EMBA???? ???????????????

1
EMBA???????????????????

• ??? ??
• ????????????????

2
????

• ???
• Stephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge
• 2009. Organizational Behavior (13th ed.).
  Pearson Prentice Hall.

3
??????

• 1.??
• 2. ?????
• 3. ????????
• 4. ????
• 5. ????
• 6. ??--??
• 7. ??--????
• 8. ??

4
??????

• 9. ????
• 10. ????
• 11. ??
• 12. ??
• 13. ???????
• 14. ?????
• 15. ??

5
???? ????

• 16. ????
• 17. ????
• 18. ????????
• 20. ???????????

6
????

• ?????
• ?????Understand, Predict, and Control
  ?/??,??,??
• ????????,???????
• ??????????,??????? What, How, Why, Who, Where,
  and When
• ??,??,???,
• ??,??,??, ????

7
????????

• ????????????????????????
• ??? ???????????????? ????????????
• ??????,???????
• ?????
• ??????????????
• ????? ???????????

8
EMBA??????

• 1.????,???????????
• ???????,???,??????????????????????
• ??????????????????????????????????????
• ??,??????????????????? ??????? ???????????????

9
EMBA??????

• 2. ??????????????,??????????????????????????????
• ???????/???????????????/???????? ??????,??????
• 3.?? ???????????????????????????
  (???????)????????? ??,???????????

10
EMBA??????????

• 3.?????? (????)?????? (????)??.
• ?????????????????,????,?????
• 4. ??????????(Measure)?????????????? (Value-Added
  Contributions)?
• ???? ????? ??????--???????? ???????????
  ????? ?????? ????????????

11
EMBA??????????

• 5. ?????????????????????????????????????
• 6. ????????
• Theory ? Research ? Practice
• ?? ? ???? ? ??

12
Toyota vs. GM ?????

• ???? 200,000/? 200,000/?
• ???? 800/?? 1,800/??
• ?? 1,600?
  2800?
• ?? 15.50-25.00 26.50 30.50
• ?? ?? 35.00 81.18
• ?? San Antonio, TX Arlington, TX
• ?? ????? UAW????

13
????????

• ??????????
• ???????????????
• ???????????????????????????
• ???? ???

14
Effectiveness vs. Efficiency

• Effectiveness
• Doing the right things, ?????
• Efficiency
• Doing things right, ?????
• ??
• ??
• Planning, Organizing, Leading, Controlling

15
Exhibit Strategic Choices
16
System--??

• ??
• ??
• ??
• ??? (?? ???)
• ????
• ????
• ?????? ??????
• (?????) ??????

17
The Organization as an Open System
18
??????

• ??
• ???,??,???,???????
• ??, ??, ??, ??, ??, ??, ??, ??
• ??,??
• ???? ? ????

19
M.E. Porter, Competitive Strategy Techniques for
Analyzing Industries and Competitors (New York
The Free Press, 1980).
20
SWOT Analaysis
21
????????

• ???????
• ???
• Edward E. Lawler, III

22
????

• ?????????????????????????????360??????????????????
  ???????
• ????/??????????????
• ????
• ??,????,????

23
??????

• ??
• ??

24
????-????

• ??????????????
• ??????
• ??????? Benchmarking
• ????????? GM SaturnTeam 99
• ????
• ????????????????????????????

25
(No Transcript)
26
??

• ???????
• ??????
• ??,???????
• ???????
• ??
• ??
• ??

27
(No Transcript)
28
Contrasting Spans of Control1365 585 780
29
????????

• Affective
• Behavioral
• Cognitive

30
?????????

• The Love of Money ????
• Affective I want to be Rich "??"??
• Behavior Money is a Motivator "??"??
• Cognitive Money is important (Importance)
• ??"??
• Money is Power ????

31
(No Transcript)
32
????????

• Job Satisfaction
• OCB
• Performance
• Turnover
• Deviance, Unethical Behavior Intentions
• Organizational Commitment

33
The Love of Money and Turnover Intentions Human
Relations (2000)
34
The Love of Money and Actual Turnover 18 Months
Later Human Relations (2000)
35
The Love of Money and OCB-Helping Behavior
36
?????????????

• Propensity to Engage in Unethical Behavior
• Unethical Behavior Intentions
• Resources Abuse ????/??
• Not Whistle Blowing????
• Theft ??
• Corruption??
• Deception??

37
The Love of Money and Evil
38
Personality

• The Big Five
• Self-Esteem
• Machiavellianism
• Values

39
Love of Money, Machiavellianism, Unethical
Behavior Journal of Business Ethics (2008)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
????,??

• ??????
• ?????? Maslow, Alderfer, Herzberg, McClelland (n
  Ach, n Aff, n Power)
• ????, ??????
• ??, ????
• ?????? Adam-Equity, Locke-Goal Setting

43
Maslow Need Hierarchy Theory
44
Maslow?????

• Importance and Satisfaction of Needs
• Persian Gulf War vs. Peacetime
• US vs. Middle-East
• ?????????
• ????? ? ????
• ?? ? ??

45
Maslow?????

• Tang West (1997) International Journal of
  Stress Management,
• Tang Ibrahim (1998) International Journal of
  Stress Management,
• Tang, Ibrahim, West (2002) International
  Journal of Management Theory and Practices

46
Herzberg Motivator-Hygiene Theory??

• 200 Accountants and Engineers
• Critical incidents, Semi-Structured Interview
• Motivator
• Hygiene
• KITA
• Salary is a Hygiene Factor, It leads to
  Movements, but not to Motivation
• Harvard Business Review 1968, 1987, 2003

47
Herzberg Motivator-Hygiene Theory?????

• Salary is a Hygiene Factor
• Add a new dimension Individual Differences
• The Love of Money ? Pay Satisfaction

48
The Love of Money ? Pay SatisfactionManagement
and Organization Review (2006)
49
??????

• ?????
• ??
• ????
• ????
• ??????

50
???????????

• Stress
• Hardiness
• Commitment, Control, Challenge
• ??,??,??
• Relaxation ??

51
Job Stress, Life Stress, Hardiness, Illness
Public Personnel Management (1992)
52
Job Stress, Life Stress, Hardiness, Absenteeism
Public Personnel Management (1992)
53
Unethical Behavior Intentions, Job Stress, and
Life Satisfaction. Macedonia. Journal of
Business Ethics (2008)
54
Unethical Behavior Intentions, Job Stress, and
Life Satisfaction. Macedonia. Journal of
Business Ethics (2008)
55
The Etic Model
56
Is the Love of Money the Root of All Evil?Method
N 6,285

• (1) High GDP Group (n 1,960, 8 entities)
• the USA, Belgium, Australia, France, Italy,
  Spain, Singapore, Hong Kong
• (2) Medium GDP Group (n 2,371, 12 entities)
  Portugal, Slovenia, South Korea, Taiwan, Malta,
  Oman, Hungary, Croatia, Mexico, Russia, South
  Africa, Malaysia
• (3) Low GDP Group (n 1,954, 10 entities)
• Romania, Brazil, Bulgaria, Peru, Macedonia,
  Thailand, China, Egypt, the Philippines, and
  Nigeria.

57
(1) High GDP Group (n 1,960/3, 8 entities)
the USA, Belgium, Australia, France, Italy,
Spain, Singapore, Hong Kong(2) Medium GDP Group
(n 2,371/3, 12 entities) Portugal, Slovenia,
South Korea, Taiwan, Malta, Oman, Hungary,
Croatia, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Malaysia
(3) Low GDP Group (n 1,954/3, 10 entities)
Romania, Brazil, Bulgaria, Peru, Macedonia,
Thailand, China, Egypt, the Philippines, and
Nigeria.
58
(1) High GDP Group (n 1,960/3, 8 entities) the
USA, Belgium, Australia, France, Italy, Spain,
Singapore, Hong Kong(2) Medium GDP Group (n
2,371/3, 12 entities) Portugal, Slovenia, South
Korea, Taiwan, Malta, Oman, Hungary, Croatia,
Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Malaysia (3) Low
GDP Group (n 1,954/3, 10 entities) Romania,
Brazil, Bulgaria, Peru, Macedonia, Thailand,
China, Egypt, the Philippines, and Nigeria.
59
(1) High GDP Group (n 1,960/3, 8 entities) the
USA, Belgium, Australia, France, Italy, Spain,
Singapore, Hong Kong(2) Medium GDP Group (n
2,371/3, 12 entities) Portugal, Slovenia, South
Korea, Taiwan, Malta, Oman, Hungary, Croatia,
Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Malaysia (3) Low
GDP Group (n 1,954/3, 10 entities) Romania,
Brazil, Bulgaria, Peru, Macedonia, Thailand,
China, Egypt, the Philippines, and Nigeria.
60
Hypnosis ??

• Important Principles Related to
  Hypnosis?????????????
• Communication ??????
• Persuasion ??
• Organizational Culture ????
• Creativity ???
• Leadership ??
• Two Key Factors
• Relaxation/Concentration ??/?????
• Suggestion ????

61
???????

• Affective Relationship ??,??
• 2. Prestige ??, Behavioral Integrity ????
• 3. Nonverbal Communication ?????
• 4. Facilitation ??
• The acceptance of one suggestion always aids to
  the acceptance of another suggestion.
• ?????????????????????

62
???????

• 5. Grading ??? ????
• Suggestions are accepted more readily if they are
  graded as to difficulty of acceptance.
• ????????? ? ?????????
• 6. Expectancy??
• When the patient is in a state of expectancy
  he/she makes suggestions more easily.
• ????? ?? ????????,?/??????????????????
• ?? 1 ??? 2 ? ?? 3

63
???????

• 7. Use Simple Language ???????
• 8. Provide a Complete Picture, ?????????
• 9. Repeat Key Points ??
• 10. When the mind talks, your body listens
• The Mind The Body
• ????????,??????
• ?? ??

64
??????

• ?????
• ?????? ?????? ???????????? (1974) AACSB
• Enron Corporation Chief Financial Officer (????)
  Andrew Fastow and former CEO (????) Jeffrey
  Skilling ??????? MBA??

65
??????

• ?????? ??? ?? ? ??
• ????
• ?????(Feiner, 2004)???? ? ??
• Sarbanes-Oxley Act, signed into law on July 30,
  2002 in the USA
• Code of Ethics ?????????
• ?????????

66
??????

• ?????????,??? (Kochan, 2002)
• ???????
• ????????????????
• ??(????,??)???(????, ?)
• ????????? ???????????
• ???? ? ??

67
The Love of Money ??,????

• ?????,????????????,?????????(???,??? 427-347 ?)?
• ????????????????,??????, ??, ???,?????????????????
  ?? (?? 1 ??? 6 9-10)?

68
Groups/Teams/Quality Circles

• Tang, Tollison, Whiteside
• 1987. Personnel Psychology.
• 1989. Journal of Management
• 1991. Journal of Social Psychology
• 1993. Public Personnel Management
• 1996. Journal of Social Psychology
• Tang Butler
• 1997. Public Personnel Management

69
?????????(EMBA)

• 1. ?????????? ??, ???????, ???????????
• 2. ??????,??????????,??????????????????????????,
  ????????????????, ?????
• 3. ??????, ??, ??, ?????????, ??????, ????,
  ???????????
• 4. ????????, ???????????, ?????????
• ??,??,???,?,???/??, ??????
• 5. ??????????????, ????????, ??????
• 6. ????--?????,?????--??????, ?????????

70
Sara Rynes (2002). Academy of Management
Journal,45 (2) 311-313.

• Low Contribution
• Results had been shown elsewhere before.
• The scope of the contribution is very limited.
  This is a very narrow slice of the problem.
• Is this really surprising?
• The research is not important. The case is not
  well made.

71
Contribution

• -Being in the right place at the right time.
  Frequent interactions with management and
  colleagues.
• -There is a sense that several activities or
  interests converge at the same time.
• -The importance of the research and the interest
  in it seem to be guided by intuition, excitement,
  and intrinsic interest.
• -

72
Contribution

• -A concern with theory also seems to be
  important. The investigator is curious.
• -It has an applied, real-world flavor to it. It
  has policy implications. The ideas often are
  tangible, useful, and pertained to ongoing
  organizational activities. Often the idea arose
  from contact with laymen in organizations.

73
Take Stock and Looking AheadRynes, S. L. AMJ,
2005, 48 (1) 9-15.

• Relative importance of theoretical, practical,
  and empirical contributions (100 points)
• 1. 42 points to Empirical contribution
• 2. 41 points to theoretical contribution
• 3. 17 points to practical contribution
• ????, ??,????/?????

74
Goals and Actions

• Interestingness, innovativeness, and novelty a
  rating category
• Inductive ?? theory-building research and
  deductive ?? theory-testing work
• Qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and
  combination methods
• Must make strong Empirical and Theoretical
  contributions and highlight the significance of
  those contributions

75
Looking Ahead

• Important
• Interesting (a higher degree of learning)
• International
• Integrative across theories, disciplines, and
  levels of analysis

76
Bartunek, Jean M., Rynes, S. L. Ireland, R. D.
2006. What makes management research interesting,
and why does it matter? AMJ, 49 (1) 9-15

• Interesting a higher degree of learning
• Readers perceive an articles topic and title as
  interesting
• Interesting articles are more likely to induce
  positive affect and are also more likely to be
  read, understood, and remembered.
• Attract, motivate, and retain students
• Hope, as a Model,
• Gain truly relevant knowledge

77
Murray Davis (1971). That is interesting! Towards
a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of
phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences,
1 309-344.

• It disconfirms some (but not all) of the
  assumptions held by its audience.
• It engages readers attention, something that
  stands out for readers in contrast to the web of
  routinely taken-for-granted propositions which
  make up the structure of their everyday life (p.
  311).

78
Reasons for Rating an Article as Most
Interesting

• 1. Counterintuitive 57
• Challenges established theory, is
  counterintuitive Goes against folk wisdom or
  consultant wisdom, etc. creates an aha moment
• 2. Quality 57
• Includes at least one of the following
  well-crafted theory, good technical or methods
  job good fit of data and theory sophisticated
  methodology great sample makes the complex look
  simple and elegant

79
Reasons for Rating an Article as Most
Interesting

• 3. Good writing 48
• Is well framed builds momentum
  provides good examples is clear and engaging
  has rich descriptions
• 4. New theory/finding 48
• Creates new theory synthesizes previous
  theories integrates multiple perspectives comes
  up with an important finding.

80
Reasons for Rating an Article as Most
Interesting

• Practical implications 31
• Generates usable knowledge in the real world
  addresses a subject that is very relevant to the
  real world.
• Impact 28
• Stimulates new empirical or theoretical work
  has been cite or quoted a lot has opened avenues
  for research in a new area.

81
Media Perspective

• Timeliness, publics attention
• Findings, in the form of numbers
• Findings equate with news.
• Creativity, pitch generic findings in a specific
  context
• Some topics are always of interest sex (a taboo
  topic) and stock options (big money)

82
Thank You

• Danke ??????
• Dankeshen ?????
• Grazie ?? ??????
• Merci ?? ??
  
• Muchas Gracias
• Obrigado
• Takk Deg