Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director

Description:

Title: Scottish Rite Program Implementation Author: Denise P. Gibbs Last modified by: ressie.gray Created Date: 7/12/2005 12:09:05 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: denisep8
Learn more at: http://images.pcmac.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director


1
STUDENT SUCCESS
PST
RtI
  • Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director
  • Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation
  • Learning Centers
  • Gibbsdenise_at_aol.com

2
This presentation is being provided today at no
cost by the Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation. The
philanthropy of the Alabama Scottish Rite
Foundation began in the 1950s in Alabama and
continues today. The mission of the Alabama
Scottish Rite Foundation is to provide help to
Alabama Schools as they work with students who
struggle in reading -particularly those students
with dyslexia.
3
RTI and Legal Mandates
  • NCLB (No Child Left Behind) and IDEA (Individuals
    with Disabilities Education Act) establish RTI
    parameters which center around
  • scientific, research-based instruction and
    intervention AND student outcomes!
  • New IDEA eligibility requirements dictate that
    schools be able to document use of research-based
    instruction and interventions along with progress
    monitoring prior to SLD determination!
  • Also included in state administrative code

4
What is RTI?
  • the practice of providing high-quality
  • research-based instruction/intervention matched
    to student needs
  • and
  • using learning rate over time
  • and level of performance
  • to
  • inform educational decisions

5
What is RTI?
  • high quality 80 rule
  • research-based backed by evidence of
    effectiveness
  • matched to student needs LEARN what needs are
    and proceed!
  • learning rate over time monitor progress to
    determine weekly rate of improvement needed and
    achieved
  • to inform educational decisions let student
    performance dictate whether you continue, alter,
    or change what you are doing.

6
What are your students needs?
7
Do your students
  • Struggle to meet basic academic standards?
  • More problems in some content areas than in
    others?
  • Show growth across all skill/ability levels?
  • ALL students are moving up (not just low getting
    higher)?

8
Do your students
  • Exhibit considerable behavioral issues?
  • Much time devoted to crowd control and
    discipline
  • Exhibit no problems what so ever!
  • Lake Wobegon?

9
If your students struggle in reading..are you
like..
  • Reading Next (2004) ?
  • 90 who struggle with reading have comprehension
    problems and only 10 have word-level problems.
  • Deshler (2007)?
  • 45 who struggle with reading have word-level
    problems!

10
If your students struggle in math...
  • Do you see more operations problems.basic math
    facts?
  • Do you see more concept and analysis problems?

11
If your students evidence too many behavior
issues...
  • Do you have positive behavior supports in place?
  • Can you identify causes of behavior issues?
  • How do behavior issues relate to academic issues?
  • Could cant do look like wont do?

12
  • When you build YOUR RTI framework around the
    needs of YOUR students, everybody wins and
    success will follow!!

13
Alabama RTI Framework
  • Response to Instruction document available online
    at www.alsde.edu
  • RTI for K-12
  • RTI for academics and behavior.
  • Three tier model

14
RTI Essential Elements
  • Scientific, research validated instruction and
    interventions
  • Tiers of effective instruction/ intervention
    matched to student needs
  • Assessment
  • Problem Solving Teams (instead of BBSST)
  • Implementation consistency

15
Scientific, research-validated instruction and
interventions
16
Research-based literacy instruction (National
Reading Panel, 2000)
  1. Phonemic awareness
  2. Phonics
  3. Vocabulary
  4. Fluency
  5. Comprehension

17
Research-based math instruction (National
Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008)
  • In mastering whole numbers, fractions and
    geometry and measurement students need to gain
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Computational fluency
  • Problem solving

18
Consistent Recommendations from Grade 4-12
Research
  • Focus upon explicit learning strategy instruction
    and provide time for students to practice using
    these strategies in small group experiences in
    daily classes.
  • Include this strategy instruction in ALL content
    area classes

19
Consistent Recommendations from Grade 4-12
Research
  • Address the need to ensure student engagement and
    motivation by providing students appropriate
    materials and meaningful classroom activities
    which allow them to be active participants in the
    learning process.

20
Consistent Recommendations fromGrade 4-12
Research
  • Make intensive intervention classes available for
    students who need them
  • Provide and require participation in professional
    development to equip educators to accomplish the
    mission

21
Tiers of Effective Instruction and Interventions
22
Elementary Tier Model (K-3)
PlusSpecial Education
?
5
Tier 3
Intensive Intervention 60 minutes
Intervention 30 minutes per dayin the classroom
Tier 2
15
Comprehensive Core 90 minutes per day reading60
minutes per day math
Tier 1
80
23
Academically, what should Tier 1 include for
elementary students?
  • MINIMUM of 90 minutes in reading and 60 minutes
    in math of uninterrupted core instruction
  • NRP and NMAP suggest a combination of whole and
    small group differentiated instruction
  • The five big ideas from the NRP and critical
    benchmarks from NMAP!

24
Tier 2 for elementary students.
  • Additional small group instruction
  • Best when provided by classroom teacher
  • At least 10-12 weeks in duration
  • Frequent progress monitoring
  • May need additional rounds of Tier 2 if
    adequate progress is being made
  • May need to move to Tier 3 if inadequate
    progress is being made

25
Tier 3 for elementary students
  • Intensive intervention
  • Does not replace or supplant (Tier 1) but may
    replace Tier 2
  • Designed to meet identified student needs in
    math, reading, and behavior
  • Student will miss something
  • Decide what will be missed
  • Schedule for success!
  • Who might provide this intervention?
  • Title I reading, math, or behavior
    interventionists SPED Para Classroom teacher,
    etc

26
Grade 4-12 Tier Model
PlusSpecial Education
?
5
Tier 3
Intensive Intervention classes
Differentiated strategy instruction in content
classes small group-intentional groupings
15
Tier 2
Tier 1
80
Core instructionStrategy instruction in content
classes whole and small group
27
About Grades 4-12 Tier 1
  • Students learn how to learn
  • Strategic teaching in ALL classes
  • Some time for students to work with peers daily
    in ALL classes
  • Encourages student engagement
  • Students become active participants in the
    learning process
  • Students make their own meaning

28
About Grades 4-12 Tier 2
  • Differentiated strategic teaching
  • Teacher explicitly models strategies with
    students and scaffolds as needed
  • Opportunities for peer-tutors and heterogeneous
    grouping (weaker with stronger and teacher
    rotates among groups)
  • Opportunities for homogeneous grouping (weak come
    together and teacher works with that group)

29
About Grades 4-12 Tier 3
  • Intensive intervention classes for students who
    need them (math, reading, and behavior)
  • Reading Word-level interventions and
    comprehension interventions
  • Math Computation and problem solving
    interventions
  • Behavior- small group sessions/classes
  • Scheduling options
  • Grade specific intervention times
  • Acceleration block

30
SPED (Tier 4) after RTI
  • LRE will be impacted!
  • How will we use inclusion?
  • Need for DIRECT services
  • Intensive, intensive intervention if Tiers did
    not result in success!
  • Probably some 11
  • Must have homogeneous grouping if not 11
  • Ongoing progress monitoring

31
RTIB K-12 Tiers
PlusSpecial Education
?
5
Tier 3
Intensive Intervention classes
15
Supplementalbehavior supports implemented in
classrooms
Tier 2
Tier 1
80
Universal positive behaviorsupports practiced
school-wideor district-wide
32
RTIB Tier 1 Universal Support
  • Environment, environment, environment!
  • Small set of school or system-wide rules
  • Be safe, be responible, be respectful
  • As a system-wide Universal Support effort in
    schools, positive behavior support (PBS) consists
    of rules, routines, and physical arrangements
    that are developed and taught by school staff to
    prevent initial occurrences of problem behavior.
  • Be safe Example Walk in the hallways

33
RTIB - Assessment
  • Office Discipline Referrals (ODR) may be a type
    of screening and progress monitoring tool.
  • Could set criteria for movement to Tier 2 as X
    number of ODRs over a given period of time.
  • Teacher nomination forms may also serve as
    assessment tools to screen for students who need
    Tier 2 behavior intervention.

34
RTIB Tier 2 Supplemental Support
  • Behavior plan, check-in/check-out, etc
  • (1) teaching the student to use new skills as a
    replacement for problem behaviors,
  • (2) rearranging the environment so that problems
    can be prevented and desirable behaviors can be
    encouraged, and
  • (3) monitoring, evaluating, and reassessing this
    simple plan over time.
  • Progress monitor behavior report card

35
RTIB Tier 3 Intensive Intervention Support
  • May include behavior intervention class utilizing
    various curricula such as
  • Skillstreaming Series
  • The PREPARE Curriculum Teaching Prosocial
    Competencies
  • Behavior Education Program
  • I Can Problem Solve
  • Bullying Prevention Program

36
RTIB Websites
  • http//www.pbis.org/
  • http//flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu/

37
RTI Uses of Assessment
38
RTI Uses of Assessment
  • To determine IF intervention is needed
    (screening)
  • To determine WHAT intervention is needed
    (Additional assessment)
  • To monitor the progress of students in
    interventions (progress monitoring)

39
Screening to determine IF intervention is needed
  • For elementary students, ALL students should be
    screened at the beginning of school (also
    referred to as benchmark testing).
  • For secondary students, schools could screen all
    entering students OR complete a records review
    and then screen students below a designated
    level or students with an intervention history!

40
Screening Tools
  • A few of the peer-reviewed screening tools
  • AIMSWEB (reading, math, spelling, written
    expression pre K-12)
  • DIBELS (reading K-6)
  • STEEP (reading and math K-12)
  • Independent, peer-review of screening and
    progress monitoring tools
  • www.rti4success.org

41
System-wide intervention criteria
  • School systems will need to determine the
    screening outcomes which will result in
    intervention consideration and referral to one of
    the problem solving teams.
  • If score is below ___ then student reviewed by
    the appropriate problem solving team

42
Problem Solving Teams
43
Number and structure of problem solving teams
  • Must have at least one team but probably best to
    have several teams at each school!
  • Some suggestions
  • Grade-level PSTs
  • Across grade level PSTs (K-2, 3-5, etc)
  • Teacher team PSTs
  • Departmental PSTs
  • Other
  • Good to involve as many school personnel as
    possible on teams.

44
Problem Solving Team and BBSST
  • With some modifications of perceived PURPOSE,
    BBSST can evolve into RTI Problem Solving Team
  • Purpose is no longer SPED gatekeeper, or SPED
    gateway, or SPED roadblock!
  • New purpose will be to
  • Make sure that appropriate interventions are
    provided for ALL students
  • Set measurable intervention goals for each
    student
  • Systematically evaluate data reflecting student
    progress in interventions

45
Problem Solving Team and BBSST
  • With some modifications of PROCESS, BBSST can
    evolve into RTI Problem Solving Teams
  • Must NOT recommend accommodations but scientific
    research-based interventions instead
  • Must use progress monitoring data rather than
    anecdotal information to form decisions.
  • Must be able to carry-over to next year as needed
  • Must rethink timelines

46
Problem Solving Team Members
  • Needed Members
  • Teachers
  • Instructional Coaches
  • SPED personnel
  • Intervention teachers
  • Counselors
  • Principal or designee

47
Problem Solving Team Member Roles
  • Chairperson
  • Which students will be discussed and in what
    order
  • Notify members
  • Secretary
  • Note decisions made and generate parent letters
  • Timekeeper
  • Keep discussions on track and timely
  • Data person
  • Present and explain graphs

48
Problem Solving Teams Work
  • Match students with appropriate interventions
  • Select appropriate progress monitoring tools
  • Set measurable intervention goals
  • Review progress monitoring data
  • Make recommendations re discontinuing,
    continuing, modifying (smaller group or more
    time), or replacing intervention.
  • Send progress reports to parents on a regular
    basis
  • DOCUMENTATION!!!!

49
Implementation Consistency
50
Keys to Consistency
  • DOCUMENTATION!
  • Applies to all tiers and all components
  • Walkthroughs
  • Professional development
  • Coaches
  • General school culture and commitment to outcomes
    and change as needed

51
  • THANK YOU!
  • gibbsdenise_at_aol.com
  • RTI for Middle and High School Structures and
    Strategies for Literacy Success (2009)
  • www.LRP.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com