Title: Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory
1Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception
research and phonological theory
Paola Escudero Paul Boersma (March
2002) Presented by Paola Escudero March 1,
2002 Optimality Theory and Phonological Theory
Seminay Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS
2Introduction
- Linguistics and L2 speech perception
- Bridging the gap
- OT and L2 mainly production
- L2 OT and perception
- Aims
- Assumptions
- Research hypothesis
3Aims
- Incorporate speech perception and phonological
theory in an OT model of phonemic categorization - Account for a more challenging case of L2
categorization, based on the integration of
multiple acoustic cues - Account for L2-specific patterns
- Further test the model with computer simulations
that use the initial state and the algorithm that
comes with the theory
4Assumptions
- OT can handle the knowledge behind L1 and L2
categorization and their development - Full Transfer for the L2 initial state L1
constraints and L1 rankings - Perception modes L1 and L2 are handle by two
separate systems - Full Access for L2 learning access to the
Gradual Learning Algorithm and the same
strategies use in L1 (e.g. category formation,
category split, etc)
5Hypothesis
- Stochastic OT together with the GLA constitutes a
successful model of L1 and L2 phonological
development -
- This model can account for the following
observations - Listeners optimise their perception in accord
with the productions they encounter - First-language (L1) listeners arrive at an
optimal perception - Second-language (L2) listeners manifest
L2-specific optimisation strategies
6Overview of the paper
- Observation 1 perception/production dependency
and L1perceptual optimisation - 1.1-1.2 Production perception differences in
the same direction - 1.3-1.4 The optimal listener vs. real listeners
- Hypothesis testing for L1 OT modelling
- 2.1 The knowledge behind L1 optimal
categorization - 2.2-2.3 The development of L1 optimal
categorization in simulations - 2.4 The simulated listeners vs real listeners
- Observation 2 L2 vowel categorization
- 3.1-3.2 L2 perception/production dependency L2
optimization - Hypothesis testing for L2 OT modelling
- 4.1-4.4 L2 initial state, development,
simulations, and comparison with real L2
listeners - Discussion
7Our case
- The vowels in the contrast have two main
acoustic/auditory differences - F1
- Duration
- We examine the preference patterns of these cues
(in production and perception) in two English
varieties Scottish and Southern British English - These varieties are the target languages for the
Spanish learners of English that will be
presented in later sections
8Production and perception differences in the same
direction
9Optimal listener
- To optimise perception, the listener has
tominimise the probability ofperceptual
confusion
- The optimal perception strategy, therefore,
islikelihood maximisation, i.e.choose the most
likely produced category,given a certain F1
duration
10Average production environment
Scottish Southern
Optimal perception (max. likelihood)
82.5
87.1
11L1 Modelling
- Constraint set
- Modelling the knowledge behind optimal
perception - Modelling the development of optimal perception
12Native English constraint set
- 260 Hz should not be perceived as /I/
- 260 Hz should not be perceived as /i/
- 500 Hz should not be perceived as /I/
- 500 Hz should not be perceived as /i/
- 60 ms should not be perceived as /I/
- 60 ms should not be perceived as /i/
- 180 ms should not be perceived as /I/
- 180 ms should not be perceived as /i/
and so on, for all F1 and duration values
13Scottish optimal perception in OT
74 ms, 349 Hz 349 Hz not /I/ 74 ms not /i/ 74 ms not /I/ 349 Hz not /i/
/I/ !
? /i/
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Southern optimal perception in OT
74 ms, 349 Hz 349 Hz not /i/ 74 ms not /i/ 74 ms not /I/ 349 Hz not /I/
? /I/
/i/ !
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
14How is the knowledge acquired?
- Whenever the listener makes a categorization
error, she applies a Gradual Learning Algorithm
Â
Â
Â
74 ms, 349 Hz 349 Hz not /i/ 74 ms not /i/ 74 ms not /I/ 349 Hz not /I/
? /I/ ? ?
? /i/ !? ?
Â
Â
Â
15L1 simulations
- Initial state
- Fed with the production distributions
- F1 and duration 21 steps, 84 constraints (21
21 2 categories) - 1000 data per virtual month
- Initial state scores 50 correct
16Comparisons and preliminary conclusion
- Optimal vs. real listeners
- Optimal vs. simulated listeners
- Simulated vs real listeners
- L1 modelling conclusion
17L2 production/perception dependency
- 7 beginners
- The more advanced bimodal distribution
Scottish
Southern
Spanish
L1
L1
L2
9
D E
0
1
D M
0
0
4
DS
1
4
1
SD
0
4
1
S M
4
6
2
S E
15
5
4
18L2 Optimisation
- Also to minimize probability of confusion
- Full Access and grammar copying
- Initial state L1 categories and system
- Not good enough, thus further optimisation
-
- Full Access to the GLA and to language universal
strategies category boundary, formation, split - L1 and L2 two separate grammars
19A possible assimilation pattern
- Native S.English has
- 13 arbitrary symbols
Spanish S.English has 2x5 vowels (7 symbols)
I i
i i?
E e
e e?
a a?
?, ? A, ?
o o?
? ?, o
u u?
U u
20L2 Modelling
- L2 speech perception generalization and our model
- Full Transfer copy of constraints, rankings
- Native Spanish constraints
- Initial grammars constraint set rankings
- Further development boundary shift and length
contrast - L2 simulations
- Comparison with optimal and real L2 listeners
21Discussion
- Category reuse and the initial state
- One or two perception systems?
- Fossilisation
- OT modelling
- The Algorithm
22Conclusion
- Our formal model for L2 phonemic categorization
successfully accounts for the attested optimal
categorization in L1 acquisition as well as for
the attested sub-optimal patterns in L2
acquisition,thereby providing the linguistic
mechanism that underlies the generalizations
forwarded by several previous models of L2 speech
perception