Title: Evidence Analysis Process
1Evidence Analysis Process
- Deborah S. Cummins, PhD
- Nov. 8, 2006
2EAL Home Page
www.adaevidencelibrary.com
Online Resource with the best available
research on important dietetics topics in
a practitioner-friendly format
3- Evidence-Based Dietetics Practice
-
- is the use of systematically reviewed
scientific evidence in making food and nutrition
practice decisions - by integrating best available evidence with
professional expertise and client values to
improve outcomes.
Definition developed by ADA Evidence-based
Practice Committee with input from Research
Committee, Quality Management Committee, and
Scope of Dietetics Practice Task Force. Approved
by ADA House of Delegates Leadership Team
4Why Evidence-based?
- Improve quality of healthcare
- Decrease wide variations in practice
- Reduce the gap between what is known from
researchand what happens in real life - Take advantage of biomedical knowledge
5Objectives
- Understand the Steps in the American Dietetic
Associations Evidence Analysis Process - Identify topics and features in the ADAs
Evidence Analysis Library
6Resources
- Check Resources on EAL for additional PowerPoint
presentations.
7- Steps in the ADA Evidence Analysis
- Process
8Steps in EA Process
- Select topic Appoint expert working group
- Define questions and Determine inclusion/exclusion
criteria - Conduct literature review for each question
- Analyze articles/ Critical appraisal
- Complete overview table and evidence summary
- Develop conclusion statement and reach consensus
on grade - Publish to online EAL
- If appropriate, go to next phase write position
paper, develop guideline toolkit - Review and Revise to keep information current
9Steps in the EA Process
- 1. Select Topic Appoint Expert Working Group
- Responsibility of Evidence-based Practice
Committee
10Structure of EBP Committee
- Joint HOD and BOD appointed committee
- Actively practicing in acute care, long-term
care, ambulatory care, and public health - Trained as evidence analysts
- Representatives from QM, Research, NCP/SL, DPBRN
Committees and BOD
11Evidence-Based Practice Committee 2006-2007
- Marion Franz, MS, RD, CDE (Chair)
- Kathleen Niedert, MBA, RD, LD, FADA (Vice Chair)
- Elvira Johnson, MS, RD, CDE, LDN
- Margie Tate, MS, RD
- David Frankenfield, MS, RD
- Nancy Lewis, PhD, RD, FADA
- Kim Robien, PhD, RD, FADA, CNSD
- Rita Johnson, PhD, RD, LDN, FADA
- Trisha Furman, MS, RD, LD, FADA
EBP Committee reports jointly to House of
Delegates and Board of Directors
12Roles and Responsibilities of EBP Committee
- Oversee
- Evidence analysis process and the Evidence
Analysis Library - Development of Evidence-Based Guidelines and
Toolkits - Promote the implementation of evidence-based
dietetic practice - Specific functions
- Appoint workgroup members
- Prioritize evidence analysis projects
- Determine format and content of products
- Evaluate EA process
13HOD
BOD
Content published on EAL
Project is ongoing
Workgroup appointed
Evidence-Based Practice Committee
Adult Weight Management
Critical Illness
Chronic Kidney Disease
Pediatric Weight Management
Measuring Energy Expenditure
Childhood Overweight
Disorders Of Lipid Metabolism
Hypertension
Heart Failure
Diabetes 12
Gestational Diabetes
Celiac Disease
Oncology
Spinal Cord Injury
Unintended Weight Loss
Non-nutritive Sweetener
Nutrition In Athletic Performance
Fiber
Nutrition Counseling
Bariatric Surgery Nutrition
HIV/AIDS
Hydration
Vegetarian Nutrition
New topic?
EBP Committee appoints an expert workgroup for
each project.
14Expert Work Group(6-8 persons for each project)
- Experts in the field
- Appointed by EBP Committee
- Key functions
- develop questions
- review materials (articles, worksheets,
summaries) - Formulate conclusion statements (answer to
question) - Assign Grade to strength of the evidence
- Develop Guidelines, if appropriate
15Steps in the EA Process
- 2. Define Questions and
- Determine Inclusion/ Exclusion Criteria
- Responsibility of Expert Work Group
16Example Question for evidence analysis
formulated by AWM workgroup
How effective is the consumption of low glycemic
index foods for reducing energy intake and
promoting weight loss?
17Search Plan Resultsfor each question
Reports Inclusion Exclusion Criteria
Date of Search Inclusion Criteria -Age -Setting
(outpatient) -Sample Size -Acceptable dropout
rate -Year Range -English Language Databases
Searched Search Terms List of Articles
18Steps in the EA Process
- 3. Literature Review
- Creation of sort list Responsibility of Lead
Analyst with ADA Librarian - Approval of sort list
-
- Responsibility of Expert Work Group
19Evidence Analysts
- Experts in critically analyzing articles
- Must have at least Masters degree many have
PhDs - Trained at ADAs EA workshop
- Mentored by ADA Staff and Lead Analysts
-
- Read and analyze articles
- Complete worksheets
- Complete quality checklists
- Complete overview tables
- Complete evidence summaries
20Included articles andExcluded articles (with
reason)
List Reason for exclusion For each article
not Included in the Analysis e.g. Sample size
Too small
21Steps in the EA Process
- 4. Critically appraise each article
- Completion of worksheet and quality criteria
checklist - Responsibility of analyst
- Reviewed by lead analyst
- Approved by workgroup
22Example Worksheet
- Citation / PubMed ID
- Date
- Study Design
- Class
- Rating (/0/-)
- Research Purpose
- Inclusion Criteria
- Exclusion Criteria
- Description of Study Protocol
- Data Collection Summary
- Description of Actual Data Sample
- Summary of Results
- Author Conclusion
- Reviewer Comments
23Example Quality Criteria Checklist
Questions related to relevance and
validity Determines if article is rated
as Positive Quality Negative Quality Neutral
Quality
24Steps in the EA Process
- 5. Summarize the articles into an overview table
and a Narrative evidence summary - Responsibility of analyst and lead analyst
- Approved by workgroup
25Overview Table
Low Glycemic Diets
Lists Citation, Study Design, Quality Rating,
Sample Size, Interventions and Outcomes in table
format enables user to compare studies side by
side
26Narrative Evidence Summary
Example Summary of evidence for Low Glycemic
Diets question
27Evidence Summary - bibliography
Citations linked to worksheets at the bottom of
the Evidence Summary
28Steps in the EA Process
- 6. Develop Conclusion Statement - the answer to
the question and Assign Grade - Responsibility of Expert Work Group
29Example Conclusion Statement
Eight randomized controlled trials report no
significant differences in energy intake or body
weight after the consumption of a low-glycemic
index diet. Grade I
Grade
30Explanation of Grades
of Grade I questions on EAL
31Steps in the EA Process
- 7. PUBLISH to ONLINE LIBRARY (EAL)
- Copyediting
- Publish
- Question, Conclusion, Grade, Evidence Summary,
Overview Table, Worksheets and Quality checklists
for each article, and Search Plan Results all
published together. - Available to all ADA members and EAL subscribers.
- Responsibility of ADA Staff
32EAL Content Growthcomparison of Oct 15 2004
Oct 15 2006
33EAL Usage (Number of pages viewed)
EAL Launched Sept 2004
Overall Total Page Views 9/2004 11/7/2006 1
Million 1,351,815
34EAL Usage Worldwide
- Users from 114 different countries
35Steps in the EA Process
- After publication of questions to online library,
there are 3 possible options. - Project is concluded or -
- Evidence analysis is incorporated into an ADA
Position Paper or - - Develop Guideline and Toolkit
- (specific steps for guideline development can be
found in a companion presentation)
36Steps in the EA Process
- Annual Review of Evidence Analysis Guideline
Projects - Review
- re-run searches for each question
- determine if revision is needed
- document date of review
- Revise
- revise using EA process
- Update rating of conclusion statements/recommendat
ions as needed
37Summary
- ADAs Evidence Analysis Library can be found at
- www.adaevidencelibrary.com
- For questions contact
- eal_at_adaevidencelibrary.com