Philosophy of Chemistry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophy of Chemistry

Description:

Title: Science Fair Project Author: Ashok Last modified by: wk86arob Created Date: 5/30/2001 4:56:59 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ash8173
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophy of Chemistry


1
Philosophy of Chemistry
  • Ashok Pratap Singh

2
What is chemistry?
  • Chemistry is in a sense the typical laboratory
    science.
  • While astronomers have to get along
  • without experimenting directly on the distant
    objects of their attention, and
  • biologists have to experiment within ethical and
    legal restraints on more available objects,
  • chemistry conforms to, and
  • indeed gave rise to, textbook explanations of
    what constitutes the scientific method.

3
What is the philosophy of chemistry?
  • The philosophy of chemistry considers............
  • the methodology and underlying assumptions of
    the science of chemistry.
  • Philosophers of chemistry discuss.............
  • for example, whether nature is symmetric as
    between right-and left-handedness.
  • i.e., "stereo-specific."
  • Left-handed amino acids and right-handed sugars
    are the basis of the chemistry of life.

4
The Chemists View
  • Chemists rightly feel proud of the fact that
    ............
  • they engage the phenomenal world through
    experimentation
  • are prepared to revise their theories and
    practices accordingly.
  • To the chemist..............
  • the philosopherwho conducts no experiments
    whatsoeverlives in a fantasy world and cannot be
    taken seriously.
  • From the scientific perspective...............
  • philosophical views do not seem very dynamic,
    since they sometimes stem from established
    philosophical doctrines or pre-beliefs about the
    ways the world should be.

5
The philosophers view
  • Most philosophers of science believe that
    .............
  • chemistry has been reduced to physics and is
    therefore of no fundamental interest.
  • chemistry has no big ideas to compare with
    quantum mechanics and relativity in physics and
    Darwins theory in biology.
  • Furthermore, given their relative lack of
    interest in experiment, as opposed to theory, it
    is not surprising that philosophers have tended
    to ignore chemistry (the experimental science).
  • But.........
  • during the past ten years or so there has been a
    significant interest in the field of philosophy
    of chemistry.

6
Reduction of Chemistry
  • The term reduction of chemistry generally means
    that....
  • all the deep questions in science can be
    resolved by appealing to the more fundamental
    theories found in physics and do not require any
    major inputs of chemistry.
  • chemistry itself gets reduced to physics as it
    increasingly uses physical principles to explain
    atomic structure and the periodic system.
  • many other areas of chemistry are also approached
    through physical principles rather than by
    focusing on qualitative aspects and observed
    phenomena.

7
Neglect of philosophy of chemistry
  • On examining of publications in philosophy of
    science we find..............
  • tens of thousands of contributions to
    philosophical problems of physics and biology,
  • whereas
  • only a small fraction of the corresponding works
    are devoted to chemistry.
  • What are the reasons for this neglect of the
    philosophy of chemistry

8
Reasons
  • The majority of chemists adore more or less some
    form of scientific realism that gives the objects
    of chemical theories, i.e. molecules, atoms,
    structures etc., the status of constituent parts
    of the world.
  • Moreover, the chemists often claim that
    chemistry is one of the oldest human enterprise
    because all changes in the material world involve
    in one way or another chemical processes, making
    superfluous a philosophical treatment of the
    obvious.

9
Reasons
  • This maybe because...........
  • physics and biology
  • with the development of relativity theory,
    quantum mechanics, evolutionary theory, and
    genetics
  • trespassed the margins of human imagination
  • and shook the traditional views about the cosmos
    and mans place in it.

10
Reasons
  • Whereas ..............
  • Chemistry,
  • during the historical period of its maturing as a
    science, was not involved in answering any
    cosmological, theological or existential
    questions
  • but was rather busy providing materials and
    methods for laying down the fundaments of the
    wealth of some nations,
  • improving the standard of living of their
    populations and setting the seeds for the various
    environmental and social problems.

11
Conclusion
  • Chemistry has a unique place between physics and
    biology in the traditional hierarchy of the
    natural sciences.
  • As such,
  • isnt it reasonable to assume that chemistry may
    yield a set of issues worthy of increased
    philosophical attention?

12
Conclusion
  • In addition, chemistry has traditionally been,
  • and continues to be,
  • the science concerned with the nature of the
    elements,
  • of substance and indeed of the nature of matter,
  • again all traditional philosophical questions!

13
Philosophers and Scientists
  • Several philosophers and scientists have
    focused on the philosophy of chemistry in recent
    years............ notably,
  • the Belgian philosopher Jaap van Brakel,
  • who wrote The Philosophy of Chemistry in 2000
  • the Maltese philosopher-chemist Eric Scerri,
  • editor of the journal "Foundations of Chemistry"
    and author of Normative and Descriptive
    Philosophy of Science and the Role of Chemistry
    in Philosophy of Chemistry, 2004
  • Scerri is especially interested in the
    philosophical foundations of the periodic table,
    and how physics and chemistry intersect in
    relation to it, which he contends is not merely a
    matter for science, but for philosophy.

14
Have a nice day !
  • References
  • Philosophy of Chemistry  Synthesis of a New
    Discipline, Davis Baird, Eric Scerri, Lee
    McIntyre (eds.), Dordrecht Springer, 2006
  • Philosophy of Chemistry, J. van Brakel, Leuven
    University Press, 2000
  • International Society for the Philosophy of
    Chemistry
  • http//ispc.sas.upenn.edu/
  • www.uni-leipzig.de
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com