BIOL B242 Evolutionary Genetics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

BIOL B242 Evolutionary Genetics

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Jim Mallet Last modified by: Mallet Created Date: 3/9/2004 9:05:28 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: JimMa88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BIOL B242 Evolutionary Genetics


1
BIOL B242 Evolutionary Genetics Coevolution   What
is coevolution? Coevolution is Evolution in
two or more evolutionary entities brought about
by reciprocal selective effects between the
entities   from Ehrlich and Raven (1964)
"Butterflies and plants a study in coevolution"
2
Examples we have already encountered   Sex and
recombination possibly a coevolutionary arms
race between organisms and their
parasites   Sexual selection between female
choice and male secondary sexual traits i.e.
coevolution within a single species Here we deal
with interspecific coevolution only.
3
Coevolution may occur in any interspecific
interaction.   For exampleInterspecific
competition for food or space Ø      
Parasite/host interactions Ø       Predator/prey
interactions Ø       Symbiosis Ø      
Mutualisms   Mimicry, for example potentially
coevolutionary, can be parasite/host interaction
(Batesian) or mutualism (Müllerian mimicry)
4
Types of coevolution "How likely is
coevolution?"   depends what you mean by
coevolution! Types   Specific coevolution
coevolution (narrow sense) Changes in one sp.
induce changes in the other Either polygenic or
gene-for-gene coevolution   Concordant speciation
or cospeciation Speciation in one form causes
speciation in another Cospeciation doesn't
necessarily require coevolution Diffuse
coevolution guild coevolution Groups of species
interact in non-pairwise fashion c.f. Ehrlich
Ravens original idea   Escape-and-radiate
coevolution evolutionary innovation enables
adaptive radiation, i.e. speciation due to
availability of ecological opportunity.
5
Gene-for-gene coevolution in the Hessian Fly,
Mayetiola destructor, a pest of wheat in
USA  Gallun et al. 1972
Hessian fly race susceptibility Resistance genes in wheat
Great Plains H1, H2 , H3, H5 , H6, H7, H8
A H3, H5, H6
B H5, H6
C H3, H5
D H5
E H1, H2, H5, H6, H7, H8
F Hl, H2, H3, H5, H7, H8
G Hl, H2, H5, H7, H8
6
  • Concordant and non-concordant phylogenies
  •  
  • If the phylogenies are concordant, this may
    imply
  • That cospeciation has occurred, or
  • That one of the groups (often the parasite) has
    "colonized" the other (the host).  Host shifts
    may well correspond to phylogeny because closely
    related hosts are more similar.
  • In other cases, phylogenies may not be
    concordant, because the parasite may be able to
    switch between host lineages fairly frequently.

7
(No Transcript)
8
Buchnera (gut symbiont of aphids)
9
Wolbachia
10
Genus Ficus and the syconium
(Source James Cook 2003
11
Fig-pollinating wasps form the family
Agaonidae Very specific coevolution
(Source James Cook 2003)
12
Wasps and seeds develop in female flowers
(Source James Cook 2003 )
13
There is significant congruence of fig and wasp
species level phylogenies
(Source James Cook 2003)
14
Host/parasite and predator/prey coevolution
Concordant phylogenies do not prove
coevolution   We must look at individual
adaptations of the exploiter and the exploited
15
Diffuse coevolution examples Defences of plants
vs herbivores "Secondary chemistry" e.g.
tannins and other phenolic compounds, alkaloids
like nicotine and THC, or cyanogenic
glycosides Often toxic   Animals, such as
insects, have obviously adapted to feeding on
plants   If plants have evolved defensive
chemistry, ? plant/insect coevolution.  
  Argument of Ehrlich Raven  
16
  • Critics argue that
  • phytophagous insects are usually rare, and
    therefore do not pose a threat to their host
    plants
  • secondary chemistry may be a byproduct of
    normal metabolic processes, rather than
    necessarily defensive

17
  • Evidence for insect/plant coevolution
  •  
  • Central American plant bullshorn Acacia
  • Acacia cornigera (Dan Janzen 1966)
  • Large spines normally vs. mammals
  • Lacks cyanogenic glycosides
  • Thorns large, hollow, shelter
  • Pseudomyrmex ants
  • Extrafloral nectaries
  • Proteinaceous food (Müllerian bodies)
  • which ants eat
  • Ants are nasty! Defend against
  • caterpillars, mammals, plants
  • Plants not occupied by ants are
  • heavily attacked.

18
(No Transcript)
19
  • Related Acacia species
  • Lack hollow thorns, food bodies
  • Spines defend against mammals
  • No specific associations with ants
  • Many cyanogenic glycosides in their leaves
  •  
  • bullshorn Acacia has evolved a close,
    mutualistic association with the ants to protect
    from herbivores (and plant competitors)
  • cyanogenic glycosides that are found in other
    species have a defensive role a role which has
    been taken over by Pseudomyrmex in the ant-acacia

20
Passiflora and Heliconius Defenses of
cyanogenic glycosides, alkaloids breached by
Heliconius
21
Coevolution in Passiflora nectaries, egg
mimicry, leaf shape diversity
22
  • Predator-prey coevolution
  •  
  • Predator offensive evolution
  • e.g. Mammalian predators must be fast, strong,
    cunning
  •  
  • Prey defence
  • Large size and strength
  • Protective coverings such as shells or hard
    bony plates
  • Defensive weapons, such as stings or horns
  • Defensive coloration (see mimicry lecture)
  • Unpalatability and nastiness
  •  
  • ...examples of coevolution

23
Highly coevolved pollination systems   e.g. bees
and orchids but unidirectional parasitism? Like
Batesian mimicry.   Bees have evolved to visit
flowers that give rewards (nectar, pollen).
  Orchids often adapt by parasitizing bees
pollination systems no reward.   But bees are
smart. Avoid flowers without rewards.   Some
orchids exploit sexual system of bees, mimic
female bees males mate, and pollinate.
24
  • Yucca and Yucca moths (Tegeticula)
  • Figs and figwasps
  •  
  • Larvae are seed/flower eaters
  • Plant is dependent on herbivore for pollination
  •  
  • v   Tightly coevolved mutualism
  •  

25
In fig wasps, and most Yucca moths, these
mutualisms have become very specific, and
essential to both species.   Similar to ancient
prokaryotic mutualisms Mitochondria
chloroplasts with archaebacterial cells producing
eukaryotes
26
Coevolutionary competitive interactions and
adaptive radiation Escape and radiate
coevolution   Problem for diversification Gause
s principle If two species have identical
resources   competitive exclusion  less well
adapted species will go extinct  
27
  • Ecological release (the reverse of Gauses
    principle)
  •  
  • A species colonizes area where no competitors
  • May experience ecological release
  • Grows to very large population sizes
  • Disruptive selection to evolve apart
  •  
  • Adaptive radiation
  •  
  • Often on islands
  • e.g. Darwin's finches of the Galapagos islands
  • e.g. Hawaiian honeycreepers
  •  

28
Sometimes on ecological islands e.g. lakes in
the North temperate zone in last 10,000
years   Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) benthic
(deep water) and limnetic (shallow water)
forms keep to their own habitat, mate
assortatively   Trout family Atlantic char
(Salvelinus), Thingvallavatn, Iceland FOUR
different trophic forms   Cichlids in African
Lakes 300 spp. in the last 12,400 years in Lake
Victoria Partly sexual selection, partly
ecological divergence
29
Adaptations leading to ecological
release "escape and radiate" coevolution
  Possession of a unique adaptation may also
allow adaptive radiation   Resin- or
latex-bearing canals in plants Latex and resin
is a physical defence against herbivorous
insects   more rapid speciation rate
30
Brian Farrell Herbivory on flowering plants
  massive amounts of speciation in ...
beetles! Curculionidae (weevils) green
conifers blue monocots red dicots brown cycads
31
Brian Farrell Herbivory on flowering plants
  massive amounts of speciation Chrysomeloidea
(leaf beetles) green conifers blue
monocots red dicots brown cycads
32
Conclusions. Coevolution Specific (gene for
gene) coevolution Co-speciation (matching
phylogenies) Diffuse coevolution (many shifts,
but evolution not independent) Escape and radiate
coevolution (eg host colonization like
islands) An area where genetics, ecology,
phylogeny interact (General themes we have
stressed in this course!)   Majority of diversity
of life not just due to adaptation to static
environments instead, due to biotic
interactions   Biotic environment itself
constantly evolving Orders of magnitude more
diversity than by simple, static adaptations
Refs Futuyma, Freeman Herron etc.
33
The End
34
Yucca and Yucca moths   Sometimes the mutualism
breaks down Moth reverts to a parasitism
does not pollinate
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com