Title: HUJI-03
1Financial Risk Management
- Zvi Wiener
- mswiener_at_mscc.huji.ac.il
- 02-588-3049
2Financial Risk Management
- Zvi Wiener
- Head of Finance Department
- The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- 02-588-3049, mswiener_at_mscc.huji.ac.il
Arik Perez arikp_at_mof.gov.il tel. 050-412-733,
02-531-7751
3Statistics
- Random variables
- Mean, Standard Deviation, Correlation
- Normal distribution
4Basic Corporate Finance
- NPV, IRR, YTM
- Assets, Liabilities
- Regulators, Bank of Israel, MOF
- ISDA, SEC
5Investments
- Stocks, Indices, ?, CAPM, ?
- Bonds, duration, convexity
- NIS, CPI linked
- callable, puttable, convertible
- Forwards, Futures, Swaps
- Options, ?
- European, American
- Call, Put, BS formula
- Markets prices, volatilites, LIBORs, swap rates
6Financial Risk Management
- Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill
- Chapter 1
- The Need for Risk Management
7Financial Risks
- Risk is the volatility of unexpected outcomes.
- Business Risk
- Financial Risk
- Legal Risk
- Operational Risk
8Analytic Risk Management Tools
- Duration 1938
- Markowitz mean-variance 1952
- Sharpes CAPM 1963
- Multiple factor models 1966
- Black-Merton-Scholes model 1973
- RAROC 1983
- Limits by duration buckets 1986
9Analytic Risk Management Tools
- Risk-weighted assets (banks) 1988
- Stress Testing 1992
- Value-at-Risk, VaR 1993
- RiskMetrics 1994
- CreditMetrics 1997
- Integration of credit and market 1998-
- Enterprisewide RM 2000-
10Derivatives and Risk Management
- Stocks and bonds are securities issued to raise
capital. - Derivatives are contracts, agreements used for
risk transfer.
11Financial Derivatives
- Futures, Forwards, Swaps
- Options
- European, American, Asian, Parisian
- Call, Put
- Cap, Floor
- Credit derivatives
12Types of Financial Risks
- Market Risk
- Credit Risk
- Liquidity Risk
- Operational Risk
- Legal Risk
13What is the current Risk?
- duration, convexity
- volatility
- delta, gamma, vega
- rating
- target zone
Bonds Stocks Options Credit Forex
Total ?
14Standard Approach
15Modern Approach
Financial Institution
16Example
- You live in Herzliya and work in Tel-Aviv.
- When do you have to leave your home to be at work
at 830?
17How much can we lose?
- Everything
- correct, but useless answer.
- How much can we lose realistically?
18Definition
- VaR is defined as the predicted worst-case loss
at a specific confidence level (e.g. 99) over a
certain period of time.
19Definition (Jorion)
- VaR is the worst loss over a target horizon with
a given level of confidence.
20VaR
21Meaning of VaR
- A portfolio manager has a daily VaR equal 1M at
99 confidence level. - This means that there is only one chance in 100
that a daily loss bigger than 1M occurs,
under normal market conditions.
22Returns
year
23Main Ideas
- A few well known risk factors
- Historical data economic views
- Diversification effects
- Testability
- Easy to communicate
24Conventional Analysis
Risk factor
25VaR approach
Risk factor
26Important
- VaR is a necessary, but not sufficient procedure
for controlling risk. - It must be supplemented by limits and controls,
in addition to an independent risk-management
function. - Sound risk-management practices.
27Financial Risk Management
- Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill
- Chapter 2
- Lessons from Financial Disasters
28Derivatives 1993-1995
- ( million)
- Shova Shell, Japan 1,580
- Kashima Oil, Japan 1,450
- Metallgesellschaft 1,340
- Barings, U.K. 1,330
- Codelco, Chile 200
- Procter Gamble, US 157
29Public Funds
- ( million)
- Orange County 1,640
- San Diego 357
- West Virginia 279
- Florida State Treasury 200
- Cuyahoga County 137
- Texas State 55
30Barings
- February 26, 1995
- 233 year old bank
- 28 year old Nick Leeson
- 1,300,000,000 loss
- bought by ING for 1.5
31Metallgesellshaft
- 14th largest industrial group
- 58,000 employees
- offered long term oil contracts
- hedge by long-term forward contracts
- short term contracts were used (rolling hedge)
- 1993 price fell from 20 to 15
- 1B margin call in cash
32Orange County
- Bob Citron, the county treasures
- 7.5B portfolio (schools, cities)
- borrowed 12.5B, invested in 5yr. notes
- interest rates increased
- reported at cost - big mistake!
- realized loss of 1.64B
33Daiwa
- 12-th largest bank in Japan
- September 1995
- Hidden loss of 1.1B accumulated over 11 years
- Toshihide Igushi, trader in New York
- Had control of front and back offices
- In 92 and 93 FED warned Daiwa about bad
management structure.
34(No Transcript)
35Big Losses
- Bank Negara, Malaysia 3B 92
- Banesto (Spains 5th bank) 4.7B 93
- Credit Lyonnais 15B 94
- SL short deposits, long loans 150 80s
- Japan 550 90s
36Responses
- G-30 report
- DPG Derivatives Policy Group, risk.ifci.ch
- JPMorgans RiskMetrics www.riskmetrics.com
- GARP www.garp.com
- PRMIA www.prmia.org
- GAO General Accounting Office,
www.gao.gov/reports.htm - FASB FAS 133 www.fas133.com, FAS 107
- IASC, IAS 39 www.iasc.org.uk
- SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
- www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7386.txt
37Financial Risk Management
- Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill
- Chapter 3
- Regulatory Capital Standards with VaR
38Why regulation?
- Externalities
- Deposit insurance
- Moral hazard less incentives to control risk
- Basel Accord 1988
- measure of solvency Cooke ratio
39Cooke ratio
- The Basel Accord requires capital to be at least
8 of the total risk-weighted assets of the bank. - Capital definition is broad
- Tier 1. Stocks, reserves (retained earnings) (?
50) - Tier 2. Perpetual securities, undisclosed
reserves, subordinated debt gt5 years.
40Weights Asset Type
- 0 Cash
- Claims on OECD central government
- local currency claims on central banks
- 20 Cash to be received
- OECD banks and regulated securities firms
- non-OECD banks below 1 year
- multilateral development banks
- foreign OECD public sector entities
- 50 residential mortgage loans
41Weights Asset Type
- 100 Claims on private sector (corp. debt,
equity) - Claims on non-OECD banks above 1 year
- Real estate
- Plant and equipment
- At national discretion
- 0-50 Claims on domestic OECD public-sector
entities - OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development) Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark,
France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, Japan,
Finland, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Czech
Republic, Hungary, Korea and Poland.
42Credit Risk Charge
43Activity Restrictions
- Restrictions on large risks (over 10 of capital)
- must be reported
- over 25 prohibited
- total of large risks can not exceed 8capital
44Criticism of 1988 Approach
- Regulatory arbitrage (securitization)
- Credit derivatives
- Inadequate differentiation of credit risks
- Non-recognition of term structure effect
- Non-recognition of risk mitigation
- Non-recognition of diversification
- Non-recognition of market risk
45Market Risk Amendment 1996
- Trading book financial instruments that
intentionally held for short-term resale and are
typically marked-to-market - Banking book other instruments, like loans.
- TRC CRC MRC
- Tier 3 capital short-term subordinated debt
(must be less than 2.5Tier1)
46The Standardized Model
- Maturity bands
- Partial netting
- Duration weights
- No diversification across risks
47The Internal Models Approach
- Quantitative parameters for VaR
- 10 business days or 2 weeks
- 99 confidence level
- at least one year of historical data updated at
least quarterly - Treatment of correlations can be recognized
48- 1 day can be scaled by square root of 10
- Typically average times k is used.
- k initially is set to 3, but later it can be
increased - Specific Risk Charge SRC is added.
49Basel Rules MRC
- Market Risk Charge MRC
- SRC - specific risk charge, k ?3.
50Backtesting
- Verification of Risk Management models.
- Comparison if the models forecast VaR with the
actual outcome - PL. - Exception occurs when actual loss exceeds VaR.
- After exception - explanation and action.
51Stress
- Designed to estimate potential losses in abnormal
markets. - Extreme events
- Fat tails
- Central questions
- How much we can lose in a certain scenario?
- What event could cause a big loss?
52Further development
- Basel II
- Better treatment of credit risk
- Operational risk
53Non banks
- Securities Firms
- Insurance companies
- Pension funds
- SEC reporting 7A in 10K
- ???? ???? ???? ????? ??????, ??? ?? ?????
54FRM-99, Question 89
- What is the correct interpretation of a 3
overnight VaR figure with 99 confidence level? - A. expect to lose at most 3 in 1 out of next 100
days - B. expect to lose at least 3 in 95 out of next
100 days - C. expect to lose at least 3 in 1 out of next
100 days - D. expect to lose at most 6 in 2 out of next 100
days
55FRM-99, Question 89
- What is the correct interpretation of a 3
overnight VaR figure with 99 confidence level? - A. expect to lose at most 3 in 1 out of next 100
days - B. expect to lose at least 3 in 95 out of next
100 days - C. expect to lose at least 3 in 1 out of next
100 days - D. expect to lose at most 6 in 2 out of next 100
days
56Properties of Risk Measure
- Monotonicity (XltY, R(X)gtR(Y))
- Translation invariance R(Xk) R(X)-k
- Homogeneity R(aX) a R(X) (liquidity??)
- Subadditivity R(XY) ? R(X) R(Y)
- the last property is violated by VaR!
57No subadditivity of VaR
- Bond has a face value of 100,000, during the
target period there is a probability of 0.75
that there will be a default (loss of 100,000). - Note that VaR99 0 in this case.
- What is VaR99 of a position consisting of 2
independent bonds?
58FRM-98, Question 22
- Consider arbitrary portfolios A and B and their
combined portfolio C. Which of the following
relationships always holds for VaRs of A, B, and
C? - A. VaRA VaRB VaRC
- B. VaRA VaRB ? VaRC
- C. VaRA VaRB ? VaRC
- D. None of the above
59FRM-98, Question 22
- Consider arbitrary portfolios A and B and their
combined portfolio C. Which of the following
relationships always holds for VaRs of A, B, and
C? - A. VaRA VaRB VaRC
- B. VaRA VaRB ? VaRC
- C. VaRA VaRB ? VaRC
- D. None of the above
60Confidence level
- low confidence leads to an imprecise result.
- For example 99.99 and 10 business days will
require history of - 10010010 100,000 days in order to have only 1
point.
61Time horizon
- long time horizon can lead to an imprecise
result. - 1 - 10 days means that we will see such a loss
approximately once in 10010 3 years. - 5 and 1 day horizon means once in a month.
- Various subportfolios may require various
horizons.
62Time horizon
- When the distribution is stable one can translate
VaR over different time periods.
This formula is valid (in particular) for iid
normally distributed returns.
63FRM-97, Question 7
- To convert VaR from a one day holding period to a
ten day holding period the VaR number is
generally multiplied by - A. 2.33
- B. 3.16
- C. 7.25
- D. 10
64FRM-97, Question 7
- To convert VaR from a one day holding period to a
ten day holding period the VaR number is
generally multiplied by - A. 2.33
- B. 3.16
- C. 7.25
- D. 10
65Home assignment
- Read chapters 1-3, pay attention to boxes.
66The end