Title: Remittances: Statistical Accuracy and Financial Benefits
1Remittances Statistical Accuracy and Financial
Benefits
- Anna Prokhorova, World Bank,
- MiRPAL Coordinator for Russia
- Almaty, Kazakhstan
- October 31 November 1, 2013
2Outline
- Global and regional outlook of remittances flows
- Methodology and sources of data
- Cost of remittances
- General Principles of International Remittances
System - Financial literacy factor
- Remittances in MiRPAL countries
31. Global and regional trends in remittances flows
4Migration and Remittance Flows Recent Trends
and Outlook, 2013-2016
- 550 billion
- remittance flows may reach worldwide in 2013 and
over 700 billion by 2016. - 414 billion
- remittance flows to developing countries are
expected to reach in 2013 (up 6.3 percent over
2012), and 540 billion by 2016. - 43 billion
- remittance flows estimated for 2013 to the
developing countries of Europe and Central Asia
(ECA) region, thus projected to have increased by
10.8 percent
5Top-10 remittance recipients in the world
- Top 10 recipients of remittances. of GDP, 2012
- Top 10 recipients of remittances. US billion,
2013e
62. Measuring Remittances
7Methodology
- Remittances cross-border person-to-person
payments of relatively low value. - Remittances compensation of employees
personal transfers (Balance of Payment Manual
6th edition) - Compensation of employees refers to the income
of border, seasonal, and other short-term workers
who work in an economy where they are not
resident, and to the income of resident workers
who are employed by a nonresident entity. - Personal transfers are defined independently of
the source of income of the sending household,
the relationship between the households, and the
purpose for which the transfer is made.
8Sources of data
- International Transaction Reporting System (ITRS)
- Bank reporting
- MTOs
- Post offices
- Findings of household surveys
- Indirect sources (e.g. migration data)
- Bilateral data
- Modeling
93. Cost of Remittances
- www.remittanceprices.worldbank.org
10Cost effectiveness
- US 16 bln a year
- can be saved up if cutting remittances prices
by at least 5 percentage points - 5x5 Objective
- was endorsed in July 2008, at LAquila summit,
by G8 in order to achieve in particular the
objective of a reduction of the global average
cost of transferring remittances from 10 to 5
in 5 years
11Global Average Total Cost for sending USD 200
12Distribution of Average Total Costs ( of
corridors)
13Total average cost in G8 countries, Q3,2013
14Cost by remittance service provider (RSP)
- In about 79 of the countries surveyed,
commercial banks and to a lesser extent
international MTOs are considered the most
relevant RSPs the role of NBFIs and mobile phone
providers is still very limited. - RSPs require a license in 66 of the countries.
- Survey results show that cash and current account
transfers are regarded as the most relevant
payment instruments for both sending and
receiving remittances. - In only 56 of the countries RSPs are required to
disclose all transaction details before the
transaction itself is performed.
RSP TYPE COST OF TRANSFER,
Commercial banks 12,86
MTOs 7,36
Post offices 5,44
Global average 8,93
- Average cost of sending USD 200 or the local
currency equivalent, Q3, 2013
154. General Principles for International
Remittances Services
- World Bank/Bank of International Settlements
16(No Transcript)
175. Financial literacy factor
- Based on World Bank research
18The Impact of Financial Literacy Training for
Migrants (2012)
- Results of a randomized experiment designed to
measure the impact of providing financial
literacy training to migrants in New Zealand and
Australia countries which had recently launched
a remittance cost comparison website
(www.sendmoneypacific.org) for sending money to
the Pacific Islands. - The case for providing financial literacy
training for migrants needs to rest on other
criteria than the financial savings from cheaper
remittances, such as the improvements in their
capabilities from being more informed customers,
and the potential savings from other aspects of
financial management, such as choice of debt
levels and instruments. - Experimenting further with adding additional
content on budgeting, saving, and debt management
seem fruitful areas for policy refinement in this
area. - No big changes in ultimate outcomes migrants
avoid switching to more expensive or less
transparent remittance channels, but do not
change the amount or frequency of remitting.
19Who You Train Matters Identifying Complementary
Effects of Financial Education on Migrant
Households (2012)
- A survey conducted in Indonesia among the migrant
worker and the migrant workers household. - The study finds strong and statistically
significant impacts of financial literacy
training given to both the migrant and her family
on savings behaviors and outcomes, in contrast to
much of the existing literature. - The study also finds that the same treatment
group is less likely to have taken out a loan in
the past six months. - The training does not change either frequency or
the amount of remittances received, but does
change how household use this money. - They are more likely to keep financial records,
and as a result of these knowledge and behavior
changes, accumulate more savings and rely less on
loans.
206. Migration and Remittances in ECA region
- MiRPAL countries
- http//peoplemov.in/
- http//www.torre.nl/remittances/
21Top 10 remittances recipients in Europe and
Central Asia region (ECA)
- Top 10 ECA countries receiving remittances. US
billion, 2013e
- Top 10 ECA countries receiving remittances, share
of GDP, , 2012
22Cost of sending remittances to MiRPAL countries
- It is important to note that Russia has a unique
environment where cross border remittances are
mostly conducted in the same currency and
possible additional cost associated with a
currency exchange are not known. - The Russian market also benefits from relatively
low fees charged by the providers when compared
to the other G8 countries.
23Remittance data in MiRPAL countries
- Cholpon-Ata, Sept 10-11 2012, eight countries
- Methodology BPM6 (Armenia, Belarus, Russia,
Ukraine in 2012) - Sources of data ITRS (all), official statistics,
administrative sources (5 countries), household
surveys (TJ, AR,ML), interviews (Russia,
Kazakhstan) - Reasons of data discrepancies respondents
coverage (local RSPs), different thresholds,
different exchange rates, geographical coverage - Next steps Kyrgyz Republic remittance module to
be included in household survey, Kazakhstan and
Moldova to introduce BPM6 in 2014
24Impact of Remittances Armenia case
- In Armenia remittances contribute to economic
growth (Granger causality test) and the cycle of
remittances activity coincides with GDP cycle. - Results of econometric analysis showed, that in
the short run remittances have positive impact on
economic growth in Armenia. In the long run the
impact is negative. - Moral hazard households receiving remittances
tend not to work. Regression analysis shows that
growth of remittances reduces employment in
Armenia - Reduction of workforce because the growth of
remittances is mostly due to migration in
previous years, which is the evidence of
workforce reduction, particularly - of
high-quality workforce - Occurrence of Dutch disease remittances
contribute to occurrence of Dutch disease
increase of the real effective exchange rate
reduces competitiveness and export - There are investments, but they are not
productive according to the Survey in Armenia
only 12 of households are engaged in business.
The main part of remittances at the peak of
economic growth was focused on housing
development - Risk of creating a trap for economic policy.
25Indicators to capture remittances impact on
development
- Channels used to transfer money (transferred
through regular channels like banks, MTOs) - Use of remittances
- -improving living conditions,
- -education
- -health
- -invested/saved
- Sources of data Household surveys
26- Thank you!
- aprokhorova_at_worldbank.org