Title: Internet Voting Technology and policy issues
1Internet VotingTechnology and policy issues
2Introductions
- Im a computer security researcher
- We study attacks and countermeasures
- Before one can design a system that will resist
attack, one must anticipate how it might be
attacked
3No Secrets
- Proactive study of attacks is generally a good
thing - Mounting such attacks is not, of course
- Dont use your super powers for evil
4Selective History of Voting (US)
- early 1800s public oral voting at County Hall
- 1800s free-form, non-secret paper ballots
popular - 1884 widespread vote fraud
- 1888 adoption of Australian secret ballot
- 1930s lever machines widely adopted
- 1960s punchcard voting developed
- 2000 butterfly ballots, chad, Florida, gack!
- 2002 HAVA
5Attacks on the Secret Ballot
- Registration fraud
- Register in multiple jurisdictions
- Graveyard voting
- Cleanse the voter list
- Districting re-districting
- Voter fraud
- Vote multiple times (ballot box stuffing)
- Multiple voting
- Impersonation
- Insider fraud
- Throw ballot boxes into the bay
- Stuff ballot box after polls close
- Sleight of hand
- Voter intimidation
- Run out of ballots
- Tallying attacks
- Malicious talliers might calculate wrong results
- Give talliers bogus tools
6Attacks on the Secret Ballot
- Registration fraud
- Identity fraud
- Voter fraud
- Impersonation
- Vote multiple times
- Vote buying, chain voting
- Insider fraud
- Ballot box stuffing
- Ballot marking
- Tallying attacks
- Inaccurate counts
- Ballot marking
- Manipulation of challenge procedure
7How Secure is the Secret Ballot?
- Its easy to forge a few fraudulent votes
- But Its very hard to forge a lot of fraudulent
votes - Summary Australian secret ballot is quite
robust a well-designed security system.
8History of Internet Voting
- 2000 36,000 Arizona citizens vote in Democratic
primary over the Internet 85 military personnel
vote in November elections over the Internet - 2000 California studies Internet voting task
force recommends against it - 2000 NSF panel warns of security risks in
Internet voting - 2004 SERVE will accept votes over the Internet
9The SERVE Project
- A DoD project for overseas voters
- Register vote from abroad
- Vote over the Internet, using your Windows
computer
10Who is eligible for SERVE? Overseas military
voters from participating jurisdictions (7
states, 51 counties)
11The SERVE Architecture (1)
Citizen
HTTPS
Ballot Def. Data
Web Server
Overseas voters
SERVEUSA.gov
Encrypted Voted Ballots
Internet
HTTPS, SFTP
UVS Control Data
- LEO Processes
- Voter Registration
- Ballot Definition
- Ballot Decryption
- Ballot Tabulation
- Voter History
UVS Control Data Ballot Definitions Voted
Ballots (Encrypted)
Firewall Identification Authentication
Process
UVS Laptop
Election officials
SERVE server infrastructure
12The SERVE Architecture (2)
Ballot Def. Data
Encrypted Voted Ballots
Central Server
UVS Control Data
Voter History
Manual
13Security Risks in SERVE (1)
- Software flaws
- Unintentional bugs might enable remote attacks
- Malicious code might contain a backdoor
- COTS software might be insecure or backdoored
- Insider attacks
- Votes cast could be modified or deleted
- Election officials could learn how you voted, or
count your votes incorrectly - Sysadmins, developers could bypass security
14Security Risks in SERVE (2)
- Attacks on the client
- Worms, viruses
- Remote attacks
- Malicious websites, ActiveX
- Denial of service attacks
- DDoS might render servers unreachable
- Targeted disenfranchisement
- Website spoofing
- Voters might be re-directed to the wrong site
(DNS hijacking, email) - Spoofed site might observe or change votes
- Automated vote swapping and vote buying
15Summary
- How do you know that your vote was counted?
- How much security is enough?
- How much security is too much?
You won the election, but I won the count. --
Somoza
16Discussion?
17Fighting Words
- Internet voting is a danger to democracy
- No voting system will ever be perfectly secure
why worry? - Absentee vote-by-mail is already insecure why
should Internet voting be held to a higher
standard? - 30 of our military today cant vote a little
insecurity is worth it if it fixes the problem - The threat of extraterritorial election fraud is
new, and requires new laws