NEUDC Draft Presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

NEUDC Draft Presentation

Description:

Title: NEUDC Draft Presentation Author: Karthik Muralidharan Last modified by: User Created Date: 7/19/2000 2:51:53 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: KarthikMur4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NEUDC Draft Presentation


1
The State and the Market in Education Delivery
Implications for Implementing the RTE Act
  • Karthik Muralidharan
  • University of California - San Diego NBER J-PAL
  • School Choice National Conference, New Delhi
  • 16 December, 2009

2
Background
  • Central role for education in the uplifting of
    historically disadvantaged communities in all
    countries
  • Especially relevant in Indian context, where the
    rigidities of caste perpetuated inequalities in
    education access across generations, making
    improved education access a critical component of
    social policy
  • As recently as 1971, the data shows substantial
    under-provision of public goods (schools,
    clinics, roads, electricity) in areas with higher
    scheduled caste and tribe populations (Banerjee
    and Somanathan, 2006)
  • But combination of political empowerment
    (especially of scheduled castes) and policy focus
    on universal provision has substantially reduced
    inequalities in access to primary education
  • Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan has been a success in terms
    of access and enrollment with over 95 of
    children enrolled in school

3
The Challenge of Education Quality
  • However, successes on the quantity front mask
    severe problems in education quality
  • 60 of children aged 6-14 in India cannot read a
    simple paragraph, though over 95 enrolled in
    school (PRATHAM, 2008)
  • Research shows that the returns to education
    (both at the individual and aggregate levels) are
    driven more by the quality than the quantity of
    education (Hanushek and Woesmann, 2008)
  • The lack of education quality severely limits the
    ability of education to serve as a vehicle of
    social mobility
  • As the locus of job creation moves to the private
    sector from the public sector, the premium is on
    skills as opposed to paper qualifications
  • Most policy discussions on quality of education
    focus on increasing public spending, but very
    little on improving effectiveness of the money
    that is spent
  • Teacher accountability and effectiveness is the
    central issue (90 of recurrent spending goes to
    teacher salaries)

4
All India Teacher Absence Map (Public Schools)
State Teacher Absence ()
Maharashtra 14.6
Gujarat 17.0
Madhya Pradesh 17.6
Kerala 21.2
Himachal Pradesh 21.2
Tamil Nadu 21.3
Haryana 21.7
Karnataka 21.7
Orissa 23.4
Rajasthan 23.7
West Bengal 24.7
Andhra Pradesh 25.3
Uttar Pradesh 26.3
Chhatisgarh 30.6
Uttaranchal 32.8
Assam 33.8
Punjab 34.4
Bihar 37.8
Jharkhand 41.9
All India 25.2
Source "Teacher Absence in India A Snapshot"
(Michael Kremer, Karthik Muralidharan, Nazmul
Chaudhury, Jeffrey Hammer, Halsey Rogers),
Journal of the European Economic Association,
vol. 3, no. 2-3, April-May 2005, pp. 658-67
5
The Emergence of Private Schools
  • One response to the lack of performance of
    government schools has been a near explosion of
    private schools in the past several years
  • 50 of children in urban India and 20 of
    children in rural India attend fee-charging
    private schools (IHDS 2005, ASER 2008)
  • These are not the fancy private schools that
    people in urban areas typically think about, but
    rather budget private schools that cater to
    poor and lower middle class parents (Muralidharan
    Kremer, 2007 Tooley 2009, etc.)
  • Main sources of competitive advantage are
  • Higher accountability (175 times more likely to
    fire absent teachers)
  • Flexibility/Responsiveness to what parents want
    (Eg. teaching English early)
  • Significantly higher student outcomes
    (attendance, test scores) even after controlling
    for observable differences in family background
  • Much more cost effective (smaller classes, less
    multi-grade teaching, though spending/child is
    3-4 times lower than spending in government
    schools)
  • The critical driver of private school economics
    is lower teacher salaries (which allows hiring
    many more teachers), and better accountability

6
Salary Distribution by School and Teacher Type
Source Calculated from data collected as part of
ongoing research by author in rural Andhra Pradesh
7
Public School Failure and Private School Entry
Source Public and Private Schools in Rural
India by Karthik Muralidharan and Michael Kremer
in School Choice International, MIT Press, 2008
8
Exit versus Voice
  • People who are dissatisfied with a relationship
    can try to improve their outcomes either through
    exit or voice (Hirshman, 1972)
  • To a large extent (but not completely),
    accountability in markets works through exit (and
    the threat of it), while accountability in
    political spaces work through voice
  • The concepts are inter-linked in that increasing
    the power to exit, can also increase voice
    because it is more credible
  • Schools are interesting because they combine
    elements of market (possibility of moving to
    private schools) and political spaces (community
    control and collective action)
  • So attempts to empower disadvantaged communities
    should either strengthen voice or enable exit (or
    both)
  • Assumes that demand is not a constraint (and this
    appears to be the case)
  • Traditional thinking on improving accountability
    has focused much more on voice (decentralization,
    parent-teacher associations, etc)

9
Evidence on the Effectiveness of Voice
  • Mixed evidence on PTAs
  • Correlations show that the existence of PTAs has
    no relation with teacher absence, though a more
    active PTA is correlated with lower teacher
    absence
  • Suggests limited effectiveness of a supply-side
    initiative to create PTAs
  • No evidence to suggest decentralization reduces
    absence (to date)
  • We use NUEPA handbooks to code an index of
    education decentralization (planning, information
    management, etc)
  • Find no relationship with teacher absence (at
    least with current forms of decentralization may
    be better with more complete devolvement)
  • Mixed evidence on the impact of information on
    teacher absence
  • Banerjee et al. find no impact of providing more
    information to Village Education Committees in UP
    regarding their powers and quality of education
  • Pandey et al. do find positive effects of an
    information intervention in MP
  • Key challenges to the effectiveness of voice are
  • Limited authority of communities over teachers
  • Even if the authority were vested in the
    communities, there would be a need for effective
    collective action, and risks of local elite
    capture would remain

10
Voice in the face of Elite Exit
  • The effectiveness of voice depends on the power
    of those exercising it
  • The challenge for schooling is that the voice
    channel is progressively weakened by the exit of
    the elite from being recipients of public
    schooling (true for other public services as
    well)
  • In our all-India sample (collected in 2003)
  • Over 80 of govt. school teachers send their own
    children to private schools
  • In villages with a private school, members of the
    Gram Panchayat are around 20 more likely to send
    their own kids to the private school
  • But absence rates are around 17 lower if all GP
    members had their own kids in the government
    school
  • Of course, the direction of causation might be
    the opposite
  • The main point is that of multiple equilibria
  • In one, the govt. school is good and every one
    sends their kids there voice is strong quality
    is maintained
  • In the other, the govt. school is weak private
    schools show up elites migrate there poor have
    no exit options and limited voice (worst of both
    worlds)

11
Enrolment and Outcomes by School Type
  • Our most recent data (collected across 5
    districts in Andhra Pradesh in 2008) show that in
    villages with a private school, the patterns of
    enrollment by school type and caste are
  • General 31 Govt. 69 Private
  • OBC 39 Govt. 61 Private
  • SC 69 Govt. 31 Private
  • Not surprising given that private schools charge
    fees (typically around Rs. 150-200/month)
  • Correlations show that the learning levels in the
    private schools are significantly higher (0.75
    SD) than those in private schools
  • These are not causal estimates and could reflect
    unobserved variables
  • But the private school effect persists even
    after controlling for school and household
    characteristics
  • Process indicators also suggest the superiority
    of private schools
  • Most revealing indicator is parental revealed
    preference
  • What does it say about the quality of the product
    (govt. schools) if you cannot even give it away
    for free? Even with a positive subsidy!

12
Combining the Best of Both Worlds?
  • The strength of markets for schools (with
    competition among suppliers and basic regulation
    on safety etc.) are that they are
  • Customer-centric, flexible, and responsive
  • Accountable
  • More likely to engender innovation
  • But the main weakness is that the market does not
    care for you if you dont have purchasing power
  • The idea that governments have to provide
    education, health, etc is based not just on
    public good considerations, but also on the
    notion that it is the only way to ensure
    universal access
  • Government provision typically does do a better
    job of providing universal access, but severe
    problems on the dimensions above
  • The idea of school vouchers/scholarships
  • Fund students and not schools
  • Parents can choose any school they like public
    or private (subject to basic regulation), pay
    with a voucher, and the school is reimbursed
    directly by the government (can empanel eligible
    private schools for quality control)

13
Implications for Empowerment
  • The point is not to claim that all private
    schools are superior to govt. schools (this is
    not the case)
  • Rather, the point is that the disadvantaged
    should have the same capacity to exercise choice
    as those who are better off
  • Why should disadvantaged groups be subject to the
    vagaries of state provision, when nearly anyone
    who can afford to secede to the private sector
    chooses to do so?
  • Vouchers are a more powerful tool than
    reservations, because they can benefit the entire
    community as opposed to the few who manage to
    secure seats in reserved categories
  • Vouchers are also a much more flexible instrument
    because the value can be calibrated to account
    for the extent of disadvantage
  • Much more likely to engender innovative supply
    responses
  • Relevant to all levels of education

14
Concerns about Vouchers/Choice
  • Are private schools really the solution?
  • Family differences could be the main driver of
    differences with govt. schools
  • Private schools are also club goods who market
    themselves by their exclusivity and by who they
    exclude as much as who they include
  • Many schools may exclude children from
    disadvantaged communities even with a voucher
  • Can poor/illiterate parents make well informed
    schooling choices?
  • Will it lead to fraudulent enrollment and kids
    not going to school?
  • Could it lead to a balkanization of schools along
    ideological/ religious/ethnic lines?
  • Schools are also about producing a shared civic
    identity and not just knowledge and skills
  • Does it mean giving up on the public system and
    the government abdicating responsibility for
    education?
  • Let us address each of these concerns

15
Summary
  • Aim of this talk has not been to promote private
    schools, but to present the facts on public and
    private schools and to provoke thinking about
    alternative means to empowerment beyond state
    provision
  • The economic case for vouchers is not based on
    public vs. private but rather on the idea
    that increased competition and choice will
    improve both public and private schools
  • But the most compelling reason to consider the
    idea is on grounds of equity and social justice
  • Vouchers are not a panacea to the problem of
    quality education (many private schools are also
    bad), but can provide disadvantaged communities
    choices similar to those available to better off
    groups
  • Several practical questions need to be answered
    but these are empirical and not theoretical
    questions and are best addressed by conducting
    small pilot projects with rigorous impact
    evaluation
  • The 25 provision in the RTE Act provides an
    opportunity for such pilots
  • We are conducting one such pilot project in
    Andhra Pradesh with Azim Premji Foundation to
    study the impact of such a scholarship program
  • Designed to be directly relevant to the
    implementation of the 25 provision

16
Design of AP School Choice Pilot and Study
  • Aim is to provide poor children in rural AP with
    increased choice to attend a school of their
    choosing by providing a scholarship to cover the
    fees of private schools
  • Baseline test conducted for all UKG and Class 1
    children in 180 villages in 5 districts of AP
  • Parents of children who took the assessment and
    had never been in a private school were invited
    to apply for the scholarships
  • All fees, books, uniforms, materials covered
    (paid directly to schools) meals and transport
    were not covered (average scholarship value of
    Rs. 3,000/year which is 25 of per child
    spending in govt. schools)
  • Scholarships can only be used in recognized
    private schools
  • Excess demand for scholarships, allocated by
    lottery
  • Schools cannot pick and choose better kids
    have to accept all or none of the lottery winners
    (APF signs agreement with all participating
    schools - participation is completely voluntary)
  • Annual assessments at the end of each school year
  • Allocation of scholarship by lottery allows us to
    estimate the impact of private schools in value
    addition without being confounded by other
    variables
  • The process also generates a lot of learning for
    scale up and for figuring out the operating
    principles by which this component of the RTE can
    be notified

17
Implications for RTE Notification
  • The idea of leveraging private schools does not
    take away the relevance of using voice to
    improve the quality of govt. schools especially
    on issues of teacher performance and
    accountability
  • But, it is a long route to accountability that
    will take a longer time, while every passing year
    is another cohort that has experienced poor
    quality education
  • Telling quote from Sarpanch in MP (an SC himself)
    on why he sent his children to the private school
    instead of trying to improve the govt. school
  • Jab tak main ye school ko sudhaar sakoon, tab
    tak mere bachchon ka bhavishya hamesha ke liye
    bigad gaya hoga
  • Expanding private schooling options (through the
    25 clause of the RTE) has the potential to
    empower entire disadvantaged communities as
    opposed to the select few who benefit from the
    status quo policies to promote social justice
  • Well worth thinking hard about the details of how
    this will be implemented in practice and how it
    will be evaluated
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com