Molecular and Histopathologic Prognostic Factors in Rectal Cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Molecular and Histopathologic Prognostic Factors in Rectal Cancer

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: tm tm Last modified by: HAV MONIRATH Created Date: 7/14/2005 1:15:26 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:212
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: tmtm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Molecular and Histopathologic Prognostic Factors in Rectal Cancer


1
Molecular and Histopathologic Prognostic Factors
in Rectal Cancer
  • Monirath Hav, MD, Ph.D. fellow (VLIR project)
  • Pathology Department
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • Promoters Prof. Dr. Piet Pattyn Prof. Dr.
    Claude Cuvelier

2
Prognostic value of MSI a comparative study
  • Cambodians 37 cases
  • Belgians 39 cases
  • Criteria revised Bethesda guidelines
  • IHC for MMR proteins ? MSI testing?
  • MSI status ? prognosis

3
Literature review
  • MSI occurs in 10-20 of colorectal cancer
  • MSI in rectal cancer is a rare event (2), but if
    present, is strongly associated with HNPCC
  • M. Nilbert et al. Eur. J. of Cancer, issue 6,
    June 1999, Pages 942-945

4
What has been known about MSI in Belgian
population ?
  • MSI in colon CA 12.4
  • MSI in rectal CA 1.11
  • MSI has no prognostic value in colon cancer
  • Vanessa
    Deschoolmeester et al.

  • European Journal of Cancer 44 (2008) 2288-229

5
Hypothesis questions
  • Is there a difference in MSI status between the 2
    populations?
  • If yes, is there a difference in prognostic value
    of MSI?
  • Based on your experience, how good is the
    correlation between IHC for MMR proteins MSI
    testing?

6
MDM2 amplification negatively predicts response
to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer
7
Current study
  • 71 cases ? 59 with neoadjuvant T.
  • IHC MDM2 p53 on biopsies resections
  • p53 mutation analysis
  • MDM2 Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
    on biopsies
  • Correlation with T downstaging and prognosis

8
(No Transcript)
9
The Two Major Apoptotic Pathways
Pro-apoptotic ligand
Cell-extrinsicpathway
ChemotherapyRadiotherapy
DR5
DR4
DNA damage
p53
Cell-intrinsicpathway
FADD
PUMA, NOXA
BCL2, BCLXL, MCL1
BAX, BAK
Procaspase 8, 10
Mitochondria
Caspase 8, 10
Cytochrome c
SMAC/DIABLO
APAF1
Caspase 9
IAP
Caspase 3, 6, 7
Apoptosis
DNA damage
Ashkenazi A. Nat Rev Can 20022420430.
10
Hypothesis
  • Presence of MDM2 overexpression in rectal
    cancer !
  • MDM2 overexpression ?-? wild-type p53
  • MDM2 overexpression ?-? absence of p53
  • MDM2 overexpression / amplification
  • no p53-dependent apoptosis
  • no downstaging (no response to
    neoadjuvant)

11
  • MDM2 Amplification in endoscopic biopsy
  • Conventional chemoradiation T. does not work
  • Need for combination with targeted T.
  • (i.e Nutlins RITA inhibit mdm2-p53 binding )

12
  • Peri-tumoral inflammation
  • favorable prognostic factor in rectal cancer

13
  • Inflammation as favourable prognostic factor in 5
    studies
  • EORTC study.
  • Leuven study.
  • Cetuximab study.
  • Shia et al. Am J Surg Pathol 2004 28 215.
  • Knutsen et al. Oncol Rep 2006.
  • No prognostic value
  • Perez et al. J Gastrointest Surg 2007 11 1534.
  • 5 positive studies time from end neoadjuvant
    treatment to surgery always lt 6 weeks, while at
    least 8 weeks in Perez et al.

14
  • Annelies Debucquoy et al.
  • Eur. Journ. of Cancer 44 (2008) 791-797

15
The current study
  • 71 patients (2005-2008 stage I III mean FU
    time 18Ms )
  • 59 cases with neoadjuvant
  • Interval neoadj-surgery /- 6 weeks
  • Peri-tumoral inflammation (PTI) cut-off 25
  • T Downstaging (38 cases) ? DFS N
  • PTI ? tumor downstaging
  • PTI ? DFS
  • Tumour deposits ? DFS

16
Response to treatment causes tumor damage and
necrosis, which increases inflammatory reaction
and elicits a specific immune response
  • Peritumoral inflammation correlates with T
    downstaging, which is a measure of tumor response
    to treatment.
  • Postoperative chemo tends to be effective when
    inflammation is present.
  • Prognostic value of inflammation increases with
    less time between end of neoadjuvant treatment
    and surgery (lt6 weeks

17
Node status and DFS
18
Tumor deposits DFS
19
Downstaging N
P0.03
20
T downstaging DFS
P0.02
21
Peri-tumoral inflammation DFS
22
Now in need for more FU data from prof. Pattyn
23
References
  • Vanessa Deschoolmeester et al. MSI has no
    prognostic value in colon cancer in Belgian
    population. European Journal of Cancer 44 (2008)
    2288-229
  • M. Nilbert et al. Microsatellite instability is
    rare in rectal carcinomas and signifies
    hereditary cancer. Eur. J. of Cancer, issue 6,
    June 1999, Pages 942-945
  • Terry Van Dyke. P53 and tumor suppression. N Engl
    J Med 356 1 (2007)
  • Jean-Francois Millau et al. P53 transcriptional
    activities A general overview and some thoughts.
    Mutation Research 681 (2009) 118133
  • Nadia N Naski et al. The p53 mRNA-Mdm2
    interaction. Cell Cycle 81, 31-34 (2009)
  • Christine M. Eischen and Guillermaina Lozano. P53
    and MDM2 Antagonists or Partners in Crime?
    Cancer Cell 15, march 3, 2009
  • Annelies Debucquoy et al. Morphological features
    and molecular markers in rectal cancer from 95
    patients included in the European Organization
    for Research and Treatment of Cancer 22921 trial
    prognostic value and effects of preoperative
    radiochemo therapy. Eur. Journ. of Cancer 44
    (2008) 791-797
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com