Mira Vogel, Goldsmiths, University of London - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Mira Vogel, Goldsmiths, University of London

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Mira Vogel Last modified by: Mira Abigail Vogel Created Date: 6/25/2004 4:01:39 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:409
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: MiraV8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mira Vogel, Goldsmiths, University of London


1
Using VLEs effectively Goldsmiths experience
  • Mira Vogel, Goldsmiths, University of London

2
25 minutes of you choose what
  • VLEs from different perspectives
  • Distinctive Moodle features (15-20 min)
  • Overview and specific examples
  • Examples of how we use the VLE at Goldsmiths
  • General to specific
  • Ideas for achieving most effective use of VLE
  • 5 mins ideas from me, for discussion
  • Discuss and present your fantasy VLE
  • Listen to my presentation on Moodle features
  • In groups your fantasy VLE what features would
    it include, and how would they help teaching and
    learning?
  • Jot your ideas on a Wiki and present them
  • Anything else?

3
VLEs from different perspectives
4
VLEs the student view
??
? ?
??
helps to make the most of the face-to-face-time
??
??
??
??
??
5
Student concerns
  • VLE mustnt threaten f2f time
  • Access
  • Accessibility
  • Usability
  • Bandwidth
  • Communication
  • Lack of non-verbal social cues - unnerving or
    liberating?
  • Typing new communication difficulties /
    strengths?
  • Longevity of a statement
  • Feeling of being watched
  • Inhibiting / motivating?
  • Expectations low and high
  • Multimedia not a priority
  • Demands for flexibility
  • Many different platforms
  • Difficulties accessing material
  • Reliability
  • As advertised, when promised.
  • Any others?

6
(No Transcript)
7
Tutor concerns
  • How to drive a VLE
  • Configuring, uploading, different perspectives
    tc
  • Web design requires new skills and knowledge
  • Different platforms
  • Perception eg line length, placing elements tc
  • Intuitive navigation
  • Orientation
  • Learning design requires new skills
  • When and how to use the tools
  • Communication
  • E-moderating is very different from f2f
    facilitation
  • Providing the medium does not mean it will be
    well used
  • Lack of time to prepare
  • Also remember to make available
  • Reservations about making stuff available online
  • theft
  • VLE mustnt threaten f2f time
  • Any more?

8
A systems administrator view of moodle
  • As the user group grows, ? stability, ? features
  • Eg LDAP authentication now built in
  • Burden of flagging bugs is widely spread
    quickly fixed
  • Light workload last month only 1½ hours
    critical jobs
  • More if you take advantage of changing the source
    code
  • Installing a new release takes 2-3 hours as and
    when
  • ..dont need a great deal of specialised
    knowledge
  • Server administration an important skill can be
    picked up
  • Uh-oh whats going on?
  • The forums are incredibly useful OS ethos
  • Compare commercial systems which do not support
    access to developers and other users
    Contents

9
Overview of Moodle
10
Whats distinctive about Moodle?
  • Pedagogic aspects
  • Emphasis on activities and interaction
  • Social constructivist model emphasises
    connectedness as a stimulus for learning
  • Flexible we can change it
  • Straightforward for most - ? cognitive load
  • Return to global perspective of an institution
    interdisciplinary insights
  • Open source aspects
  • Transparency
  • User-group - lively, friendly, supportive,
    sharing
  • Support timely but requires initiative.
  • Ownership ? self-efficacy
  • Faith in the face of inadequacies
  • Nimble responses to bugs, wishlists new
    approaches
  • Documentation variable currency, completeness
    relevance.

11
Features of Moodle
  • Four roles in moodle
  • Administrator, course creator, lecturer, student
  • Those higher in the hierarchy can assume lower
    roles
  • Three course types
  • Topic view, weekly view and social view
  • Integration of different file types
  • Scheduling and organising
  • Strong on activities in groups or individually
  • Assignment, Chat, Choice, Dialogue, Forum,
    Glossary, Journals, Lesson, Wiki, Workshop
  • Coming soon (among other things)
  • Blog tool greater configurability of groups
    full accessibility

12
Requirements for running Moodle
  • At Goldsmiths we run it on
  • Twin Intel Xeon 2.8 GHz Processors
  • 4 GB RAM
  • 292 GB Storage (RAID)
  • Two Gigabits NICs
  • Red Hat Linux 8.0, Apache Web server, PostgreSQL
  • PHP scripting language (version 4.1.0 or later)
  • Database server MySQL or PostgreSQL are
    recommended
  • Staff development and support in learning design,
    rather than procedural use of Moodle
  • Optional support we pay 3k per year to
    Moodles dad, Martin Dougiamas for any quick
    fixes Contents

13
  • Ideas for the future

At Goldsmiths
14
Goldsmiths experience with Moodle
  • Worst use
  • Files, files and more files
  • Information graveyard
  • Imbalance no activities
  • Fragmented course areas
  • Lack of context or hierarchies of importance
  • Empty forums and chat sessions
  • Missed opportunities for communication
  • Expectation that students can comfortably read
    from a screen
  • Best use
  • The vibrant PGCE forums
  • Mutual support for remote students meets a real
    need
  • Self assessment - EFL
  • Embedded fill-in-the-blank questions with
    feedback
  • Wiki as a gallery space for Art Design students
  • Workshop for
  • Peer-reviewing journal articles at a distance
  • Reviewing online Creole language resources

15
Our teaching and learning challenge
  • Move on from naïve usage
  • Our teaching and learning challenge
  • Tutors preparing / gathering / pointing to
    content AND designing activities which promote
    the higher forms of learning
  • Flexible design for diverse learners
  • Trustworthiness - currency, completeness,
    accuracy, attribution, adherence to schedule,
    housekeeping
  • Usability, accessibility, affective responses
  • Our fellowship scheme - for buying out time,
    buying equipment tc
  • Workshops 2 hours on a variety of topics

We spent a while watching our birdbox
16
  • Ideas for the future

Distinctive Moodle Features
17
Moodle - the less intuitive activities
  • Choice
  • Glossary
  • Journal
  • Lesson
  • Quizzes
  • Wiki
  • (Scorm)
  • Workshop

18
Moodle choice polling tool
  • Strengths
  • Promotes involvement
  • Allows consultation
  • Configurable - eg how respondents see results
  • Drawbacks
  • Once choice only cant use it for eg rating or
    matching
  • Single question only not a questionnaire
  • Applications
  • Icebreaking
  • Straw polls
  • Enticing learners into a course space
  • Quick consultation in advance of session
  • Specific feedback
  • Examples in practice
  • Contact celt_at_gold.ac.uk for access to light
    pollution legislation

19
Moodle glossary shared reference
  • Strengths
  • Can be activity or resource
  • Useful for acquainting learners with basic terms
    and concepts a grounding
  • Builds research and communication skills
  • Drawbacks
  • Needs a validation method
  • Application
  • Defining frequently used jargon or difficult
    concepts
  • Trigger for discussion and debate
  • Use in practice
  • Contact celt_at_gold.ac.uk for access to Astronomy
    101

20
Moodle journal reflective dialogue
  • Strengths
  • A self-contained record for future reference
  • Can flag progress or difficulties
  • Configurable can be shown to or hidden from
    other students
  • Drawbacks
  • Tutor initiated not a blog
  • Depends on the trigger question
  • Tutor must check or ? motivation, and ? cynical
    checking boxes
  • Can be a drag to complete
  • Application
  • Personally keeping in touch with students
  • Gauging and comparing attitudes
  • Examples in practice
  • PGCE students on placements confidential so
    unable to show.

21
Moodle lessons guided learning
  • Strengths
  • Gated progress
  • Branched navigation can be very responsive
  • Feedback
  • Drawbacks
  • Easy to swamp student with information
  • A little too programmed for some
  • Application
  • Good for grounding in procedures, mechanisms tc
  • Good for clearing up frequent misunderstandings
  • Examples in practice
  • Contact celt_at_gold.ac.uk for access to Renewable
    energy

22
Moodle quiz self-test and assessment
  • Strengths
  • Feedback
  • Configurable
  • Drawbacks
  • A bit clunky to set up
  • Some formats involve (simple) hand-coding
  • Simple interface eg no drag-and-drop (SCORM a
    solution here)
  • Application
  • Consolidate knowledge
  • Identify gaps in knowledge
  • Benchmark knowledge
  • Revision
  • Examples in practice
  • Contact celt_at_gold.ac.uk for access to Revise
    solar water heating and Astronomy quiz

23
Moodle wikis web sites edited by users
  • Strengths
  • Quick and easy to publish and revise
  • No need for expertise, client software
  • Remote collaboration on shared resource
  • Drawbacks
  • Vulnerable to inexperienced users, or even abuse
  • Needs ground rules
  • Eg risk of conflict when saving lost work
  • Application
  • Many eg showcase, regular website
  • Planning, sharing examples
  • Examples in practice
  • Contact celt_at_gold.ac.uk for access to Our homes

24
Moodle workshop peer review
  • Strengths
  • Supports complexity eg criteria, weighting
  • Supports scales, yes/no, numerical and free text
  • Various ways to disseminate results
  • Drawbacks
  • Designing good ones takes time and thought
  • Requires manually enabling the different stages
  • Application
  • Peer review
  • Groups reviewing external resources
  • Examples in practice
  • Contact celt_at_gold.ac.uk for access to Metaphysics
    workshop
  • Contents

25
  • Ideas for the future

Ideas for the future
26
Ideas for the future
  • Hypothecated fellowships for use of specific
    tools, or adoption of specific criteria?
  • Eg use of a feature like peer-review (Workshop)
    or Wiki
  • Eg Integration of VLE and f2f
  • Stop shielding tutors from the technicalities
  • Staff development
  • Raising awareness
  • Opportunistic piggy-backing
  • Outreach work
  • Ratification in the strategy
  • Develop guidelines or even protocols and request
    adherence by VLE users?
  • Eg Housekeeping
  • Eg Balance of information and activities
  • Embed e-learning into
  • Staff-development courses?
  • Student feedback criteria?
  • More incentives for best use?
  • Value it prizes with cred
  • Also support for poor use
  • Miras, not necessarily Goldsmiths. Contents

27
  • Ideas for the future

Discussion / poll
28
Discuss the best thing about VLEs?
  • A Virtual Learning Environment is a way to unite
    content creation and management, activities,
    communication, and organising students.
  • Go to http//moodledev.gold.ac.uk (contact
    celt_at_gold.ac.uk for access if necessary) and take
    the poll there (Choice)
  • Question
  • Out of the choices below, what do you think is
    the most useful aspect of a Virtual Learning
    Environment?
  • Added communication channels.
  • Monitoring how students use a course.
  • Easy creation of content for online delivery.
  • Availability of material any time, any place,
    anywhere.
  • Coordinating activities at a distance.
  • Freeing up face-to-face time.

29
References / bibliography
  • Course management systems comparisonhttp//www.e
    dutools.info/course/compare/byproduct/http//www.
    cmsmatrix.org
  • The story of Moodle at Dublin City
    Universityhttp//odtl.dcu.ie/wp/2004/odtl-2004-01
    .html
  • Moodle forum Comparisons and Advocacyhttp//mood
    le.org/mod/forum/view.php?id2784
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com