Geometric Spin Hall Effect of Light - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Geometric Spin Hall Effect of Light

Description:

Questions The answer is: YES, but . Many detectors are sensitive to the electric field energy density rather than Poynting vector flux, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: MON129
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Geometric Spin Hall Effect of Light


1
Geometric Spin Hall Effect of Light
Andrea Aiello, Norbert Lindlein, Christoph
Marquardt, Gerd Leuchs
  • MPL Olomouc, June 24, 2009

2
Optical angular momentum and spin-orbit coupling
  • A suitably prepared beam of light may have both a
    spin and an orbital angular momentum (SAM and
    OAM).
  • SAM ? circular polarization
  • OAM ? spiraling phase-front
  • SAM and OAM may be coupled!

L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. Spreeuw, and
J. P. Woerdman, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185,
(1992) http//www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Optics/play/ph
otonOAM/
3
Spin Hall effect of light
This effect is also known as Imbert-Fedorov shift
Onur Hosten and Paul Kwiat, Science 319, 787-790
(2008)
4
Geometrodynamics of spinning light
K. Y. Bliokh et al. Nature Photon. 2, 748753
(2008).
5
Geometric spin Hall effect of light
z
y
y
z
x
x
A. Aiello, N. Lindlein, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs,
arXiv0902.4639v1quant-ph (2009).
6
Questions
  1. What is the physical origin of such a shift?
  2. Is this shift measurable?

7

Reminder Helicity of light
helicity
8

Linear and angular momentum of light
Total linear and angular momenta
9
Linear and angular momentum of light per unit
length
Transverse linear momentum
Transverse angular momentum
10
Centroid (barycenter) of the intensity
distribution
11
Angular momentum-vs-transverse shift
12
Geometric Spin Hall Effect of Light
at z 0
helicity
13
Questions
  1. What is the physical origin of such a shift?
  2. Is this shift measurable?

14
The answer is YES, but.
  • Many detectors are sensitive to the electric
    field energy density rather than Poynting vector
    flux,
  • Such energy density contains the contributions
    given by the three components (x,y,z) of the
    electric field
  • The flux of the Poynting vector across the
    observation plane contains the contributions
    given by the two transverse components (x,y) of
    the electric field only

15
  • In practice, it will be sufficient to use a
    polarizer (non tilted!) in front of the detector
    to attenuate either or in
    order to measure a non-zero shift.
  • The difference between energy density and linear
    momentum distributions is also relevant, e.g., in
    atomic beam deflection experiments

Observation plane
16
Conclusions
  1. When a circularly polarized beam of light is
    observed from a reference frame tilted with
    respect to the direction of propagation of the
    beam, the barycenter of the latter undergoes a
    shift comparable with the wavelength of the light
  2. Extensive numerical simulations performed with
    the program POLFOCUS agree very well with
    analytical predictions for well collimated beams
    not too close to grazing incidence
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com