Title: CDS on ABS Documentation
1CDS on ABS Documentation
American Securitization Forum Sunset Seminar-CDS
of ABS March 8, 2006 John J. McGreevy Director
and Senior Counsel Merrill Lynch
2 3 CDS on ABS Overview
- The structured product synthetics market has
experienced tremendous growth over the past year.
Product development has been consistent with the
growth pattern of the corporate credit
derivatives market - CDS on ABS allows protection sellers to gain
exposure to ABS assets that are not readily
available in the cash market due to supply
constraints - Allows protection buyers to hedge or take a short
directional view in a more efficient manner than
available in the cash market - Provides protection sellers leverage
- Flexibility provides exposure types (index
trades, tranche trades) not available before in
the cash market
4 CDS on ABS Overview
- Prior to 2005
- Trades were individually negotiated
- No inter-dealer market
- Broadly speaking, trades covered Interest
Shortfalls and ultimate principle, but there was
no standardization - Early 2005 standard terms crystallized very
quickly. While the ISDA drafting process was not
complete, there was consensus among dealers on
basic terms - Many trades done on dealer docs pre-ISDA have
been novated to the ISDA standard.
5 6CDS on ABS Documentation
- Current forms
- Credit Derivative Transaction on Mortgage Backed
Security with Pay-As-You-Go and Physical
Settlement (ISDA Form I) - Credit Derivative Transaction on Asset-Backed
Security with Pay-As-You-Go Settlement (ISDA
Form II) - Credit Derivative Transaction on Asset-Backed
Security with Cash or Physical Settlement - ABX/ CMBX
- To Come ISDA CDO/Note form
- To Come ABX/CMBX tranche confirm?
7 CDS on ABS Documentation
- Thus far, ISDA has developed 3 different forms
(i) Pay-As-You-Go and Physical Settlement (Form
I), (ii) Cash and Physical Settlement and (iii)
Pay-As-You-Go Settlement (Form II) - Form I terms form the basis for ABX and CMBX
- Form I is the dominant form in the U.S. dealer
market and to date is the standard for trading
8- Form I Pay-As-You-Go or Physical Settlement
9Form I
- Tenor
- Effective Maturity Date (the earlier of the
Scheduled Termination Date and Final Amortization
Date) - The last Floating Rate Payer Payment Date
- The last Delivery Date
- The last Additional Fixed Amount Payment Date (up
to one year after Effective Maturity Date if a
Floating Event has occurred and remains
un-reimbursed) -
10Form I
- Reference Obligation Notional Amount
- Decreases upon Principal Payment
- Decreases upon Writedown
- Increases upon Writedown Reimbursement
- Decreases upon Physical Settlement (part or whole)
11Form I
- Applicable Percentage
- Percent covered of Outstanding Principal Amount -
may be more than 100 of the face amount of the
Reference Obligation - Adjusted by (i) further issuance of fungible
securities (ii) cancellations of Outstanding
Principal Amount resulting from purchases (iii)
Physical Delivery and (iv) Implied Writedown (or
reimbursements thereof)
12Form I
- Floating Events A payment is made by Seller to
Buyer, but the trade continues - Writedown (which includes Implied Writedown)
- Failure to Pay Principal at Legal Final or
Final Amortization Date - Interest Shortfall does cover PIK interest
- Additional Fixed Payments
- Writedown Reimbursements
- Principal Shortfall Reimbursements
- Interest Shortfall Reimbursements
13Form I
- Interest Shortfall Cap election as Applicable
or Not Applicable - If Not Applicable, seller is liable dollar for
dollar for shortfalls in coupon payments - If Applicable
- Fixed Cap- Seller is liable for shortfalls only
up to an amount equal to the Fixed Amount (i.e.,
Fixed Amount nets to zero) - Variable Cap- Fixed Amount nets to zero and
seller must also pay Interest Shortfalls through
LIBOR (maximum out of pocket exposure is LIBOR on
the Notional Amount) - To Date, Fixed Cap is market standard
14Form I
- WAC Cap Interest Provision Applicable or Not
Applicable. - If Not Applicable, then Interest Shortfalls are
determined without regard to WAC caps. That is,
if a cap kicks in to lower the amount of interest
owed on the Reference Obligation, an Interest
Shortfall DOES OCCUR under the CDS. - If Applicable and a cap kicks in to lower the
amount of interest owed on the Reference
Obligation, an Interest Shortfall DOES NOT OCCUR. - The original ISDA Form I had no such election but
was drafted so that the application of WAC Caps
and the like would always cause an Interest
Shortfall. - This concept was only recently introduced, but
based in early returns the market is sticking
with Not Applicable
15Form I
- Credit Events
- Notifying Party Buyer only
- Exercise in whole or in part
- Credit Events
- Failure to Pay Principal
- Writedown
- Distressed Rating Downgrade to CCC or below or
rating withdrawal (subject to reinstatement
within 3 months) - Physical Settlement Reference Obligation only
16Form I
- Reference Obligation Coupon Step-Up
- Applicable or Not Applicable on a confirm by
confirm basis - Fixed Rate increased by step-up amount of
Reference Obligation - Buyers option within five days after non-call,
Buyer can terminate flat
17Form I Documentation Issues
- Recent updates to Form I
- WAC Cap Applicable or Inapplicable
- Maturity Extension eliminated as a Credit Event
- Other technical fixes
- Implied Writedown
- Rating Agencies and natural protection sellers
hate it. - Issue an implied writedown may occur while the
cash bond is still paying its full coupon. - Documentation work-around for trades with CDOs
18Form I Documentation Issues
- What does the future hold
- Standard terms supplement and short form confirm,
for trading via DTC? - Will individual firms systems build outs hold up
when/if Floating Events and Credit Events occur?
19 20Form II
- Based upon Form I, with amendments sought by a
group of CDS end users - Intent of the amendments was to more closely
mirror the cashflow of the Reference Obligation
21Form II
- PAUG Settlement only unless Optional Physical
Settlement election is made at inception - If Physical Settlement option is included,
Physical Settlement is Seller Only (Form I is
Buyer Only) - No Credit Events. Floating Events trigger right
to deliver notice of physical settlement, if
applicable - No Interest Shortfall Cap concept
- Implied Writedown eliminated
- Distressed Rating Downgrade eliminated
- Option to require pass through of Reference
Obligation voting rights
22Form II
- Calculation of Expected Interest and Interest
Shortfalls takes into account available funds
caps. - In Form I terms, WAC Cap is always Applicable
- Make - Whole payments as well as payments in
consideration of amendments to the Reference
Obligation are passed through to Protection
Seller as Additional Fixed Payments - Such amounts, however, are not covered by
Interest Shortfall provisions - PAUG Floating Events
- Writedown actual applied loses or principal
reductions only - Principal Shortfall
- Interest Shortfall deferring or capitalizing
interest does not cause an Interest Shortfall
23Form II Documentation Issues
- Dealers wont use it
- Anecdotally - very few trades booked on this form
24- Cash or Physical Settlement
25Cash or Physical Settlement
- The form most similar to corporate CDS
- Buyer pays Fixed Amounts, calculated by reference
to an initial notional amount which fluctuates
depending upon amortization etc. - Seller pays Floating Amount on day Final Price is
determined or the Delivery Date - Synthetic Delivery Mechanic parties may use
bidding for a total return swap on the Reference
Obligation to calculate Cash Settlement Amount
26Cash or Physical Settlement
- Credit Events
- Failure to Pay
- Loss Event
- Bankruptcy (optional)
-
- Restructuring
- Rating Downgrade to CC (optional)
27 Cash or Physical Settlement
- Cash Settlement, unless, Seller receives Notice
of Physical Settlement prior to first Valuation
Date - Valuation Date. Seller selects a Business Day
120-140 calendar days after Event Determination
Date - Physical Settlement - Reference Obligation Only
- Payment of Floating Amount and accrued interest -
60 Business Day cap
28Cash or Physical Documentation Issues
- Primarily used in Europe, few trades in the U.S.
- Rating agency issues make cash settlement
difficult/uneconomical for trades with CDOs
29 30ABX/CMBX Documentation Issues
- Both use a Standard Terms Supplement with short
form confirm, for DTC Settlement - Both are based on ISDAs Form I
- No Physical Settlement, PAUG only
- Fixed Cap always applies
- An ABX Floating Amount Event has already occurred.
31Future Documentation Issues
- ISDA confirm for ABS other than RMBS/CMBS
- Conjecture the form will include PAUG, Physical
and Cash Settlement - Draft expected soon
- Tranche Confirms?