Nonparametric Tests - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 94
About This Presentation
Title:

Nonparametric Tests

Description:

Title: Chapter 11 Author: Lyn Noble Description: Send comments to: Lyn Noble 11901 Beach Blvd Jacksonville FL 32246 lnoble_at_fccj.edu Last modified by – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 95
Provided by: LynN213
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nonparametric Tests


1
Chapter 11
  • Nonparametric Tests

2
Chapter Outline
  • 11.1 The Sign Test
  • 11.2 The Wilcoxon Tests
  • 11.3 The Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • 11.4 Rank Correlation
  • 11.5 The Runs Test

3
Section 11.1
  • The Sign Test

4
Section 11.1 Objectives
  • Use the sign test to test a population median
  • Use the paired-sample sign test to test the
    difference between two population medians
    (dependent samples)

5
Nonparametric Test
  • Nonparametric test
  • A hypothesis test that does not require any
    specific conditions concerning the shape of the
    population or the value of any population
    parameters.
  • Generally easier to perform than parametric
    tests.
  • Usually less efficient than parametric tests
    (stronger evidence is required to reject the null
    hypothesis).

6
Sign Test for a Population Median
  • Sign Test
  • A nonparametric test that can be used to test a
    population median against a hypothesized value k.
  • Left-tailed test
  • H0 median ? k and Ha median lt k
  • Right-tailed test
  • H0 median ? k and Ha median gt k
  • Two-tailed test
  • H0 median k and Ha median ? k

7
Sign Test for a Population Median
  • To use the sign test, each entry is compared with
    the hypothesized median k.
  • If the entry is below the median, a ? sign is
    assigned.
  • If the entry is above the median, a sign is
    assigned.
  • If the entry is equal to the median, 0 is
    assigned.
  • Compare the number of and signs.

8
Sign Test for a Population Median
  • Test Statistic for the Sign Test
  • When n ? 25, the test statistic x for the sign
    test is the smaller number of or ? signs.
  • When n gt 25, the test statistic for the sign test
    is
  • where x is the smaller number of or ? signs
    and n is the sample size (the total number of
    or ? signs).

9
Performing a Sign Test for a Population Median
In Words In Symbols
  1. State the claim. Identify the null and
    alternative hypotheses.
  2. Specify the level of significance.
  3. Determine the sample size n by assigning signs
    and signs to the sample data.
  4. Determine the critical value.

State H0 and Ha.
Identify ?.
n total number of and signs
If n ? 25, use Table 8. If n gt 25, use Table 4.
10
Performing a Sign Test for a Population Median
In Words In Symbols
  1. Calculate the test statistic.

If n ? 25, use x.If n gt 25, use
If the test statistic is less than or equal to
the critical value, reject H0. Otherwise, fail
to reject H0.
  1. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the
    null hypothesis.
  2. Interpret the decision in the context of the
    original claim.

11
Example Using the Sign Test
  • A bank manager claims that the median number of
    customers per day is no more than 750. A teller
    doubts the accuracy of this claim. The number of
    bank customers per day for 16 randomly selected
    days are listed below. At a 0.05, can the
    teller reject the bank managers claim?
  • 775 765 801 742
  • 754 753 739 751
  • 745 750 777 769
  • 756 760 782 789

12
Solution Using the Sign Test
median 750
  • H0
  • Ha

median gt 750
  • Compare each data entry with the hypothesized
    median 750

775 765 801 742 754 753 739 751 745 750 777 769 75
6 760 782 789
0
  • There are 3 signs and 12 signs
  • n 12 3 15

13
Solution Using the Sign Test
0.05
  • a
  • Critical Value

Use Table 8 (n 25)
Critical value is 3
14
Solution Using the Sign Test
  • Test Statistic

x 3 (n 25 use smaller number of or signs)
Reject H0
  • Decision

At the 5 level of significance, the teller can
reject the bank managers claim that the median
number of customers per day is no more than 750.
15
Example Using the Sign Test
  • A car dealership claims to give customers a
    median trade-in offer of at least 6000. A random
    sample of 103 transactions revealed that the
    trade-in offer for 60 automobiles was less than
    6000 and the trade-in offer for 40 automobiles
    was more than 6000. At a 0.01, can you reject
    the dealerships claim?

16
Solution Using the Sign Test
  • H0
  • Ha
  • a
  • Critical value

median 6000
  • Test Statistic
  • Decision

There are 60 signs and 40 signs. n 60 40
100 x 40
median lt 6000
0.01
n gt 25
Fail to Reject H0
-2.33
At the 1 level of significance you cannot reject
the dealerships claim.
-1.9
17
The Paired-Sample Sign Test
  • Paired-sample sign test
  • Used to test the difference between two
    population medians when the populations are not
    normally distributed.
  • For the paired-sample sign test to be used, the
    following must be true.
  • A sample must be randomly selected from each
    population.
  • The samples must be dependent (paired).
  • The difference between corresponding data entries
    is found and the sign of the difference is
    recorded.

18
Performing The Paired-Sample Sign Test
In Words In Symbols
  1. State the claim. Identify the null and
    alternative hypotheses.
  2. Specify the level of significance.
  3. Determine the sample size n by finding the
    difference for each data pair. Assign a sign
    for a positive difference, a sign for a
    negative difference, and a 0 for no difference.

State H0 and Ha.
Identify ?.
n total number of and signs
19
Performing The Paired-Sample Sign Test
In Words In Symbols
  1. Determine the critical value.
  2. Find the test statistic.

Use Table 8 inAppendix B.
x lesser number of and signs
  1. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the
    null hypothesis.
  2. Interpret the decision in the context of the
    original claim.

If the test statistic is less than or equal to
the critical value, reject H0. Otherwise, fail
to reject H0.
20
Example Paired-Sample Sign Test
  • A psychologist claims that the number of repeat
    offenders will decrease if first-time offenders
    complete a particular rehabilitation course. You
    randomly select 10 prisons and record the number
    of repeat offenders during a two-year period.
    Then, after first-time offenders complete the
    course, you record the number of repeat offenders
    at each prison for another two-year period. The
    results are shown on the next slide. Ata
    0.025, can you support the psychologists claim?

21
Example Paired-Sample Sign Test
Prison 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Before 21 34 9 45 30 54 37 36 33 40
After 19 22 16 31 21 30 22 18 17 21
Sign
Solution
The number of repeat offenders will not decrease.
  • H0
  • Ha

The number of repeat offenders will decrease.
  • Determine the sign of the difference between the
    before and after data.

22
Solution Paired-Sample Sign Test
Sign
0.025 (one-tailed)
  • a
  • n
  • Critical value

1 9 10
Critical value is 1
23
Solution Paired-Sample Sign Test
Sign
  • Test Statistic
  • Decision

x 1 (the smaller number of or signs)
Reject H0
At the 2.5 level of significance, you can
support the psychologists claim that the number
of repeat offenders will decrease.
24
Section 11.1 Summary
  • Used the sign test to test a population median
  • Used the paired-sample sign test to test the
    difference between two population medians
    (dependent samples)

25
Section 11.2
  • The Wilcoxon Tests

26
Section 11.2 Objectives
  • Use the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine if
    two dependent samples are selected from
    populations having the same distribution
  • Use the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine if
    two independent samples are selected from
    populations having the same distribution.

27
The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
  • Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
  • A nonparametric test that can be used to
    determine whether two dependent samples were
    selected from populations having the same
    distribution.
  • Unlike the sign test, it considers the magnitude,
    or size, of the data entries.

28
Performing The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
In Words In Symbols
  1. State the claim. Identify the null and
    alternative hypotheses.
  2. Specify the level of significance.
  3. Determine the sample size n, which is the number
    of pairs of data for which the difference is not
    0.
  4. Determine the critical value.

State H0 and Ha.
Identify ?.
Use Table 9 in Appendix B.
29
Performing The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
In Words In Symbols
  • Calculate the test statistic ws.
  • Complete a table using the headers listed at the
    right.
  • Find the sum of the positive ranks and the sum of
    the negative ranks.
  • Select the smaller of absolute values of the sums.

Headers Sample 1, Sample 2, Difference, Absolute
value, Rank, and Signed rank. Signed rank takes
on the same sign as its corresponding difference.
30
Performing The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
In Words In Symbols
  1. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the
    null hypothesis.
  2. Interpret the decision in the context of the
    original claim.

If ws is less than or equal to the critical
value, reject H0. Otherwise, fail to reject H0.
31
Example Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
  • A sports psychologist believes that listening to
    music affects the length of athletes workout
    sessions. The length of time (in minutes) of 10
    athletes workout sessions, while listening to
    music and while not listening to music, are
    shown in the table. At a 0.05, can you support
    the sports psychologists claim?

With music 45 38 28 39 41 47 62 54 33 44
Without music 38 40 33 36 42 41 54 47 28 35
32
Solution Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
There is no difference in the length of the
athletes workout sessions.
  • H0
  • Ha
  • a
  • n

There is a difference in the length of the
athletes workout sessions.
0.05 (two-tailed test)
10 (the difference between each data pair is not
0)
33
Solution Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
  • Critical Value

Table 9
Critical value is 8
34
Solution Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
  • Test Statistic

With music Without music Difference Absolute value Rank Signed rank
45 38
38 40
28 33
39 36
41 42
47 41
62 54
54 47
33 28
44 35
7
7.5
-2
2
4.5
-5
3
3
1
-1
6
6
8
9
7
7.5
4.5
5
9
10
35
Solution Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
  • Test Statistic

The sum of the negative ranks is -1 (-2)
(-4.5) -7.5
The sum of the positive ranks is (3) (4.5)
(6) (7.5) (7.5) (9) (10) 47.5
ws 7.5 (the smaller of the absolute value of
these two sums -7.5 lt 47.5)
36
Solution Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
  • Decision

Reject H0
At the 5 level of significance, you have enough
evidence to support the claim that music makes a
difference in the length of athletes workout
sessions.
37
The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
  • Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
  • A nonparametric test that can be used to
    determine whether two independent samples were
    selected from populations having the same
    distribution.
  • A requirement for the Wilcoxon rank sum test is
    that the sample size of both samples must be at
    least 10.
  • n1 represents the size of the smaller sample and
    n2 represents the size of the larger sample.
  • When calculating the sum of the ranks R, use the
    ranks for the smaller of the two samples.

38
Test Statistic for The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
  • Given two independent samples, the test statistic
    z for the Wilcoxon rank sum test is

where R sum of the ranks for the smaller
sample,
and
39
Performing The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
In Words In Symbols
  1. State the claim. Identify the null and
    alternative hypotheses.
  2. Specify the level of significance.
  3. Determine the critical value(s).
  4. Determine the sample sizes.

State H0 and Ha.
Identify ?.
Use Table 4 in Appendix B.
n1 n2
40
Performing The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
In Words In Symbols
  • Find the sum of the ranks for the smaller sample.
  • List the combined data in ascending order.
  • Rank the combined data.
  • Add the sum of the ranks for the smaller sample.

R
41
Performing The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
In Words In Symbols
  1. Calculate the test statistic.
  2. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the
    null hypothesis.
  3. Interpret the decision in the context of the
    original claim.

If z is in the rejection region, reject H0.
Otherwise, fail to reject H0.
42
Example Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
  • The table shows the earnings (in thousands of
    dollars) of a random sample of 10 male and 12
    female pharmaceutical sales representatives. At a
    0.10, can you conclude that there is a
    difference between the males and females
    earnings?

Male 58 73 94 81 78 74 66 75 97 79
Female 66 57 81 73 65 78 71 67 64 77 80 70
43
Solution Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
There is no difference between the males and the
females earnings.
  • H0
  • Ha

There is a difference between the males and the
females earnings.
0.10 (two-tailed test)
  • a
  • Rejection Region

44
Solution Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
To find the values of R, µR, and?R, construct a
table that shows the combined data in ascending
order and the corresponding ranks.
Ordered data Sample Rank
57 F 1
58 M 2
64 F 3
65 F 4
66 M 5.5
66 F 5.5
67 F 7
70 F 8
71 F 9
73 F 10.5
73 F 10.5
Ordered data Sample Rank
74 M 12
75 M 13
77 F 14
78 M 15.5
78 F 15.5
79 M 17
80 F 18
81 M 19.5
81 F 19.5
94 M 21
97 M 22
45
Solution Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
  • Because the smaller sample is the sample of
    males, R is the sum of the male rankings.

R 2 5.5 10.5 12 13 15.5 17 19.5
21 22 138
  • Using n1 10 and n2 12, we can find µR, and?R.

46
Solution Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
  • H0
  • Ha

no difference in earnings.
  • Test Statistic

difference in earnings.
  • a
  • Rejection Region

0.10
  • Decision

Fail to reject H0
At the 10 level of significance, you cannot
conclude that there is a difference between the
males and females earnings.
1.52
47
Section 11.2 Summary
  • Used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine
    if two dependent samples are selected from
    populations having the same distribution
  • Used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine if
    two independent samples are selected from
    populations having the same distribution.

48
Section 11.3
  • The Kruskal-Wallis Test

49
Section 11.3 Objectives
  • Use the Kruskal-Wallis test to determine whether
    three or more samples were selected from
    populations having the same distribution.

50
The Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • Kruskal-Wallis test
  • A nonparametric test that can be used to
    determine whether three or more independent
    samples were selected from populations having the
    same distribution.
  • The null and alternative hypotheses for the
    Kruskal-Wallis test are as follows.

H0 There is no difference in the distribution
of the populations. Ha There is a difference
in the distribution of the populations.
51
The Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • Two conditions for using the Kruskal-Wallis test
    are
  • Each sample must be randomly selected
  • The size of each sample must be at least 5.
  • If these conditions are met, the test is
    approximated by a chi-square distribution with k
    1 degrees of freedom where k is the number of
    samples.

52
The Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • Test Statistic for the Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • Given three or more independent samples, the test
    statistic H for the Kruskal-Wallis test is

where k represent the number of samples, ni
is the size of the ith sample, N is the sum of
the sample sizes, Ri is the sum of the ranks of
the ith sample.
53
Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test
In Words In Symbols
  1. State the claim. Identify the null and
    alternative hypotheses.
  2. Specify the level of significance.
  3. Identify the degrees of freedom
  4. Determine the critical value and the rejection
    region.

State H0 and Ha.
Identify ?.
d.f. k 1
Use Table 6 in Appendix B.
54
Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test
In Words In Symbols
  • Find the sum of the ranks for each sample.
  • List the combined data in ascending order.
  • Rank the combined data.
  • Calculate the test statistic.

55
Performing a Kruskal-Wallis Test
In Words In Symbols
If H is in the rejection region, reject H0.
Otherwise, fail to reject H0.
  1. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the
    null hypothesis.
  2. Interpret the decision in the context of the
    original claim.

56
Example Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • You want to compare the hourly pay rates of
    actuaries who work in California, Indiana, and
    Maryland. To do so, you randomly select several
    actuaries in each state and record their hourly
    pay rate. The hourly pay rates are shown on the
    next slide. At a 0.01, can you conclude that
    the distributions of actuaries hourly pay rates
    in these three states are different? (Adapted
    from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)

57
Example Kruskal-Wallis Test
Sample Hourly Pay Rates Sample Hourly Pay Rates Sample Hourly Pay Rates
CA(Sample 1) IN(Sample 2) MD(Sample 3)
40.50 33.45 49.68
44.98 40.12 44.94
47.78 38.65 48.80
43.20 35.98 49.20
37.10 35.97 40.37
49.88 4570 48.79
42.05 42.05 53.82
52.94 35.97 45.35
41.70 38.25 53.25
43.85 43.57
58
Solution Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • H0
  • Ha

There is no difference in the hourly pay rates in
the three states.
There is a difference in the hourly pay rates in
the three states.
  • a
  • d.f.
  • Rejection Region

0.01
k 1 3 1 2
59
Solution Kruskal-Wallis Test
The table shows the combined data listed in
ascending order and the corresponding ranks.
Ordered Data Sample Rank
33.45 IN 1
35.97 IN 2.5
35.97 IN 2.5
35.98 IN 4
37.10 CA 5
38.25 IN 6
38.65 IN 7
40.12 IN 8
40.37 MD 9
40.50 CA 10
Ordered Data Sample Rank
41.70 CA 11
42.05 IN 12.5
42.05 CA 12.5
43.20 CA 14
43.57 MD 15
43,85 CA 16
44.94 MD 17
44.98 CA 18
45.35 MD 19
45.70 IN 20
Ordered Data Sample Rank
47.78 CA 21
48.79 MD 22
48.80 MD 23
49.20 MD 24
49.68 MD 25
49.88 CA 26
52.94 CA 27
53.25 MD 28
53.82 MD 29
60
Solution Kruskal-Wallis Test
The sum of the ranks for each sample is as
follows. R1 5 10 11 12.5 14 16
18 21 26 27 160.5 R2 1
2.5 2.5 4 6 7 8 12.5 20
63.5 R3 9 15 17 19 22 23 24
25 28 29 211
61
Solution Kruskal-Wallis Test
  • H0
  • Ha

no difference in hourly pay rates
  • Test Statistic

H 13.12
difference in hourly pay rates.
  • Decision

Reject H0
0.01
  • a
  • d.f.
  • Rejection Region

At the 1 level of significance, you can conclude
that there is a difference in actuaries hourly
pay rates in California, Indiana, and Maryland.
3 1 2
13.12
62
Section 11.3 Summary
  • Used the Kruskal-Wallis test to determine whether
    three or more samples were selected from
    populations having the same distribution.

63
Section 11.4
  • Rank Correlation

64
Section 11.4 Objectives
  • Use the Spearman rank correlation coefficient to
    determine whether the correlation between two
    variables is significant.

65
The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
  • Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
  • A measure of the strength of the relationship
    between two variables.
  • Nonparametric equivalent to the Pearson
    correlation coefficient.
  • Calculated using the ranks of paired sample data
    entries.
  • Denoted rs

66
The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
  • Spearman rank correlation coefficient rs
  • The formula for the Spearman rank correlation
    coefficient is
  • where n is the number of paired data entries
  • d is the difference between the ranks of
    a paired data entry.

67
The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
  • The values of rs range from -1 to 1, inclusive.
  • If the ranks of corresponding data pairs are
    identical, rs is equal to 1.
  • If the ranks are in reverse order, rs is equal
    to -1.
  • If there is no relationship, rs is equal to 0.
  • To determine whether the correlation between
    variables is significant, you can perform a
    hypothesis test for the population correlation
    coefficient ?s.

68
The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
  • The null and alternative hypotheses for this test
    are as follows.

H0 ?s 0 (There is no correlation between the
variables.) Ha ?s ? 0
(There is a significant correlation between
the variables.)
69
Testing the Significance of the Spearman Rank
Correlation Coefficient
In Words In Symbols
  1. State the null and alternative hypotheses.
  2. Specify the level of significance.
  3. Determine the critical value.
  4. Find the test statistic.

State H0 and Ha.
Identify ?.
Use Table 10 in Appendix B.
70
Testing the Significance of the Spearman Rank
Correlation Coefficient
In Words In Symbols
If rs is greater than the critical value,
reject H0. Otherwise, fail to reject H0.
  1. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the
    null hypothesis.
  2. Interpret the decision in the context of the
    original claim.

71
Example The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
  • The table shows the prices (in dollars per 100
    pounds) received by U.S. farmers for beef and
    lamb from 1999 to 2005. At a 0.05, can you
    conclude that there is a correlation between the
    beef and lamb prices? (Source U.S. Department
    of Agriculture)

Year Beef Lamb
1999 63.4 74.5
2000 68.6 79.8
2001 71.3 66.9
2002 66.5 74.1
2003 79.7 94.4
2004 85.8 101.0
2005 89.7 110.0
72
Solution The Spearman Rank Correlation
Coefficient
  • H0
  • Ha

?s 0 (no correlation between beef and lamb
prices)
?s ? 0 (correlation between beef and lamb prices)
  • a
  • n
  • Critical value

0.05
7
The critical value is 0.786
73
Solution The Spearman Rank Correlation
Coefficient
Beef Rank Lamb Rank d d2
63.4 74.5
68.6 79.8
71.3 66.9
66.5 74.1
79.7 94.4
85.8 101.0
89.7 110.0
1
3
-2
4
3
4
-1
1
4
1
3
9
2
2
0
0
5
5
0
0
6
6
0
0
7
7
0
0
Sd2 14
74
Solution The Spearman Rank Correlation
Coefficient
?s 0
  • H0
  • Ha
  • Test Statistic

?s ? 0
  • a
  • n
  • Critical value

0.05
7
  • Decision

Fail to Reject H0
The critical value is 0.786
At the 5 level of significance, you cannot
conclude that there is a significant correlation
between beef and lamb prices between 1999 and
2005.
75
Section 11.4 Summary
  • Used the Spearman rank correlation coefficient to
    determine whether the correlation between two
    variables is significant.

76
Section 11.5
  • The Runs Test

77
Section 11.5 Objectives
  • Use the runs test to determine whether a data set
    is random.

78
The Runs Test for Randomness
  • A run is a sequence of data having the same
    characteristic.
  • Each run is preceded by and followed by data with
    a different characteristic or by no data at all.
  • The number of data in a run is called the length
    of the run.

79
Example Finding the Number of Runs
  • A liquid-dispensing machine has been designed to
    fill one-liter bottles. A quality control
    inspector decides whether each bottle is filled
    to an acceptable level and passes inspection (P)
    or fails inspection (F). Determine the number of
    runs for the sequence and find the length of each
    run.
  • P P F F F F P F F F P P P P P P

There are 5 runs.
Solution
P P F F F F P F F F P P P P P P
Length of run
2
4
1
3
6
80
Runs Test for Randomness
  • Runs Test for Randomness
  • A nonparametric test that can be used to
    determine whether a sequence of sample data is
    random.
  • The null and alternative hypotheses for this test
    are as follows.

H0 The sequence of data is random. Ha The
sequence of data is not random.
81
Test Statistic for the Runs Test
  • When n1 ? 20 and n2 ? 20, the test statistic for
    the runs test is G, the number of runs.
  • When n1 gt 20 or n2 gt 20, the test statistic for
    the runs test is

where
82
Performing a Runs Test for Randomness
In Words In Symbols
  1. State the claim. Identify null and alternative
    hypotheses.
  2. Specify the level of significance. (Use a 0.05
    for the runs test.)
  3. Determine the number of data that have each
    characteristic and the number of runs.

State H0 and Ha.
Identify ?.
Determine n1, n2, and G.
83
Performing a Runs Test for Randomness
In Words In Symbols
  1. Determine the critical values.
  2. Calculate the test statistic.

If n1 ? 20 and n2 ? 20, use Table 12. If n1 gt 20
or n2 gt 20, use Table 4.
84
Performing a Runs Test for Randomness
In Words In Symbols
  1. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the
    null hypothesis.
  2. Interpret the decision in the context of the
    original claim.

If G ? the lower critical value, or if G ? the
upper critical value, reject H0. Otherwise, fail
to reject H0.
85
Example Using the Runs Test
  • A foreman for a construction company records
    injuries reported by workers during his shift.
    The following sequence shows whether any injuries
    were reported during each month in a recent year.
    I represents a month in which at least one injury
    was reported and N represents a month in which no
    injuries were reported. At a 0.05, can you
    conclude that the occurrence of injuries each
    month is not random?
  • I I N N N I N I I N N N

86
Solution Using the Runs Test
  • H0
  • Ha

The occurrence of injuries is random.
The occurrence of injuries is not random.
  • I I N N N I N I I N N N
  • n1 number of Is
  • n2 number of Ns
  • G number of runs
  • a
  • Critical value

5
7
6
0.05
Because n1 20, n2 20, use Table 12
87
Solution Using the Runs Test
  • Critical value
  • n1 5 n2 7 G 6

The lower critical value is 3 and the upper
critical value is 11.
88
Solution Using the Runs Test
  • H0
  • Ha

random
  • Decision

Fail to Reject H0
At the 5 level of significance, you do not have
enough evidence to support the claim that the
occurrence of injuries is not random. So, it
appears that the injuries reported by workers
during the foremans shift occur randomly.
not random
  • n1 n2
  • G
  • a
  • Critical value

5
7
6
0.05
lower critical value 3 upper critical value 11
  • Test Statistic

G 6
89
Example Using the Runs Test
  • You want to determine whether the selection of
    recently hired employees in a large company is
    random with respect to gender. The genders of 36
    recently hired employees are shown below. At a
    0.05, can you conclude that the selection is not
    random?
  • M M F F F F M M M M M M
  • F F F F F M M M M M M M
  • F F F M M M M F M M F M

90
Solution Using the Runs Test
  • H0
  • Ha

The selection of employees is random.
The selection of employees is not random.
  • M M F F F F M M M M M M
  • F F F F F M M M M M M M
  • F F F M M M M F M M F M
  • n1 number of Fs
  • n2 number of Ms
  • G number of runs

14
22
11
91
Solution Using the Runs Test
  • H0
  • Ha

random
  • Test Statistic

not random
  • n1 n2
  • G
  • a
  • Critical value

14
22
11
0.05
  • Decision

n2 gt 20, use Table 4
92
Solution Using the Runs Test
93
Solution Using the Runs Test
  • H0
  • Ha

random
  • Test Statistic

z -2.53
not random
  • n1 n2
  • G
  • a
  • Critical value

14
22
  • Decision

Reject H0
11
You have enough evidence at the 5 level of
significance to support the claim that the
selection of employees with respect to gender is
not random.
0.05
-2.53
94
Section 11.5 Summary
  • Used the runs test to determine whether a data
    set is random.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com