Preventing Surgical Site Infections: Back to Basics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Preventing Surgical Site Infections: Back to Basics

Description:

Kathleen Kohut, RN, MS, CIC, CNOR Klkohut_at_gmail.com Prewash prior to application Follow manufacturer s directions Utilize proper aseptic technique during ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1481
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: SarahV82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preventing Surgical Site Infections: Back to Basics


1
Preventing Surgical Site InfectionsBack to
Basics
  • Kathleen Kohut, RN, MS, CIC, CNOR
  • Klkohut_at_gmail.com

2
Speaker Disclosures
  • 3M
  • AMN Healthcare
  • BESmith
  • The Compass Group

3
Objectives
  1. Name the 2 most common mechanisms for wound
    contamination
  2. Discuss 7 areas of opportunity for improvement
  3. Describe the use of glycemic control and nasal
    decolonization initiatives for the reduction of
    SSIs.
  4. List 3 ways to facilitate process improvements in
    the Operating Room

4
Invaluable Resources
  • National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)
  • 1999 HICPAC SSI Guidelines
  • AORN Guidelines
  • Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Measures

5
SCIP Quality Measures
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
  • Drug, Timing, Dosing
  • Hair Removal
  • Glycemic Control
  • Normothermia
  • Expanded in June
  • All surgical patients
  • Qualitynet.org

6
Back to the Basics
  • Aseptic Technique
  • Traffic
  • Aseptic Technique
  • Sterilization
  • Aseptic Technique
  • ABX Prophylaxis
  • Aseptic Technique
  • Hair Removal
  • Aseptic Technique
  • Skin Antisepsis
  • Aseptic Technique
  • Dressings

7
1. Aseptic Technique
  • Principles were developed to reduce the risk of
    wound contamination.

8
Defining the Risk of SSI
  • Risk of SSI Dose of Bacterial
  • Contamination X Virulence
  • Resistance of Host (patient)
  • Berry Kohns, Operating Room Technique, 11th
    ed., p. 254

9
Causes of Wound Contamination
  • Exogenous sources
  • Cleanliness of environment, lack of proper
    airflow, shedding by the Surgical Team
  • Endogenous sources
  • Patients own skin/hair
  • Infection at a remote site

10
The Number One Source
  • People Shedding
  • 4000-10,000 particles per minute
  • (Berry Kohns, Operating Room Technique, 11th
    ed., p. 252)
  • Carried by wind currents to the sterile field
    which results in wound contamination.
  • Patient
  • Surgical Team
  • Ancillary Personnel
  • Sales Reps
  • Students
  • Passersby

11
Shedding plus Wind Currents
  • Requires the control of
  • Amount of Traffic
  • Traffic Patterns
  • Sherertz, et al. Cloud HCWs. Emerging Infect
    Dis. 20017(2) 241-44.
  • Edmiston, et al. Airborne Particulates in the OR
    Environment. AORN 1999 69(6) 1169-1183.

12
2. Traffic Control
  • Essential personnel only
  • One foot (min) perimeter around sterile field
  • Sterile fields should be a destination, not a
    thoroughfare
  • Limit students and observers
  • The right of the student to learn vs. the right
    of the patient to receive safe patient care
  • DeKastle, R.  Telesurgery Providing Remote
    Surgical Observations for Students.  AORN 2009
    90 (1) 93-101.
  • Utilize alternative methods of communication

13
Kohut SSI Equation
  • People Wind (-) Aseptic Technique
  • gt ABX Skin Prep
  • Wound Contamination
  • SSI

14
Containment is the key
  • 1. Patient
  • Pre-op Showers
  • Hat and clean gown/linen for patient
  • 2. Surgical Team
  • Hand Hygiene
  • Nocardia farcinica (Wenger, et al. J Infect Dis.
    Nov 1998)
  • Proper aseptic technique
  • Properly worn hats, masks, clean OR scrubs,
    jackets, minimal jewelry (AORN scrub attire)

15
Ban Skull Caps
  • Dineen, P, Drusin, L. Epidemics of Postoperative
    Wound Infections Associated with Hair Carriers.
    Lancet 1973 (Nov) 1157-59.

16
Lack of Containment
  • BAD
  • VERY BAD

17
Standards of Excellence
  • PETA APPROVED
  • GOLD STANDARD

18
Environment
  • Room Requirements
  • Ventilation System (15/hr 3 fresh)
  • Positive pressure
  • Temperature (68-73 F)
  • Humidity (30-60)
  • Room Cleaning
  • Between cases
  • Terminal cleaning
  • Types of construction materials
  • Clutter
  • AORN, Recommended Practices for Perioperative
    Nursing Safe Environment of Care. (2008 ed., p
    357)

19
Surgical Conscience
  • Requires strict adherence to the principles of
    aseptic technique by all team members for every
    patient on every case.
  • ORs that value these principles create a patient
    centered culture.
  • Girard, NJ. Surgical Conscience Still
    Pertinent. AORN (2007)86 (1) 13-14.

20
3. Sterilization
  • Proper Management of Sterile Processing
    Departments
  • Technology
  • Workflow
  • Staff certification
  • Proper Sterilization Processes
  • Focus area for The Joint Commission
  • Cleaning, sterilization, and storage
  • www.jointcommission.org/Library/WhatsNew/steam_ste
    rilization.htm

21
Flash Sterilization
  • Utilized for
  • Dropped instruments
  • Poorly designed work processes
  • Lack of instrumentation
  • Surgeon scheduling
  • Results in contamination due to
  • Poor cleaning due to lack of time
  • Methods of delivery to the sterile field
  • Closed containers are best practice
  • TJC will be looking for them
  • Carlo, A. The New Era of Flash Sterilization.
    AORN 2007 86(1) p 58-70.

22
Flash Data
  • Calculation of flash events rate x
    100 of cases/month

23
4. Antibiotic Prophylaxis
  • SCIP Measures
  • INF 1,2,3
  • Goal gt90
  • Best Practice- Anesthesiologists
  • Proper dosage for obese population (BMIgt30)
  • Dont forget redosing q 3 hours

24
5. Hair Removal
  • SCIP INF 6 Surgery patients with appropriate
    hair removal.
  • Minimize as much as possible
  • Clippers only
  • Not in the OR!

25
6. Skin Antisepsis
  • The attributes of an appropriate surgical skin
    antiseptic require
  • The ability to significantly reduce
    microorganisms (2 log, 3 log)
  • Provide broad spectrum activity
  • Be fast acting
  • Have a persistent effect
  • All products with FDA approval meet this criteria
  • AORN, Recommended Practices for Perioperative
    Nursing Skin Antisepsis. (2008 ed., pp537-555)

26
Other Skin Antisepsis Considerations
  • Procedure
  • Prep area
  • Application Methodology
  • Scrubbing vs. Painting
  • Length of the procedure
  • Challenges to the prep area
  • -blood, saline, friction
  • Patient Safety

27
Critical Thinking is Required
  • Ultimately, the OR nurse decides at the point of
    care by assessing the patient to insure that the
    skin antisepsis planned for will be appropriate
    for that patient based on allergy status, body
    site, and skin integrity.

28
Current Recommendations
  • CDC SSI guideline states to use an appropriate
    antiseptic
  • SHEA Compendium - Optimal preparation and
    disinfection of the operative site
  • AORN compares products but does not provide
    specific product recommendations

29
Current Research
  • Limited research is available that compares
    commonly used skin antiseptic agents with SSI
    outcomes
  • The majority of the literature compares microbial
    counts
  • The correlation between microbial counts and SSI
    outcomes is unclear

30
Current Research
  • Saltzman, MD, et al. Efficacy of Surgical
    Preparation Solutions in Shoulder Surgery. J
    Bone Joint Surg AM 2009911949053
  • Microbial culture study of 150 patients
  • Compared 3 methods
  • Iodophor Scrub/Paint vs. ChloraPrep vs.
    Duraprep
  • Result
  • Microbial counts were less using ChloraPrep
  • SSI Outcome was no SSIs in any of the groups

31
Current Research
  • Swenson, et al. Preoperative skin preparation on
    postoperative wound infection a prospective
    study of three skin preparation protocols.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009 30964-971
  • SSI Outcome study of 3209
  • general surgery patients
  • Compared 3 methods
  • Iodophor Scrub/ETOH/Paint vs. ChloraPrep vs.
    DuraPrep
  • Result
  • SSI Outcomes- A statistical difference with lower
    SSI rates using iodine based products.

32
Current Research
  • Darouiche, RO, et al. Chlorhexidine-Alcohol
    versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site
    Antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010 362(1)18-26.
  • Microbial culture study of 849 patients
  • Compared 2 methods
  • Iodophor Scrub/Paint vs. Chlorhexidine-alcohol
  • Result
  • Significantly lower SSI rates with
    Chlorhexidine-alcohol prep for surperficial and
    deep incisional wounds

33
Clear as Mud..
34
Product Application
  • Prewash prior to application
  • Follow manufacturers directions
  • Utilize proper aseptic technique during
    application gloves to contain shedding

35
7. Dressings
  • Optimal dressings are
  • Permeable to gas exchange
  • Impermeable to microbes/contamination
  • Create a moist healing environment (37C)

36
Dressings
  • Stay in place
  • Good adherence properties
  • Change on day 2-3 unless drainage, dirty, or
    damaged
  • Use proper aseptic technique when applying the
    dressings before the drapes are removed
  • Partner with Wound Care Specialists
  • Sussman, C, Bates-Jensen, B. Wound Care A
    Collaborative Practice Manual for Health
    Professionals 2006 (Chap11)

37
The New Basics
  • Glycemic Control
  • Nasal Decolonization

38
Glycemic Control
  • 30-35 of cardiac patients are diabetics
  • SCIP INF 4 Cardiac surgery patients with
    controlled 6 a.m. postoperative serum glucose.
  • The OR cannot be a black hole

39
S. aureus Nasal Carriage
  • Between 25-30 of all patients are colonized
  • Another 60 carry it intermittently
  • 85 of S. aureus infections were endogenous in
    SSI study populations
  • Nasal decolonization should be considered due to
    the risk of S. aureus SSIs
  • Van Rijen, et al. Intranasal Mupirocin for
    reduction of S. aureus in surgical patients with
    nasal carriage. J Anti Chemotherapy 2008
    61254-261.
  • Perl, TM, et al. Intranasal Mupirocin to Prevent
    Postoperative Staphylococcus Aureus Infections.
    N Engl J Med 2002 346(24) 1871-7.

40
Speciality Specific Opportunities
  • Cardiac
  • Spinal Fusions
  • Labor and Delivery
  • Cath Lab

41
Cardiac Surgery
  • 2 concurrent surgeries
  • Skin antisepsis
  • Bone wax
  • Traffic and of people
  • Hypothermia

42
Spinal Surgery
  • Equipment
  • Amount, position, cleanliness
  • Weiner, BK, Kilgore, WB. Bacterial shedding in
    common spine procedures headlamp/loupes and the
    operative microscope. Spine 200732(8)918-20.
  • Biswas, D, et al. Sterility of C-arm fluroscopy
    during spinal surgery. Spine 2008
    33(17)1913-17.
  • Antibiotics
  • Redosing
  • Time
  • Longer surgeries, waiting for X-ray
  • Dressings
  • Posterior incisions (higher risk)

43
LD and Cath Lab
  • Aseptic technique
  • Skin antisepsis

44
Facilitating Process Improvements
  • Provide the data
  • Trend and report ABX and flash data monthly
  • SSI Outcome data Quarterly
  • Utilize data to implement change
  • NPSGs
  • Multidisciplinary- IP, Quality, nurses, techs,
    surgeons, anesthesia, schedulers, housekeeping

45
Process Improvements
  • Make regular observations of aseptic technique
  • Standardize
  • Use forms to quantify when possible
  • Simplify- pick one thing to get started

46
Process Improvements
  • Implement Changes
  • Seek out champions
  • Communication is essential
  • Get feedback from staff and re-evaluate prn
  • Insure that new outcome data is communicated to
    staff
  • Celebrate Success!

47
Results After Process Improvements
48
Questions?
  • KLKohut_at_gmail.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com