A Review of Laparoscopic Ureteral Injury in Pelvic Surgery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

A Review of Laparoscopic Ureteral Injury in Pelvic Surgery

Description:

A Review of Laparoscopic Ureteral Injury in Pelvic Surgery Obstetrical and Gynecological survey Volume 58, Number 12 2004 4 29 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: 5009172
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Review of Laparoscopic Ureteral Injury in Pelvic Surgery


1
A Review of Laparoscopic Ureteral Injury in
Pelvic Surgery
  • Obstetrical and Gynecological survey
  • Volume 58, Number 12

2004? 4? 29? ? ? ?
2
Abstract
  • Objective of this study
  • laparoscopic surgeries? ureteral injury? ??? ???
    review
  • Determine
  • Reported rates of ureteral injury
  • Initial laparoscopic surgeries during which
    ureteral injury occurred
  • Time of injury recognition (intra- versus
    postoperative)
  • Type
  • Location
  • Mode of injury repair
  • Surgical laparoscopic instruments involved in
    ureteral injury.

3
  • ??? medical subject heading(MSH) terms ?? ? ??
  • Medline computerized database ? the online ACOG
    database ??
  • 1966 2003? ??? ??? ????? ? ??? ????? ?? ??
    literature ??

4
  • A total of 70 reported instances in 2491 reported
    cases
  • Incidences of injury lt1 to 2
  • 2491 cases
  • case reports, small series of studies, as well as
    longer, consecutive studies.
  • Total 70 case?
  • The type of laparoscopic surgery
  • Not described or specified 18(25.7) cases
  • LAVH 14 (20.0)
  • Ureteral injury identification
  • Intraoperatively 6(8.6) cases
  • Postoperatively 49(70.0) cases
  • Not specified 15(21.4) cases
  • Type of injury
  • not specified or described 36(51.4)
  • Transection most common, 14 (20.0)

5
  • Location of ureteral injury
  • Not specified 46(65.7) cases
  • At or above the pelvic brim 10(14.3) cases
  • Surgical laparoscopic instrument
  • Electrocautery 17(24.3) cases
  • Not reported 34(48.6) cases
  • Repair the ureteral injury
  • Laparotomy - 43(61.4) cases
  • LAVH the leading procedure in which injury
    occurred
  • Electrocoagulation ???? injury? ??

6
Target Audience
  • Obstericians Gynecologists, Family physicians

Learning Objectives
  • After completion of this article, the reader
    should be able to
  • Summarize the reported rates of ureteral injury
  • Identify the location of the more common
    laparoscopic ureteral injury
  • List the various types of laparoscopic ureteral
    injuries

7
Materials and Methods
  • Laparoscopic surgeries? ??? ureteral injury? ??
    ??? ?? (1966-2003)
  • Appropriate MSH terms? ??? medline database ?
    online ACOG database? ??
  • Bibliographies? manual? ??
  • Key terms Laparoscopic complication and
    ureter

8
Results
  • Medline computerized database 3344 articles
  • ACOG database 3690 articles
  • Manual search of bibliographies
  • 30 articles discussed ureteral injury during
    laparoscopic surgery
  • 70 individual cases contained

9
Rate of Injury and Initial Procedure
  • Incidence rates lt1 to 2
  • Initial laparoscopic procedure
  • Not described 18(25.7) cases
  • LAVH 14(20.0) cases
  • Oophorectomy 8 (11.4)
  • Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy 7 (10.0)
  • Laparoscopic sterilization 5 (7.1)
  • Excision of endometriosis 5 (7.1),
  • Endometriosis ablation 4 (5.7)
  • Drainage of lymphoceles, electrocoagulation, and
    laparoscopic adhesiolysis ?? 3 (4.3)

10
Time of Injury Recognition
  • Intraoperatively 6 cases (8.6)
  • Postoperatively 49 (70.0) cases
  • Not specified 15 (21.4) cases

11
Type of Injury
  • Not described 36 of the 70 (51.4) cases
  • Transection 14 cases (20.0)
  • Laceration, obstruction, and stenosis ?? 4
    cases (5.71)
  • Fistula formation, necrosis, and ligation ?? 2
    cases (2.9)
  • Resection and burn injury ?? 1 case (1.4)

12
Location of Injury
  • Not specified 46 cases (65.7)
  • At or above the pelvic brim 10 of the 70 cases
    (14.3)
  • At or above the uterine artery 8 cases (11.4)
  • At or above the bladder 6 cases (8.6)

13
Mode of Approach to Injury Treatment
  • Laparotomy 43 cases (61.4)
  • Not described 15 cases (21.4)
  • Repair through laparoscopy 8 cases (11.4)
  • Conservative, nonsurgical management 4 cases
    (5.7).

14
Instrumentation Involved in the Injury
  • Not specified 34 (48.6)
  • Electrocautery 17 (24.3)
  • Endoscopic stapling 12 (17.1)
  • CO2 laser 4 (5.7)
  • Forceps 2 (2.9)
  • Aspirating needle 1 (1.4).

15
(No Transcript)
16
Discussion
  • Incidence of major complications in laparoscopic
    hysterectomy
  • 3.5
  • Incidence of ureteral injuries
  • Between 0.3 and 2
  • Rate of laparoscopic ureteral injury
  • Not comprehensively described and documented in
    the literature

17
  • ?? Laparoscopic hysterectomies ? retroperitoneal
    laparoscopic procedures ? ??? ?? Ureteral injury
    ?? ?? ??
  • Härkki-Sirén et al.
  • Ureters particularly vulnerable to injury
    during major operative laparoscopy

18
  • Intraoperative diagnoses of ureteral injury
  • only 6(8.6) cases
  • Papers on classic (nonlaparoscopic) gynecologic
  • procedures
  • Injury diagnosis ????? ureteral injury?
    detection?? method? ?? ??
  • Hurt et al. 5 methods
  • 1) retrograde ureteral dye injection
  • 2) intravenous dye injection
  • 3) intraoperative ureteral catheterization
  • 4) intravenous excretory urography
  • 5) dissection of the ureter
  • 15(21.4) cases? diagnosis time? ?? ?? ??

19
  • Ureteral injury repair? approach ??
  • Laparotomy 43(61.4) cases
  • 15(21.4)cases did not report
  •  Gordon and Lewis
  • Focal ureteral injuries
  • Double J-shaped catheter? ????, urine leakage? ??
    ureter? ???? spontaneous healing? ???? ?? ??
  • More extensive damage
  • end-to-end anastomosis ? ureteral implantation?
    ??
  • laparotomy? ??

20
  • Preferred technique of ureteral injury repair
  • Dependent on the time of injury diagnosis
  • 59 cases
  • both time of ureteral injury diagnosis and mode
    of treatment were reported
  • Diagnosed postoperatively
  • Laparotomy ?? ??? 49 case? 38 cases (77.6)
  • 5 cases of ureteral injury not treated using
    laparotomy
  • 4 cases conservative treatment
  • 1 case laparoscopic approach
  • most often repaired using laparotomy
  • Diagnosed intraoperatively
  • laparoscopic repair ??
  • 6 cases
  • 2 cases laparotomy
  • 4 cases laparoscopy.

21
  • The type and location of ureteral injuries
  • Type not specifically described in 51.4
  • Location specified in even fewer cases
  • Potential locations for ureteral injury
  • Hurt et al. classic, nonlaparoscopic pelvic
    surgeries
  • at the pelvic brim
  • Ureter? uterine arteries ???? cervix ???? ???? ??
  • Ureters? bladder? ???? vaginal fornix? ?? ??
  • Gordon and Lewis laparoscopic surgeries
  • at the infundibulopelvic ligament
  • where the ureter passes deep to the ovarian fossa
  • at the ureteral canal
  • Our review
  • at or above the pelvic brim the most common
    site

22
  • Instruments involved in ureteral injuries
  • 34 cases (48.6) not defined or specified
  • LAVH and electrocautery
  • Identified as leading causes of laparoscopic
    ureteral injury
  • (when data was available for analysis and
    review)
  • In more than 50 of the cases
  • Location and type of injury were also not
    specified
  • In this review (most common findings)
  • Electrocautery instrumentation
  • Transection injuries
  • At or above the pelvic brim

23
  • Decrease the risk of this complication
  • Ostrzenski
  • laparoscopic suturing and tying method
  • Laparoscopic suturing technique and the tying of
    an intracorporeal or extracorporeal
  • staplers or electrocautery?? ?? ??? method
  • Improved training in laparoscopic technique
  • Recognition of intra- and retroperitoneal gross
    and functional anatomy
  • Lower urinary tract? integrity? ???? ??
    intraoperative protocols ??
  • ???? urology consultation? ??
  • Decrease the delay in recognition of ureteral
    injury
  • Increase of their intraoperative repair.

24
  • laparoscopic surgeries? ureter injury? ?? Data
    and discussion
  • Lacking in both breadth and depth
  • Much of the reviewed literature on existing
    information
  • Cursory and incomplete.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com