Delivering Treatment for Depression into the Patient - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Delivering Treatment for Depression into the Patient

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: Steve Massa Last modified by: Jeffrey Burk Created Date: 5/13/2003 9:48:35 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: SteveM159
Learn more at: https://avapl.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Delivering Treatment for Depression into the Patient


1
Delivering Treatment for Depression into the
Patients Home Telephone Internet
  • David C. Mohr, Ph.D.
  • Northwestern University
  • Center for the Management of Complex Chronic Care
  • Hines VA

2
What I will talk about today
  • Describe our telephone psychotherapy research
    program in depression.
  • We began in 1995, when the telephone was the
    principal option for reaching out
  • Current state of internet treatments for
    depression
  • Our developing research in integrating internet
    and telephone.

3
Telephones in Psychotherapy
  • In 1876 Alexander Graham Bell invented the
    telephone
  • Three years later, in 1879, BMJ published the
    first report of a the use of a telephone to
    diagnose a childs cough.
  • Another 70 years was required before the first
    reports of the use of telephones in psychotherapy
    were published (1949).
  • A 1996 APA task force report stated that
    empirical evidence of the efficacy of
    telphone-administered psychotherapy was scant to
    non-existent.

4
Why look at telephone psychotherapy?
  • Nearly 2/3rds of practicing clinical
    psychologists today report using the phone to
    some degree to deliver care.
  • Mental Health carve-outs, HMOs, the VA and others
    are beginning to develop and implement
    tele-mental health programs to
  • Extend care
  • Save costs
  • Research to develop and validate tele-mental
    health programs would
  • Facilitate policy decision making
  • Support standards for quality

5
How we began
  • We began in 1995, when the telephone was the
    principal tool for outreach
  • Many patients at the UCSF Multiple Sclerosis
    Center were unable to attend regularly scheduled
    appointments due to
  • Disability
  • Distance from center
  • Two-thirds of patients would prefer psychotherapy
    or counseling to pharmacotherapy.

6
Initial Pilot Research
  • We developed a telephone-administered cognitive
    behavioral therapy (T-CBT) that includes
  • A patient workbook to
  • facilitate communication
  • provide information
  • provide support between sessions.
  • 32 Kaiser multiple sclerosis patients with POMS
    depression gt 15 were randomly assigned to
  • 8 weeks of T-CBT administered by 2nd-3rd year
    graduate students.
  • Usual care control (UCC) through Kaiser Permanente

7
Mohr, D.C. et al., J Clin Conult Psychology.
200568356-361
8
T-CBT vs. T-SEFT
  • Compared 16 weeks of T-CBT to T-Supportive
    Emotion-Focused Therapy (T-SEFT).
  • T-SEFT a manualized, client centered tx, aimed at
    enhancing awareness of emotions and inner
    experience, with operationalized procedures for
    enhancing therapeutic relationship.
    Interventions focused on behavior or cognition
    were prohibited.
  • 127 Patients were randomized
  • MS
  • BDI 16
  • 1 physical symptoms causing participation
    restriction (handicap)
  • 99 (77) women
  • Therapists were Ph.D psychologists, with
    allegiance to their treatment arm.
  • Supervisors were specialists in CBT and SEFT
  • Patients were followed for one year after
    treatment cessation

9
Mohr, D.C. et al., Arch Gen Psychaitr.
2005621007-1014
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
T-CBT vs. T-SEFT
  • A large literature has shown most psychotherapies
    are equivalent in reducing depression.
  • CBT and SEFT, face-to-face, have been shown to be
    equivalent in face-to-face administration (Watson
    et al. JCCP 200371773-81)
  • Our finding that T-CBT is superior suggests that
    this this may not be true with tele-therapy to
    patients with barriers.
  • Skills training is important!

14
Attrition
  • Attrition in trials of face-to-face
    psychotherapy ranges from 15-60 with a means of
    26 to 47
  • Attrition was 7 (5.5)
  • 3 (4.8) for T-CBT
  • One was removed secondary to trauma.
  • 4 (6.2) for T-SEFT

15
(No Transcript)
16
Barriers to Psychotherapy in Primary Care
  • Primary care is the de facto site for
    identification and treatment of depression.
  • Approximately 2/3rds of depressed patients state
    that they would prefer psychotherapy to
    antidepressant medications. But
  • Only approximately 20 follow-up on referrals by
    their primary care physician.
  • Of those who begin nearly half dropout of
    treatment.
  • This suggests that there are significant barriers
    to psychotherapy.

17
Barriers to Psychotherapy in 290 UCSF Primary
Care patients
  • Depressed patients are more likely to perceive
    barriers (74.0 vs. 51.4, p.0002)
  • Among depressed patients 68.3 report practical
    barriers including
  • Transportation (21.2)
  • Time constraints (20.6)
  • Caregiving responsibilities (13.6)
  • 19.2 report emotional barriers including
  • Concerns about being seen while emotional (6.8)
  • People finding out they are in psychotherapy
    (6.8)

18
And so, can we reach out?
  • Depression is both a indication for psychotherapy
    and a barrier to receiving it.
  • Inserting behavioral medicine into primary care
    has not been widely adopted.
  • Data suggest T-CBT may increase access for and
    reduce attrition from psychotherapy for
    depression.
  • A current trial is examining T-CBT for the
    treatment of depression in veterans in rural
    areas with limited mental health services.
  • A randomized trial of T-CBT compared to
    face-to-face CBT for depression in primary care
    has been funded by the NIMH and will begin in the
    coming months.

19
Telecommunications innovations since 1995
  • Internet penetration
  • 73 of Americans have internet access (compared
    to 95 with telephone access).
  • 42 have broadband access (40 increase in one
    year).
  • Access is much higher in urban areas
  • Promise of Internet CBT
  • Standardized presentation of therapy material
  • Interactive programming for exercises
  • No geographic limitations to services.
  • Patient access 24/7
  • Costs are potentially minimal
  • Multiple avenues for contact with therapist

20
Why should we be worried about standardization of
content?
  • RCT data shows CBT is largely equivalent to
    antidepressant medication.
  • Among 6,047 pts treated with psychotherapy in
    HMOs, CMHCs, EAPs etc. (Hansen 2002,2003)
  • 8.2 deteriorated
  • 56.8 showed no change
  • 20.9 showed some measurable improvement
  • 14.1 met criteria for recovery
  • After 16 sessions, only 50 of patients show
    measurable improvement.

21
Why are psychotherapy outcomes so bad in the
community, compared to RCTs
  • Patients in the community may be more difficult
    than those selected for clinical trials.
  • Multiple psychiatric problems, substance abuse,
    etc.
  • But RCTs rule most people out for not being
    severe enough.
  • Assuring competence in a private endeavor
  • Evidence that adherence to tx model improves
    outcomes.
  • Even in RCTs at least 25 of sessions do not meet
    criteria.
  • Nobody knows what therapists in the community do.

22
I-CBT
  • Opportunity to provide standardized care
  • Provide over a long distance
  • At minimal cost.

23
(No Transcript)
24
Clarke, 2002 Contd
  • Potential reasons for failure
  • Low compliance with website
  • Median visits 2
  • Mean visits 2.6 3.5
  • Attrition
  • 34.4 across both treatments

25
(No Transcript)
26
Clarke, 2005 contd
  • Compliance somewhat better but not great
  • I-CBTpostcard M 5.06.2
  • I-CBTtelephone call M 5.65.8
  • TAU (I-CBT access) M 2.62.5
  • Attrition still not good
  • I-CBTpostcard 38.7
  • I-CBTtelephone call M 46.3
  • TAU 20.0

27
(No Transcript)
28
Christensen, 2005 Contd
  • Compliance
  • I-CBT Lay phone calls M 14.89.7 of 29
    exercises
  • Internet information M 4.51.4 visits
  • Attrition
  • I-CBT Lay phone calls 33.5
  • Internet information 17.6
  • No treatment control 11.8

29
Problems with I-CBT
  • Assignment to I-CBT associated with greater
    dropout than no-tx or TAU.
  • People arent using it.
  • 34-47 of I-CBT patients drop out.
  • 2-6 visits
  • Phone calls from lay persons dont help much
  • I-CBT sites to date have not been tailored to the
    patient.

30
(No Transcript)
31
Strengths Weakness
  • Telephone-Psychotherapy (T-CBT)
  • Low attrition (lt5)
  • Strong efficacy under controlled conditions
  • Excellent outreach / reduction in barriers
  • Relies on therapist adherence to tx model
  • No significant cost savings
  • I-CBT
  • Standardized presentation of material
  • Geographic coverage, 24/7 coverage
  • Minimal cost
  • Effect sizes appear much lower than other
    treatments
  • Attrition high (comparable to face-to-face
    therapy)
  • Compliance (visiting site) is low.

32
One hour of Psychotherapy per week
?
?
Psychotherapy
33
Or..
?
?
Brief T-CBT
e-mail
e-mail
e-mail
Web Class
Web HW
Web HW
Web HW
Web HW
Web HW
Brief Telephone Coaching
Web HW
34
Conclusions
  • Telephone administered psychotherapy is effective
    in treating depression.
  • The inclusion of CBT skills training components
    add benefit during 16 weeks of treatment.
  • These skills may be taught more efficiently using
    tele-communications technology that brings
    training into patients lives.
  • Future research
  • Compare telephone administered psychotherapy to
    face-to-face administered psychotherapy
  • Evaluate new procedures for integrating treatment
    into patients lives using internet and other
    telecommunications technologies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com