WATERWAYS AND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

WATERWAYS AND

Description:

WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS CE 394K 11-22-05 Dr. Maidment Final Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf Background TxDOT to use crash-tested bridge rails May ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:221
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: BrandonKl8
Category:
Tags: and | waterways | bridge

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WATERWAYS AND


1
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS
CE 394K 11-22-05 Dr. Maidment
Final Presentation by Brandon Klenzendorf
2
Background
  • TxDOT to use crash-tested bridge rails
  • May impact FEMA 100-year floodplains
  • Cause for map revisions time and money!
  • Need to determine how bridge rails affect water
    surface profiles

3
TxDOT Design Frequencies
TxDOT Hydraulic Design Manual
4
Project Purpose
  • In order to solve this problem, we need to
    predict
  • Hydraulic impact of crash-tested bridge rails
  • 100-year peak flood discharges
  • Determine peak discharge for 100-year return
    period flood
  • Use GIS and NFF programs to gain info on flood
    discharges

5
GIS Data Collection
  • State of Texas HUCs from TNRIS
  • http//www.tnris.state.tx.us/
  • Major highway network from TNRIS
  • Major stream network from TNRIS
  • DEMs for selected bridges from USGS
  • http//seamless.usgs.gov/

6
1
3
7
10
4
2
8
11
5
9
6
7
(No Transcript)
8
ArcHydro Tools
  • DEM processing
  • Problems with gaps in stream layer
  • Drainage line creation
  • Batch point watershed delineation
  • Longest upstream length
  • Upstream and downstream elevations

9
Bridge 1
Problems!
10
USGS NFF Program
  • National Flood Frequency Program
  • Estimates the magnitude and frequency of flood
    peak discharges and hydrographs
  • 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 500-year frequency
    floods
  • Uses Visual Basic and regression equations
    specific for each state
  • FREE!!!
  • http//water.usgs.gov/software/nff.html

11
NFF Program Parameters
  • Drainage Area (A) area (mi2) contributing to
    flow at the bridge
  • Shape Factor (SH) ratio of stream length
    squared (mi2) to drainage area (mi2)
  • Represents stream length to average width
  • Stream Slope (SL) change in elevation (ft)
    divided by steam length (mi)

12
Hydrologic Regions
  • Determined based on physiography and climatic
    conditions
  • Each hydrologic region has range of applicable
    parameters
  • Hydrologic Region 1 - Q100371A0.847SH-0.307

13
Determined NFF Parameters
Hydrologic Region Area (mi2) Upstream Length (mi) Slope (ft/mi) Shape Factor Latitude (DD) Longitude (DD)
R-1 1120.9 29.12 9.85 0.756 36.202 -101.306
R-2 548.4 17.16 37.62 0.537 31.878 -103.947
R-3 3408.1 45.53 13.24 0.608 34.090 -99.730
R-4 2098.0 40.19 7.77 0.770 32.399 -100.894
R-5 1447.0 43.04 11.66 1.280 29.514 -97.494
R-6 489.2 27.966 -98.973
R-7 1917.4 33.072 -97.532
R-8 2590.9 31.435 -97.759
R-9 571.0 28.703 -97.047
R-10 991.2 32.777 -95.798
R-11 923.2 30.396 -94.255
14
NFF Interface
15
Flood Region Map
16
NFF Results
  • 100-year hydrograph for five bridges
  • Bridge 5 has largest peak, but third largest area
  • Bridge 3 has second lowest peak, but largest area

5
1
4
3
2
17
(No Transcript)
18
Completed Work
  • Geodatabase of Texas rivers, highways, and HUCs
  • ArcHydro tools for all bridges
  • Batch point watershed delineation for all bridges
  • Partial completion of longest stream length
  • Partial completion of NFF analysis

19
Future Work
  • Longest stream lengths for remaining Hydrologic
    Regions
  • NFF analysis for all bridges
  • Comparison of results
  • Analyze errors in DEMs, HUCs, and bridge
    locations
  • Write final report

20
Questions
?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com