Mobility for All explorations into - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mobility for All explorations into

Description:

Title: CLever Target Dates Author: Jim Sullivan Last modified by: Jim Sullivan Created Date: 6/9/2001 3:17:18 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: jims176
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mobility for All explorations into


1
Mobility for All explorations into
understanding the way things are
Jim Sullivan CLever Retreat6/14/01
2
Agenda
  • vision
  • design approach
  • initial explorations
  • strategic partnerships
  • success model?

3
Mobility for AllVision
  • NOT a high tech system
  • designed exclusively for the disabled
  • an inclusive system that
  • lowers accessibility barriers
  • has universal acceptance/appeal
  • provides gateways to independence and richer
    social interaction for those without
    transportation
  • transcends physical mobility and encompasses
    communication, planning, and socialization, and
    learning

4
Agenda
  • vision
  • design approach
  • initial explorations
  • strategic partnerships
  • success model?

5
Design Approach
  • Understand how things are
  • identify supported users
  • analyze current systems, assistive approaches and
    environments
  • Envision the future how things could/should be
  • task/activity analysis ? scenario development
  • professional collaboration (Communications Arts,
  • City of Boulder, caregiver communities
    etc.)
  • develop conceptual frameworks assistive
    prototypes
  • demonstrate, integrate, evaluate, and improve
    systems
  • identify new assistive frameworks and
    technologies
  • iterate!

6
Agenda
  • vision
  • design approach
  • initial explorations
  • strategic partnerships
  • success model?

7
understanding the way things are
  • environment locations, landmarks
  • navigation information representation, cognitive
    challenges
  • human factors comfort, shelter, view, labels,
    accessibility
  • safety getting to and from the station, exposure
    to traffic, getting help

8
environments
Skip - south Broadway
Table Mesa - Park and Ride
residential routes - Gillespie
9
navigation
What bus must I take to get to Pearl Street?
Table Mesa Park and Ride
10
navigation (map)
Where am I? Must I use this map?
11
navigation (map)
or should I use this map?
12
navigation
These maps are hard to understand can I just
use this schedule?
13
navigation (schedule)
  • But I want to go Pearl Street ..
  • What bus should I take?
  • When will I arrive?
  • Why is it organized like this?

14
human factors
protection from traffic and elements?
comfortable seating?
clearly labeled navigational aids and landmarks?
visibility of approaching buses?
15
safety
panic buttons (Park Ride only)
  • Do people living here use this stop?
  • Are there problems recognizing it from other
    residential bus stops?

16
Some category contrasts
  • Park and Ride vs. passenger-only stops
  • landmarks and labels
  • shelters
  • emergency support
  • lighting
  • Residential vs. main street stops
  • traffic safety
  • landmarks and labels
  • shelter and seating
  • support for special populations (ex Mary Sandoe
    House)
  • Single route vs. multi-route stops
  • navigational challenges

17
A closer look ...
  • Park and Ride vs. passenger-only stops
  • landmarks and labels
  • shelters
  • emergency support
  • lighting
  • Residential vs. main street stops
  • traffic safety
  • landmarks and labels
  • shelter and seating
  • support for special populations (ex Mary Sandoe
    House)
  • Single route vs. multi-route stops
  • navigational challenges

18
Single route vs. multi-route bus stops
single route stops
multi-route stops
Source http//www.rtd-denver.com/SystemMaps/bould
er.htm
19
Navigational challenges Single route vs.
multi-route stops
  • Single route bus stop tasks
  • 1. get on the bus headed in the correct direction
  • 2. get off the bus at correct destination
  • Multi-route stops
  • service more than one bus route.
  • some routes require changing buses!
  • increased task complexity
  • 1a. identify the correct bus (i.e. route and
    direction)
  • ? must comprehend maps AND schedules
  • 1b. get on the correct bus
  • 2a. get off bus
  • 2b. repeat 1a through 2a until at destination

20
What if
Source http//www.rtd-denver.com/SystemMaps/bould
er.htm
21
Additional challengesthe routing problem
  • Main tasks
  • 1. identify the best route
  • 2. get on correct bus
  • 3. get off the bus at the correct destination
  • What is the best route?
  • for most people minimize Ttotal travel time (?)
  • in unsafe (high traffic/crime) areas minimize
    Twait (?)
  • for those with attention deficits
  • minimize transfers stops (?)

22
Additional challengesthe routing problem
rich opportunities to study in scenarios,
prototypes and user studies
  • Main tasks
  • 1. identify the best route
  • 2. get on correct bus
  • 3. get off the bus at the correct destination
  • Determining the best route
  • for most people minimize Ttotal travel time (?)
  • in unsafe (high traffic/crime) areas minimize
    Twait (?)
  • for those with attention deficits
  • minimize transfers stops (?)

23
Additional challenges the routing problem
  • Main tasks
  • 1. identify the best route
  • 2. get on correct bus
  • 3. get off the bus at the correct destination
  • Determining the best route
  • for most people minimize Ttotal travel time (?)
  • in unsafe (high traffic/crime) areas minimize
    Twait (?)
  • for those with attention deficits
  • minimize transfers stops (?)

many dual use applications for foreign
travelers, etc.
24
integration opportunities
  • navigation?
  • trip planning?
  • location/environmental issues?
  • communications?
  • safety?
  • human factors and comfort?

25
Whats next?
  • Understand how things are
  • Analyze other systems, assistive approaches and
    environments
  • Envision the future how things could/should be
  • task/activity analysis ? scenario development
  • professional collaboration (Communication Arts,
  • City of Boulder, caregiver communities
    etc.)
  • develop conceptual frameworks assistive
    prototypes
  • demonstrate, integrate, evaluate, and improve
    systems
  • identify new assistive frameworks and
    technologies
  • iterate!

26
Collaboration MeetingCity of Boulder
andCognitive Levers (CLever) Research Team
June 19, 2001
27
Agenda
  • vision
  • design approach
  • initial explorations
  • strategic partnerships
  • tentative project schedule
  • success model?

28
What about this bus stop?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com