Accurate gamma-ray spectrometry of environmental samples: a challenge - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Accurate gamma-ray spectrometry of environmental samples: a challenge

Description:

Title: Accurate gamma-ray spectrometry of environmental samples: a challenge Author: PTB Last modified by: Octavian Sima Created Date: 8/30/2002 7:24:29 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: ptb69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accurate gamma-ray spectrometry of environmental samples: a challenge


1
Accurate gamma-ray spectrometry of environmental
samples a challenge
  • O. Sima - Bucharest University
  • D. Arnold - PTB Braunschweig
  • C. Dovlete - ERL Bucharest

2
Accurate gamma-ray spectrometry of environmental
samples a challenge
  • Introduction
  • Problems in efficiency calibration of the
    spectrometer
  • Coincidence summing effects
  • Matrix effects
  • Geometry effects
  • GESPECOR
  • Summary and conclusions

3
Introduction
  • Assessment of radioactivity of environmental
    samples
  • carefully designed sampling procedures
  • appropriate sample preparation
  • accurate sample measurement
  • rigorous analysis of the results
  • Modern requirements and conditions
  • low detection limits
  • accurate evaluation of uncertainty
  • high number of samples, various types, matrices,
    available quantities
  • high efficiency detectors available

4
Problems in efficiency calibration
  • Low level activity low detection limit
  • high efficiency measurement conditions
  • volume sources
  • Detection efficiency for high efficiency
    measurements
  • nuclide specific coincidence summing effects
  • Detection efficiency for volumic samples
  • dependent upon sample matrix and density

gt Direct experimental calibration - limited
number of matrices - specific nuclides -
expensive, problems with the management of
radioactive material
gt Additional procedures for a complete
calibration required
5
Coincidence summing effects
  • Are encountered in the case of measurement of
    nuclides which decay through the emission of
    coincident radiation (cascading photons, X-rays,
    annihilation photons etc)
  • Depend on the details of the decay scheme
  • Nuclide and peak specific effects
  • Are much enhanced in high efficiency measurement
    conditions
  • Effects
  • summing out (coincidence losses from the peak) gt
    decrease of the apparent efficiency
  • summing in (additional counts in the sum peak) gt
    increase of the apparent efficiency

6
  SPECTRUM OF 22Na (WELL-TYPE DETECTOR)          
           
 
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Coincidence summing - sample analysis -
efficiency calibration ex 1 l Marinelli
beaker Co-60 gt 1173 keV 0.926, 1332 keV
0.924 Y-88 gt 898 keV 0.932, 1836 keV
0.920 ex Well-type detector Co-60 gt 1173
keV 0.445, 1332 keV 0.424 Y-88 gt 898 keV
0.472, 1836 keV 0.390 gt Accurate procedures for
the evaluation of the effects required
10
Matrix effects
  • Matrix effects are encountered when the
    calibration source has a different composition
    and density than the sample of interest
  • Depend on
  • sample geometry
  • linear attenuation coefficient
  • photon energy
  • detector parameters
  • Linear attenuation coefficient obtained from
  • sample composition and density
  • transmission experiments

11
- Transmission factor approximated by exp(-?d) ?
12
Transmission factors (log scale). Sample R3.5,
H2 cm
1
0.1
exp(-?d)
0.01
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
0.8 1.0 1.2
1.4
Linear attenuation coefficient (1/cm)
13
Relative error ? (). Soil sample, R3.5 cm, H2
cm.
30
20
10
0
- 10
- 20
10 100
1000
Energy (keV)
14
Geometry effects
  • For samples measured close to the end cap of a
    closed end coaxial detector efficiency very
    sensitive to geometry details
  • For some samples (e.g. powder) it is difficult to
    assure exactly the standard geometry
  • Detectors parameters may vary in time (e.g. the
    entrance window of the end cap)

15
Relative error of activity ?(A) (). Soil sample,
R3.5 cm
Relative error of activity ?(A) (). Soil sample,
R3.5 cm
0
- 2
- 4
- 6
- 8
- 10
10 100
1000
Energy (keV)
16
GESPECOR
  • Monte Carlo based software dedicated to solve
    problems in gamma spectrometry
  • - computation of coincidence summing corrections
  • - computation of self-attenuation effects
    (matrix effects)
  • - computation of the efficiency
  • Typical applications environmental spectrometry
  • - detectors HPGe (closed end or well-type),
    Ge(Li)
  • - sources cylinder, Marinelli, point,
    parallelepiped, ring
  • - matrix any (known composition) or known ?
  • - nuclides 100 (for coincidence summing
    effects)
  • Extension for very large samples variance
    reduction techniques (focused photon emission,
    weighted emission point)

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Direct efficiency calibration - typical sources
(cylinder, Marinelli, point sources) - special
geometries Parallelepiped (Al-26 in meteorite
samples) Spherical source (Rn-222 sources) In
situ measurements Drum waste containersEfficien
cy transfer less sensitive to detector details
22
(No Transcript)
23
Summary and conclusions
  • Accurate assessment of the radioactivity of
    environmental samples a challenge
  • Coincidence summing effects
  • Matrix effects
  • Geometry effects
  • The GESPECOR software can solve typical problems
    required by an accurate assessment of the
    radioactivity of environmental samples
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com