Title: Outline of Semantics
1 Outline of Semantics
- Forms of thought
- Mapping meaning onto language
- Word meaning
- Semantic features
- Prototypes and Stereotypes
- Relational meanings
- (Word meaning and) longer expressions
- Reference and Sense
- Sentence meaning
- propositions
- sentence v.s. utterance
- Discourse meaning cohesion, coherence,
- background knowledge, the cooperative principle
- Markedness
2Forms of thought
- A thought may be compared to a cloud shedding a
shower of words. - Mental representation
- Have you ever had the experience of wanting to
express a thought, but you couldn't find the
words for it? - Language is NOT the basic form of thought.
3Mental Representation
- Mental imageries
- A. sound images
- B. visual images
- C. math
- D. movementaction patterns
4Sound Images
- You can play music in your head, no?
- Reading music
5Visual Images
- Pictures in your mind
- How do you find your way home?
- Remembering scenery the apt. I stayed in NYC, in
Hsintien, and the one I stay now. - Recognizing people matching pictures already in
memory with what you see now. - Painters Michelangelo
- Matching color dressing.
6Math
- Doing math problems in your head.
- (Hsin Swan ??)
7Movement (Action Patterns)
- How to tie knots use tools dance write Chinese
calligraphy tie your shoes braid hair use
chopsticks, etc. - Books explained with pictures and words often
easier just to follow pictures
8Transfer among Different Forms of Thought
- Yes, we do it all the time
- e.g. We describe pictures in mind in words form
pictures from words heard put some sort of
process into maththen explain in words for
dance draw pictures of steps, etc. - Therefore, language is not the basic form of
thought.
9Semantics
- Definition the study of meaning in
language how meaning is represented in
language - Importance of meaning the basic function of
language is communication - Difficulty to define semantics completely
10 Mapping Meaning onto language (1)
- Examples
- English, Chinese, Spanish He gave me a pen.
(Nash 92) - Turkish Babam bana topu verdi.
- (father to-me ball gave)
- actor recipient object action
- (possessed by speaker)
(definite) (past, 3rd person, singular) -
(witnessed by
speaker) - Hebrew Aba natan li et ha
kadur. - (daddy gave me the
ball) actor
action recipient definite object - (past, 3rd person, singular,
masculine)
object particle
11Mapping meaning onto language (2)
- Problems of mapping meaning onto language not
all straightforward beyond the basic 4 elements
(i.e., number, gender, definiteness of
participants and where/how this information is to
be encoded).
12 Mapping meaning onto language (3)
- Examples of my present different kinds of
possessions. - A. my shoescan be thrown away when worn
out, but other people not likely to wear
them - B. my chairbut others can sit in it
- C. my nosehas nothing to do with others,
nor will I throw it away
13Mapping meaning onto language (4)
- Note the differences
- A. He has a big nose.
- (Have I possess something more general
than own) - B. He owns a big nose.
- (You cannot own parts of your body only
materials or object which you can give away or
buy/sell it, can be owned.) - C. He is the possessor of his big nose.
- (Possesscloser to own than to have)
14 Mapping meaning onto language (5)
- How does a child learn semantics?
- Slobin Model (Nash 91)
-
KNOWLEDGE of the world
Parts of KNOWLEDGE marked in HUMAN LANGUAGE
Parts of KNOWLEDGE marked in language X (language
the child is learning)
15Mapping meaning onto language (6)
- The childs problem of mapping meaning onto
language - A. Which aspects of knowledge of world would
likely to be marked? - B. Which aspects must be marked in a particular
language? - C. How are they marked? (words word order,
affixes, function word, ) - So, well work hard to explain how some aspects
of our knowledge of meaning are expressed in
language.
16Word meaning
- Word meaning including
- A. features
- B. prototypes
- C. stereotypes
- D. relational meanings (degree, direction)
- E. reference and sense (take us into semantics
of longer expressions)
17Features
- Definition more basic concepts/ideas that cannot
be defined any further primitive semantic
elements. - Combinations of features - (e.g., see Nash
94-95) - A. Advantages
- 1. a universal element found in all langs.
(Nash 95) - 2. similar to phonological features
- B. Disadvantage very limited application
18Advantage 1 Universal
- While we may speak different languages, were all
humans with the same human brain, perceive the
world with the same human senses. - e.g. HUMAN, ANIMATE, ROUND, MALE,
FEMALE, LIQUID, - MOVEABLE, etc.
19Advantage 2 Similar to Phonological Features
- Psychologically similar to phonological features
- Same kind of mental operation from phonology ?
semantics - Phonemes defined by its features
- e.g. /p/consonantal, -voiced, stop,
bilabial
20Disadvantage
- Very limited applicationdo not work for many
words - e.g. A. chair/stool/bench/bean bag
- B. ugly/beautiful
- C. red/green
- D. table/desk
- E. book/pamphlet
- Lead to idea of prototypes
21Prototype
- Definition a typical/ideal example (serving to
represent the whole class) an examplar - Concept of prototype helps explain meaning of
certain words in terms of resemblance to the
clearest examplar. - Eleanor Roschs experiments
- A. bird
- Robin, sparrow, canary, dove, lark, parrot,
owl, peacock, duck, penguin, ostrich, bat - B. clothing
- shirts, dresses, skirts, bathing suit, pajamas,
shoes, stockings, the hat, gloves - C. vegetable
- pea, carrot, cauliflower, onion, potato,
mushroom
22Stereotype
- Definition a list of typical characteristics of
describing something more abstract
representation of possible qualities - e.g. bird feathers, wings, beak, fly, lay eggs
23Relational Meanings
- Words may differ - a feature. But, many sets of
words differ, or may be grouped, in other ways,
including degree and direction. - Degree amountcontrast to - of features
- e.g. hot/cold, long/short, tall/short,
hard/soft, good/bad, wet/dry, beautiful/ugly - Direction for example, buy/sell, come/go,
give/receive, borrow/lend, read/write. - Note A. fatheralso relational (in a different
way) - B. kill and hurtcause and effect
relations (Nash 97)
24Longer Expressions
- Reference and sense applying to semantics of
both words and longer expressions - Reference dealing with the relationships between
language and the world (Nash 98) - e.g. My son is in the beech tree.
- identify person identify thing
- Sense dealing with relationships inside the
language. - e.g. The moon was bright last night. (reference)
- My love is like the moon. (sense)
25Reference and Sense (1)
- Sense but not reference function words, such as
and, or, never, perhaps, otherwise, but. These
make connections between meanings of different
units of language. - Same reference but different sense
- e.g. The evening star west. (sunset)
- The morning star east. (sunrise)
- Same object (same reference) but different sense
(different aspect) different ways of referring
to the same thing.
Venus
26Reference and Sense (2)
- The same word can have more than one sense. For
example,bank - a. I have an account at the Bank of Scotland.
- b. We steered the safe to the other bank of the
river. - c. The DC-10 banked sharply to avoid a crash.
- d. I banked the furnace up with coke last night.
- e. a bank shot
27Reference and Sense (3)
- Other examples
- my father/ the man who married my
mother/???/???? - different senses, although refer to the same
person (same reference) - Could have different reference
- e.g. stepfather or illegitimate child
28Sentence Meaning (1)
- Proposition the basic idea/thought of the
sentence events or states say something about
events/states. - Proposition predicate argument(s) (Nash 19-20.
84) -
- A sentence can have more than one propositions.
- sentence (see definition)
- utterance what speakers say or write
Aspect of entity, quality, state, activity,
relation with other entity/ things.
entity (some sort of thing)
29Sentence
- Definition a unit of language (an abstract
thing, a part of language itself), a string of
words put together by the grammatical rules of a
language. - Meanings of a sentence come from only within the
language independent of context.
30Utterance
- Definition the meaning of an utterance comes
from both the language the context from
features of language (e.g. intonation, stress,
gestures) - What speakers say or write you can give the
time, date, place of an utterance (including
intonation, stress, patterns and gestures) - An event in the world which can be thought as an
example of a sentence, or of part of a sentence
(e.g., a phrase or a word) - Different functions in context
- statement of fact thanks apology
- explanation tease promise
- suggestion insult
- denial request, compliment
- e.g. Mr. Nash likes tea. (Nash 20, 99)
- argument argument
- predicate (shows
relationship)
31Sentence Meaning (2)
- Propositional meaning (sentence) vs.
interpersonal meaning (utterance) - Proposition vs. utterance analysis
- the difference (Nash 100-101)
- e.g. The book is open.accusation
- Tom opened the book
defense against accusation put blame on somebody
else
32Sentence Meaning (3)
- Examples of utterance
- Can you open the window?mother to child
(order) - Is your homework ready?
- student student (can I copy it?)
- teacher students (now, turn it in)
- Meaning of utterances based on the context
(depending on the interactions of the speakers
and their relationship).
33Sentence Meaning (4)
- Sentence vs. utterance
- e.g. He loves her.sentence
-
- He loves her.utterance
- Expressions without propositional meaning, only
international meaning e.g. Hello, Goodbye,
pardon, Hey (something like verbal gestures)
(understand, but who are they?)
(with knowledge of reference of pronouns)
34Sentence Meaning (5)
- Utterance meaning has to be determined from the
context (intentions of speaker/hearer, their
relationship the time, place, roles) - Sentence meaning (propositions) independent of
context.
35Sentence Meaning (6)
Utterance Sentence Propositions
Can be loud or quiet
Can be grammatical or not
Can be true or false
In a particular regional accent
In a particular language
36Sentence Meaning (7)
Utterance Sentences propositions
Can be loud or quiet - -
Can be grammatical or not -
Can be true or false
In a particular regional accent - -
In a particular language -
37- Family tree relationship
- proposition
-
- sentence sentence sentence
- utterance utterance utterance utterance
utterance utterance
38- mental processes
- thoughts
- abstract semantic entities
- propositions
- Linguistic entities
- e.g. sentences
- Actions e.g. utterances
39Discourse (1)
- Language longer than a sentence
- Important at many levels syntax morphology
discourse structuresthe structures of units
longer than a sentence. - TEXT e.g. (Nash 101)
- The monster danced with Yang Li-Hua. He enjoyed
it. She didnt.
40Discourse (2)
- Examples of different discourse structures
- A. writing
- a. paragraph
- b. composition (longer organization)
- c. book (chapter)
- d. storytypical structure chronological
order - B. apartment descriptions
- C. conversation casual/classroom/ ordered
discussion/debate/interview/ritual (e.g. church
ritual, graduation, wedding ritual, classroom
ritual??.??.??.??)
41Discourse (3)
- Some important elements in discourse cohesion,
coherence, background knowledge, the co-operative
principle - Cohesion the ties and connections which exist
within texts. -
Text a piece of spoken or written language.
42Cohesion (1)
- Examples of cohesion (Yule 140)
- pronouns, (e.g. he, my, I , it) lexical
connections (e.g. Lincoln convertiblethe carthe
convertible) general connections with shared
meaning elements (e.g. moneyboughtsawingpenny
worth a fortunesoldpay) relationship marker
(e.g. however) tensefirst 4 sentences past
tense, last one presenta different time.
43Cohesion (2)
- Cohesion the grammatical and/ or lexical
relationships between the different elements of a
text. This may be the relationship between
different sentences or between different parts of
a sentence. - Example
- A Is Jane coming to the party?
- B. Yes, she is.
- There is a link between Jane and she, also
between is coming and is.
44Coherence (1)
- The relationships which link the meanings of
utterances in a discourse or of the the sentences
in a text. - These links may be based on the speakers shared
knowledge (background knowledge) - e.g. A Could you give me a ride home?
- B Sorry, Im visiting my sister.
- Theres no grammatical or lexical link between
As Q and Bs reply, but the exchange has
coherence, because both A and B know that Bs
sister lives in the opposite direction to As
home.
45Coherence (2)
- Coherence that the text makes sensecoherence
achieved more by people than by texts (than by
language itself)we expect coherencewe try to
arrive at an interpretation which is in line with
our experience of the way the world is (Yule
141). - An example of coherence without cohesion (Yule
142)
46Coherence (3)
- Obviously, theres something else involved what
is it? in the interpretation of a conversation,
except the information expressed in the
sentences. - It is clear that language users must have a lot
of knowledge of how conversational interaction
works which is not simply linguistic knowledge.
47Background knowledge
- Examples (Yule 146-47)inference, build-up,
changing influence - 2nd sentence Who is John?
- Hows he traveling?
- 3rd sentence Whos John? (How traveling?)
- 4th sentence Whos John?
- 5th sentence surprise
- We create what the text is about (not just the
text does this), based on expectation of what
normally happens (background knowledge).
48The Cooperative Principle (1)
- In conversation participants are assumed (by
others) to be cooperating. - Four Maxims set out by Grice (1975)
- Quantity an informative as is required, no
more, no less. - Quality Dont say something you believe to
be false or something you dont know. - Relation Be relevant
- Manner Be clear, brief and orderly
49The Cooperative Principle (2)
- These are the normal expectations
- e.g. expectations about Quantity To make a
long story short, I wont bore you with all the
details. - Quality An far as I know Correct me if I am
wrong I think I feel Its possible
that (maybe)
50The Cooperative Principle (3)
- The 4 maxims and the whole principle ? allow
interpretations (see Yule 145 bottom) - Carol Are you coming to the party tonight?
- Lara Ive got an exam tomorrow.
- Just a brief introduction to Discoursemany more
elements involved, very complex.
51Lexicon (1)
- Q Do the lexical items (words) of a language
have some sort of overall structure/organization
like phonology, morphology, and syntax have? - Whats the exact nature of a unit for definition?
That is, what is a lexical unit?
52Lexicon (2)
- Dictionary entry is not exactly what we think of
as a word. Its really a paradigm an example of
all the forms of a word, used to represent the
whole set. - Examples
- childrepresents child, childs, children,
childrens - taketakes, taking, took, taken.
- Some sets include only one member how, yet,
often
53Lexicon (3)
- How is the paradigmatic form chosen?
- e.g. find a new word
- ritualistic ? look up ritual
- larger ?look up large
54Unmarked
- The paradigmatic form is the unmarked form the
form which does not seem special in any way,
that seems most basic, that has nothing added
(phonemes, sounds, morphemes). - e.g. child childs, children
- large larger
- car cars
- ritual ritualistic
- strangle strangulation
- old/young How old is she? the normal Q
55Markedness (1)
- The theory that in the languages of world certain
linguistics elements are more BASIC, National,
and Frequent (these elements are unmarked less
basic, national, frequent elements are marked) - Examples
- A. Singular examples carcars
(singularunmarked pluralmarked) - B. unmarked S-V-O sentence I dislike such
people. - marked O-S-V sentence Such people I dislike.
56Markedness (2)
- Marking may be a basic principle for assigning
universal (and possibly innate) values to certain
kinds of features
Slobin Model
(Nash 91)
57Markedness (3)
- C. more frequentunmarked
- e.g. Falling intonation vs. rising intonation
- D. more specificmarked
- (more commonunmarked)
- e.g. dog (unmarked) vs. bitch (marked)
- E. distributionunrestricted (unmarked)
- e.g. How tall is John? vs. How short is John?
58Markedness (4)
- Markedness theory applies at all levels
- A. Phonology
- e.g. /p, t, k, s, n/ unmarked consonants
- /v, z, Q, ð/ more marked
- falling intonationunmarked
- rising intonationmarked
- B. lexicon e.g. dog/ bitch (marked)
- C. morphology e.g. car/ cars (marked)
- D. syntax e.g. active vs. passive (marked)
59Markedness (5)
- Discourse e.g. politeness
-
- too polite unmarked too informal
- (marked) (marked)
Could you lend me a pencil?
Would you be so kind? just let me borrow your
pencil for a minute?
Without saying anything, just grasp the pencil.
60Markedness (6)
- Unmarked elements easier to acquire
- Marked elements more difficult to acquire
- Some experimental evidence shows that teaching
marked forms can lead to faster acquisition of
both marked and unmarked forms, but teaching
unmarked forms wont help students learn marked
forms.