Medical Management of Contacts to Infectious Pulmonary Tuberculosis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Medical Management of Contacts to Infectious Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Description:

Title: Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005 Author: mff8 Last modified by: Valerie Gunn Created Date: 11/18/2005 5:01:22 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:199
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: mff8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Medical Management of Contacts to Infectious Pulmonary Tuberculosis


1
Medical Management of Contacts to Infectious
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
  • Alfred Lardizabal, MD
  • New Jersey Medical School
  • Global Tuberculosis Institute

2
Continuing Education Statement
  • The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
    Jersey Center for Continuing and Outreach
    Education (UMDNJ-CCOE) designates this
    educational activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA
    Category 1 Credits.  Physicians should only claim
    credit commensurate with the extent of their
    participation in the activity.
  • UMDNJ-CCOE certifies that this continuing
    education offering meets the criteria for up to
    .15 Continuing Education Units, as defined by the
    National Task Force on the Continuing Education
    Unit (CEU), provided the activity is completed as
    designed. One CEU is awarded for 10 contact hours
    of instruction.

3
Faculty Disclosure
  • Alfred Lardizabal has expressed that his
    presentation does not include discussion of
    commercial products or services, or an unapproved
    or uninvestigated use of a commercial product.
    He has no significant financial relationships to
    disclose.
  • Lillian Pirog has expressed that her presentation
    does not include discussion of commercial
    products or services, or an unapproved or
    uninvestigated use of a commercial product. She
    has no significant financial relationships to
    disclose.

4
Background (1)
  • 1962 Isoniazid (INH) demonstrated to be
    effective in preventing tuberculosis (TB) among
    household contacts of persons with TB disease
  • Investigation and treatment of contacts with
    latent TB infection (LTBI) quickly becomes
    strategy in TB control and elimination in the
    U.S.
  • 1976 American Thoracic Society (ATS) published
    guidelines for investigation, diagnostic
    evaluation, and medical treatment of TB contacts

5
Background (2)
  • 2005 National TB Controllers Association (NTCA)
    and CDC release guidelines on the investigation
    of contacts of persons with infectious TB
  • Expanded guidelines on investigation of TB
    exposure and transmission, and prevention of
    future TB cases through contact investigations
  • Standard framework for assembling information and
    using findings to inform decisions

6
Contact Investigations A Crucial Prevention
Strategy
  • On average, 10 contacts are identified for each
    person with infectious TB in the U.S.
  • 2030 of all contacts have LTBI
  • 1 of contacts have TB disease
  • Of contacts who will ultimately have TB disease,
    approximately one-half develop disease in the
    first year after exposure

7
Decisions to Initiate a Contact Investigation
  • Public health officials must decide which
  • Contact investigations should be assigned a
    higher priority
  • Contacts to evaluate first
  • Decision to investigate an index patient depends
    on presence of factors used to predict likelihood
    of transmission
  • Site of disease
  • Positive sputum bacteriology
  • Radiographic findings

8
(No Transcript)
9
Determining the Infectious Period
  • Focuses investigation on contacts most likely to
    be at risk for infection
  • Sets time frame for testing contacts
  • Information to assist with determining infectious
    period
  • Approximate dates TB symptoms were noticed
  • Bacteriologic results
  • Extent of disease

10
Start of Infectious Period
  • Cannot be determined with precision estimation
    is necessary
  • Start is 3 months before TB diagnosis
    (recommended)
  • Earlier start should be used in certain
    circumstances (e.g., patient aware of illness for
    longer period of time)

11
Closing the Infectious Period
Infectious period closed when all the following
criteria are met
  • Effective treatment for 2 weeks,
  • Diminished symptoms, and
  • Bacteriologic response

12
Assigning Priorities to Contacts
13
Prioritization of Contacts (1)
Patient has pulmonary, laryngeal, or pleural TB with cavitary lesion on chest radiograph or is AFB sputum smear positive Patient has pulmonary, laryngeal, or pleural TB with cavitary lesion on chest radiograph or is AFB sputum smear positive
Household contact High
Contact lt5 years of age High
Contact with medical risk factor (HIV or other medical risk factor) High
Contact with exposure during medical procedure (bronchoscopy, sputum induction, or autopsy) High
Contact in a congregate setting High
Contact exceeds duration/environment limits (limits per unit time established by the health department for high-priority contacts) High
Contact is 5 years and 15 years of age Medium
Contact exceeds duration/environment limits (limits per unit time established by the health department for medium-priority contacts) Medium
Any contact not classified as high or medium priority is assigned a low priority. Any contact not classified as high or medium priority is assigned a low priority.
14
Prioritization of Contacts (2)
Patient is a suspect or has confirmed pulmonary/pleural TB AFB smear negative, abnormal chest radiograph consistent with TB disease, may be NAA and/or culture positive Patient is a suspect or has confirmed pulmonary/pleural TB AFB smear negative, abnormal chest radiograph consistent with TB disease, may be NAA and/or culture positive
Contact lt5 years of age High
Contact with medical risk factor (e.g., HIV) High
Contact with exposure during medical procedure (bronchoscopy, sputum induction, or autopsy) High
Household contact Medium
Contact exposed in congregate setting Medium
Contact exceeds duration/environment limits (limits per unit time established by the local TB control program) Medium
Any contact not classified as high or medium priority is assigned a low priority. Any contact not classified as high or medium priority is assigned a low priority.
15
Diagnostic Evaluation of Contacts
16
Information to Collect During Initial Assessment
(1)
  • Previous M. tuberculosis infection or disease and
    related treatment
  • Contacts verbal report and documentation of
    previous TST results
  • Current symptoms of TB illness

17
Information to Collect During Initial Assessment
(2)
  • Medical conditions making TB disease more likely
  • Mental health disorders
  • Type, duration, and intensity of TB exposure
  • Sociodemographic factors

18
Information to Collect During Initial Assessment
(3)
  • HIV status contacts should be offered HIV
    counseling and testing if status unknown
  • Information regarding social, emotional, and
    practical matters that might hinder participation

19
Reassess Strategy After Initial Information
Collected
  • After initial information collected
  • Priority assignments should be reassessed
  • Medical plan for diagnostic tests and possible
    treatment can be formulated for high- and
    medium-priority contacts

20
Tuberculin Skin Testing
  • All high or medium priority contacts who do not
    have a documented previous positive tuberculin
    skin test (TST) or previous TB disease should
    receive a TST at the initial encounter.
  • If not possible, TST should be administered
  • 7 working days of listing high-priority contacts
  • 14 days of listing medium-priority contacts

21
Interpreting Skin Test Reaction
  • 5 mm induration is positive for any contact
  • Two-step procedure should not be used for testing
    contacts
  • A contact whose second TST is positive after
    initial negative result should be classified as
    recently infected

22
Postexposure Tuberculin Skin Testing
  • Window period is 810 weeks after exposure ends
  • Contacts who have a positive result after a
    previous negative result are said to have had a
    change in tuberculin status from negative to
    positive

23
(No Transcript)
24
Evaluation and Follow-up of Children lt5 Years of
Age
  • Always assigned a high priority as contacts
  • Should receive full diagnostic medical
    evaluation, including a chest radiograph
  • If TST 5 mm of induration and last exposure lt8
    weeks, LTBI treatment recommended (after TB
    disease excluded)
  • Second TST 810 weeks after exposure decision to
    treat is reconsidered
  • Negative TST treatment discontinued
  • Positive TST treatment continued

25
Evaluation and Follow-up of Immunosuppressed
Contacts
  • Should receive full diagnostic medical
    evaluation, including a chest radiograph
  • If TST negative 8 weeks after end of exposure,
    full course of treatment for LTBI recommended
    (after TB disease is excluded)

26
Window-Period Prophylaxis
Decision to treat contacts with a negative skin
test result should take the following factors
into consideration
  • The frequency, duration, and intensity of
    exposure
  • Corroborative evidence of transmission from the
    index patient

27
Prophylactic Treatment
Prophylactic treatment (after TB disease is
excluded) of presumed M. tuberculosis infection
recommended for persons
  • With HIV infection
  • Taking immunosuppressive therapy for organ
    transplant
  • Taking anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a)
    agents

28
Treatment After Exposure to Drug-Resistant TB
  • Consultation with physician with MDR expertise
    recommended for selecting a LTBI regimen
  • Contacts should be monitored for 2 years after
    exposure

29
Selecting Contacts for Directly Observed Therapy
  • Contacts aged lt5 years
  • Contacts who are HIV infected or otherwise
    substantially immunocompromised
  • Contacts with a change in their tuberculin skin
    test status from negative to positive
  • Contacts who might not complete treatment because
    of social or behavior impediments

30
Source-Case Investigations
31
Source-Case Investigations
  • Seeks the source of recent M.tuberculosis
    infection
  • In the absence of cavitary disease, young
    children usually do not transmit M.tuberculosis
    to others
  • Recommended only when TB control program is
    achieving its objectives when investigating
    infectious cases

32
(No Transcript)
33
Child with LTBI
  • Search for source of infection for child is
    unlikely to be productive
  • Recommended only with infected children lt2 years
    of age, and only if data are monitored to
    determine the value of the investigation

34
Procedures for Source-Case Investigation
  • Same procedure as standard contact investigation
  • Patient or guardians best informants (associates)
  • Focus on associates who have symptoms of TB
    disease
  • Should begin with closest associates

35
Contact Investigations
36
Background 1
  • 6/14/04 39 year-old female admitted to the
    hospital with complaints for approximately one
    month of cough, fever, decreased appetite, night
    sweats and 23 lb weight loss
  • 6/17 Chest x-ray cavitary disease consistent with
    TB
  • 6/17 Bronchial wash AFB smear positive (3)

37
(No Transcript)
38
Background - 2
  • 6/19 Treatment (RIPE) initiated
  • 6/21 Suspected case of tuberculosis verbally
    reported by hospital infection control to the
    local health department

39
Background 3
  • 6/21 LHD informed TB Control of suspected case
    adding the following information
  • Presenting patient was a volunteer at a daycare
    center
  • Director of center is the sister of patient
  • Name, address and telephone of daycare center
    provided

40
Background 4
  • 6/21 Telephone call to director of daycare center
    from TB controller
  • Purpose to set up a meeting to discuss potential
    exposure to children and staff
  • Conduct on-site exposure assessment of center
  • Provide TB education to the director
  • Identify high-priority contacts during infectious
    period established at 2/146/14/04

41
Background - 5
  • During telephone conversation, the following was
    indicated by the director
  • Index patient was a part-time volunteer
  • a couple of hours (2-5) per week
  • Secretary with little or no exposure to children

42
Background - 6
  • Near the conclusion of telephone call the
    following exchange occurred
  • Director So, should my daughter be tested?
  • TB Control Tell me about your daughter and how
    much exposure she had to your sister
  • Director Not too much. She doesnt attend the
    daycare but we do spend some time socially (maybe
    5 hours) together on the weekends going to the
    mall

43
Background - 7
  • TB Control How old is your daughter?
  • Director 6 months
  • TB Control Ill make arrangements for your
    daughter to be tested tomorrow morning
  • TB Control By the way, how is your daughter
    feeling?
  • Director Well, she was diagnosed with
    bronchitis a few weeks ago and is still coughing

44
  • Final culture result MTB

45
Contact Investigation
  • 6/22 First of 4 TB interviews with the patient
    conducted by HCW in hospital revealed
  • Infectious period confirmed at 2/14-6/14/04
  • Patient may have spent more time in daycare than
    originally described
  • Patient indicates not much contact with children
    at daycare
  • 8 high priority contacts identified
  • 2 household
  • 6 social
  • 6/23 Initiation of on-site assessment of daycare
    center

46
(No Transcript)
47
Contact Investigation
  • As a result of on-site assessment 35 high
    priority contacts identified
  • 30 children ages 3-4 years
  • 5 staff members
  • Notification process begins for testing
  • Education sessions provided to parents of daycare
    children
  • During these sessions it is learned that the 6
    month old infant, directors daughter, was at
    daycare center on regular basis

48
Contact Investigation
  • 6/23 6 month old infant (directors daughter)
    evaluated at clinic
  • TST 15 mm
  • CXR hilar adenopathy with suspected miliary TB
  • Admitted to hospital with diagnosis of suspected
    miliary TB

49
(No Transcript)
50
Contact Investigation
  • 6/25 Field visit to social contact residence by
    HCW identifies a second 6 mo. old infant not
    named on initial interview
  • 70 hours exposure per week during infectious
    period
  • Diagnosed with pneumonia 3 weeks ago
  • HCW TB Controller consult with pediatric nurse
    practitioner at Lattimore and infant is referred
    to ED and is admitted with a diagnosis of
    suspected pulmonary TB

51
(No Transcript)
52
Medical Evaluation
  • 6/29 - 6/30 Tuberculin skin tests administered
    on all 35 daycare contacts and chest x-rays taken
    on all 30 children from daycare
  • Extra clinic sessions scheduled in addition to 3
    evening clinics at local health department where
    most contacts reside to accommodate the medical
    evaluations of the 30 children

53
Contact Investigation Initial Infection Disease
Results Household and Social Contacts
  • Total 9 high priority contacts identified
  • 4 children/5 adults
  • TST () 5/9 (56)
  • TB disease 2/9 (22)
  • 2 infants
  • TST (-) 4/9 (44)

54
Contact Investigation Infection Disease
Results Daycare
Children 30 (3-4 years of age)
TST () TST () w/ disease 11/30 (37) 5/11 (45)
TST (-) TST (-) w/ disease 19/30 (63) 2/19 (11)
Staff 5
TST () TST (-) 3/5 (60) - 2 adolescents 2/5 (40) No disease
55
Contact Investigation Results Totals After
Initial Testing
Investigation Totals 44 32 4 yrs old
TST () 19/44 (43)
TST (-) 25/44 (57)
TB disease 9/44 (20) All 4 yrs old
56
Prevention of Tuberculosis in Children Missed
Opportunities
  • Failure to find and appropriately manage adult
    source cases (Case finding)
  • Delay in reporting the initial diagnosis of TB
  • Contact investigation interview failure
  • Delay in evaluation of exposed children
  • Failure to completely evaluate exposed children
  • Failure to maintain a contact under surveillance
  • LTBI diagnosed treatment not prescribed
  • Failure to complete treatment for LTBI
    (Adherence)

57
Contact Investigations Lessons Learned
  • Importance of on-site assessment
  • Re-interviews of presenting patients strongly
    recommended to allow a complete and accurate
    assessment of exposure
  • Different interviewers if no contacts, rapport
    issue
  • Despite the rapidity of the CI process 9 cases of
    disease occurred
  • Children develop disease soon after infection so
    it is imperative to move quickly
  • Local pediatricians are generally not familiar
    with the evaluation recommended for and the
    prophylactic treatment of children exposed to
    tuberculosis

58
(No Transcript)
59
Medical Management of TB Contacts from a Nursing
Perspective
  • Lillian Pirog, RN, PNP
  • Nurse Manager-Lattimore Practice
  • NJMS Global Tuberculosis Institute

60
The Role of the Nurse Case Manager with Respect
to TB Contacts
  • Interview the index case for contacts
  • Administer and read the TST
  • Educate the contacts
  • Monitor contacts at monthly interval
  • Ensure treatment adherence

Note Not all duties discussed today will apply
to all nurses, and some duties performed by TB
nurse case managers may not be discussed
61
Interviewing the Index Case
  • Interviewing the index case for contacts should
    be done on more than one occasion
  • On the initial visit
  • On subsequent visits until you are satisfied all
    the contacts have been identified
  • A visit to the site of exposure will help provide
    important information regarding possible
    transmission and contacts

62
Past Medical History
  • Obtain contacts past medical history
  • Ask the contact
  • Have you ever been diagnosed with tuberculosis?
  • Have you ever had a TB skin test?
  • If yes why, when, where, and what was the result
  • Ask about medical conditions that may elevate the
    contacts status to high risk
  • Ask about behaviors that may elevate the
    contacts status to high risk
  • Ask about TB symptoms
  • Ask about previous HIV testing

63
Contact Education
  • Explain the following
  • Transmission and Pathogenesis
  • TST (how it is performed)
  • TST results and what they mean
  • Retesting (if necessary)
  • Always give the contact an opportunity to ask
    questions
  • And ask them to tell you in their own words what
    theyve
  • learned

64
Contact Education cont.
  • The evaluation process
  • TST
  • If you are tested you must be available for the
    reading in 48-72 hours
  • X-ray
  • Medical examination
  • Treatment if necessary
  • Importance of adherence with treatment
  • Provide literature

65
TST
  • Administer the TST
  • Explain the procedure
  • Explain that PPD is not a live bacteria. It can
    not give you TB
  • Explain how to care for the site
  • Do not place a bandage on the site
  • Do not scratch
  • Pat it with cold cloth
  • Can rub it with ice
  • Its okay to bathe and wash the site

66
TST cont.
  • Results
  • Explain a positive result
  • It only tell us that the germ is in your body
    nothing more. Further medical evaluation is
    needed
  • Explain a negative result
  • Explain the need for retesting (if necessary)
  • Explain window prophylaxis (if necessary)

67
Monthly Follow up Visits
  • First visit
  • Review test results
  • Blood
  • Sputum
  • Explain how medications are taken
  • Explain possible adverse reactions to medication
  • Provide clinic telephone number and an emergency
    telephone numbers for after clinic hours and
    weekends.

68
Monthly Follow up Visits
  • First visit cont.
  • Reiterate the importance of medication adherence
    and follow up appointments
  • Offer HIV test (if HIV status is unknown)
  • HIV testing should be offered to all contacts

69
Subsequent Follow up Visits
  • Ask about medication side effects
  • Observe for possible adverse reactions
  • Reiterate importance of compliance with treatment
    and follow up visits
  • Review medication regimen
  • Give follow up appointment (in a month)

70
High Risk Contacts
  • HIV
  • Children lt5 years old
  • Those with Other medical conditions

71
Window Period
  • The window period is the eight to ten week period
    after last exposure
  • Window Prophylaxis
  • Treatment doing the window period has been
    recommended for susceptible and vulnerable
    contacts to prevent rapidly emerging of TB disease

72
Signs of Adherence Problems
  • Missed follow up appointments
  • Not picking up medication refill from pharmacy
  • Finding too many pills when conducting a pill
    count
  • Unaddressed adverse reactions

73
Addressing Adherence Problems
  • Identify adherence problems and try to resolve
    them
  • Reeducate
  • Free medication (Gratis Medication Program)
  • DOT for contacts (If funding permits)

74
Dont Underestimate the Power of a Smile
  • Build a rapport
  • Show you care

75
Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com