Title: Hamlet: An Introduction to Interpretations
1Hamlet An Introduction to Interpretations
2Grand Poetical Puzzle
- Play best reflects the universality of
Shakespeares genius, yet most enigmatic - Hamlet has caused more discussion than any other
character in fiction, dramatic or non-dramatic
3Two Hamlets in the play
- I. Sweet Prince
- Sensitive young intellectual and idealist
- Expresses himself in unforgettable poetry
- Dedicated to the truth
4Two Hamlets, cont.
- II. Barbaric Hamlet
- Treats Ophelia cruelly
- Slays Polonius then speaks of lugging guts into
another room - Callously reports sending Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern to their deaths - Did Shakespeare transmute an old play without
reconstructing it?
5Critics dont accept the idea that Shakespeare
was not careful
- Audiences and readers find themselves sympathetic
to Hamlet - Try to find the key to his character through
intensive study of Renaissance thought
6H. N. Hudson, Shakespearean critic
- It is easy to invent with plausibility almost
any theory respecting Hamlet, but very hard to
make any theory comprehend the whole subject. - From his Introduction to Hamlet, 1870
7Tragic Hero
- Must start with the assumption that the tragic
hero has a clear and sacred obligation to kill
Claudius and to do so without delay - Basic question Why does so much time elapse
before the young Prince sweeps to his revenge? - It is argued that if he had acted quickly in
killing Claudius, that everyone, including
Hamlet, would still be alive at the end of the
play
8Six InterpretationsI. Hamlet, the Victim of
External Difficulties
- Simple answer
- Hamlet faces external difficulties which make
immediate, positive action impossible - Claudius too powerful only once placed himself
in a defenseless position. - If H. acted, how could he have convinced the
people that he justifiably had executed revenge?
9II. Hamlet, the Sentimental Dreamer
- Romantic critics of the late 18th and early 19th
centuries saw H. as gifted but incapable of
positive action. - Goethe first pointed out a sentimental
interpretation Hamlet is a young man of
lovely, pure, and moral nature, without the
strength of nerve which forms a hero.
10II. Sentimental Dreamer, cont .
- Goethes Prince is an impractical dreamer
- A.W. Schleger Hamlet has no firm belief either
in himself or in anything else in the
resolutions which he so often em- braces and
always leaves unexecuted, his weakness is too
apparent his far-fetched scruples are often
mere pretexts to cover his want of determination - - Dramatic Art Literature, 1810
11Sentimental Dreamer, cont.
- Coleridge Hamlet suffers from an over-balance
of the contemplative faculty and thereby
becomes the creature of mere meditation and loses
his power to action - - Notes Lectures on Shakespeare, 1808
- William Hazlitt At other times , when he is
most bound to act, he remains puzzled, undecided,
and sceptical sic, dallies with his purposes,
till the occasion is lost - - Characters in Shakespeares Plays, 1818
12III. The Victim of Excessive Melancholy
- Theory comes from 18th century
- Hamlets grief is pathological.
- It is a destructive thing which causes him to
procrastinate and leads to his death. - Melancholy called the Elizabethan malady
- Was recognized as a disease
- Treatises written on it
13Excessive Melancholy, cont.
- Melancholy characters of one kind or another
appeared often in elizabethan and Jacobean plays - Hamlet has been classified as the intellectual
melancholy type - Disease that afflicts him is most destructive
kind, melancholy adust - When his mood shifts from deep depression to
elation, he is following the pattern of behavior
peculiar to the melancholic described by Bright
in his A Treatise of Melancholie, 1586
14IV. The Victim of the Oedipus Complex
- Freudian, or neo-Freudian, interpretation of
Hamlet that appeals to people today - Dr. Ernest Jones, disciple and biographer of
Sigmund Freud, wrote Hamlet Oedipus in 1910 - Hamlet suffered from an undue and unhealthy
attachment of a son for his mother which is apt
to be morbidly suppressed and cause great mental
distress
15Oedipus Complex, cont.
- Harry Levin rejects the theory
- This theory motivates Hamlets delay by
identifying him with Claudius, through whom he
has vicariously accomplished the Oedipal feat of
murdering his father and marrying his mother - -The Question of Hamlet
16V. Motivated by Ambition
- Play seen as one of the Elizabethan ambition
plays - The reason for Hamlets desire to kill his uncle
is not to avenge his fathers foul and most
unnatural murder, but rather to make possible
his own advancement to the throne - The delays and inner conflicts are the result of
his awareness that personal ambition and pride,
not sacred duty, motivate him.
17VI. Misled by the Ghost
- Not all critics agree that the ghost is an honest
ghost or that Hamlet has a solemn duty to slay
Claudius - This denies the assumption that Hamlet is the
instrument of divine vengeance public justice
and is instead a sinner must suffer for his
sins - Hamlet is a tragic hero who should not take
vengeance into his own hands
18Misled by the Ghost, cont.
- Renaissance theories of revenge will help us
understand Hs dilemma - The test of the Ghosts honesty is not to
establish Claudiuss guilt, but to establish the
nature of the Ghosts injunction - If Ghost is not honest, the Prince is called upon
to execute private vengeance, an eye for an eye,
a tooth for a tooth, which is contrary to
Christian teaching - Hs problem a man who believes in heaven and
hell and whose reason tells him that the man who
defies divine ordinance ultimately must face
judgment
19Misled by the Ghost, cont.
- Shakespeare, then, portrays a tragic hero who
should not take vengeance into his own hands and
a Ghost that is a spirit damnd. - This is Eleanor Prossers theory Hamlet and
Revenge, 1967 - Instead of seeing H as one whose propensity for
thought prevents him from performing the
necessary action, Prosser finds him to be one
whose conscience, which operates with reason,
restrains him for some time from acting
impulsively in response to instinct.
20Conclusions
- Shakespeares tragedy is a work of surpassing
interest and genius, and the tragic hero is
universally attractive and fascinating. - Only the naïve will start with the assumption
that there is one obvious interpretation of the
play and that critics, not Shakespeare, have
introduced complexities into it.