakers
Poor people
Providers
19
Client-provider
  • Strengthen accountability by
  • Choice
  • Participation clients as monitors

20
FSSAP Bangladesh
Making Services Work for Poor People
  • Criteria
  • Attendance in school
  • Passing grade
  • Unmarried
  • Girls to receive scholarship deposited to account
    set up in her name
  • School to receive support based on of girls

21
Client-providerEDUCO Program in El Salvador
  • Parents associations (ACEs)
  • Hire and fire teachers
  • Visit schools on regular basis
  • Contract with Ministry of Education to deliver
    primary education

22
EDUCO promoted parental involvement
which boosts student performance
Source Adapted from Jimenez and Sawada 1999
23
The Bamako Initiative
  • Community managed services
  • Partnership between state and community
    organizations
  • Financial contributions from users locally
    retained, owned and managed
  • Government contract and subsidy

24
Client-ProviderBamako Initiative
Making Services Work for Poor People
Evolution of antenatal care coverage Mali
1987-2000
Evolution of national immunization coverage
25
Client-ProviderBamako Initiative
Making Services Work for Poor People
Under five mortality decrease
.among the poor in Mali
26
No blanket policy on user fees
27
A framework of relationships of accountability
Policymakers
Poor people
Providers
28
Citizen-policymaker
  • Political economy of public services

29
Why dont services work for poor people?
Ah, there he is again! How time flies! Its
time for the general election already!
By R. K. Laxman
30
PRONASOL expenditures according to party in
municipal government
Source Estevez, Magaloni and Diaz-Cayeros 2002
31
Citizen-policymaker
  • Political economy of public services
  • Formal channels
  • Importance of non-formal channels
  • Role of information
  • Citizen report card (initiatives in Vietnam,
    Indonesia, Philippines)
  • Publicizing textbook distribution in
    Philippinesand engaging communities as monitors

32
Schools in Uganda received more of what they were
due
Source Reinikka and Svensson (2001), Reinikka
and Svensson (2003a)
33
A framework of relationships of accountability
Policymakers
Providers
Poor people
34
Policymaker-provider
  • Hard to monitor versus Easy to monitor
  • Information for monitoring

35
Policymaker-providerContracting NGOs in Cambodia
  • Contracting out (CO) NGO can hire and fire,
    transfer staff, set wages, procure drugs, etc.
  • Contracting in (CI) NGO manages district,
    cannot hire and fire (but can transfer staff),
    0.25 per capita budget supplement
  • Control/Comparison (CC) Services run by
    government
  • 12 districts randomly assigned to CC, CI or CO

36
Utilization of facilities by poor People sick in
last month
Source Bhushan, Keller and Schwartz 2002
37
Ceara increased effectiveness of government
services
Making Services Work for Poor People
Source www.developmentgoals.org
38
A framework of relationships of accountability
Policymakers
Poor people
Providers
39
What not to do
  • Leave it to the private sector
  • Simply increase public spending
  • Apply technocratic solutions

40
What not to do
technocratic solutions
Of course we have progressed a great deal, first
they were coming by bullock-cart, then by jeep
and now this!
41
What is to be done?
  • Expand information
  • Generation and dissemination
  • Impact evaluation
  • Tailor service delivery arrangements to service
    characteristics and country circumstances

42
Eight sizes fit all?
43
Eight sizes fit all?
44
Eight sizes fit all?
45
Eight sizes fit all?
46
Eight sizes fit all?
47
Eight sizes fit all?
48
What are we up against when attempting to improve
aid efficiency?
49
WDR messages to donors
  • Harmonize policies and procedures around
    recipients systems
  • Where possible, integrate aid in recipients
    budget
  • Finance impact evaluation of service delivery
    innovations
  • 300 million a year in Bank projects allocated
    for evaluation

50
world development report 2004
Making Services Work for Poor People
http//econ.worldbank.org/wdr/wdr2004
51
Strengths of Clients and Policymakers as monitors
52
Individual Oriented clinical care
Providers Hospitals Clinics Individual
practitioners (licensed or not)
High asymmetry of information Transaction
intensive High discretion
Bottlenecks Skilled human resources Physical
access Quality Cost
Levers Direct control of users Self
Regulation Sophisticated purchasing capacity
53
Population Oriented Outreach
  • Providers
  • Integrated in clinical services (clinics, GP)
  • Integrated in schools, workplace
  • Outreach health post
  • Mobile Activities
  • Home visits, door to door activities

Lower Asymmetry of information Less Transaction
intensive Low discretion standards Public good
nature or network externality
Bottlenecks Low demand Low continuity Opportunit
y Cost
Levers Collective action Government Primarily
54
Providers Retail Community based organizations/
associations Cooperatives Social marketing,
media, Womens groups, associations etc
Family Oriented Support to self care
Low asymmetry of information Transaction light
High discretion in taste/ values
Bottlenecks Knowledge Availability and cost of
commodities
Levers Imitate the market Direct control of
users
55
A framework of relationships of accountability
Policymakers
Poor people
Providers
56
Decentralization
National policymakers
Local policymakers
Poor people
Providers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com