Title: Institutional Review Board Application Procedures ...and more!
1Institutional Review Board Application
Procedures ...and more!
- Choya Washington
- Division of Research Affairs
- Graduate Research Affairs
- San Diego State University
2Overview
- What is the IRB?
- Important Historical Events
- What is reviewed by the IRB
- How to submit a protocol to the IRB
3What is the IRB?
- The IRB stands for the Institutional Review Board
- IRBs are composed of individuals with the
expertise and background needed to conduct a
complete and adequate review of the research
planned by an institution - The IRB reviews all research with human subjects
conducted at SDSU
4Who is on the Board
- M.D.s
- Faculty members from various colleges
- Community Member
- Non Scientist
- We also invite outside experts to assist with the
review of protocols as necessary - Advocates for certain classes of participants are
invited to aid in the review of certain types of
research
5Why Does the IRB exist? Important Historical
Events
- Willowbrook Study
- Tuskegee Study
- 1974 National Research Act
- 1979 The Belmont Report
6The Willowbrook Study Mid 1950s Early 1970s
- Vulnerable population Involved infecting
mentally retarded children with a Hepatitis virus
to study the progression of the disease and to
test new vaccinations. - Undue Influence The study was extremely coercive
as parents often had a difficult time getting
their children admitted to any mental health care
facilities. - Parents were manipulated by the researchers into
allowing their children to participate and were
told that their children could not enroll at
Willowbrook unless they agreed to participate. - Risks The nature of the experiments were
extremely cruel and unjust.
7Tuskegee Study-200-300 Black men w/ syphilis were
enrolled to document the effects of the disease
untreated over time
- This study exemplifies
- Unfair subject selection syphilis can
potentially affect all human beings not just
African American men. - Denial of informed consent subjects were not
told of their disease or given the option to opt
out of the study. - Excessive Risk The risks far exceeded any
potential benefits. 1943-Penicillin was
discovered as a treatment, but was withheld from
the subjects.
81974 National Research Act
- Created the National Commission for the
Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical
Behavioral Research - Required informed consent for all government
sponsored studies - Established IRBs
91979 Belmont Report
- Belmont Report outlines acceptable ethical
practices in research - Foundation of current federal regulations
- Three basic tenets of the Belmont Report include
- Respect
- Informed Consent
- Voluntary Participation
- Privacy Confidentiality
- Beneficence
- Maximize benefits
- Minimize risk-Qualifications of researcher to
carry out the study in a safe and appropriate
manner? - Justice
- Fair subject selection
- Equitable distribution of risks benefits
10What is Reviewed by the IRB
- Is it research?
- Are human subjects involved?
- Types of review and risk
11What is Reviewed by the IRB
- Research involving human subjects
- Defined by 45 CFR 46.102(d) as
- A systematic investigation designed to develop
or contribute to generalizable knowledge - Generalizable knowledge
- publication (article, thesis or dissertation)
- professional presentation
12Are Human Subjects Involved? A few examples
- Reviewed by the IRB
- Studies that use medical records, or case files
(this is individual information about subjects) - Studies that will involve the opinions, feelings,
experiences, or characteristics of individuals - Not reviewed by the IRB
- Studies concerning amount of people using a given
resource center (does not involve individual
information about subjects it is information
about individual facilities). - Aggregate data (e.g., census data, etc)
13 Read the Guidebook
14 Pass the Tutorial
15 Benign Exempt
Minimal Risk Expedited Greater than
Full Committee Minimal Risk
1 gt1 gt6
Risk level Reviewers required
Review level
16Full Committee Review
- Research that involves
- an intervention or manipulation of the subject's
environment (sometimes but not always-whether
full committee review is required is dependant on
risk involved) - deception
- vulnerable subjects e.g. children, prisoners,
mentally disabled, pregnant women (sometimes but
not always-whether full committee review is
required is dependant on risk involved) - greater than minimal risk
17Full Committee Example
- Research concerning factors that may lead to
low school performance in a particular racial
group - Includes interviews about students sexual
practices, illegal behaviors (drug use)
18Full Committee Deadline Dates
- Protocols due 2 weeks prior to meeting.
- Dates are listed on the web site
- Expect notification of review outcome within
one-week of IRB meeting
19Common Problems in Full Committee Research
- Adequately addressing risks and risk management
plans for vulnerable subject populations and/or
asking subjects to complete high-risk tasks. - Know the possible repercussions and how you will
protect subjects whether it is their safety, or
from social risks, or illegal risks that may come
from participation.
- Undue Influence during recruitment
- Vulnerable populations
- Informed Consent Process
20Expedited Review
- Expedited review includes certain kinds of
research involving no more than minimal risk - Deadline dates do not apply
- Minimal risk probability of harm/discomfort in
research is not greater than that encountered in
daily life
21Expedited Example
- Using confidential methods like survey, focus
group, interview to obtain information. - Interviewing teachers in a focus group at their
place of employment -Includes questions about
what their feelings on administration, school
policies and their peers.
22Exempt Review
- Children in a normal classroom setting
- Adults who complete a non-sensitive survey
- Observation of public behavior
- Non-anonymous data as long as no risk is posed if
confidentiality is breached - Food studies of wholesome foods without additives
- Analysis of existing data-may need to ck w/ IRB
23Exempt Prospective Examples
- Anonymous survey of teachers opinions on current
school policy and improvements needed. - Non-anonymous, benign study in which parents are
asked about which produce their children like to
eat and how often they eat it.
24 Prior to Submission
- Access the templates on IRB website
- Submit a vIRB Questionnaire by following these
steps - Login to the vIRB through the WebPortal
- Choose Yes to access the Questionnaire then
- You will receive a response within 5-7 days.
- Have your faculty sponsor READ and APPROVE of
your protocol and supporting documents before
submitting!!!
25Step 4 Using the virtual IRB (vIRB)
- Access your WebPortal Account
- Click Activate Research Role
- Click Launch IRB
- All notifications are electronic
- You will receive an email when your submission
is - received
- reviewed
- approved
26Contact Information
- List yourself as the Principal Investigator (PI)
- Email address
- Phone number
- List your Thesis Chair (Masters) or Faculty
Sponsor (Doctoral) as the Co-I - Email address
- Office phone number
27Be Consistent!
- Anonymity vs. Confidentiality
- example, the study is anonymous no identifying
information will be collected - example, the study is confidential, data will be
stored in a locked cabinet, a code will be
created between data and subject information,
this link will be destroyed at the end of the
study
28Subjects and Research Activities Complete and
Consistent
- Protocol Document
- Respond to section directions for EACH subject
group AND research activity. Use subheadings. - E.G. Subject Involvement Section
- Students/Patients Will take 15 minute online
survey - Staff Will take a 10 minute online survey and
will participate in audiotaped 30-minute
interview - Administrators Will participate in two
consecutive audiotaped 60-minute interviews (for
a total of 120 minutes spread over two days) - Supporting Documents
- Upload recruitment materials, consent documents
and study instruments for EACH subject group.
29Common Issues
- Inadequate responses to conditions-comments often
have several parts ensure you respond to each
part of the comment - Inadequate consent forms-Language should be
understandable - Non -coercive
- Not just a written form, but an on-going open
discussion of participants rights and study
details
30Types of Consent Forms
- Informal Consent (Exempt)
- Formal Informed Consent (Full Committee and
Expedited) - Children in research
- Assent forms
- Parental Permission forms
- Save yourself time and stress use SDSU templates!
31Beneficence/ Fair Subject Selection
- Subjects should be chosen to participate because
they best represent the population under study - Recruitment should be done in a neutral fashion
avoid persuasive language or situations. - Maximize benefits
- To the individual, scientific knowledge, the
population from which study participants are
drawn - Minimize risks
- Some risk in research is acceptable, but risks
should be minimized to the greatest extent
possible
32Upload Supporting Documents
- Upload all applicable documents
- Letters of Authorization
- Recruitment Materials
- Informed Consent Forms
- Study Instruments
- Grant Narrative (if funded)
33Additional IRB Review
- If you have other affiliations
- Joint Students
- Hospital
- University
- If you will be conducting a study through another
institution, you must receive their IRB approval
before submitting to the SDSU IRB.
34Step 5 Protocol Maintenance
- Once you have approval, you are responsible for
submitting requests for changes to your protocol
in the form of a Modification request. - Pay attention to expiration dates!!! You must
renew your protocol to continue research
activities before it expires by submitting a
Report of Progress!!!
35Good luck!
- IRB Contact Information
- Phone (619) 594-6622
- Office Student Services East, 1410
- E-mail irb_at_mail.sdsu.edu
Amy McDaniel amcdanie_at_mail.sdsu.edu
619-594-0758 Brianne Larsen blarsen_at_mail.sdsu.ed
u 619-594-3380
Choya Washington cwashing_at_mail.sdsu.edu 619-594-38
22